Skip to content

Discontinuation vs Continuation of Long-term Opioid Therapy in Suboptimal and Optimal Responders With Chronic Pain

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Clinical Trial of Structured Opioid Discontinuation Versus Continued Opioid Therapy in Suboptimal and Optimal Responders to High-dose Long-term Opioid Analgesic Therapy for Chronic Pain.

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02741076
Enrollment
44
Registered
2016-04-18
Start date
2016-09-14
Completion date
2018-04-27
Last updated
2019-11-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Drug Abuse, Narcotic Abuse, Opiate Addiction, Opioid-Related Disorders

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect on pain intensity (PI) of structured discontinuation of long-term opioid analgesic therapy compared to continuation of opioid therapy in Suboptimal and Optimal Responders to high-dose, long-term opioid analgesic therapy for chronic low back pain (CLBP).

Detailed description

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study which consisted of a common Screening Visit for all subjects, then different schedules for Optimal and Suboptimal Responders, followed by a common schedule for the Blinded Structured Opioid Discontinuation Period (BSODP) and Follow-up Period. The original protocol (10 Jan 2016) was amended twice: Amendment 1 (07 Jul 2016) and Amendment 2 (08 Feb 2017). Screening of subjects only started after Amendment 1 approval. Approximately half the subjects were screened under Amendment 1 and half under Amendment 2. The original statistical analysis plan (SAP) was amended twice as well based on the protocol amendments. The current SAP is version 1.3, dated 11 April 2018, which added a section to list the analyses that were not being completed as a result of the premature termination of this study. The duration of the entire study for each subject was approximately 33 to 37 weeks. For Suboptimal Responders: the study duration included Screening Period of up to 3 weeks, Run-in Period of 1 week, Baseline Period of 1 week, Blinded Structured Opioid Discontinuation Period of 24 weeks, and Follow-up Period of 4 weeks. For Optimal Responders: the study duration included Screening Period of up to 3 weeks, Observation Period of 1 week, Taper Period up to 2 weeks, Open Label Titration Period of 3 weeks, Blinded Structured Opioid Discontinuation Period of 24 weeks, and Follow-up Period of 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in the mean Average PI score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) from Baseline to the 1 week period before the Week 12 visit. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics (number of observations \[n\], mean, standard deviation, median, first and third quartiles, minimum, and maximum for continuous variables; and frequency and percentage for categorical variables). Due to the inability to recruit a sufficient number of subjects over an acceptable period of time, the study was terminated prematurely and efficacy analyses were reduced and only a brief summary of the statistical analyses of the primary endpoint in each group (Suboptimal Responders and Optimal Responders) were performed.

Interventions

DRUGStructured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER)

Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER)

DRUGContinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER)

Continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER)

Sponsors

Member Companies of the Opioid PMR Consortium
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Be male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female aged 18 to 75 years, inclusive. 2. Have a clinical diagnosis of non-radicular CLBP (pain that occurs in an area with boundaries between the lowest rib and the crease of the buttocks) of Class 1 or proximal radicular (above the knee) pain of Class 2 based on the Quebec Task Force Classification for Spinal Disorders (subjects with previous surgery or chronic pain syndrome, i.e., classes 9.2 or 10, will be allowed if their pain does not radiate or radiates only proximally) for a minimum of 12 months and 1. For the Suboptimal Responder group, pain must have been present for at least several hours a day and have an Average PI score of 6-9 on an 11-point NRS within the past 24 hours of screening. 2. For the Optimal Responder group, subjects must have an Average PI score of 1-4 on an 11-point NRS within the past 24 hours of screening. 3. Have been taking ER/LA opioids or immediate release opioids (at least 4 times at day) for at least 12 months. 4. Have been taking one of the 3 index ER opioid drugs around-the-clock at a twice-a-day frequency for at least 3 consecutive months at a total daily dose within the range shown below. Daily Dose Range 1. Morphine sulfate extended-release: 120-540mg 2. Oxycodone extended-release: 80-360mg 3. Oxymorphone extended-release: 40-180mg 5. Be considered, in the opinion of the Investigator, to be in generally good health other than CLBP at screening based upon the results of a medical history, physical examination, 12-lead ECG, and laboratory profile. 6. Speak, read, write, and understand English (to reduce heterogeneity of data), understand the consent form, and be able to effectively communicate with the study staff. 7. Have access to the Internet (to access the patient support program). 8. Voluntarily provide written informed consent. 9. Be willing and able to complete study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

1. Have any clinically significant condition that would, in the opinion of the Investigator, preclude study participation or interfere with the assessment of pain and other symptoms of CLBP or increase the risk of opioid-related AEs. 2. Have a primary diagnosis of fibromyalgia, complex regional pain syndrome, neurogenic claudication due to spinal stenosis, spinal cord compression, acute nerve root compression, severe or progressive lower extremity weakness or numbness, bowel or bladder dysfunction as a result of cauda equina compression, diabetic amyotrophy, meningitis, diskitis, back pain because of secondary infection or tumor, or pain caused by a confirmed or suspected neoplasm. 3. Have undergone a surgical procedure for back pain within 6 months prior to the Screening Visit. 4. Have had a nerve or plexus block, including epidural steroid injections or facet blocks, within 1 month prior to the Screening Visit or botulinum toxin injection in the lower back region within 3 months prior to screening. 5. Have a history of confirmed malignancy within past 2 years, with exception of basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been successfully treated. 6. Have uncontrolled blood pressure, i.e., subject has a sitting systolic blood pressure \>180 mm Hg or \<90 mm Hg, or a sitting diastolic blood pressure \>110 mmHg or \<40 mm Hg at screening. 7. Have a body mass index (BMI) \>45 kg/m2. Anyone with a BMI \>40 but \<45 will complete a screening tool (STOPBang Questionnaire) to rule out high risk of obstructive sleep apnea. 8. Have clinically significant depression based on a score of ≥20 on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) 9. Have suicidal ideation associated with actual intent and a method or plan in the past year: Yes answers on items 4 or 5 of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). 10. Have a previous history of suicidal behaviors in the past 5 years: Yes answer (for events that occurred in the past 5 years) to any of the suicidal behavior items of the C-SSRS. 11. Have any lifetime history of serious or recurrent suicidal behavior. (Non-suicidal self-injurious behavior is not a trigger for a risk assessment unless in the Investigator's judgment it is indicated.) 12. Have clinically significant abnormality in clinical chemistry, hematology or urinalysis, including serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase/aspartate aminotransferase or serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase/alanine aminotransferase ≥3 times the upper limit of the reference range or a serum creatinine \>2 mg/dL at screening. 13. Have severe enough psychiatric or substance abuse disorder to compromise the subject's safety or scientific integrity of the study. 14. Have on-going litigation associated with back pain or pending applications for workers compensation or disability issues or subjects who plan on filing litigation or claims within the next 12 months; subjects with settled past litigations will be allowed as will subjects who have been on workers compensation or disability claims for at least 3 months. 15. Have used a monoamine oxidase inhibitor within 14 days prior to the start of study medication. 16. Are taking agonist-antagonists (pentazocine, butorphanol or nalbuphine), buprenorphine, methadone, barbiturates, or more than one type of benzodiazepine within 1 month prior to screening. 17. Have a positive urine drug test (UDT) for illicit drugs (including marijuana), non-prescribed controlled substances (opioid or non-opioid), or alcohol at screening. 18. Have taken any investigational drug within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit or are currently enrolled in another investigational drug study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the Mean Average Pain Intensity (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)From baseline to the 1 week period prior to the Week 12 visitBaseline is defined as the mean of the available Average PI scores on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) over the 7-day Baseline Period. For the scheduled post-randomization visits, mean Average Pain Intensity is defined as the means of the respective PI scores over the 7 days preceding the visit. If there is only one daily PI score available, the mean is not calculated, and the data point is considered missing. PI = Pain Intensity. Higher scores indicate more pain intensity; lower scores less pain intensity. Scale range 0-10.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Weeks 12 and 24Percent pain intensity difference (PID) relative to baseline is defined as 100\* ((baseline Average PI - mean Average PI at visit)/baseline Average PI). The percentages are based on number of subjects in the Intent-to-Treat set per treatment group. PI is measured on the Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS). Higher scores indicate more pain intensity; lower scores less pain intensity. Scale range 0-10. This outcome measure applies only to Suboptimal Responders.
Number of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Weeks 12 and 24Percent pain intensity difference (PID) relative to baseline is defined as 100\* ((baseline Average PI - mean Average PI at visit)/baseline Average PI). The percentages are based on number of subjects in the Intent-to-Treat set per treatment group. PI is measured on the Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS). Higher scores indicate more pain intensity; lower scores less pain intensity. Scale range 0-10. This outcome measure applies only to Optimal Responders.
Change From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Weeks 12 and 24The MOS Sleep Scale is a 12-item questionnaire which measures sleep quality in 7 scales over the past 4 weeks: sleep disturbance, snoring, sleep short of breath or headache, sleep adequacy, sleep somnolence, and 2 sleep problems indexes. In addition, the average hours of sleep over the past 4 weeks is recorded as a raw measure and also coded as an optimal sleep index. The MOS is scored and the sleep scales calculated according to the MOS Sleep Scale User's Manual v1.0 (Spritzer and Hays, 2003). The scores on the dimensions and the sleep indices were converted to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores reflecting more of the attribute implied by the name (e.g. greater sleep disturbance, greater sleep adequacy of sleep).
Participants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)4 weeks prior to baseline and prior to 12 and 24 week visitsOptimal Sleep Index is based on the average number of hours of sleep each night during the past 4 weeks. Index=1 represents 7-8 hours and Index=0 represents \< 7 hours or \> 8 hours.
Change From Baseline in the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Weeks 12 and 24The PHQ-8 is an 8-item questionnaire that aims at assessing the level of mood of a subject. Each item is scored from 0 = not at all to 3= nearly every day; the total score, which is the sum of the score for each item, can be from 0 to 24. A score ≥10 is considered major depression and ≥20 is severe major depression.
Change in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)From baseline to weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24Baseline is defined as the mean of the available Average PI scores on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) over the 7-day Baseline Period. For the scheduled post-randomization visits, mean Average Pain Intensity is defined as the means of the respective PI scores over the 7 days preceding the visit. If there is only one daily PI score available, the mean is not calculated, and the data point is considered missing. PI = Pain Intensity. Higher scores indicate more pain intensity; lower scores less pain intensity. Scale range 0-10.
Participant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentBaseline and weeks 12, 24The EQ-5D-5L is a self-administered general measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments.The EQ-5D-5L measures quality of life in 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain/discomfort, and Anxiety/depression. Each is rated in 5 levels from no problems/pain/anxiety to being unable/extreme pain/extreme anxiety. The responses for each category are summarized by treatment and visit with frequencies and percentages reporting each level.
Participant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L Standardized Instrument)Baseline to 12 and 24 week visitThe EQ-5D-5L is a self-administered general measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments. The visual analog scale (VAS) rates the subject's health on a 0-100 scale from the worst imaginable health state to the best imaginable health state.
Digit Symbol Substitution TestChange from Baseline to 12 and 24 week visitOverall neuropsychological function is assessed using the DSST, a test that is sensitive to brain damage, dementia, age, and depression, and is a widely used instrument for measuring the neuropsychological effects of opioid therapy. The digits (1-9) are paired with symbols, and the test consists of matching the symbol for a series of digits as fast as possible. Score is number of correct symbols in 90 seconds. A decrease from baseline detects deterioration in processing speed. An increase from baseline detects improvement in processing speed.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Baseline to 12 and 24 week visitThe Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses the participant's level of improvement/worsening from the beginning to the end of treatment. Participants are asked to select the category of change that most closely describes any change experienced in the pain of their painful areas from the beginning of the Blinded Structured Opioid Discontinuation Period to Week 12 and to Week 24. The scale has levels describing change as: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse.
Sexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenChange from Baseline to 12 and 24 week visitFor the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)(15-items) each question is scored on a scale of 0 or 1 to 5, with 0 as no sexual attempts, 1 as the highest frequency, and 5 as the lowest, except where 1=1-2, 2=3-4, 3=5-6, 4=7-10 attempts, and 5=11 or more attempts. Missing responses are scored as 0. For the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)(19 items) each question is scored on a scale of 0-5 or 1-5. The FSFI examines the following 6 domains with minimum and maximum scores as indicated: desire(1.2-6.0), arousal(0-6.0), lubrication(0-6.0), orgasm(0-6.0), satisfaction(0.8-6.0), and pain(0-6.0). A computational formula sums the scores within each domain and multiplies that sum by a prescribed weighting factor: desire 0.6, arousal 0.3, lubrication 0.3, orgasm 0.4, satisfaction 0.4, pain 0.4. Higher scores indicate greater functionality. The single final score range is 2.0 to 36, which is reported as an average for each group of female study participants as change from baseline.
Number of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Baseline, 12 and 24 week visitThe PHQ-8 is an 8-item questionnaire that aims at assessing the level of depression of a subject. Each item is scored from 0 = not at all to 3= nearly every day; the total score, which is the sum of the scores for each item, can be from 0 to 24. A score \>= 10 is considered major depression and \>= 20 is severe major depression.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

First Subject First Visit 14 September 2016; Date of Early Study Termination 29 January 2018

Pre-assignment details

Prior to randomization, subjects gave consent and entered a pre-assignment period that assessed eligibility for the intervention phase of the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal Responder
Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Suboptimal Responder
13
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal Responder
Structured continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Suboptimal Responder
12
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal Responder
Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Responder
3
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal Responder
Structured continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Responder
4
Total32

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0110
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1000
Overall StudyNo additional information available0011
Overall StudySponsor Request2301
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStructured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderContinuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderStructured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderContinuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants9 Participants3 Participants4 Participants28 Participants
Age, Continuous56.5 years56.1 years41.7 years49.8 years54.1 years
Age, Customized
<25
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
25-49
3 Participants4 Participants2 Participants1 Participants10 Participants
Age, Customized
50-64
9 Participants5 Participants1 Participants3 Participants18 Participants
Age, Customized
Equal to or greater than 65
1 Participants3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants4 Participants1 Participants2 Participants12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants8 Participants2 Participants2 Participants20 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants10 Participants3 Participants3 Participants24 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
13 participants12 participants3 participants4 participants32 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants7 Participants1 Participants2 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants5 Participants2 Participants2 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 130 / 120 / 30 / 4
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 137 / 122 / 31 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 130 / 120 / 30 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

Change in the Mean Average Pain Intensity (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)

Baseline is defined as the mean of the available Average PI scores on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) over the 7-day Baseline Period. For the scheduled post-randomization visits, mean Average Pain Intensity is defined as the means of the respective PI scores over the 7 days preceding the visit. If there is only one daily PI score available, the mean is not calculated, and the data point is considered missing. PI = Pain Intensity. Higher scores indicate more pain intensity; lower scores less pain intensity. Scale range 0-10.

Time frame: From baseline to the 1 week period prior to the Week 12 visit

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange in the Mean Average Pain Intensity (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)-0.2198 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83544
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange in the Mean Average Pain Intensity (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)-0.3328 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.00514
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange in the Mean Average Pain Intensity (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)0.3750 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28794
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange in the Mean Average Pain Intensity (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)1.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)

The PHQ-8 is an 8-item questionnaire that aims at assessing the level of mood of a subject. Each item is scored from 0 = not at all to 3= nearly every day; the total score, which is the sum of the score for each item, can be from 0 to 24. A score ≥10 is considered major depression and ≥20 is severe major depression.

Time frame: Weeks 12 and 24

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline in the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)12 Weeks-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.75
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline in the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)24 Weeks0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.47
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline in the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)24 Weeks-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.98
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline in the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)12 Weeks-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.94
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline in the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)12 Weeks3.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.81
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline in the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)24 Weeks0.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.07
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline in the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)12 Weeks3.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline in the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)24 Weeks-1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Secondary

Change From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)

The MOS Sleep Scale is a 12-item questionnaire which measures sleep quality in 7 scales over the past 4 weeks: sleep disturbance, snoring, sleep short of breath or headache, sleep adequacy, sleep somnolence, and 2 sleep problems indexes. In addition, the average hours of sleep over the past 4 weeks is recorded as a raw measure and also coded as an optimal sleep index. The MOS is scored and the sleep scales calculated according to the MOS Sleep Scale User's Manual v1.0 (Spritzer and Hays, 2003). The scores on the dimensions and the sleep indices were converted to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores reflecting more of the attribute implied by the name (e.g. greater sleep disturbance, greater sleep adequacy of sleep).

Time frame: Weeks 12 and 24

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Adequacy Week 240.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.28
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Awaken Short of Breath or Headache Week 123.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.36
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Problems Index II Week 12-5.4274 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.32784
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Problems Index II Week 244.8333 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.9152
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Disturbance Week 12-5.673 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.5378
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Snoring Week 120.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.42
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Adequacy Week 1210.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.26
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Somnolence Week 12-4.6154 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.43683
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Problems Index I Week 12-4.1026 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.25907
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Quantity Week 120.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Disturbance Week 245.375 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.4283
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Snoring Week 240.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 42.16
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Awaken Short of Breath or Headache Week 2410.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.32
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Somnolence Week 246.0000 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.47378
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Problems Index I Week 246.6667 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.09242
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Quantity Week 24-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.81
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Awaken Short of Breath or Headache Week 120.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.97
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Quantity Week 12-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.31
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Somnolence Week 122.7778 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.33945
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Snoring Week 1210.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.63
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Problems Index II Week 24-6.8056 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.251
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Disturbance Week 24-10.313 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.4418
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Disturbance Week 12-5.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.3754
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Adequacy Week 2413.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.23
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Snoring Week 240.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 38.54
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Problems Index I Week 24-9.1667 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.91176
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Awaken Short of Breath or Headache Week 2410.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 41.4
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Somnolence Week 24-4.1667 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.92847
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Problems Index I Week 12-0.2778 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.66414
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Problems Index II Week 12-2.222 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.63651
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Quantity Week 24-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.46
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Adequacy Week 120.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.29
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Awaken Short of Breath or Headache Week 1213.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.09
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Snoring Week 120.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 40
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Quantity Week 240.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Somnolence Week 126.6667 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.63834
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Problems Index I Week 124.4444 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.6198
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Problems Index II Week 122.0370 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.23816
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Problems Index I Week 24-6.6667 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.85618
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Quantity Week 12-2.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.89
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Disturbance Week 24-5.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.1421
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Problems Index II Week 24-2.2222 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.99888
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Snoring Week 2440.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.28
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Awaken Short of Breath or Headache Week 2420.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.28
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Adequacy Week 2425.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.21
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Adequacy Week 123.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.17
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Disturbance Week 12-0.417 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3229
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Somnolence Week 2416.6667 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.99832
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Disturbance Week 24-10.000 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.75
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Snoring Week 1215.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.15
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Somnolence Week 24-11.1111 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.698
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Quantity Week 120.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Problems Index II Week 121.8056 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.50823
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Awaken Short of Breath or Headache Week 1210.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.55
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Problems Index I Week 120.8333 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9536
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Adequacy Week 240.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Somnolence Week 128.3333 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.78237
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Problems Index I Week 24-2.2222 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.70628
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Quantity Week 240.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Problems Index II Week 24-2.2222 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.40698
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Snoring Week 2413.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.55
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Adequacy Week 125.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.15
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Awaken Short of Breath or Headache Week 2440.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 40
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Sleep Disturbance Week 122.813 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.5635
Secondary

Change in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)

Baseline is defined as the mean of the available Average PI scores on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) over the 7-day Baseline Period. For the scheduled post-randomization visits, mean Average Pain Intensity is defined as the means of the respective PI scores over the 7 days preceding the visit. If there is only one daily PI score available, the mean is not calculated, and the data point is considered missing. PI = Pain Intensity. Higher scores indicate more pain intensity; lower scores less pain intensity. Scale range 0-10.

Time frame: From baseline to weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)4 weeks-0.1123 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77962
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)24 weeks-0.5000 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83692
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)20 weeks-0.4153 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81486
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)16 weeks-0.3462 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79086
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)8 weeks-0.3671 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8681
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)4 weeks-0.1413 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.99386
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)8 weeks0.0984 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62794
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)16 weeks-0.5714 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.37382
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)20 weeks-0.6873 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.08941
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderChange in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)24 weeks-0.1532 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23299
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)20 weeks-0.4821 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.08591
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)16 weeks-0.6964 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.38896
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)24 weeks0.2857 Score on a scale
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)4 weeks0.4940 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64818
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)8 weeks0.3393 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63135
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)8 weeks0.1413 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25046
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)24 weeks1.5 Score on a scale
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)20 weeks-0.3095 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.03367
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)16 weeks0.4508 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.48807
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderChange in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)4 weeks0.3143 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38951
Secondary

Digit Symbol Substitution Test

Overall neuropsychological function is assessed using the DSST, a test that is sensitive to brain damage, dementia, age, and depression, and is a widely used instrument for measuring the neuropsychological effects of opioid therapy. The digits (1-9) are paired with symbols, and the test consists of matching the symbol for a series of digits as fast as possible. Score is number of correct symbols in 90 seconds. A decrease from baseline detects deterioration in processing speed. An increase from baseline detects improvement in processing speed.

Time frame: Change from Baseline to 12 and 24 week visit

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderDigit Symbol Substitution TestWeek 12 from baseline7.8 Score on a testStandard Deviation 8.23
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderDigit Symbol Substitution TestWeek 24 from baseline8.9 Score on a testStandard Deviation 8.41
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderDigit Symbol Substitution TestWeek 24 from baseline0.1 Score on a testStandard Deviation 12.84
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderDigit Symbol Substitution TestWeek 12 from baseline6.1 Score on a testStandard Deviation 10.22
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderDigit Symbol Substitution TestWeek 12 from baseline3.3 Score on a testStandard Deviation 7.64
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderDigit Symbol Substitution TestWeek 24 from baseline-6.0 Score on a testStandard Deviation 5.66
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderDigit Symbol Substitution TestWeek 12 from baseline0.00 Score on a testStandard Deviation 4.83
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderDigit Symbol Substitution TestWeek 24 from baseline-3.3 Score on a testStandard Deviation 7.64
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)

The PHQ-8 is an 8-item questionnaire that aims at assessing the level of depression of a subject. Each item is scored from 0 = not at all to 3= nearly every day; the total score, which is the sum of the scores for each item, can be from 0 to 24. A score \>= 10 is considered major depression and \>= 20 is severe major depression.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 and 24 week visit

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Major Depression Week 242 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Major Depression Baseline2 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Severe Major Depression Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Severe Major Depression Baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Major Depression Week 121 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Severe Major Depression Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Major Depression Baseline5 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Major Depression Week 123 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Major Depression Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Severe Major Depression Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Severe Major Depression Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Severe Major Depression Baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Severe Major Depression Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Severe Major Depression Baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Major Depression Baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Major Depression Week 121 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Major Depression Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Severe Major Depression Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Major Depression Week 121 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Severe Major Depression Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Major Depression Baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Severe Major Depression Baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Severe Major Depression Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)Major Depression Week 240 Participants
Secondary

Number of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)

Percent pain intensity difference (PID) relative to baseline is defined as 100\* ((baseline Average PI - mean Average PI at visit)/baseline Average PI). The percentages are based on number of subjects in the Intent-to-Treat set per treatment group. PI is measured on the Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS). Higher scores indicate more pain intensity; lower scores less pain intensity. Scale range 0-10. This outcome measure applies only to Suboptimal Responders.

Time frame: Weeks 12 and 24

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 30% Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 10% Week 123 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 20% Week 121 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 10% Week 245 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)>0% (any improvement) Week 248 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 20% Week 241 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)>0% (any improvement) Week 127 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 30% Week 121 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 10% Week 123 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)>0% (any improvement) Week 243 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 30% Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 20% Week 121 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)>0% (any improvement) Week 125 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 30% Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 20% Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 10% Week 243 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)>0% (any improvement) Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)>0% (any improvement) Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 10% Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 30% Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 20% Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 20% Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 10% Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 30% Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 30% Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 10% Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 20% Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)>0% (any improvement) Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 10% Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)>0% (any improvement) Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 30% Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 20% Week 120 Participants
Secondary

Number of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)

Percent pain intensity difference (PID) relative to baseline is defined as 100\* ((baseline Average PI - mean Average PI at visit)/baseline Average PI). The percentages are based on number of subjects in the Intent-to-Treat set per treatment group. PI is measured on the Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS). Higher scores indicate more pain intensity; lower scores less pain intensity. Scale range 0-10. This outcome measure applies only to Optimal Responders.

Time frame: Weeks 12 and 24

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 40% Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Greater than or equal to 30% Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 20% Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Greater than or equal to 10% Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Equal to 0% (any worsening) Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Greater than or equal to 40% week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 30% Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 20% Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Greater than or equal to 10% Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Greater than 0% (any worsening) Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Greater than 0% (any worsening) Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Equal to 0% (any worsening) Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Greater than or equal to 10% Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Greater than or equal to 40% week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Greater than or equal to 10% Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Greater than or equal to 30% Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 40% Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 30% Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 20% Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 20% Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 20% Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Equal to 0% (any worsening) Week 121 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Greater than or equal to 10% Week 241 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Greater than 0% (any worsening) Week 241 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 40% Week 121 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Greater than or equal to 40% week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 20% Week 121 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Greater than or equal to 30% Week 121 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 30% Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Greater than or equal to 10% Week 121 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 40% Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Greater than or equal to 30% Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 20% Week 122 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 20% Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Greater than or equal to 10% Week 122 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Greater than or equal to 40% week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Greater than or equal to 10% Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)greater than or equal to 30% Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Greater than 0% (any worsening) Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderNumber of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)Equal to 0% (any worsening) Week 122 Participants
Secondary

Participant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized Instrument

The EQ-5D-5L is a self-administered general measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments.The EQ-5D-5L measures quality of life in 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain/discomfort, and Anxiety/depression. Each is rated in 5 levels from no problems/pain/anxiety to being unable/extreme pain/extreme anxiety. The responses for each category are summarized by treatment and visit with frequencies and percentages reporting each level.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 12, 24

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to Walk Baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem doing usual activities Week 244 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem washing or dressing week 125 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSeverely anxious or depressed baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem washing or dressing Baseline1 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem Walking Week 121 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerately anxious or depressed baseline4 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlightly anxious or depressed baseline5 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem washing or dressing baseline1 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight pain or discomfort baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtreme pain or discomfort baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere pain or discomfort baseline7 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem washing or dressing baseline10 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem doing usual activities Week 242 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem washing or dressing baseline1 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem doing usual activities Week 241 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate pain or discomfort baseline6 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo pain or discomfort baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to wash or dress baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight Problem Walking Week 122 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to do usual activities baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem doing usual activities baseline3 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem doing usual activities Baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtremely anxious or depressed Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem doing usual activities baseline10 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem doing usual activities Baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to washing or dressing Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem washing or dressing Week 243 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate Problem Walking Week 128 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtreme pain or discomfort Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem washing or dressing Week 243 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem washing or dressing Week 243 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere Problem Walking Week 122 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere pain or discomfort Week 244 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to Walk Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere Problem Walking Week 241 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to Walk Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate Problem Walking Baseline8 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate Problem Walking Week 245 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem Walking Week 242 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem washing or dressing Week 122 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNot anxious or depressed baseline4 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtremely anxious or depressed Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSeverely anxious or depressed Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem washing or dressing Week 124 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSeverely anxious or depressed Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerately anxious or depressed Week 124 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate pain or discomfort Week 245 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight pain or discomfort Week 241 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight Problem Walking Week 242 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerately anxious or depressed Week 243 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlightly anxious or depressed Week 122 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNot anxious or depressed Week 127 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtreme pain or discomfort Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem washing or dressing Week 241 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo pain or discomfort Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere pain or discomfort Week 122 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate pain or discomfort Week 1211 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight pain or discomfort Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNot anxious or depressed Week 244 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem Walking Baseline1 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to do usual activities Week 241 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo pain or discomfort Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to do usual activities Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight Problem Walking Baseline1 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtremely anxious or depressed baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem doing usual activities Week 124 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem doing usual activities Week 124 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlightly anxious or depressed Week 243 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem doing usual activities Week 124 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem doing usual activities Week 121 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere Problem Walking Baseline3 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem doing usual activities Week 242 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to wash or dress Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem washing or dressing Week 122 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to Walk Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight pain or discomfort baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerately anxious or depressed baseline5 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSeverely anxious or depressed baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtremely anxious or depressed baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem Walking Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight Problem Walking Week 123 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate Problem Walking Week 127 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere Problem Walking Week 122 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem washing or dressing Week 123 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem washing or dressing Week 126 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem doing usual activities Week 123 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtremely anxious or depressed Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight Problem Walking Week 244 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to washing or dressing Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem Walking Baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight Problem Walking Baseline2 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate Problem Walking Baseline7 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere Problem Walking Baseline2 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to Walk Baseline1 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem washing or dressing Baseline3 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem washing or dressing baseline3 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem washing or dressing baseline5 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem washing or dressing baseline1 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to wash or dress baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem doing usual activities Baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem doing usual activities Baseline1 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem doing usual activities baseline5 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem doing usual activities baseline6 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to do usual activities baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo pain or discomfort baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate pain or discomfort baseline6 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere pain or discomfort baseline6 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtreme pain or discomfort baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNot anxious or depressed baseline3 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlightly anxious or depressed baseline4 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem washing or dressing week 123 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem washing or dressing Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to wash or dress Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem doing usual activities Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem doing usual activities Week 126 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem doing usual activities Week 123 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to do usual activities Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo pain or discomfort Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight pain or discomfort Week 121 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate pain or discomfort Week 129 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere pain or discomfort Week 121 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtreme pain or discomfort Week 121 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNot anxious or depressed Week 127 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlightly anxious or depressed Week 124 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerately anxious or depressed Week 121 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSeverely anxious or depressed Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem Walking Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate Problem Walking Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere Problem Walking Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to Walk Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem washing or dressing Week 242 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem washing or dressing Week 244 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem washing or dressing Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem washing or dressing Week 242 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem doing usual activities Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem doing usual activities Week 245 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem doing usual activities Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem doing usual activities Week 242 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to do usual activities Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo pain or discomfort Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight pain or discomfort Week 244 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate pain or discomfort Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere pain or discomfort Week 243 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtreme pain or discomfort Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNot anxious or depressed Week 245 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlightly anxious or depressed Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerately anxious or depressed Week 243 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSeverely anxious or depressed Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtremely anxious or depressed Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to Walk Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerately anxious or depressed Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem doing usual activities Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to do usual activities Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem washing or dressing Week 241 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtreme pain or discomfort Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate Problem Walking Week 122 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNot anxious or depressed Week 241 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem washing or dressing Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo pain or discomfort Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem Walking Baseline1 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate pain or discomfort Week 241 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem washing or dressing Week 241 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNot anxious or depressed Week 121 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem washing or dressing Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem doing usual activities Week 121 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight Problem Walking Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight Problem Walking Week 241 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo pain or discomfort Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem washing or dressing baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem doing usual activities Week 241 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlightly anxious or depressed Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem Walking Week 121 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlightly anxious or depressed Week 241 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem doing usual activities Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to wash or dress Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem washing or dressing Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight Problem Walking Baseline2 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerately anxious or depressed Week 122 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem doing usual activities Baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight pain or discomfort Week 241 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem doing usual activities baseline1 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight pain or discomfort Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtremely anxious or depressed Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem doing usual activities Week 241 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem doing usual activities baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSeverely anxious or depressed Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to wash or dress baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate Problem Walking Baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to do usual activities baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem washing or dressing Week 121 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtremely anxious or depressed Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtremely anxious or depressed baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo pain or discomfort baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem washing or dressing baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem doing usual activities Baseline2 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate pain or discomfort baseline2 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtreme pain or discomfort Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem doing usual activities Week 121 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem doing usual activities Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere pain or discomfort baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere pain or discomfort Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem washing or dressing baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem Walking Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtreme pain or discomfort baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate pain or discomfort Week 122 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSeverely anxious or depressed baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNot anxious or depressed baseline1 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to Walk Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem doing usual activities Week 121 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate Problem Walking Week 241 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlightly anxious or depressed baseline2 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to washing or dressing Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem washing or dressing Baseline3 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerately anxious or depressed baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight pain or discomfort baseline1 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to Walk Baseline0 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to do usual activities Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem washing or dressing week 122 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere Problem Walking Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere pain or discomfort Week 121 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere Problem Walking Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem washing or dressing Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSeverely anxious or depressed Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere Problem Walking Baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSeverely anxious or depressed baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to wash or dress Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate Problem Walking Baseline1 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem doing usual activities Week 121 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem doing usual activities Week 121 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight Problem Walking Baseline1 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem doing usual activities Week 122 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo pain or discomfort Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem doing usual activities Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem Walking Baseline2 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerately anxious or depressed baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to do usual activities Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerately anxious or depressed Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo pain or discomfort Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtreme pain or discomfort Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight pain or discomfort Week 121 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight pain or discomfort Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate pain or discomfort Week 122 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere pain or discomfort Week 121 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem washing or dressing Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem washing or dressing baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtreme pain or discomfort Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight Problem Walking Week 242 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNot anxious or depressed Week 123 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate pain or discomfort Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlightly anxious or depressed Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight pain or discomfort baseline2 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerately anxious or depressed Week 121 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem washing or dressing Week 123 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSeverely anxious or depressed Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtremely anxious or depressed Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to Walk Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem Walking Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere pain or discomfort Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate Problem Walking Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere Problem Walking Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere Problem Walking Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to Walk Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate Problem Walking Week 121 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSeverely anxious or depressed Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem washing or dressing Week 242 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem washing or dressing Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight Problem Walking Week 122 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNot anxious or depressed Week 242 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo pain or discomfort baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem washing or dressing Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to washing or dressing Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem Walking Week 121 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem doing usual activities Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem doing usual activities Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem doing usual activities Baseline1 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtremely anxious or depressed baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem doing usual activities Baseline2 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlightly anxious or depressed Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem doing usual activities baseline1 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to wash or dress baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem doing usual activities baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem doing usual activities Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to do usual activities baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem washing or dressing baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate pain or discomfort baseline2 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem washing or dressing baseline1 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere pain or discomfort baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem doing usual activities Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtreme pain or discomfort baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNot anxious or depressed baseline2 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentNo problem washing or dressing Baseline3 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentExtremely anxious or depressed Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlightly anxious or depressed baseline2 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to Walk Baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSlight problem washing or dressing Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentModerate problem washing or dressing week 121 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere Problem Walking Baseline0 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentUnable to do usual activities Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized InstrumentSevere problem washing or dressing Week 120 Participants
Secondary

Participant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L Standardized Instrument)

The EQ-5D-5L is a self-administered general measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments. The visual analog scale (VAS) rates the subject's health on a 0-100 scale from the worst imaginable health state to the best imaginable health state.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 and 24 week visit

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L Standardized Instrument)Week 12 visit5.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.45
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L Standardized Instrument)Week 24 visit4.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.68
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L Standardized Instrument)Week 12 visit3.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.89
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L Standardized Instrument)Week 24 visit8.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.57
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L Standardized Instrument)Week 24 visit-4.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.44
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L Standardized Instrument)Week 12 visit-17.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.01
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L Standardized Instrument)Week 12 visit-6.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.97
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L Standardized Instrument)Week 24 visit0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.86
Secondary

Participants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)

Optimal Sleep Index is based on the average number of hours of sleep each night during the past 4 weeks. Index=1 represents 7-8 hours and Index=0 represents \< 7 hours or \> 8 hours.

Time frame: 4 weeks prior to baseline and prior to 12 and 24 week visits

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=1 Week 241 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=0 Baseline10 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=1 Baseline3 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=0 Week 1211 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=1 Week 122 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=0 Week 249 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=0 Week 247 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=0 Week 1210 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=1 Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=1 Baseline3 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=0 Baseline9 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=1 Week 122 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=0 Baseline2 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=1 Baseline1 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=0 Week 122 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=0 Week 241 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=1 Week 121 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=1 Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=1 Week 123 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=0 Week 242 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=0 Baseline3 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=0 Week 121 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=1 Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderParticipants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)Index=1 Baseline1 Participants
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses the participant's level of improvement/worsening from the beginning to the end of treatment. Participants are asked to select the category of change that most closely describes any change experienced in the pain of their painful areas from the beginning of the Blinded Structured Opioid Discontinuation Period to Week 12 and to Week 24. The scale has levels describing change as: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 and 24 week visit

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Much improved Week 243 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Very much improved Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Minimally Worse Week 121 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Much Worse Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Very Much Worse Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Much Worse Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Much improved Week 123 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Very much improved Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Minimally Worse Week 241 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)No change Week 243 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Minimally improved Week 128 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)No change Week 121 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Minimally improved Week 243 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Very Much Worse Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)No change Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Very much improved Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Much improved Week 121 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Minimally improved Week 125 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)No change Week 123 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Minimally Worse Week 121 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Much Worse Week 122 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Very Much Worse Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Very much improved Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Much improved Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Minimally improved Week 244 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Minimally Worse Week 242 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Much Worse Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Very Much Worse Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)No change Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Much Worse Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Much improved Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Minimally improved Week 121 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Minimally Worse Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Very much improved Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Minimally improved Week 242 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)No change Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Much Worse Week 120 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Very much improved Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Minimally Worse Week 121 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Very Much Worse Week 240 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Very Much Worse Week 121 Participants
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Much improved Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Very Much Worse Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Very much improved Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Much Worse Week 241 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Much improved Week 242 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Minimally improved Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Much improved Week 121 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Minimally improved Week 121 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)No change Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Very Much Worse Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Minimally Worse Week 240 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Minimally Worse Week 121 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Very much improved Week 120 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Much Worse Week 121 Participants
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)No change Week 120 Participants
Secondary

Sexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for Women

For the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)(15-items) each question is scored on a scale of 0 or 1 to 5, with 0 as no sexual attempts, 1 as the highest frequency, and 5 as the lowest, except where 1=1-2, 2=3-4, 3=5-6, 4=7-10 attempts, and 5=11 or more attempts. Missing responses are scored as 0. For the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)(19 items) each question is scored on a scale of 0-5 or 1-5. The FSFI examines the following 6 domains with minimum and maximum scores as indicated: desire(1.2-6.0), arousal(0-6.0), lubrication(0-6.0), orgasm(0-6.0), satisfaction(0.8-6.0), and pain(0-6.0). A computational formula sums the scores within each domain and multiplies that sum by a prescribed weighting factor: desire 0.6, arousal 0.3, lubrication 0.3, orgasm 0.4, satisfaction 0.4, pain 0.4. Higher scores indicate greater functionality. The single final score range is 2.0 to 36, which is reported as an average for each group of female study participants as change from baseline.

Time frame: Change from Baseline to 12 and 24 week visit

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Orgasm Week 240.40 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.007
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Sexual Desire Week 241.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.59
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Satisfaction Week 24-0.72 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.277
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Intercourse Satisfaction Week 24-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.68
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Sexual Desire Week 122.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Desire Week 120.23 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Pain Week 120.65 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.312
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Orgasmic Function Week 24-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.33
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Erectile Function Week 122.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.14
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Satisfaction Week 12-0.10 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.849
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Intercourse Satisfaction Week 12-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Arousal Week 120.38 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.711
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Desire Week 240.48 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.301
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Overall Satisfaction Week 243.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.67
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Overall Satisfaction Week 121.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Arousal Week 241.80 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.561
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Orgasm Week 12-0.05 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.216
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Erectile Function Week 241.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.56
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Lubrication Week 120.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.368
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Pain Week 240.88 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.411
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Orgasmic Function Week 12-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Lubrication Week 240.30 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.205
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Arousal Week 24-0.90 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.559
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Orgasm Week 240.27 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.462
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Erectile Function Week 24-0.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.26
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Satisfaction Week 12-0.40 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.046
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Erectile Function Week 12-4.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.26
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Overall Satisfaction Week 242.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.05
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Desire Week 12-0.86 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.544
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Pain Week 122.69 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.589
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Intercourse Satisfaction Week 12-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.22
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Arousal Week 12-0.47 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.614
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Sexual Desire Week 240.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.64
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Lubrication Week 240.30 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Orgasm Week 120.91 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Orgasmic Function Week 240.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.83
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Satisfaction Week 24-0.67 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.155
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Pain Week 240.80 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.386
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Sexual Desire Week 121.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.35
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Overall Satisfaction Week 121.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.36
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Intercourse Satisfaction Week 240.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.41
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Desire Week 24-1.40 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.51
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Orgasmic Function Week 12-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.24
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Lubrication Week 120.94 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.514
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Orgasmic Function Week 120.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Sexual Desire Week 120.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Intercourse Satisfaction Week 120.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Overall Satisfaction Week 121.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Desire Week 120.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Orgasm Week 12-4.40 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Overall Satisfaction Week 240.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.83
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Arousal Week 12-6.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Lubrication Week 12-3.60 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Satisfaction Week 12-0.40 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Erectile Function Week 124.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.83
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Erectile Function Week 247.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Orgasmic Function Week 241.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Sexual Desire Week 24-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.54
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Intercourse Satisfaction Week 242.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.83
Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Pain Week 12-3.20 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Arousal Week 240.90 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Pain Week 240.40 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Orgasmic Function Week 121.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Satisfaction Week 240.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Satisfaction Week 120.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Intercourse Satisfaction Week 120.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Orgasmic Function Week 242.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Orgasm Week 120.20 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.283
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Lubrication Week 240 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Arousal Week 121.35 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.636
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Sexual Desire Week 120.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Sexual Desire Week 240.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.41
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Desire Week 240.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Desire Week 120.30 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.424
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Pain Week 12-0.40 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.131
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Intercourse Satisfaction Week 241.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Overall Satisfaction Week 240.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.41
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Erectile Function Week 122.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.07
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Orgasm Week 24-0.40 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Overall Satisfaction Week 120.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenMale Erectile Function Week 244.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal ResponderSexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for WomenFemale Lubrication Week 120.30 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026