Skip to content

A Pilot Study to Evaluate Patient Tolerance and Nursing Ease-of-Use of a Novel Hearing Protection Device

A Pilot Study to Evaluate Patient Tolerance and Nursing Ease-of-Use of a Novel Hearing Protection Device to Reduce Exposure to Excessive Noise Among Patients Undergoing Neonatal Intensive Care

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02744066
Acronym
NEATCAP
Enrollment
55
Registered
2016-04-20
Start date
2017-01-31
Completion date
2017-10-05
Last updated
2018-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hearing Impairment

Brief summary

Before they are born, babies are protected from hearing very loud noises by their mother's bodies. After delivery, they are exposed to many loud noises that are potentially harmful. These noises happen in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The purpose of this research project is to test the fit and the ease-of-use of a new device that may protect infant's hearing in the NICU.

Detailed description

Despite the best efforts of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) caregivers, vulnerable and fragile NICU patients are frequently exposed to noxious levels of noise from monitoring and respiratory equipment alarms, as well as from routine NICU care practices. Particularly detrimental to sleep and auditory development are patient exposures to high frequency noises that are specifically designed to alert NICU caregivers to important changes in patient status. This pilot study will help evaluate the fit, ergonomic design and the ease-of-use of a novel hearing protection system (special ear-muffs along with a unique attachment mechanism) specifically designed top diminish the transmission of high frequency noises to patients within the NICU, while allowing some transmission of low frequency sounds, such as a mother's voice.

Interventions

DEVICENEATCAP

Neonates will be sized and fitted to wear the non-invasive novel hearing protection device over a set period of time in the NICU. Vitals will be monitored.

Sponsors

Michael Balsan, MD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Hours to 2 Weeks
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Neonate admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit * Age greater than 12 hours and less than 2 weeks * Informed consent from the parent(s)

Exclusion criteria

* Significant cranial trauma noted on admission * Congenital anomalies of the head and/or neck * Hemodynamic instability requiring pharmacologic intervention * Recommendation by the attending neonatologist not to enroll the patient

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Skin Erythema After Device ApplicationSkin erythema was evaluated at the time of device removal after 1 hour of application in phase #1 and after 3 daily 8 hour periods of application in phase #2.Skin will be assessed for adverse effects such as any device-related adverse events, including evidence of skin redness, rash and/or bruising or discomfort at the site of device application. Skin erythema was described as none, mild, moderate or severe as evaluated by the NICU nursing staff.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Specific Responses to the Ease of Use Questionnaire for NICU Staff.After 1 hour in phase #1 / After 3 x 8 hours in phase #2A \>80% positive response to a multi-question Ease-of-Use Questionnaire completed by the participating NICU staff. Ease-of-Use Questionnaire constructed on a 5 point Likert Scale: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree that the device was easy-to-use. Phase #1 consists of 25 data points. Phase #2 consists of 25 data points. Evaluations were obtained after device removal in both phases.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were recruited from admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in two phases. In phase #1 of the study 25 infants were recruited for participation and 25 infants completed the protocol. In phase #2 of the study 30 additional infants were recruited, with 25 infants completing the protocol. The total number studied was 50.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Phase #1
Infants recruited in phase #1 had the device placed for 1 hour, with recordings of vital signs before and after devise placement.
25
Phase #2
Infants recruited in phase #2 had the device placed for 8 hour periods on three consecutive days with vital signs recorded before, during and after device placements.
25
Total50

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDischarged from NICU prior to completion04
Overall StudyWithdrawal by parent01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPhase #1Phase #2Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
25 Participants25 Participants50 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Birth Weight2.6 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.84
2.3 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.94
2.5 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
Gestational Age at Birth36.6 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.29
34.8 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.87
35.7 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7
Head Circumference32.3 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.03
31.4 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.66
31.8 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants8 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants17 Participants32 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 250 / 25
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 251 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 250 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Skin Erythema After Device Application

Skin will be assessed for adverse effects such as any device-related adverse events, including evidence of skin redness, rash and/or bruising or discomfort at the site of device application. Skin erythema was described as none, mild, moderate or severe as evaluated by the NICU nursing staff.

Time frame: Skin erythema was evaluated at the time of device removal after 1 hour of application in phase #1 and after 3 daily 8 hour periods of application in phase #2.

Population: Phase #2 data reports the number of participants experiencing erythema at any time after device removal after 3 daily 8 hour periods of device application.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Phase #1Number of Participants With Skin Erythema After Device ApplicationSkin Erythema after Device ApplicationModerate Skin Erythema0 Participants
Phase #1Number of Participants With Skin Erythema After Device ApplicationSkin Erythema after Device ApplicationMild Skin Erythema15 Participants
Phase #1Number of Participants With Skin Erythema After Device ApplicationSkin Erythema at BaselineMild Skin Erythema0 Participants
Phase #1Number of Participants With Skin Erythema After Device ApplicationSkin Erythema after Device ApplicationSevere Skin Erythema0 Participants
Phase #1Number of Participants With Skin Erythema After Device ApplicationSkin Erythema at BaselineModerate Skin Erythema0 Participants
Phase #1Number of Participants With Skin Erythema After Device ApplicationSkin Erythema after Device ApplicationNo Skin Erythema10 Participants
Phase #1Number of Participants With Skin Erythema After Device ApplicationSkin Erythema at BaselineSevere Skin Erythema0 Participants
Phase #1Number of Participants With Skin Erythema After Device ApplicationSkin Erythema after Device ApplicationSkin Breakdown0 Participants
Phase #1Number of Participants With Skin Erythema After Device ApplicationSkin Erythema at BaselineSkin Breakdown0 Participants
Phase #1Number of Participants With Skin Erythema After Device ApplicationSkin Erythema at BaselineNo Skin Erythema25 Participants
Phase #2Number of Participants With Skin Erythema After Device ApplicationSkin Erythema at BaselineSkin Breakdown0 Participants
Phase #2Number of Participants With Skin Erythema After Device ApplicationSkin Erythema after Device ApplicationNo Skin Erythema10 Participants
Phase #2Number of Participants With Skin Erythema After Device ApplicationSkin Erythema after Device ApplicationMild Skin Erythema14 Participants
Phase #2Number of Participants With Skin Erythema After Device ApplicationSkin Erythema after Device ApplicationModerate Skin Erythema0 Participants
Phase #2Number of Participants With Skin Erythema After Device ApplicationSkin Erythema after Device ApplicationSevere Skin Erythema1 Participants
Phase #2Number of Participants With Skin Erythema After Device ApplicationSkin Erythema after Device ApplicationSkin Breakdown0 Participants
Phase #2Number of Participants With Skin Erythema After Device ApplicationSkin Erythema at BaselineNo Skin Erythema25 Participants
Phase #2Number of Participants With Skin Erythema After Device ApplicationSkin Erythema at BaselineMild Skin Erythema0 Participants
Phase #2Number of Participants With Skin Erythema After Device ApplicationSkin Erythema at BaselineModerate Skin Erythema0 Participants
Phase #2Number of Participants With Skin Erythema After Device ApplicationSkin Erythema at BaselineSevere Skin Erythema0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Specific Responses to the Ease of Use Questionnaire for NICU Staff.

A \>80% positive response to a multi-question Ease-of-Use Questionnaire completed by the participating NICU staff. Ease-of-Use Questionnaire constructed on a 5 point Likert Scale: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree that the device was easy-to-use. Phase #1 consists of 25 data points. Phase #2 consists of 25 data points. Evaluations were obtained after device removal in both phases.

Time frame: After 1 hour in phase #1 / After 3 x 8 hours in phase #2

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Phase #1Number of Participants With Specific Responses to the Ease of Use Questionnaire for NICU Staff.Disagree0 Participants
Phase #1Number of Participants With Specific Responses to the Ease of Use Questionnaire for NICU Staff.Agree4 Participants
Phase #1Number of Participants With Specific Responses to the Ease of Use Questionnaire for NICU Staff.Neutral0 Participants
Phase #1Number of Participants With Specific Responses to the Ease of Use Questionnaire for NICU Staff.Strongly Agree21 Participants
Phase #1Number of Participants With Specific Responses to the Ease of Use Questionnaire for NICU Staff.Strongly Disagree0 Participants
Phase #2Number of Participants With Specific Responses to the Ease of Use Questionnaire for NICU Staff.Strongly Agree14 Participants
Phase #2Number of Participants With Specific Responses to the Ease of Use Questionnaire for NICU Staff.Strongly Disagree0 Participants
Phase #2Number of Participants With Specific Responses to the Ease of Use Questionnaire for NICU Staff.Disagree0 Participants
Phase #2Number of Participants With Specific Responses to the Ease of Use Questionnaire for NICU Staff.Neutral1 Participants
Phase #2Number of Participants With Specific Responses to the Ease of Use Questionnaire for NICU Staff.Agree10 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026