Endotracheal Intubation
Conditions
Brief summary
The investigators sought to compare the time to intubation and success rate of the endotracheal intubation using standard double-lumen tube and video tube ETView DL in an adult cadaver model in normal and difficult airway conditions.
Interventions
DEVICEVivaSight DL
intubation using VivaSight DL tube
DEVICEconventional double-lumen tube
intubation using conventional double-lumen tube
Sponsors
Medical University of Warsaw
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* fresh adult cadavers
Exclusion criteria
* cadavers with face injures
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time required for endotracheal intubation | 1 day | time from pick up the tube to first ventilation |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time required for visual confirmation of double lumen tube position position | 1 day | Time required for visual confirmation of double lumen tube position position |
| success rate of intubation attempt | 1 day | success rate of first intubation attempt |
| Ease of intubation | 1 day | To access subjective opinion about the difficulty of each intubation method, participants were asked to rate it on a visual analog scale (VAS) with a score from 1 (extremely easy) to 10 (extremely difficult). |
Countries
Poland
Outcome results
None listed