Skip to content

Clinical Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety of the IMP in Patients With Non Healing Wounds Originating From Ulcers

An Interventional, Single Arm, Phase I/IIa Clinical Trial to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of APZ2 on Wound Healing of Chronic Venous Ulcer (CVU)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02742844
Enrollment
13
Registered
2016-04-19
Start date
2016-08-31
Completion date
2019-01-15
Last updated
2020-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skin Ulcer Venous Stasis Chronic

Keywords

somatic cell therapy, phase I/IIa, mesenchymal stem cells, ABCB5+, APZ2, chronic venous ulcer, varicose ulcer, skin ulcer, advanced therapy medicinal product, APZ2-II-01, autologous use

Brief summary

The aim of this clinical trial is to investigate the efficacy (by monitoring the wound size reduction) and safety (by monitoring occurring adverse events) of the investigational medicinal product APZ2 after one single application on chronic venous leg ulcer wounds.

Detailed description

This is an interventional, single arm, phase I/IIa clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of ABCB5+ mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) on wound healing in patients with chronic venous ulcer (CVU). Autologous MSCs will be isolated ex vivo from a small skin biopsy and will be expanded in vitro. The IMP APZ2 containing the ABCB5+ cells will then be applied on the wound surface of CVU under local anesthesia. Patients are followed up for efficacy for 3 months which allows to distinguish actual wound healing from transient wound coverage. The wound healing process will be documented by standardized photography. The wound size evaluation will start on the day of the first change of wound dressing. The quality of the wound healing process will be assessed on the basis of formation of granulation tissue, epithelialization and wound exudation. Pain will be assessed using a numerical rating scale and quality of life will be investigated with standardized and validated questionnaires. To assess long-term safety of APZ2 an additional follow-up visit at Month 12 post IMP application is included.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALAPZ2 application

Application of IMP on patients wound.

Sponsors

Ticeba GmbH
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
FGK Clinical Research GmbH
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Granzer Regulatory Consulting & Services
CollaboratorOTHER
RHEACELL GmbH & Co. KG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female patients aged 18 to 85 years; 2. Chronic venous leg ulcer (as defined by the current AWMF guidelines: therapy resistant ulcer that shows no improvement within 3 months despite of optimal phlebological therapies or is not healed within 12 months) for at least 6 weeks but shorter than 3 years diagnosed by doppler ultrasonography (DUS), ankle brachial index (ABI, 0.9-1.3), physical examination and dermatological review; 3. Wound size between 5 and 50 square cm measured by a standardized photography at the screening visit; 4. Wound location between knee and ankle; 5. Patients suffering from 2 ulcers at the same extremity, as long as these ulcers are separated by a minimum bridge of 1 cm of epithelialized skin; 6. Patients must agree to have at least one biopsy performed before treatment. In case IMP production from the first biopsy is not successful, a second biopsy will be taken; 7. Body mass index (BMI) between 20 and 40 kg/m²; 8. Patients understand the nature of the procedure and are providing written informed consent prior to any clinical trial procedure; 9. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative blood pregnancy test at Screening and at Visit 5 before the IMP application; 10. Women of childbearing potential and their partner must be willing to use highly effective contraceptive methods during the course of the clinical trial.

Exclusion criteria

General

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of wound size reductionWeek 12 post baseline, or last available post-baseline measurement if the Week 12 measurement is missingPercentage of wound size reduction at Week 12, or last available post-baseline measurement if the Week 12 measurement is missing (last observation carried forward \[LOCF\])
Assessment of adverse event (AE) occurrenceAt biopsy removal, 1-3 days post biopsy, 7-10 days post biopsy, 6-12 weeks post biopsy; at baseline and days 3, 8 and weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and month 12 post baselineAll during the clinical trial occurring AEs will be registered, documented and evaluated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients achieving complete wound closureWeeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 post baseline and at any time point up to week 12
Time to first complete wound closureBetween baseline and week 12 post baselineA priori specification not possible
Proportion of patients achieving 30% wound closureWeeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 post baseline and at any time point up to week 12
Time to first 30% wound closureBetween baseline and week 12 post baselineA priori specification not possible
Percentage of wound epithelializationAt baseline and days 3, 8 and weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 post baselineAmount of wound epithelialization in % of wound area will be assessed by the investigator based on image analysis of images taken from the wound.
Percentage of wound size reductionWeeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 post baselinePercentage of wound size reduction at Weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 (without LOCF)
Pain assessment as per numerical rating scale (NRS)At baseline and days 1-3, 8 and weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 post baseline
Quality of life (QoL) assessment using the SF-36 questionnaireAt baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 post baseline
Dermatologic quality of life assessment using the DLQI questionnaireAt baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 post baseline
Physical examination and vital parametersAt Screening, baseline, week 12, month 12
Formation of granulation tissue and wound exudationAt baseline and days 3, 8 and weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 post baselineFormation of granulation tissue in % of wound area will be assessed by the investigator based on image analysis of images taken from the wound. Wound exudation will be classified by the investigator using following scores: * High: Small amounts of fluid or free fluids are visible when the dressing is removed; dressing is extensively marked or wet * Moderate: Small amounts of fluid are visible when dressing is removed; wound bed may appear glossy; Primary dressing may be lightly marked * Low: Wound bed is dry; there is no visible moisture; Primary dressing is unmarked; dressing may be adherent to wound
Absolute wound size reductionWeeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 post baseline

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026