Skip to content

Reassure Device: Measurement Accuracy of Continuous Respiration Rate

A Comparison of the Non-contact Reassure Device Measurement Accuracy of Respiration Rate With SOMNOScreen, When Measured on a Continuous Basis Whilst the Subjects Are Asleep

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02740478
Enrollment
20
Registered
2016-04-15
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2015-07-31
Last updated
2021-04-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Accuracy of Respiration Rate Measurement

Brief summary

The aim of the trial is to prove that the Reassure10.5 GHz sensor is equivalent in performance to the SomnoScreen Plus RC in indicating the breathing rate of adult subjects over a number of hours when the subjects are lying still or in bed asleep

Detailed description

Each recording comprised at least 2 hours duration. The subject was lying on a bed, wearing the SomnoScreen and with the Reassure on a bed-side table in the recommended position: at arm's length, pointing at the subject's upper torso. The subject was asked to lie in set positions on the bed for 20 minutes at a time. The data was recorded continuously for the duration of the trial and so encompassed the acts of turning from one position to another and any minor movement made by the subject. If the subject fell asleep during the trial, they were only woken when it came time for the next position change. Key Duration Remarks Supine \>=20minutes Subject Lying on back Prone \>=20minutes Subject Lying face down Facing Left \>=20minutes Subject's Chest facing Reassure device Facing Right \>=20minutes Subject's Back facing Reassure device Foetal Left \>=20minutes Subject's Chest facing Reassure device Foetal Right \>=20minutes Subject's Back facing Reassure device

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

ResMed
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Willing Volunteer

Exclusion criteria

* Restless leg syndrome

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Respiration Rate Comparability2 hour recordingThe respiration rate measured contemporaneously by the Reassure and the reference device, SomnoScreen, are compared on a second-by-second basis, over the whole recording duration. The difference between the two respiration rate measurements (the delta) for all 20 subjects' recordings are plotted on a normal distribution chart, giving 130,000 data points. The distribution chart reveals the mean difference between the two devices' measurements and the Standard Deviation (SD). The measure of success is if the 95% (ie 2SD) of the difference in the respiration rate indicated by the two devices (the delta) is less than 5 breaths per minute. This measure is derived from the peer review paper by Lim et al, cited in the References section

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Volunteer subjects recruited until quantity 20 had completed the study

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Reassure 10.5 GHz Sensor Sleep Simulation
Volunteer subjects, willing to undergo the trial of lying still on a bed for 2 hours. The subject's position changed every 20 minutes so that a range of positions explored. Subjects' respiration rate measure by the non-contact Reassure device and compared to a SomnoScreen device that uses chest effort belts to record the respiration rate. Volunteers recruited until there were 20 that completed the study.
20
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicReassure 10.5 GHz Sensor Sleep Simulation
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Ireland
20 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 21
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 21
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 21

Outcome results

Primary

Respiration Rate Comparability

The respiration rate measured contemporaneously by the Reassure and the reference device, SomnoScreen, are compared on a second-by-second basis, over the whole recording duration. The difference between the two respiration rate measurements (the delta) for all 20 subjects' recordings are plotted on a normal distribution chart, giving 130,000 data points. The distribution chart reveals the mean difference between the two devices' measurements and the Standard Deviation (SD). The measure of success is if the 95% (ie 2SD) of the difference in the respiration rate indicated by the two devices (the delta) is less than 5 breaths per minute. This measure is derived from the peer review paper by Lim et al, cited in the References section

Time frame: 2 hour recording

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Reassure 10.5 GHz Sensor Sleep SimulationRespiration Rate Comparability0.4 breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 1.2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026