Skip to content

Kryptonite - a Novel Osteosynthesis Method for Median Sternotomy

Kryptonite - a Novel Osteosynthesis Method for Median Sternotomy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02738437
Enrollment
8
Registered
2016-04-14
Start date
2011-08-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2016-04-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

osteogenesis, Positron-Emission Tomography, Radiostereometric analysis

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to investigate the beneficial effect of bone cement in combination with wire cerclage on the stability of the sternum following median sternotomy. One half of the patients received only wire cerclage the other both bone cement and wire cerclage.

Detailed description

The aim of this study was to investigate the beneficial effect of bone cement in combination with wire cerclage on the stability of the sternum following median sternotomy. It has been shown previously that wire cerclage alone does not provide a stabile osteosynthesis following median sternotomy. The hypothesis is that if a stabile osteosynthesis can be achieved patient recovery can be hastened and patient discomfort and pain reduced. One half of the patients received only wire cerclage the other both bone cement and wire cerclage. The stability of the sternum was evaluated using radiostereometric analysis, PET-CT and patient reported outcomes in the form of SF-36 and VAS.

Interventions

DEVICEKryptonite-bone cement

Sponsors

Aarhus University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
60 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* undergoing elective Heart surgery

Exclusion criteria

* none

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiostereometric analysis6 weeks, 3 and 6 monthsEvaluation of change of Stability/mobility of the osteotomy evaluated using radiostereometric analysis. The distance in cm between sternal halves is measured.
Evaluation of sternal healing using PET-scan3 and 6 monthsChange in bone healing using PET-scan

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain3 weeks, 3 and 6 monthsevaluation of the patients pain-levels using VAS
General well-being3 weeks, 3 and 6 monthsevaluation of the patients general well-being using SF-36
sternal discomfort3 weeks, 3 and 6 monthsevaluation of the specific discomfort related to median sternotomy using a specific questionnaire

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026