Skip to content

Follicular Steroid Genesis in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation

Analysis of Follicular Steroid Synthesis During Controlled Ovarian Stimulation With Recombinant FSH vs HMG in GnRH Antagonist Cycles

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02738580
Acronym
ESTEFOL
Enrollment
112
Registered
2016-04-14
Start date
2016-10-18
Completion date
2018-06-15
Last updated
2020-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation, Infertility

Brief summary

Serum concentrations of the different hormones involved in follicular steroid genesis during a cycle of controlled ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH or HMG will be compared in this study. Serum Progesterone (P) levels at the end of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (i.e. the day of triggering) have been related to cycle outcome, in terms of ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates. Large cohort studies show that P levels above a certain threshold are associated with poorer cycle outcome. The mechanisms behind P elevation are not well understood yet. It has been shown that P levels are positively related to ovarian response and to the dose of FSH given during COS. Furthermore, it has been well documented that P levels at the end of stimulation are significantly higher when recombinant (r) FSH is used for COS when compared to HMG, either in a GnRH agonist long protocol or in a GnRH antagonist protocol. Some authors suggest that this finding is explained by the fact that COS with rFSH provides a higher oocyte yield than when hMG is given, so the higher P levels observed would be explained by the larger number of follicles developed when rFSH is used. On the other hand, other authors explain this event by a different follicular esteroidogenesis when HMG is used for COS compared to rFSH The hypotheisis behind this assumption is that rFSH enhances P synthesis from its precursor pregnenolone in the granulosa cells. This P is unable to be further metabolized into androgens because of the lack of 17-20 lyase in the human granulosa cells, and therefore is delivered into circulation. On the other hand, when HMG is given for COS, the ∆4 pathway is promoted, and pregnenolone will be catabolized in to Dehidroepiandrostenodione (DHEA), in the theca cells, and this one to Androstenodione, which will be finally aromatized in to estrogens. This mechanism will explain the lower P and higher E2 levels observed in HMG cycles in comparison to rFSH cycles.

Interventions

DRUGCOS with GnRH antagonists and rFSH

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists and rFSH in women with normal ovarian function.

DRUGCOS with GnRH antagonists and HP-HMG

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists and HP-HMG in women with normal ovarian function.

Sponsors

Roche Pharma AG
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI VALENCIA
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Good physical and psychological condition * Normal menstrual cycle (25-35 days) * Normal ovarian reserve defined by serum ANH010-30 pMol/L * All other criteria to fulfill by oocyte donors

Exclusion criteria

* Kidney failure * Ovarian Polyquistic syndrome * Any systemic or metabolic disfunction that counter indicates the use of gonadotrophins * Any other reason that involves exclusion of the oocyte donation program

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SERUM PROGSTERONE CONCENTRATION21 daysCompare hormonal blood serum concentrations of progesterone during ovarian stimulation implied in follicular steroidogenesis during a cycle of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation with either r-FSH or HP-HMG.
OVARIAN RESPONSE21 daysNUMBER OF FOLICLES REACHED AND PUNCTURED AFTER CONTROLED OVARIAN STIMULATION

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
rFSH
Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists and rFSH in women with normal ovarian function. COS with GnRH antagonists and rFSH: Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists and rFSH in women with normal ovarian function.
56
HP-HMG
Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists and HP-HMG with normal ovarian function. COS with GnRH antagonists and HP-HMG: Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists and HP-HMG in women with normal ovarian function.
56
Total112

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyEXCLUDED FROM DONNOR PROGRAM01
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy32
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicrFSHHP-HMGTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
56 Participants56 Participants112 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
56 Participants56 Participants112 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 560 / 56
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 560 / 56
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 560 / 56

Outcome results

Primary

OVARIAN RESPONSE

NUMBER OF FOLICLES REACHED AND PUNCTURED AFTER CONTROLED OVARIAN STIMULATION

Time frame: 21 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
rFSHOVARIAN RESPONSE16.5 folicles
HP-HMGOVARIAN RESPONSE17.5 folicles
p-value: <0.49t-test, 1 sided
Primary

SERUM PROGSTERONE CONCENTRATION

Compare hormonal blood serum concentrations of progesterone during ovarian stimulation implied in follicular steroidogenesis during a cycle of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation with either r-FSH or HP-HMG.

Time frame: 21 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
rFSHSERUM PROGSTERONE CONCENTRATION0.74 ng/mL
HP-HMGSERUM PROGSTERONE CONCENTRATION0.45 ng/mL
p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026