Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Conditions
Keywords
Quality of life
Brief summary
The objective of this study is to assess quality of life (QoL), skin pain, work productivity/activity and health related problems in Swedish patients with moderate to severe HS before and after 6 months treatment with Adalimumab. Participants will be treated in accordance with normal routine clinical care.
Interventions
Adalimumab
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of Hidradenitis Suppurativa * Prescribed Adalimumab according to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) * Willingness to sign and date a Patient Information/Informed Consent Form
Exclusion criteria
* Prior biologic treatment discontinued \<6 months before the baseline visit * Patient not able to understand the language of the provided patient questionnaires * History of non-compliance with medication or a medical history that could enhance non-compliance with medication, as determined by the investigator
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in DLQI at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | DLQI assesses symptoms and impacts of dermatologic diseases on quality of life. DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a more impaired quality of life. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in DLQI at Week 24 | Baseline, Week 24 | DLQI assesses symptoms and impacts of dermatologic diseases on quality of life. DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a more impaired quality of life. |
| Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 4 | Baseline, Week 4 | The Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain NRS was used to assess the worst and average skin pain due to HS. NRS consists of 2 VAS response questions. Skin pain was rated from 0 (no skin pain) to 10 (skin pain as bad as you can imagine) for each. |
| Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | The Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain NRS was used to assess the worst and average skin pain due to HS. NRS consists of 2 VAS response questions. Skin pain was rated from 0 (no skin pain) to 10 (skin pain as bad as you can imagine) for each. |
| Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 24 | Baseline, Week 24 | The Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain NRS was used to assess the worst and average skin pain due to HS. NRS consists of 2 VAS response questions. Skin pain was rated from 0 (no skin pain) to 10 (skin pain as bad as you can imagine) for each. |
| EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4 | Baseline, Week 4 | The EQ-5D is a participant assessment of 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Participants report the extent of their problems with each of the 5 dimensions of health as some problems/no problems, some problems/no problems/unable to do, or none/moderate/extreme. |
| EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | The EQ-5D is a participant assessment of 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Participants report the extent of their problems with each of the 5 dimensions of health as some problems/no problems, some problems/no problems/unable to do, or none/moderate/extreme. |
| EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24 | Baseline, Week 24 | The EQ-5D is a participant assessment of 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Participants report the extent of their problems with each of the 5 dimensions of health as some problems/no problems, some problems/no problems/unable to do, or none/moderate/extreme. |
| Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 4 | Baseline, Week 4 | The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0-100 where increased scores correspond to better HRQL. 0 is the 'worst imaginable health state' and 100 is the 'best imaginable health state'. Change in EQ-5D VAS score was calculated by deducting the final score from the baseline score. Increased scores correspond to better health state. |
| Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0-100 where increased scores correspond to better HRQL. 0 is the 'worst imaginable health state' and 100 is the 'best imaginable health state'. Change in EQ-5D VAS score was calculated by deducting the final score from the baseline score. Increased scores correspond to better health state. |
| Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 24 | Baseline, Week 24 | The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0-100 where increased scores correspond to better HRQL. 0 is the 'worst imaginable health state' and 100 is the 'best imaginable health state'. Change in EQ-5D VAS score was calculated by deducting the final score from the baseline score. Increased scores correspond to better health state. |
| Change From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 4 | Baseline, Week 4 | The HSIA is a disease specific questionnaire measuring the impact the participant experiences associated with HS. HSIA consist of 18 sub-items, 16 of which range from 0 (no impact) to 10 (most negative impact), and 2 items register time at work/school and time away from work/school because of HS. Overall scores are presented as the percent of maximum HS impact (high values indicate a negative HS impact). |
| Change From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | The HSIA is a disease specific questionnaire measuring the impact the participant experiences associated with HS. HSIA consist of 18 sub-items, 16 of which range from 0 (no impact) to 10 (most negative impact), and 2 items register time at work/school and time away from work/school because of HS. Overall scores are presented as the percent of maximum HS impact (high values indicate a negative HS impact). |
| Change From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 24 | Baseline, Week 24 | The HSIA is a disease specific questionnaire measuring the impact the participant experiences associated with HS. HSIA consist of 18 sub-items, 16 of which range from 0 (no impact) to 10 (most negative impact), and 2 items register time at work/school and time away from work/school because of HS. Overall scores are presented as the percent of maximum HS impact (high values indicate a negative HS impact). |
| WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 4 | Baseline, Week 4 | The 'work time missed due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'work time missed due to health problem' was calculated based on 2 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit and (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4) and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity. |
| Change From Baseline in DLQI at Week 4 | Baseline, Week 4 | DLQI assesses symptoms and impacts of dermatologic diseases on quality of life. DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a more impaired quality of life. |
| WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 24 | Baseline, Week 24 | The 'work time missed due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'work time missed due to health problem' was calculated based on 2 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit and (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4) and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity. |
| WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 4 | Baseline, Week 4 | The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q5/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q5/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 24 | Baseline, Week 24 | The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q5/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4 | Baseline, Week 4 | The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24 | Baseline, Week 24 | The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4 | Baseline, Week 4 | The 'overall activity impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall activity impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q6) to what degree did the disease impair the ability to do regular activities in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q6/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24 | Baseline, Week 24 | The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4: Participants Not Employed at Baseline | Baseline, Week 4 | The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12: Participants Not Employed at Baseline | Baseline, Week 12 | The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24: Participants Not Employed at Baseline | Baseline, Week 24 | The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity. |
| Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) Over Time | Week 4, 12 and 24 | HiSCR is a clinical endpoint focusing on assessment of HS inflammatory signs and symptoms to determine the clinical effectiveness of adalimumab. HiSCR requires: * At least a 50% reduction in the total abscess and inflammatory nodule count (AN count) relative to baseline, and * No increase in abscess count, and * No increase in draining fistula count. In first bullet AN count is defined as sum of abscess count and inflammatory nodules count. |
| WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | The 'work time missed due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'work time missed due to health problem' was calculated based on 2 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit and (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4) and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity. |
Countries
Sweden
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa Participants with moderate or severe HS treated prescribed adalimumab according to the Swedish Summary of Product Characteristics and treated as per routine clinical practice. | 24 |
| Total | 24 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 39.5 years |
| Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) | 17.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2 |
| EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score | 56.6 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.98 |
| EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses Anxiety/Depression: Extreme | 3 Participants |
| EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses Anxiety/Depression: Moderate | 14 Participants |
| EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses Anxiety/Depression: None | 7 Participants |
| EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses Mobility: No Problems | 11 Participants |
| EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses Mobility: Some Problems | 13 Participants |
| EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses Pain/Discomfort: Extreme | 7 Participants |
| EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses Pain/Discomfort: Moderate | 17 Participants |
| EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses Pain/Discomfort: None | 0 Participants |
| EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses Self-Care: No Problems | 24 Participants |
| EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses Self-Care: Some Problems | 0 Participants |
| EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses Usual Activities: No Problems | 10 Participants |
| EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses Usual Activities: Some Problems | 13 Participants |
| EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Responses Usual Activities: Unable to Do | 1 Participants |
| Hidradenitis Suppurativa Impact Assessment (HSIA) Overall Score | 53.9 percent of maximum HS impact STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.1 |
| Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Skin Pain at its Worst | 6.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.95 |
| Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Skin Pain on Average | 4.5 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.83 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Caucasian | 23 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Mixed Race | 1 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 17 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 7 Participants |
| WPAI-SHP: Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem | 35 percent of impairment while working STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.28 |
| WPAI:SHP: Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem | 40.6 percent of impairment of activity STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.3 |
| WPAI:SHP: Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem: Participants Not Employed at Baseline | 51.4 percent of impairment of activity STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.45 |
| WPAI-SHP: Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem | 36.4 percent of overall work impairment STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.59 |
| WPAI-SHP: Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem | 8.5 percent of work time missed STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.92 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 24 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 24 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 24 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in DLQI at Week 12
DLQI assesses symptoms and impacts of dermatologic diseases on quality of life. DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a more impaired quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Change From Baseline in DLQI at Week 12 | -7.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.79 |
Change From Baseline in DLQI at Week 24
DLQI assesses symptoms and impacts of dermatologic diseases on quality of life. DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a more impaired quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 24.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Change From Baseline in DLQI at Week 24 | -9.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.05 |
Change From Baseline in DLQI at Week 4
DLQI assesses symptoms and impacts of dermatologic diseases on quality of life. DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a more impaired quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 4.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Change From Baseline in DLQI at Week 4 | -9.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.94 |
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 12
The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0-100 where increased scores correspond to better HRQL. 0 is the 'worst imaginable health state' and 100 is the 'best imaginable health state'. Change in EQ-5D VAS score was calculated by deducting the final score from the baseline score. Increased scores correspond to better health state.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 12 | 11.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.08 |
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 24
The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0-100 where increased scores correspond to better HRQL. 0 is the 'worst imaginable health state' and 100 is the 'best imaginable health state'. Change in EQ-5D VAS score was calculated by deducting the final score from the baseline score. Increased scores correspond to better health state.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 24.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 24 | 8.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.52 |
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 4
The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0-100 where increased scores correspond to better HRQL. 0 is the 'worst imaginable health state' and 100 is the 'best imaginable health state'. Change in EQ-5D VAS score was calculated by deducting the final score from the baseline score. Increased scores correspond to better health state.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 4.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 4 | 9.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.11 |
Change From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 12
The HSIA is a disease specific questionnaire measuring the impact the participant experiences associated with HS. HSIA consist of 18 sub-items, 16 of which range from 0 (no impact) to 10 (most negative impact), and 2 items register time at work/school and time away from work/school because of HS. Overall scores are presented as the percent of maximum HS impact (high values indicate a negative HS impact).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Change From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 12 | -27.1 percent of maximum HS impact | Standard Deviation 20.96 |
Change From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 24
The HSIA is a disease specific questionnaire measuring the impact the participant experiences associated with HS. HSIA consist of 18 sub-items, 16 of which range from 0 (no impact) to 10 (most negative impact), and 2 items register time at work/school and time away from work/school because of HS. Overall scores are presented as the percent of maximum HS impact (high values indicate a negative HS impact).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 24.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Change From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 24 | -26 percent of maximum HS impact | Standard Deviation 24.59 |
Change From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 4
The HSIA is a disease specific questionnaire measuring the impact the participant experiences associated with HS. HSIA consist of 18 sub-items, 16 of which range from 0 (no impact) to 10 (most negative impact), and 2 items register time at work/school and time away from work/school because of HS. Overall scores are presented as the percent of maximum HS impact (high values indicate a negative HS impact).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 4.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Change From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 4 | -26.7 percent of maximum HS impact | Standard Deviation 23.33 |
Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 12
The Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain NRS was used to assess the worst and average skin pain due to HS. NRS consists of 2 VAS response questions. Skin pain was rated from 0 (no skin pain) to 10 (skin pain as bad as you can imagine) for each.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 12 | Skin Pain at its Worst | -2.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.82 |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 12 | Skin Pain on Average | -2.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.46 |
Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 24
The Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain NRS was used to assess the worst and average skin pain due to HS. NRS consists of 2 VAS response questions. Skin pain was rated from 0 (no skin pain) to 10 (skin pain as bad as you can imagine) for each.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 24.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 24 | Skin Pain at its Worst | -2.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.66 |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 24 | Skin Pain on Average | -1.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.09 |
Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 4
The Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain NRS was used to assess the worst and average skin pain due to HS. NRS consists of 2 VAS response questions. Skin pain was rated from 0 (no skin pain) to 10 (skin pain as bad as you can imagine) for each.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 4.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 4 | Skin Pain at its Worst | -3.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.22 |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 4 | Skin Pain on Average | -2.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.45 |
EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12
The EQ-5D is a participant assessment of 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Participants report the extent of their problems with each of the 5 dimensions of health as some problems/no problems, some problems/no problems/unable to do, or none/moderate/extreme.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12 | Mobility: No Problems | 16 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12 | Mobility: Some Problems | 2 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12 | Self-Care: No Problems | 17 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12 | Self-Care: Some Problems | 1 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12 | Usual Activities: No Problems | 16 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12 | Usual Activities: Some Problems | 2 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12 | Usual Activities: Unable to Perform | 0 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12 | Pain/Discomfort: None | 4 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12 | Pain/Discomfort: Moderate | 13 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12 | Pain/Discomfort: Extreme | 1 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12 | Anxiety/Depression: None | 11 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12 | Anxiety/Depression: Moderate | 7 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12 | Anxiety/Depression: Severe | 0 Participants |
EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24
The EQ-5D is a participant assessment of 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Participants report the extent of their problems with each of the 5 dimensions of health as some problems/no problems, some problems/no problems/unable to do, or none/moderate/extreme.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 24.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24 | Mobility: No Problems | 14 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24 | Mobility: Some Problems | 4 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24 | Self-Care: No Problems | 17 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24 | Self-Care: Some Problems | 1 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24 | Usual Activities: No Problems | 15 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24 | Usual Activities: Some Problems | 2 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24 | Usual Activities: Unable to Perform | 1 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24 | Pain/Discomfort: None | 7 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24 | Pain/Discomfort: Moderate | 10 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24 | Pain/Discomfort: Extreme | 1 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24 | Anxiety/Depression: None | 11 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24 | Anxiety/Depression: Moderate | 6 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24 | Anxiety/Depression: Severe | 1 Participants |
EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4
The EQ-5D is a participant assessment of 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Participants report the extent of their problems with each of the 5 dimensions of health as some problems/no problems, some problems/no problems/unable to do, or none/moderate/extreme.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants with an assessment at Week 4.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4 | Anxiety/Depression: None | 9 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4 | Anxiety/Depression: Moderate | 10 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4 | Mobility: No Problems | 17 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4 | Mobility: Some Problems | 2 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4 | Self-Care: No Problems | 18 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4 | Self-Care: Some Problems | 1 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4 | Usual Activities: No Problems | 16 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4 | Usual Activities: Some Problems | 3 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4 | Usual Activities: Unable to Perform | 0 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4 | Pain/Discomfort: None | 7 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4 | Pain/Discomfort: Moderate | 11 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4 | Pain/Discomfort: Extreme | 1 Participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4 | Anxiety/Depression: Severe | 0 Participants |
Mean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 12
The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q5/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline with an assessment at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Mean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 12 | -15 percent of impairment while working | Standard Deviation 24.61 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 24
The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q5/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline with an assessment at Week 24.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Mean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 24 | -14 percent of impairment while working | Standard Deviation 16.47 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline with an assessment at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12 | -16.2 percent of impairment of activity | Standard Deviation 29.59 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12: Participants Not Employed at Baseline
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants not employed at Baseline with an assessment at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12: Participants Not Employed at Baseline | -36 percent of impairment of activity | Standard Deviation 8.94 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline assessed at Week 24.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24 | -15 percent of impairment of activity | Standard Deviation 42.75 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24: Participants Not Employed at Baseline
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants not employed at Baseline with an assessment at Week 24.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24: Participants Not Employed at Baseline | -31.7 percent of impairment of activity | Standard Deviation 25.63 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4
The 'overall activity impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall activity impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q6) to what degree did the disease impair the ability to do regular activities in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q6/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline at Week 4.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4 | -25 percent of impairment of activity | Standard Deviation 31.32 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4: Participants Not Employed at Baseline
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants not employed at Baseline with an assessment at Week 4.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4: Participants Not Employed at Baseline | -28 percent of impairment of activity | Standard Deviation 17.89 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline with an assessment at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12 | -15 percent of overall work impairment | Standard Deviation 24.61 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline with an assessment at Week 24.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24 | -16.2 percent of overall work impairment | Standard Deviation 15.85 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)\] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline with an assessment at Week 4.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4 | -17.4 percent of overall work impairment | Standard Deviation 28.07 |
Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) Over Time
HiSCR is a clinical endpoint focusing on assessment of HS inflammatory signs and symptoms to determine the clinical effectiveness of adalimumab. HiSCR requires: * At least a 50% reduction in the total abscess and inflammatory nodule count (AN count) relative to baseline, and * No increase in abscess count, and * No increase in draining fistula count. In first bullet AN count is defined as sum of abscess count and inflammatory nodules count.
Time frame: Week 4, 12 and 24
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Observed cases with an assessment at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) Over Time | Week 4 | 73.7 percentage of participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) Over Time | Week 12 | 55.6 percentage of participants |
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) Over Time | Week 24 | 61.1 percentage of participants |
WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 4
The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q5/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline with an assessment at Week 4.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 4 | -17.5 percent of impairment while working | Standard Deviation 28 |
WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 12
The 'work time missed due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'work time missed due to health problem' was calculated based on 2 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit and (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4) and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline and an assessment at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 12 | 2 percent of work time missed | Standard Deviation 6.32 |
WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 24
The 'work time missed due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'work time missed due to health problem' was calculated based on 2 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit and (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4) and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline and an assessment at Week 24.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 24 | -13.1 percent of work time missed | Standard Deviation 31.75 |
WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 4
The 'work time missed due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'work time missed due to health problem' was calculated based on 2 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit and (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4) and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Population: Full Analysis Set (modified Intention-to-treat): All enrolled participants, with the exception of those who were enrolled and not treated with any dose of adalimumab, or who had no baseline or post baseline data collected for the primary analysis variable DLQI. Participants employed at Baseline with a Week 4 assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa | WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 4 | -6.7 percent of work time missed | Standard Deviation 28.24 |