Skip to content

Quality Control of CE-Certified Phonak Hearing Aids - 2015_03

Quality Control of CE-Certified Phonak Hearing Aids

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02740023
Enrollment
12
Registered
2016-04-15
Start date
2015-11-30
Completion date
2016-02-29
Last updated
2018-06-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hearing Loss

Brief summary

Phonak Hearing Systems pass through different development and study stages. At an early stage, feasibility studies are conducted to investigate new algorithms, features and functions in an isolated manner.

Interventions

DEVICEHearing Aid (Phonak Audéo V90-13)

Phonak's Receiver-In-the-Canal (RIC) hearing aid Audéo V90-13 will be fitted to the participants individual Hearing loss.

DEVICEHearing Aid (Successor of Phonak Audéo V90-13)

The successor of Phonak's Receiver-In-the-Canal (RIC) hearing aid Audéo V90-13 will be fitted to the participants individual Hearing loss.

Sponsors

Sonova AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult hearing impaired persons (minimum age: 18 years) with and without (experience with) hearing aids * Good written and spoken (Swiss) German language skills * Healthy outer ear * Ability to fill in a questionnaire (p/eCRF) conscientiously * Informed Consent as documented by signature

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications to the MD in this study, e.g. known hypersensitivity or allergy to the investigational product * Limited mobility and not in the position to attend weekly appointments * Limited ability to describe listening impressions/experiences and the use of the hearing aid * Inability to produce a reliable hearing test result * Massively limited dexterity * Known psychological problems * Central hearing disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Speech intelligibility in percent in a quiet listening situationOne weekThe data, serving as primary outcomes are collected in a series of lab appointments. The speech intelligibility in quiet will be assessed with the aid of the german rhyme test Einsilber-Reimtest nach von Wallenberg und Kollmeier (WaKo). The result is the speech intelligibility in percent. Descriptive statistics will be executed in the form of determining the median and quartiles. Interference statistics will be executed by applying the appropriate parametric or non-parametric test, depending on the data's distribution. A significance level of 5% is pursued.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Speech intelligibility in percent in a noisy listening situationOne weekThe data, serving as secondary outcomes are collected in a series of lab appointments. The speech intelligibility in noise will be assessed with the aid of the german rhyme test Einsilber-Reimtest nach von Wallenberg und Kollmeier (WaKo). The result is the speech intelligibility in percent. Descriptive statistics will be executed in the form of determining the median and quartiles. Interference statistics will be executed by applying the appropriate parametric or non-parametric test, depending on the data's distribution. A significance level of 5% is pursued.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Initial first fit acceptance (pre-calulation) in labOne weekThe data, serving other pre-specified outcomes are collected within the first lab appointment. The acceptance of the initial first fit will be assessed with the aid of quantitative questions within an interview. The results are points on a scale and open ended (e.g. Question: Please rate the sound quality; Answer scale: bad, poor, fair, good, excellent) . Descriptive statistics will be executed in the form of determining number of answers. Interference statistics will be executed by applying the appropriate parametric or non-parametric test, depending on the data's distribution. A significance level of 5% is pursued.
Sound quality and listening effort ratings in labFour weeksThe data, serving other pre-specified outcomes are collected within the lab appointments. The sound quality and listening effort ratings will be assessed with the aid of the Multi-Stimulus Test with Hidden Reference and Anchor (MUSHRA). The results are quantitative sound quality and listening effort ratings. Descriptive statistics will be executed in the form of determining the median and quartiles. Interference statistics will be executed by applying the appropriate parametric or non-parametric test, depending on the data's distribution. A significance level of 5% is pursued.

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026