Skip to content

Efficacy of Low Dose, SubQ Interleukin-2 (IL-2) to Expand Endogenous Regulatory T-Cells in Liver Transplant Recipients

Efficacy of Low Dose, Subcutaneous Interleukin-2 (IL-2) to Expand Endogenous Regulatory T-Cells in Liver Transplant Recipients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02739412
Enrollment
6
Registered
2016-04-15
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2022-07-31
Last updated
2026-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Transplantation

Brief summary

The purpose of this investigation is to study if very low dose IL-2, given to liver transplant patients by subcutaneous (under the skin) injections, over a 4 week period of time, will cause an increase in the number of Treg cells in the blood.

Detailed description

A common complication of organ transplantation is 'rejection' of the transplanted organ. This occurs when the body's immune system tries to attack (or reject) the transplanted organ. Drugs known as immunosuppressants (anti-rejection medications) are prescribed for patients after transplantation to prevent rejection. But, anti-rejection medications are associated with significant side effects including high blood pressure, high blood sugars, and high cholesterol - all of which may increase the risk of heart and vascular complications. Anti-rejection medications also increase the long-term risk of some types of cancer. Sometimes, liver transplant patients who stop taking anti-rejection medications do not experience rejection of their transplanted liver and the liver keeps working. These patients are said to tolerate the transplanted liver, and this condition is referred to as tolerance. Doctors are working to learn more about why some liver transplant patients develop tolerance after receiving a transplant, while others do not. Studies have shown that patients who develop tolerance have an increase in a type of immune cell called regulatory T-cells or Tregs. This means Tregs may be important in preventing rejection of a transplanted organ. Studies have also shown that a human cytokine (a type of protein), called interleukin-2 (IL-2) aids in increasing the number of Treg cells in the body, and IL-2 has been given to patients to successfully treat disorders of the immune system such as graft vs host disease - a serious condition sometimes seen in patients after bone marrow transplantation. The purpose of this investigation is to study if low dose IL-2, given to liver transplant patients by subcutaneous (under the skin) injections, over a 4 week period of time, will cause an increase in the number of Treg cells in the blood. In addition, investigators will learn about the kinds of side effects low dose IL-2 will cause and how severe those side effects will be.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALInterleukin-2

Subjects will self-administer low dose IL-2 as subQ injection (0.30 MIU per meter squared body surface area) for 4 weeks.

Sponsors

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult liver transplant recipients 2-4 years post transplantation 2. Male or female adult, age 18 - 65 years 3. Stable dosage of suppressant therapy for 1 month prior to study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Recipient of multiple transplants (including solid organ, stem-cell, and bone marrow) 2. Serum liver panel (ALT, AST, Alkaline Phosphatase and Total Bilirubin) \> 2 x ULN, 3. Serum creatinine \> 1.5 x ULN, 4. eGFR of \< 40 ml/min, 5. Detectable hepatitis viral load, 6. Abnormal ECG with clinically significant findings per study physician's judgement, 7. Active infection, 8. Presence or history of autoimmunity disorders, 9. Evidence of allograft rejection, 10. Liver biopsy or fibroscan evidence of advanced stage liver fibrosis (\> Stage 2 Fibrosis), 11. Presence or history of cardiac or pulmonary disease, 12. Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women, 13. Health condition precludes participation in trial at study physician's judgment, 14. Inability to give consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Regulatory T-Cell Countbaseline, week 2, week 4, week8, week12Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Flow Cytometry
% Increase in CD4 Tregsbaseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks% CD4 T Regs were measured at several time points after IL-2 administration.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Differential Immune Cell Countbaseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 WeeksPeripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Flow Cytometry

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Kidney Function Serum Panel (> 1.5 x Upper Limit Normal)2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 36 weeksNumber of participants with a serum creatinine \> 1.5 x upper limit of normal through week 36
Liver Function Serum Panel (> 2 x Upper Limit Normal)week 2, 4 week, week 8, week12, week36Number of patients with a serum amino alaninetransferase \> 2 x upper limit of normal through week 36

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Open Label. Active Study Treatment Arm
IL-2 (Interleukin-2; Aldesleukin; Proleukin) administered daily as a single subcutaneous injection 0.30 MIU per meter squared body surface area for a duration of 4 weeks.
6
Total6

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOpen Label. Active Study Treatment Arm
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
6 Participants
Age, Continuous54 years
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT)19 units of ALT/L
CD19 B cells (%PBMC)4.84 %PBMC
CD3T cells (%PBMC)53.74 %PBMC
CD4 conventional T cells (% of CD4 cells)97.34 %PBMC
CD4 T cells (% PBMC)25.29 %PBMC
CD4 Treg cells (% CD4 T cells)2.13 %PBMC
CD4Treg (% of PBMC)0.44 %PBMC
CD56 NK (%PBMC)6.37 %PBMC
CD8 T cells (%PBMC)28.05 %PBMC
Hematocrit39 %
Monocyte/Dendritic cells (% PBMC)12.82 %PBMC
NKT (%PBMC)13.56 %PBMC
Platelet count162,000 platelets /uL
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants
Time from transplant2.85 years
White Blood Cell count (WBC)5.85 cells *10^9/L

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

% Increase in CD4 Tregs

% CD4 T Regs were measured at several time points after IL-2 administration.

Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Open Label. Active Study Treatment Arm% Increase in CD4 TregsBaseline CD4Treg (%CD4Tcells)2.13 percentage of CD4 T cells
Open Label. Active Study Treatment Arm% Increase in CD4 TregsWk2 CD4Treg (%CD4Tcells)13.15 percentage of CD4 T cells
Open Label. Active Study Treatment Arm% Increase in CD4 TregsWk4 CD4Treg (%CD4Tcells)11.93 percentage of CD4 T cells
Open Label. Active Study Treatment Arm% Increase in CD4 TregsWk8 CD4Treg(%CD4Tcells)2.79 percentage of CD4 T cells
Open Label. Active Study Treatment Arm% Increase in CD4 TregsWk12 CD4Treg (%CD4Tcells)2.63 percentage of CD4 T cells
Primary

Regulatory T-Cell Count

Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Flow Cytometry

Time frame: baseline, week 2, week 4, week8, week12

Population: The efficacy analysis was performed on 5 patients. 1 patient withdrew from the study due to an adverse event before any efficacy data was obtained.6 patients were enrolled, 66% male with a median age of 54 years. Median time from transplant was 2.8 years. Five patients were on tacrolimus monotherapy and 1 patients was on tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmRegulatory T-Cell CountBaseline CD4Tred (%PBMC)0.44 percentage of PBMC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmRegulatory T-Cell CountWk2 CD4Treg (%PBMC)3.71 percentage of PBMC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmRegulatory T-Cell CountWk4 CD4Treg (%PBMC)3.57 percentage of PBMC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmRegulatory T-Cell CountWk8 CD4Treg (%PBMC)0.6 percentage of PBMC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmRegulatory T-Cell CountWk12 CD4Treg (%PBMC)0.64 percentage of PBMC
Comparison: This is an open label feasibility study to assess the efficacy and safety of a 4 week course of daily subcutaneous IL-2 injections to increase peripheral blood CD4 Tregs. Results are expressed as median, IQR and comparison were performed using one way or two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test. For all comparisons, a p\< 0.05 was considered significant.p-value: <0.01ANOVA
Secondary

Differential Immune Cell Count

Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Flow Cytometry

Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountBaseline CD3Tcells (%PBMC)53.74 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk2 CD3Tcells (%PBMC)57.05 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk4 CD3Tcells (%PBMC)53.69 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk8 CD3Tcells (%PBMC)58.00 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk12 CD3 Tcells (%PBMC)53.35 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountBaseline CD4Tcells (%PBMC)25.59 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk2 CD4Tcells (%PBMC)23.7 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk4 CD4Tcells (%PBMC)26.11 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk8 CD4Tcells (%PBMC)26.91 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk12 CD4Tcells (%PBMC)26.08 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountBaseline CD8Tcells (%PBMC)28.05 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk2 CD8Tcells (%PBMC)22.9 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk4 CD8Tcells (%PBMC)22.9 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk8 CD8Tcells (%PBMC)24.88 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk12 CD8Tcells (%PBMC)23.23 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountBaseline CD19Bcells (%PBMC)4.84 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk2 CD19Bcells (%PBMC)4.84 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk4 CD19Bcells (%PBMC)3.63 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk8 CD19Bcells (%PBMC)6.16 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk12 CD19Bcells (%PBMC)6.63 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountBaseline CD56NKcells (%PBMC)6.37 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk2 CD56NKcells (%PBMC)12.53 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk4 CD56NKcells (%PBMC)11.72 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk8 CD56NKcells (%PBMC)6.95 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk12 CD56NKcells (%PBMC)6.09 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountBaseline NKTcells (%PBMC)13.56 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk2 NKTcells (%PBMC)11.75 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk4 NKTcells (%PBMC)9.33 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk8 NKTcells (%PBMC)10.69 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk12 NKTcells (%PBMC)11.58 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountBaseline Monocytes/Dendritic12.82 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk2 Monocytes/Dendritic cells (%PBMC)9.00 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk4 Monocytes/Dendritic (%PBMC)12.87 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk8 Monocytes/Dendritic (%PBMC)11.77 percentage of PMBC
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmDifferential Immune Cell CountWk12 Monocytes/Dendritic (%PBMC)12.35 percentage of PMBC
Other Pre-specified

Kidney Function Serum Panel (> 1.5 x Upper Limit Normal)

Number of participants with a serum creatinine \> 1.5 x upper limit of normal through week 36

Time frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 36 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmKidney Function Serum Panel (> 1.5 x Upper Limit Normal)Week 21 Participants
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmKidney Function Serum Panel (> 1.5 x Upper Limit Normal)week 40 Participants
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmKidney Function Serum Panel (> 1.5 x Upper Limit Normal)week 80 Participants
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmKidney Function Serum Panel (> 1.5 x Upper Limit Normal)week 120 Participants
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmKidney Function Serum Panel (> 1.5 x Upper Limit Normal)week 360 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Liver Function Serum Panel (> 2 x Upper Limit Normal)

Number of patients with a serum amino alaninetransferase \> 2 x upper limit of normal through week 36

Time frame: week 2, 4 week, week 8, week12, week36

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmLiver Function Serum Panel (> 2 x Upper Limit Normal)weeks 120 Participants
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmLiver Function Serum Panel (> 2 x Upper Limit Normal)week 20 Participants
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmLiver Function Serum Panel (> 2 x Upper Limit Normal)week 40 Participants
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmLiver Function Serum Panel (> 2 x Upper Limit Normal)week 80 Participants
Open Label. Active Study Treatment ArmLiver Function Serum Panel (> 2 x Upper Limit Normal)week 360 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026