Mainstream Sleep Tracking Devices vs Polysomnography

Sensitivity and Specificity of Mainstream Sleep Tracking Devices Compared to Polysomnography

Status

Withdrawn

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT02744235

Enrollment

Registered

2016-04-20

Start date

2016-03-31

Completion date

2017-04-30

Last updated

2017-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epileptiform Activity, Severe Insomnia, Severe Sleep Apnea

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two popular portable sleep monitoring devices-the Fitbit Charge®, Jawbone UP®, and SleepTime smartphone app-to the gold standard Polysomnography (PSG). Parameters that will be analyzed include sleep onset latency, sleep efficiency, and sleep staging. Specifically, this study will investigate the validity of the Jawbone UP®, Fitbit Charge®, and SleepTime app in detecting sleep and wakefulness in comparison to conventional Polysomnography (PSG).

Interventions

DEVICEPolysomnography Data

DEVICEJawbone UP®

DEVICEFitbit Charge ®

Study design

Allocation

Intervention model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Masking

NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 65 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing Polysomnography

Exclusion criteria

* severe sleep apnea * severe insomnia with less than two hours of sleep per night * epileptiform activity * electrical status epilepticus of sleep

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Time it takes subject to fall asleep	Up to 3 Months
Number of Minutes of Sleep	Up to 3 Months
Number of Arousals	Up to 3 Months

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026