Skip to content

Post Marketing Observational Study (PMOS) to Assess Quality of Life in Swedish Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) Patients

Post Marketing Observational Study to Assess Quality of Life Changes in Swedish Patients With Moderate or Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) After 6 Months on Adalimumab Treatment (HOPE Study)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02739828
Acronym
HOPE
Enrollment
24
Registered
2016-04-15
Start date
2016-04-07
Completion date
2018-03-28
Last updated
2019-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Keywords

Quality of life

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to assess quality of life (QoL), skin pain, work productivity/activity and health related problems in Swedish patients with moderate to severe HS before and after 6 months treatment with Adalimumab. Participants will be treated in accordance with normal routine clinical care.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALAdalimumab

Adalimumab

Sponsors

AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of Hidradenitis Suppurativa * Prescribed Adalimumab according to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) * Willingness to sign and date a Patient Information/Informed Consent Form

Exclusion criteria

* Prior biologic treatment discontinued \<6 months before the baseline visit * Patient not able to understand the language of the provided patient questionnaires * History of non-compliance with medication or a medical history that could enhance non-compliance with medication, as determined by the investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in DLQI at Week 12Baseline, Week 12DLQI assesses symptoms and impacts of dermatologic diseases on quality of life. DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a more impaired quality of life.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in DLQI at Week 24Baseline, Week 24DLQI assesses symptoms and impacts of dermatologic diseases on quality of life. DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a more impaired quality of life.
Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 4Baseline, Week 4The Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain NRS was used to assess the worst and average skin pain due to HS. NRS consists of 2 VAS response questions. Skin pain was rated from 0 (no skin pain) to 10 (skin pain as bad as you can imagine) for each.
Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain NRS was used to assess the worst and average skin pain due to HS. NRS consists of 2 VAS response questions. Skin pain was rated from 0 (no skin pain) to 10 (skin pain as bad as you can imagine) for each.
Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 24Baseline, Week 24The Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain NRS was used to assess the worst and average skin pain due to HS. NRS consists of 2 VAS response questions. Skin pain was rated from 0 (no skin pain) to 10 (skin pain as bad as you can imagine) for each.
EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4Baseline, Week 4The EQ-5D is a participant assessment of 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Participants report the extent of their problems with each of the 5 dimensions of health as some problems/no problems, some problems/no problems/unable to do, or none/moderate/extreme.
EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The EQ-5D is a participant assessment of 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Participants report the extent of their problems with each of the 5 dimensions of health as some problems/no problems, some problems/no problems/unable to do, or none/moderate/extreme.
EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24Baseline, Week 24The EQ-5D is a participant assessment of 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Participants report the extent of their problems with each of the 5 dimensions of health as some problems/no problems, some problems/no problems/unable to do, or none/moderate/extreme.
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 4Baseline, Week 4The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0-100 where increased scores correspond to better HRQL. 0 is the 'worst imaginable health state' and 100 is the 'best imaginable health state'. Change in EQ-5D VAS score was calculated by deducting the final score from the baseline score. Increased scores correspond to better health state.
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0-100 where increased scores correspond to better HRQL. 0 is the 'worst imaginable health state' and 100 is the 'best imaginable health state'. Change in EQ-5D VAS score was calculated by deducting the final score from the baseline score. Increased scores correspond to better health state.
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 24Baseline, Week 24The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0-100 where increased scores correspond to better HRQL. 0 is the 'worst imaginable health state' and 100 is the 'best imaginable health state'. Change in EQ-5D VAS score was calculated by deducting the final score from the baseline score. Increased scores correspond to better health state.
Change From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 4Baseline, Week 4The HSIA is a disease specific questionnaire measuring the impact the participant experiences associated with HS. HSIA consist of 18 sub-items, 16 of which range from 0 (no impact) to 10 (most negative impact), and 2 items register time at work/school and time away from work/school because of HS. Overall scores are presented as the percent of maximum HS impact (high values indicate a negative HS impact).
Change From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The HSIA is a disease specific questionnaire measuring the impact the participant experiences associated with HS. HSIA consist of 18 sub-items, 16 of which range from 0 (no impact) to 10 (most negative impact), and 2 items register time at work/school and time away from work/school because of HS. Overall scores are presented as the percent of maximum HS impact (high values indicate a negative HS impact).
Change From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 24Baseline, Week 24The HSIA is a disease specific questionnaire measuring the impact the participant experiences associated with HS. HSIA consist of 18 sub-items, 16 of which range from 0 (no impact) to 10 (most negative impact), and 2 items register time at work/school and time away from work/school because of HS. Overall scores are presented as the percent of maximum HS impact (high values indicate a negative HS impact).
WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 4Baseline, Week 4The 'work time missed due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'work time missed due to health problem' was calculated based on 2 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit and (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4) and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Change From Baseline in DLQI at Week 4Baseline, Week 4DLQI assesses symptoms and impacts of dermatologic diseases on quality of life. DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a more impaired quality of life.
WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 24Baseline, Week 24The 'work time missed due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'work time missed due to health problem' was calculated based on 2 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit and (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4) and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 4Baseline, Week 4The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q5/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Mean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q5/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Mean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 24Baseline, Week 24The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q5/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4Baseline, Week 4The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24Baseline, Week 24The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4Baseline, Week 4The 'overall activity impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall activity impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q6) to what degree did the disease impair the ability to do regular activities in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q6/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24Baseline, Week 24The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4: Participants Not Employed at BaselineBaseline, Week 4The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12: Participants Not Employed at BaselineBaseline, Week 12The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24: Participants Not Employed at BaselineBaseline, Week 24The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) Over TimeWeek 4, 12 and 24HiSCR is a clinical endpoint focusing on assessment of HS inflammatory signs and symptoms to determine the clinical effectiveness of adalimumab. HiSCR requires: * At least a 50% reduction in the total abscess and inflammatory nodule count (AN count) relative to baseline, and * No increase in abscess count, and * No increase in draining fistula count. In first bullet AN count is defined as sum of abscess count and inflammatory nodules count.
WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The 'work time missed due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'work time missed due to health problem' was calculated based on 2 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit and (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4) and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Countries

Sweden

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Participants with moderate or severe HS treated prescribed adalimumab according to the Swedish Summary of Product Characteristics and treated as per routine clinical practice.
24
Total24

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicParticipants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Age, Continuous39.5 years
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)17.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score56.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.98
EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses
Anxiety/Depression: Extreme
3 Participants
EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses
Anxiety/Depression: Moderate
14 Participants
EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses
Anxiety/Depression: None
7 Participants
EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses
Mobility: No Problems
11 Participants
EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses
Mobility: Some Problems
13 Participants
EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses
Pain/Discomfort: Extreme
7 Participants
EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses
Pain/Discomfort: Moderate
17 Participants
EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses
Pain/Discomfort: None
0 Participants
EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses
Self-Care: No Problems
24 Participants
EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses
Self-Care: Some Problems
0 Participants
EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses
Usual Activities: No Problems
10 Participants
EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses
Usual Activities: Some Problems
13 Participants
EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses
Usual Activities: Unable to Do
1 Participants
Hidradenitis Suppurativa Impact Assessment (HSIA) Overall Score53.9 percent of maximum HS impact
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.1
Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Skin Pain at its Worst
6.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.95
Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Skin Pain on Average
4.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.83
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
23 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed Race
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants
WPAI-SHP: Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem35 percent of impairment while working
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.28
WPAI:SHP: Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem40.6 percent of impairment of activity
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.3
WPAI:SHP: Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem: Participants Not Employed at Baseline51.4 percent of impairment of activity
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.45
WPAI-SHP: Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem36.4 percent of overall work impairment
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.59
WPAI-SHP: Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem8.5 percent of work time missed
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.92

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in DLQI at Week 12

DLQI assesses symptoms and impacts of dermatologic diseases on quality of life. DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a more impaired quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaChange From Baseline in DLQI at Week 12-7.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.79
Comparison: Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.0001paired t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in DLQI at Week 24

DLQI assesses symptoms and impacts of dermatologic diseases on quality of life. DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a more impaired quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaChange From Baseline in DLQI at Week 24-9.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.05
Comparison: Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.0004paired t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in DLQI at Week 4

DLQI assesses symptoms and impacts of dermatologic diseases on quality of life. DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a more impaired quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 4.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaChange From Baseline in DLQI at Week 4-9.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.94
Comparison: Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: <0.0001paired t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 12

The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0-100 where increased scores correspond to better HRQL. 0 is the 'worst imaginable health state' and 100 is the 'best imaginable health state'. Change in EQ-5D VAS score was calculated by deducting the final score from the baseline score. Increased scores correspond to better health state.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaChange From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 1211.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.08
Comparison: Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.0215paired t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 24

The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0-100 where increased scores correspond to better HRQL. 0 is the 'worst imaginable health state' and 100 is the 'best imaginable health state'. Change in EQ-5D VAS score was calculated by deducting the final score from the baseline score. Increased scores correspond to better health state.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaChange From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 248.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.52
Comparison: Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.1652paired t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 4

The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0-100 where increased scores correspond to better HRQL. 0 is the 'worst imaginable health state' and 100 is the 'best imaginable health state'. Change in EQ-5D VAS score was calculated by deducting the final score from the baseline score. Increased scores correspond to better health state.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 4.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaChange From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 49.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.11
Comparison: Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.0278paired t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 12

The HSIA is a disease specific questionnaire measuring the impact the participant experiences associated with HS. HSIA consist of 18 sub-items, 16 of which range from 0 (no impact) to 10 (most negative impact), and 2 items register time at work/school and time away from work/school because of HS. Overall scores are presented as the percent of maximum HS impact (high values indicate a negative HS impact).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaChange From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 12-27.1 percent of maximum HS impactStandard Deviation 20.96
Secondary

Change From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 24

The HSIA is a disease specific questionnaire measuring the impact the participant experiences associated with HS. HSIA consist of 18 sub-items, 16 of which range from 0 (no impact) to 10 (most negative impact), and 2 items register time at work/school and time away from work/school because of HS. Overall scores are presented as the percent of maximum HS impact (high values indicate a negative HS impact).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaChange From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 24-26 percent of maximum HS impactStandard Deviation 24.59
Secondary

Change From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 4

The HSIA is a disease specific questionnaire measuring the impact the participant experiences associated with HS. HSIA consist of 18 sub-items, 16 of which range from 0 (no impact) to 10 (most negative impact), and 2 items register time at work/school and time away from work/school because of HS. Overall scores are presented as the percent of maximum HS impact (high values indicate a negative HS impact).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 4.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaChange From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 4-26.7 percent of maximum HS impactStandard Deviation 23.33
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 12

The Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain NRS was used to assess the worst and average skin pain due to HS. NRS consists of 2 VAS response questions. Skin pain was rated from 0 (no skin pain) to 10 (skin pain as bad as you can imagine) for each.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 12.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaChange From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 12Skin Pain at its Worst-2.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.82
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaChange From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 12Skin Pain on Average-2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.46
Comparison: Skin pain at its worst. Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.0004paired t-test
Comparison: Skin pain on average. Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.0016paired t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 24

The Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain NRS was used to assess the worst and average skin pain due to HS. NRS consists of 2 VAS response questions. Skin pain was rated from 0 (no skin pain) to 10 (skin pain as bad as you can imagine) for each.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaChange From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 24Skin Pain at its Worst-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.66
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaChange From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 24Skin Pain on Average-1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.09
Comparison: Skin pain at its worst. Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.0003paired t-test
Comparison: Skin pain on average. Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.0094paired t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 4

The Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain NRS was used to assess the worst and average skin pain due to HS. NRS consists of 2 VAS response questions. Skin pain was rated from 0 (no skin pain) to 10 (skin pain as bad as you can imagine) for each.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 4.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaChange From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 4Skin Pain at its Worst-3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.22
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaChange From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 4Skin Pain on Average-2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.45
Comparison: Skin pain at its worst. Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.0005paired t-test
Comparison: Skin pain on average. Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.0006paired t-test
Secondary

EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12

The EQ-5D is a participant assessment of 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Participants report the extent of their problems with each of the 5 dimensions of health as some problems/no problems, some problems/no problems/unable to do, or none/moderate/extreme.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 12.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12Mobility: No Problems16 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12Mobility: Some Problems2 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12Self-Care: No Problems17 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12Self-Care: Some Problems1 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12Usual Activities: No Problems16 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12Usual Activities: Some Problems2 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12Usual Activities: Unable to Perform0 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12Pain/Discomfort: None4 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12Pain/Discomfort: Moderate13 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12Pain/Discomfort: Extreme1 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12Anxiety/Depression: None11 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12Anxiety/Depression: Moderate7 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12Anxiety/Depression: Severe0 Participants
Secondary

EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24

The EQ-5D is a participant assessment of 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Participants report the extent of their problems with each of the 5 dimensions of health as some problems/no problems, some problems/no problems/unable to do, or none/moderate/extreme.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24Mobility: No Problems14 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24Mobility: Some Problems4 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24Self-Care: No Problems17 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24Self-Care: Some Problems1 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24Usual Activities: No Problems15 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24Usual Activities: Some Problems2 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24Usual Activities: Unable to Perform1 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24Pain/Discomfort: None7 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24Pain/Discomfort: Moderate10 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24Pain/Discomfort: Extreme1 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24Anxiety/Depression: None11 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24Anxiety/Depression: Moderate6 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24Anxiety/Depression: Severe1 Participants
Secondary

EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4

The EQ-5D is a participant assessment of 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Participants report the extent of their problems with each of the 5 dimensions of health as some problems/no problems, some problems/no problems/unable to do, or none/moderate/extreme.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 4.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4Anxiety/Depression: None9 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4Anxiety/Depression: Moderate10 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4Mobility: No Problems17 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4Mobility: Some Problems2 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4Self-Care: No Problems18 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4Self-Care: Some Problems1 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4Usual Activities: No Problems16 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4Usual Activities: Some Problems3 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4Usual Activities: Unable to Perform0 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4Pain/Discomfort: None7 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4Pain/Discomfort: Moderate11 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4Pain/Discomfort: Extreme1 Participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaEQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4Anxiety/Depression: Severe0 Participants
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 12

The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q5/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline with an assessment at Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaMean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 12-15 percent of impairment while workingStandard Deviation 24.61
Comparison: Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.4531Sign test
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 24

The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q5/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline with an assessment at Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaMean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 24-14 percent of impairment while workingStandard Deviation 16.47
Comparison: Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.0313Sign test
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12

The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline with an assessment at Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaMean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12-16.2 percent of impairment of activityStandard Deviation 29.59
Comparison: Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.3438Sign test
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12: Participants Not Employed at Baseline

The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants not employed at Baseline with an assessment at Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaMean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12: Participants Not Employed at Baseline-36 percent of impairment of activityStandard Deviation 8.94
Comparison: Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.0625Sign test
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24

The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline assessed at Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaMean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24-15 percent of impairment of activityStandard Deviation 42.75
Comparison: Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.125Sign test
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24: Participants Not Employed at Baseline

The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants not employed at Baseline with an assessment at Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaMean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24: Participants Not Employed at Baseline-31.7 percent of impairment of activityStandard Deviation 25.63
Comparison: Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.125Sign test
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4

The 'overall activity impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall activity impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q6) to what degree did the disease impair the ability to do regular activities in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q6/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline at Week 4.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaMean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4-25 percent of impairment of activityStandard Deviation 31.32
Comparison: Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.0386Sign test
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4: Participants Not Employed at Baseline

The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants not employed at Baseline with an assessment at Week 4.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaMean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4: Participants Not Employed at Baseline-28 percent of impairment of activityStandard Deviation 17.89
Comparison: Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.0625Sign test
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12

The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline with an assessment at Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaMean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12-15 percent of overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 24.61
Comparison: Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.4531Sign test
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24

The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline with an assessment at Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaMean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24-16.2 percent of overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 15.85
Comparison: Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.0156Sign test
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4

The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline with an assessment at Week 4.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaMean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4-17.4 percent of overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 28.07
Comparison: Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.3438Sign test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) Over Time

HiSCR is a clinical endpoint focusing on assessment of HS inflammatory signs and symptoms to determine the clinical effectiveness of adalimumab. HiSCR requires: * At least a 50% reduction in the total abscess and inflammatory nodule count (AN count) relative to baseline, and * No increase in abscess count, and * No increase in draining fistula count. In first bullet AN count is defined as sum of abscess count and inflammatory nodules count.

Time frame: Week 4, 12 and 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Observed cases with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaPercentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) Over TimeWeek 473.7 percentage of participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaPercentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) Over TimeWeek 1255.6 percentage of participants
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaPercentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) Over TimeWeek 2461.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 4

The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q5/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline with an assessment at Week 4.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaWPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 4-17.5 percent of impairment while workingStandard Deviation 28
Comparison: Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.1797Sign test
Secondary

WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 12

The 'work time missed due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'work time missed due to health problem' was calculated based on 2 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit and (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4) and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline and an assessment at Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaWPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 122 percent of work time missedStandard Deviation 6.32
Comparison: Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 1Sign test
Secondary

WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 24

The 'work time missed due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'work time missed due to health problem' was calculated based on 2 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit and (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4) and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline and an assessment at Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaWPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 24-13.1 percent of work time missedStandard Deviation 31.75
Comparison: Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 0.5Sign test
Secondary

WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 4

The 'work time missed due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'work time missed due to health problem' was calculated based on 2 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit and (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4) and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline with a Week 4 assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Hidradenitis SuppurativaWPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 4-6.7 percent of work time missedStandard Deviation 28.24
Comparison: Analysis is under the assumption of completely missing at random (deleted incomplete observations).p-value: 1Sign test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026