Skip to content

TWB-103 for Adult Patients With Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Site Wounds

A Phase I/II Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of TWB-103 in Adult Patients With Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Site Wounds (DSW)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02737748
Enrollment
48
Registered
2016-04-14
Start date
2017-07-06
Completion date
2021-05-07
Last updated
2023-07-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Donor Site Complication

Keywords

Donor Site Wounds

Brief summary

Primary objective: 1. To evaluate the safety of TWB-103 in split-thickness skin graft donor site wounds (DSW) for Phase I in terms of Incidence of treatment-related AEs and SAEs (including infections and bleeding) 2. To evaluate the efficacy for Phase I+II of TWB-103 in split-thickness skin graft donor site wounds (DSW) in terms of The healing time from DSW creation to 100% re-epithelialization Secondary objective: 1. To evaluate the efficacy of TWB-103 in split-thickness skin graft donor site wounds (DSW) in secondary efficacy endpoints 2. To evaluate the safety of TWB-103 in split-thickness skin graft donor site wounds (DSW) in secondary safety endpoints

Detailed description

The study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TWB-103 in adult subjects with split-thickness skin graft donor site wounds (DSW). In Phase I proportion, eligible subjects were recruited sequentially with one week staggering of treatment. Eligible subjects were randomized into TWB-103 or Placebo groups in a 1:1 ratio. Phase I was planned to recruit 3 evaluable subjects each in TWB-103 and Placebo groups. Evaluable subjects in Phase I were (1) he/she who received at least one dose and had follow-up evaluation at least 14 days after the first dose or (2) he/she who received at least one dose and had early withdrawn due to safety reasons before Day 28. When all of those 6 evaluable subjects completed the planned treatment period (14 days or till first 100% re-epithelialization, which came first), the recruitment was temporarily stopped for 14 days for safety observation. The safety data before and on Day 28 Visit were reviewed by the sponsor and the principal investigator. If no safety issue was decided, the study would enter Phase II portion and eligible subjects would be randomized into a 1:1 ratio into one of the TWB-103 and Placebo groups. The dosing regimen designed in Phase II portion was the same as it was designed in Phase I portion. Subjects were instructed to attend scheduled visits at Screening, Day 0 (treatment start the day), Day 3, Day 7, Day 10, and Day 14 (end of treatment). All subjects were scheduled to attend a follow-up visit on Day 28 to evaluate the status of the target wound and then enter a 360-day follow-up phase. During the 360-day follow-up, four follow-up visits were scheduled at 90±14 days, 180±14 days, 270±14 days, and 360±14 days following the subject's Day 28 visit (if no Day 42 visit) or Day 42 visit.

Interventions

DRUGTWB-103 Group

Each subject received TWB-103+Tegaderm for up to 10 days or to the day of 100% re-epithelialization, whichever comes first, followed by Tegaderm alone application from Day 10 to 14 if failing to achieve 100% re-epithelialization by Day 10.

DRUGPlacebo Group

Each subject received Placebo+Tegaderm for up to 10 days or to the day of 100% re-epithelialization, whichever comes first, followed by Tegaderm alone application from Day 10 to 14 if failing to achieve 100% re-epithelialization by Day 10.

Sponsors

A2 Healthcare Taiwan Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Transwell Biotech Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Female/male patients, aged 20-65 years old 2. Presenting a split-thickness skin graft donor site wound with a minimum size of 15 cm2 but no more than 100 cm2, with a minimum width of 3 cm and with an approximate thickness of 0.010\ 0.012 inches. The graft cannot be harvested from a site from which a skin graft was previously obtained. 3. If the primary wound is a result of a thermal or chemical burn, the total body surface area of the said wound must be less than 15%. 4. Females of childbearing potential must have a documented negative serum pregnancy test done at the screening visit, which is within 2 weeks prior the DSW creation and the treatment 5. Both male and female patients must agree to use highly effective contraceptives from signing informed consent to 30 days after the last dose administration. 6. Willing to comply with the study protocol and to sign the Informed Consent Form

Exclusion criteria

1. Female patients who are pregnant or lactating or planning a pregnancy and any male patient whose partner (wife) planning a pregnancy from signing informed consent to 30 days after the last dose administration. 2. Clinically significant disease or condition that may compromise graft take and/or donor site healing (e.g. the presence of a bleeding disorder, capillary fragility, venous or arterial disorder directly affecting the donor site to be treated, known or suspected systemic malignancies, human immunodeficiency virus infection, renal or liver disease, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, thrombocytopenia, vasculitis, poor nutritional status). 3. Patients who are currently receiving or have received the following treatments within 4 weeks prior to study entry are excluded from the study: 1. systemic or inhaled corticosteroids or immunosuppressant agents; or 2. therapeutic doses of anticoagulants (e.g. Coumadin, Heparin, low molecular weight Heparin) for pre-existing medical conditions, for whom a dose interruption from Screening through the end of the study period is contraindicated. 4. Autoimmune disease, e.g. lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis. 5. Hematologic disease, malignancy or hypo-immunity. 6. History of HIV or congenital immunodeficiency. 7. History of alcoholism or drug abuse. 8. Have used any tobacco product within 1 week prior to Day 0. 9. Patients previously treated with any cell-based product, including autologous tissue at the treatment site. 10. Received an investigational drug, device or biological/bioactive treatment within 30 days prior to Screening Visit. 11. Any clinical condition or significant concurrent disease judged by the investigator to complicate the evaluation of the trial treatment. 12. History of sensitivity to bovine or porcine origin materials, or human serum albumin. 13. DSWs located in the face, over joints, lower legs or the buttocks 14. Any of the following hematologic abnormalities: (Hemoglobin \< 10.0 g/dL, ANC \< 1,500/μL, platelets \< 75,000 /μL) 15. Any of the following serum chemistry abnormalities: (Total bilirubin \> 1.5 × ULN, AST or ALT \> 3 × ULN, gamma-GT \> 2.5 x ULN, Alk-P \> 2.5 x ULN, serum albumin \< 2.7 g/dL, creatinine \>1.5 x ULN, any other ≥ Grade 2 laboratory abnormality (based on CTCAE) at baseline (other than those listed above) 16. DSWs in area with active skin infection or with skin condition that is considered highly susceptible to infection judged by the investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Treatment-related AEs and SAEs (Including Infections and Bleeding)Day 0~Day 28The number of participants with treatment-related AEs and SAEs (including infections and bleeding) will be observed for the 7 patients in Phase I
The Healing Time From DSW Creation to the First 100% Re-epithelialization With Confirmation for at Least 10 Days Apart Assessed by the InvestigatorDays 42 or earlierThe healing time from DSW creation to the first 100% re-epithelialization with confirmation for at least 10 days apart assessed by the investigator for all patients in Phase I and II.
Number of Participants Reached Confirmed Healing Within 28 Days.Days 42 or earlierThe number of participants in Phase I and II reached confirmed healing by the investigator within 28 days.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Healing Percentage of Wounds (Ratio of Healing Area and Original Area) at Days 7, 10 and 14 After DSW CreationDay 7, 10 and 14The healing percentage of wounds will be calculated based on the healing area measured on Day 7, 10 and 14, comparing to the original area measured on Day 0 for all patients in Phase I and II.
The Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire ScoreDays 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42, Day 90/180/270/360 from Day 28 or 42All patients in Phase I and II will evaluate the pain based on Short-form McGill pain questionnaire at each visit. The visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal line, usually, 10 cm (= 100 mm) in length, scored from 0 (none) to 10 (extreme). On this scale, a higher score in VAS indicates the worse pain.
Number of Participants With AEs and SAEsScreening~ Day 360 from Day 28 or 42The number of participants with AEs and SAEs will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Changes in Post-treatment Vital Signs-pulse Rate Compared to BaselineDays 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42Changes in post-treatment vital signs-pulse rate will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Changes in Post-treatment Vital Signs-body Temperature Compared to BaselineDays 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42Changes in post-treatment vital signs-body temperature will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Changes in Post-treatment Vital Signs-systolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineDays 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42Changes in post-treatment vital signs-systolic blood pressure will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Changes in Post-treatment Vital Signs-diastolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineDays 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42Changes in post-treatment vital signs-diastolic blood pressure will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-white Blood Cells Compared to BaselineDays 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-hematology-white blood cells will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-neutrophils Compared to BaselineDays 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-hematology-neutrophils will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hemoglobin Compared to BaselineDays 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-hematology-hemoglobin will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hematocrit Compared to BaselineDays 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-hematology-hematocrit will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Changes in Post-treatment Physical Examination Compared to BaselineDays 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42Changes in post-treatment physical examination will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-red Blood Cells Compared to BaselineDays 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-hematology-red blood cells will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-aspartate Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineDays 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-aspartate aminotransferase will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alanine Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineDays 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-alanine aminotransferase will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-serum Creatinine Compared to BaselineDays 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-serum creatinine will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-blood Urea Nitrogen Compared to BaselineDays 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-blood urea nitrogen will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-Albumin Compared to BaselineDays 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-albumin will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-bilirubin Compared to BaselineDays 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-bilirubin will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-gamma-glutamyl Transferase Compared to BaselineDays 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-gamma-glutamyl transferase will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alkaline Phosphatase Compared to BaselineDays 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-alkaline phosphatase will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
Number of Participants With Treatment-related AEs and SAEs (Including Infections and Bleeding)Screening~ Day 360 from Day 28 or 42The number of participants with treatment-related AEs and SAEs (including infections and bleeding) will be observed for all patients in Phase I and II
The Number of Censored Subjects Assessed by the Investigator and the First Additional EvaluatorDays 42 or earlierThe number of censored subjects in Phase I and II assessed by the investigator and the first additional evaluator. The first additional evaluator judged the healing status by looking at the photos of DSW. If the 100% re-epithelialization was not observed by Day 28 visit, the healing time was censored on the day of the last visit up to Day 28 visit. If the 100% re-epithelialization was observed by Day 28 visit but no confirmation was made, the healing time was censored on day of the last visit up to Day 28 visit.
Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-platelets Compared to BaselineDays 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-hematology-platelets will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.
The Healing Time From DSW Creation to the First 100% Re-epithelialization With Confirmation for at Least 10 Days Apart, Assessed by the First Additional EvaluatorDays 42 or earlierThe healing time from DSW creation to the first 100% re-epithelialization with confirmation for at least 10 days apart assessed by the investigator for all patients in Phase I and II. The first additional evaluator judged the healing status by looking at the photos of DSW.
Number of Participants With Complete Wound Closure at Day 7, 10 and 14 After DSW Creation.Day 7, 10 and 14Complete wound closure is defined as skin 100% re-epithelialization without drainage or dressing requirements. This endpoint will be in all patients in Phase I and II.

Countries

Japan, Taiwan

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was a multicenter study enrolling subjects from one site in Taiwan and two sites in Japan, between July 06, 2017 and May 07, 2021.

Pre-assignment details

48 subjects were screened in this study; 8 subjects were screen failures, resulting in 40 randomized subjects.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
TWB-103 Group
Each subject received TWB-103+Tegaderm for up to 10 days or to the day of 100% re-epithelialization, whichever comes first, followed by Tegaderm alone application from Day 10 to 14 if failing to achieve 100% re-epithelialization by Day 10. The baseline was defined as the most recently available data before the administration of 1st dose treatment.
20
Placebo Group
Each subject received Placebo+Tegaderm for up to 10 days or to the day of 100% re-epithelialization, whichever comes first, followed by Tegaderm alone application from Day 10 to 14 if failing to achieve 100% re-epithelialization by Day 10. The baseline was defined as the most recently available data before the administration of 1st dose treatment.
20
Total40

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTWB-103 GroupPlacebo GroupTotal
Age, Continuous44.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.53
42.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.56
43.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.41
Baseline Donor Site Wound (DSW) Size53.37 cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.726
40.91 cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.427
47.14 cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.863
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
20 Participants20 Participants40 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
5 participants5 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
15 participants15 participants30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants9 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants11 Participants24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 2010 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Reached Confirmed Healing Within 28 Days.

The number of participants in Phase I and II reached confirmed healing by the investigator within 28 days.

Time frame: Days 42 or earlier

Population: Case first 100% re-epithelialization at any visit till Visit 7 (Day 28 Visit) with confirmation for at least 10 days apart:~Healing Time \[days\] = date of first 100% re-epithelialization - date of DSW creation (Visit 2).~Case else: Censored Healing Time \[days\] = date of last assessment up to Visit 7 - date of DSW creation (Visit 2).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TWB-103 GroupNumber of Participants Reached Confirmed Healing Within 28 Days.19 Participants
Placebo GroupNumber of Participants Reached Confirmed Healing Within 28 Days.14 Participants
p-value: 0.0324Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-related AEs and SAEs (Including Infections and Bleeding)

The number of participants with treatment-related AEs and SAEs (including infections and bleeding) will be observed for the 7 patients in Phase I

Time frame: Day 0~Day 28

Population: Phase I was planned to recruit 3 evaluable subjects each in TWB-103 and Placebo groups. Evaluable subjects in Phase I were (1) he/she who received at least one dose and had follow-up evaluation at least 14 days after the first dose or (2) he/she who received at least one dose and had early withdrawn due to safety reasons before Day 28.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TWB-103 GroupNumber of Participants With Treatment-related AEs and SAEs (Including Infections and Bleeding)Treatment-Related AEs0 Participants
TWB-103 GroupNumber of Participants With Treatment-related AEs and SAEs (Including Infections and Bleeding)SAEs0 Participants
Placebo GroupNumber of Participants With Treatment-related AEs and SAEs (Including Infections and Bleeding)Treatment-Related AEs0 Participants
Placebo GroupNumber of Participants With Treatment-related AEs and SAEs (Including Infections and Bleeding)SAEs0 Participants
Primary

The Healing Time From DSW Creation to the First 100% Re-epithelialization With Confirmation for at Least 10 Days Apart Assessed by the Investigator

The healing time from DSW creation to the first 100% re-epithelialization with confirmation for at least 10 days apart assessed by the investigator for all patients in Phase I and II.

Time frame: Days 42 or earlier

Population: Case first 100% re-epithelialization at any visit till Visit 7 (Day 28 Visit) with confirmation for at least 10 days apart:~Healing Time \[days\] = date of first 100% re-epithelialization - date of DSW creation (Visit 2).~Case else: Censored Healing Time \[days\] = date of last assessment up to Visit 7 - date of DSW creation (Visit 2).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TWB-103 GroupThe Healing Time From DSW Creation to the First 100% Re-epithelialization With Confirmation for at Least 10 Days Apart Assessed by the Investigator9 Healing Time [days]
Placebo GroupThe Healing Time From DSW Creation to the First 100% Re-epithelialization With Confirmation for at Least 10 Days Apart Assessed by the Investigator10 Healing Time [days]
p-value: 0.2217Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alanine Aminotransferase Compared to Baseline

Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-alanine aminotransferase will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42

Population: The general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-alanine aminotransferase of each subject was examined at all scheduled visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alanine Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)29.25 Alanine Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 24.512
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alanine Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)62.20 Alanine Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 54.509
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alanine Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)32.79 Alanine Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 42.926
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alanine Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)21.63 Alanine Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 16.78
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alanine Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)31.89 Alanine Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 29.57
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alanine Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)54.50 Alanine Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 62.933
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alanine Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineBaseline25.30 Alanine Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 18.374
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alanine Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)28.00 Alanine Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 2.828
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alanine Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineBaseline28.20 Alanine Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 16.776
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alanine Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)22.95 Alanine Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 14.125
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alanine Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)27.15 Alanine Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 15.301
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alanine Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)26.22 Alanine Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 15.619
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alanine Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)25.20 Alanine Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 23.868
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alanine Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)28.28 Alanine Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 24.826
Secondary

Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-Albumin Compared to Baseline

Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-albumin will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42

Population: The general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-albumin of each subject was examined at all scheduled visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-Albumin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)4.02 Albumin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 0.585
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-Albumin Compared to BaselineBaseline4.24 Albumin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 0.411
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-Albumin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)3.99 Albumin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 0.54
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-Albumin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)4.12 Albumin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 0.586
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-Albumin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)3.86 Albumin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 0.529
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-Albumin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)4.31 Albumin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 0.401
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-Albumin Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)4.45 Albumin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 0.212
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-Albumin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)4.33 Albumin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 0.387
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-Albumin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)3.98 Albumin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 0.377
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-Albumin Compared to BaselineBaseline4.08 Albumin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 0.492
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-Albumin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)4.30 Albumin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 0.2
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-Albumin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)3.87 Albumin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 0.526
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-Albumin Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)4.50 Albumin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 0.283
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-Albumin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)4.09 Albumin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 0.528
Secondary

Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alkaline Phosphatase Compared to Baseline

Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-alkaline phosphatase will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42

Population: The general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-alkaline phosphatase of each subject was examined at all scheduled visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alkaline Phosphatase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)138.80 Alkaline Phosphatase [U/L]Standard Deviation 101.935
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alkaline Phosphatase Compared to BaselineBaseline102.65 Alkaline Phosphatase [U/L]Standard Deviation 74.944
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alkaline Phosphatase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)97.95 Alkaline Phosphatase [U/L]Standard Deviation 63.847
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alkaline Phosphatase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)104.63 Alkaline Phosphatase [U/L]Standard Deviation 70.811
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alkaline Phosphatase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)156.22 Alkaline Phosphatase [U/L]Standard Deviation 74.933
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alkaline Phosphatase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)108.16 Alkaline Phosphatase [U/L]Standard Deviation 84.534
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alkaline Phosphatase Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)156.50 Alkaline Phosphatase [U/L]Standard Deviation 118.087
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alkaline Phosphatase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)114.00 Alkaline Phosphatase [U/L]Standard Deviation 82.523
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alkaline Phosphatase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)158.89 Alkaline Phosphatase [U/L]Standard Deviation 79.899
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alkaline Phosphatase Compared to BaselineBaseline107.65 Alkaline Phosphatase [U/L]Standard Deviation 79.693
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alkaline Phosphatase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)196.40 Alkaline Phosphatase [U/L]Standard Deviation 91.694
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alkaline Phosphatase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)101.35 Alkaline Phosphatase [U/L]Standard Deviation 73.382
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alkaline Phosphatase Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)73.50 Alkaline Phosphatase [U/L]Standard Deviation 7.778
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-alkaline Phosphatase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)102.85 Alkaline Phosphatase [U/L]Standard Deviation 71.589
Secondary

Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-aspartate Aminotransferase Compared to Baseline

Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-aspartate aminotransferase will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42

Population: The general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-aspartate aminotransferase of each subject was examined at all scheduled visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-aspartate Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)24.75 Aspartate Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 15.21
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-aspartate Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineBaseline22.55 Aspartate Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 10.773
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-aspartate Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)32.50 Aspartate Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 23.335
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-aspartate Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)45.00 Aspartate Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 43.052
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-aspartate Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)33.37 Aspartate Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 46.94
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-aspartate Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)19.05 Aspartate Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 6.06
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-aspartate Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)26.44 Aspartate Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 16.883
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-aspartate Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)19.50 Aspartate Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 3.536
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-aspartate Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineBaseline21.85 Aspartate Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 8.177
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-aspartate Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)20.00 Aspartate Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 5.648
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-aspartate Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)24.40 Aspartate Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 9.762
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-aspartate Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)21.33 Aspartate Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 6.837
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-aspartate Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)22.40 Aspartate Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 12.876
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-aspartate Aminotransferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)22.00 Aspartate Aminotransferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 8.931
Secondary

Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-bilirubin Compared to Baseline

Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-bilirubin will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42

Population: The general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-bilirubin of each subject was examined at all scheduled visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-bilirubin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)8.39 Bilirubin [umol/L]Standard Deviation 5.095
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-bilirubin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)14.30 Bilirubin [umol/L]Standard Deviation 10.487
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-bilirubin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)7.44 Bilirubin [umol/L]Standard Deviation 3.842
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-bilirubin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)9.40 Bilirubin [umol/L]Standard Deviation 6.565
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-bilirubin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)9.20 Bilirubin [umol/L]Standard Deviation 5.59
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-bilirubin Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)18.22 Bilirubin [umol/L]Standard Deviation 8.829
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-bilirubin Compared to BaselineBaseline9.63 Bilirubin [umol/L]Standard Deviation 4.824
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-bilirubin Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)6.84 Bilirubin [umol/L]Standard Deviation 2.419
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-bilirubin Compared to BaselineBaseline8.10 Bilirubin [umol/L]Standard Deviation 4.975
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-bilirubin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)8.92 Bilirubin [umol/L]Standard Deviation 6.039
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-bilirubin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)8.73 Bilirubin [umol/L]Standard Deviation 4.876
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-bilirubin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)9.64 Bilirubin [umol/L]Standard Deviation 4.47
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-bilirubin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)9.03 Bilirubin [umol/L]Standard Deviation 3.058
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-bilirubin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)9.10 Bilirubin [umol/L]Standard Deviation 2.873
Secondary

Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-blood Urea Nitrogen Compared to Baseline

Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-blood urea nitrogen will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42

Population: The general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-blood urea nitrogen of each subject was examined at all scheduled visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-blood Urea Nitrogen Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)14.46 Blood Urea Nitrogen [mg/dL]Standard Deviation 3.956
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-blood Urea Nitrogen Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)14.12 Blood Urea Nitrogen [mg/dL]Standard Deviation 5.304
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-blood Urea Nitrogen Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)11.58 Blood Urea Nitrogen [mg/dL]Standard Deviation 2.234
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-blood Urea Nitrogen Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)12.82 Blood Urea Nitrogen [mg/dL]Standard Deviation 3.873
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-blood Urea Nitrogen Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)13.02 Blood Urea Nitrogen [mg/dL]Standard Deviation 3.938
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-blood Urea Nitrogen Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)11.90 Blood Urea Nitrogen [mg/dL]Standard Deviation 2.97
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-blood Urea Nitrogen Compared to BaselineBaseline13.59 Blood Urea Nitrogen [mg/dL]Standard Deviation 4.838
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-blood Urea Nitrogen Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)16.50 Blood Urea Nitrogen [mg/dL]Standard Deviation 3.536
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-blood Urea Nitrogen Compared to BaselineBaseline14.06 Blood Urea Nitrogen [mg/dL]Standard Deviation 4.271
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-blood Urea Nitrogen Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)13.23 Blood Urea Nitrogen [mg/dL]Standard Deviation 3.779
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-blood Urea Nitrogen Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)14.72 Blood Urea Nitrogen [mg/dL]Standard Deviation 5.427
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-blood Urea Nitrogen Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)13.54 Blood Urea Nitrogen [mg/dL]Standard Deviation 2.967
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-blood Urea Nitrogen Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)14.48 Blood Urea Nitrogen [mg/dL]Standard Deviation 3.189
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-blood Urea Nitrogen Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)13.13 Blood Urea Nitrogen [mg/dL]Standard Deviation 2.537
Secondary

Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-gamma-glutamyl Transferase Compared to Baseline

Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-gamma-glutamyl transferase will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42

Population: The general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-gamma-glutamyl transferase of each subject was examined at all scheduled visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-gamma-glutamyl Transferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)37.16 Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 31.597
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-gamma-glutamyl Transferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)56.20 Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 36.072
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-gamma-glutamyl Transferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)37.60 Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 29.674
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-gamma-glutamyl Transferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)28.47 Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 19.234
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-gamma-glutamyl Transferase Compared to BaselineBaseline37.65 Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 36.863
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-gamma-glutamyl Transferase Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)32.50 Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 24.749
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-gamma-glutamyl Transferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)44.11 Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 33.572
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-gamma-glutamyl Transferase Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)21.50 Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 0.707
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-gamma-glutamyl Transferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)37.25 Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 26.479
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-gamma-glutamyl Transferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)39.65 Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 30.275
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-gamma-glutamyl Transferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)49.44 Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 39.17
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-gamma-glutamyl Transferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)47.80 Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 43.2
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-gamma-glutamyl Transferase Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)38.22 Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 33.676
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-gamma-glutamyl Transferase Compared to BaselineBaseline38.75 Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase [U/L]Standard Deviation 26.754
Secondary

Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-serum Creatinine Compared to Baseline

Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-serum creatinine will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42

Population: The general laboratory assessment-biochemistry-serum creatinine of each subject was examined at all scheduled visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-serum Creatinine Compared to BaselineBaseline62.68 Serum Creatinine [umol/L]Standard Deviation 14.386
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-serum Creatinine Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)57.64 Serum Creatinine [umol/L]Standard Deviation 19.016
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-serum Creatinine Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)60.51 Serum Creatinine [umol/L]Standard Deviation 15.129
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-serum Creatinine Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)62.44 Serum Creatinine [umol/L]Standard Deviation 12.363
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-serum Creatinine Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)58.39 Serum Creatinine [umol/L]Standard Deviation 14.422
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-serum Creatinine Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)56.58 Serum Creatinine [umol/L]Standard Deviation 5.001
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-serum Creatinine Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)54.42 Serum Creatinine [umol/L]Standard Deviation 17.045
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-serum Creatinine Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)66.30 Serum Creatinine [umol/L]Standard Deviation 6.251
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-serum Creatinine Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)61.75 Serum Creatinine [umol/L]Standard Deviation 18.31
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-serum Creatinine Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)63.78 Serum Creatinine [umol/L]Standard Deviation 19.811
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-serum Creatinine Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)60.21 Serum Creatinine [umol/L]Standard Deviation 17.133
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-serum Creatinine Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)63.12 Serum Creatinine [umol/L]Standard Deviation 37.742
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-serum Creatinine Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)64.63 Serum Creatinine [umol/L]Standard Deviation 18.637
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-biochemistry-serum Creatinine Compared to BaselineBaseline62.01 Serum Creatinine [umol/L]Standard Deviation 17.022
Secondary

Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hematocrit Compared to Baseline

Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-hematology-hematocrit will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42

Population: The general laboratory assessment-hematology-hematocrit of each subject was examined at all scheduled visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hematocrit Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)40.35 Hematocrit [%]Standard Deviation 5.706
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hematocrit Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)39.84 Hematocrit [%]Standard Deviation 6.529
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hematocrit Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)40.01 Hematocrit [%]Standard Deviation 5.41
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hematocrit Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)40.43 Hematocrit [%]Standard Deviation 4.206
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hematocrit Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)38.07 Hematocrit [%]Standard Deviation 4.537
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hematocrit Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)41.45 Hematocrit [%]Standard Deviation 1.768
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hematocrit Compared to BaselineBaseline40.60 Hematocrit [%]Standard Deviation 3.886
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hematocrit Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)42.05 Hematocrit [%]Standard Deviation 2.192
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hematocrit Compared to BaselineBaseline42.00 Hematocrit [%]Standard Deviation 4.92
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hematocrit Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)41.57 Hematocrit [%]Standard Deviation 6.565
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hematocrit Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)41.34 Hematocrit [%]Standard Deviation 5.591
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hematocrit Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)40.07 Hematocrit [%]Standard Deviation 5.525
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hematocrit Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)40.80 Hematocrit [%]Standard Deviation 7.005
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hematocrit Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)41.33 Hematocrit [%]Standard Deviation 4.312
Secondary

Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hemoglobin Compared to Baseline

Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-hematology-hemoglobin will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42

Population: The general laboratory assessment-hematology-hemoglobin of each subject was examined at all scheduled visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hemoglobin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)13.38 Hemoglobin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 2.033
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hemoglobin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)13.22 Hemoglobin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 2.565
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hemoglobin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)13.28 Hemoglobin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 1.981
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hemoglobin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)13.35 Hemoglobin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 1.726
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hemoglobin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)12.72 Hemoglobin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 1.796
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hemoglobin Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)14.05 Hemoglobin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 1.344
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hemoglobin Compared to BaselineBaseline13.47 Hemoglobin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 1.436
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hemoglobin Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)13.30 Hemoglobin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 1.697
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hemoglobin Compared to BaselineBaseline13.84 Hemoglobin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 1.741
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hemoglobin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)13.79 Hemoglobin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 2.22
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hemoglobin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)13.69 Hemoglobin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 2.002
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hemoglobin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)13.56 Hemoglobin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 1.89
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hemoglobin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)13.82 Hemoglobin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 2.572
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-Hemoglobin Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)13.73 Hemoglobin [g/dL]Standard Deviation 1.665
Secondary

Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-neutrophils Compared to Baseline

Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-hematology-neutrophils will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42

Population: The general laboratory assessment-hematology-neutrophils of each subject were examined at all scheduled visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-neutrophils Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)4.54 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 1.431
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-neutrophils Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)6.62 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 4.944
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-neutrophils Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)4.61 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 1.604
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-neutrophils Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)3.94 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 1.733
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-neutrophils Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)3.93 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 0.808
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-neutrophils Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)2.17 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 0.826
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-neutrophils Compared to BaselineBaseline5.36 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 1.95
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-neutrophils Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)3.44 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 0.074
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-neutrophils Compared to BaselineBaseline4.65 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 1.542
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-neutrophils Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)4.71 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 1.577
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-neutrophils Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)4.37 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 2.322
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-neutrophils Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)4.06 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 0.747
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-neutrophils Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)4.71 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 0.523
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-neutrophils Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)4.19 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 1.128
Secondary

Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-platelets Compared to Baseline

Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-hematology-platelets will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42

Population: The general laboratory assessment-hematology-platelets of each subject were examined at all scheduled visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-platelets Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)268.42 10^9 platelets/LStandard Deviation 68.664
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-platelets Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)248.50 10^9 platelets/LStandard Deviation 88.388
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-platelets Compared to BaselineBaseline298.95 10^9 platelets/LStandard Deviation 69.549
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-platelets Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)290.95 10^9 platelets/LStandard Deviation 63.692
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-platelets Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)308.50 10^9 platelets/LStandard Deviation 50.055
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-platelets Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)311.44 10^9 platelets/LStandard Deviation 67.93
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-platelets Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)314.80 10^9 platelets/LStandard Deviation 81.174
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-platelets Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)290.50 10^9 platelets/LStandard Deviation 19.092
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-platelets Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)260.11 10^9 platelets/LStandard Deviation 50.326
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-platelets Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)279.10 10^9 platelets/LStandard Deviation 67.043
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-platelets Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)225.60 10^9 platelets/LStandard Deviation 26.885
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-platelets Compared to BaselineBaseline284.60 10^9 platelets/LStandard Deviation 63.444
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-platelets Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)247.22 10^9 platelets/LStandard Deviation 51.575
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-platelets Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)278.70 10^9 platelets/LStandard Deviation 79.961
Secondary

Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-red Blood Cells Compared to Baseline

Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-hematology-red blood cells will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42

Population: The general laboratory assessment-hematology-red blood cells of each subject were examined at all scheduled visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-red Blood Cells Compared to BaselineBaseline4.61 10^12 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.558
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-red Blood Cells Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)4.30 10^12 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.842
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-red Blood Cells Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)4.59 10^12 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.763
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-red Blood Cells Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)4.60 10^12 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.586
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-red Blood Cells Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)4.54 10^12 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.729
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-red Blood Cells Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)4.41 10^12 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.198
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-red Blood Cells Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)4.19 10^12 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.476
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-red Blood Cells Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)5.21 10^12 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.488
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-red Blood Cells Compared to BaselineBaseline4.86 10^12 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.674
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-red Blood Cells Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)4.82 10^12 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.824
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-red Blood Cells Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)4.83 10^12 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.811
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-red Blood Cells Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)4.58 10^12 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.892
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-red Blood Cells Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)4.48 10^12 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.832
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-red Blood Cells Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)4.83 10^12 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.639
Secondary

Changes in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-white Blood Cells Compared to Baseline

Changes in post-treatment general laboratory assessment-hematology-white blood cells will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42

Population: The general laboratory assessment-hematology-white blood cells of each subject were examined at all scheduled visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-white Blood Cells Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)7.20 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 1.638
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-white Blood Cells Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)9.27 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 4.634
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-white Blood Cells Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)7.00 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 1.84
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-white Blood Cells Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)6.52 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 2.11
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-white Blood Cells Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)6.27 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 0.877
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-white Blood Cells Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)4.63 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 1.025
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-white Blood Cells Compared to BaselineBaseline7.93 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 2.107
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-white Blood Cells Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)6.63 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 1.605
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-white Blood Cells Compared to BaselineBaseline7.40 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 1.785
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-white Blood Cells Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)7.44 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 2.064
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-white Blood Cells Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)7.26 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 2.835
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-white Blood Cells Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)7.19 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 1.425
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-white Blood Cells Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)7.30 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 0.78
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment General Laboratory Assessment-hematology-white Blood Cells Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)6.99 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 1.76
Secondary

Changes in Post-treatment Physical Examination Compared to Baseline

Changes in post-treatment physical examination will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42

Population: The physical examination of each subject was examined at all scheduled visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Physical Examination Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3) (Multi-Selection by Body System)1 Participant with Physical Abnormality
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Physical Examination Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7) (Multi-Selection by Body System)1 Participant with Physical Abnormality
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Physical Examination Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10) (Multi-Selection by Body System)0 Participant with Physical Abnormality
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Physical Examination Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14) (Multi-Selection by Body System)0 Participant with Physical Abnormality
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Physical Examination Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28) (Multi-Selection by Body System)1 Participant with Physical Abnormality
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Physical Examination Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42) (Multi-Selection by Body System)0 Participant with Physical Abnormality
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Physical Examination Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28) (Multi-Selection by Body System)0 Participant with Physical Abnormality
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Physical Examination Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3) (Multi-Selection by Body System)0 Participant with Physical Abnormality
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Physical Examination Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14) (Multi-Selection by Body System)0 Participant with Physical Abnormality
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Physical Examination Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7) (Multi-Selection by Body System)0 Participant with Physical Abnormality
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Physical Examination Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42) (Multi-Selection by Body System)0 Participant with Physical Abnormality
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Physical Examination Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10) (Multi-Selection by Body System)0 Participant with Physical Abnormality
Secondary

Changes in Post-treatment Vital Signs-body Temperature Compared to Baseline

Changes in post-treatment vital signs-body temperature will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42

Population: The vital signs-body temperature of each subject was examined at all scheduled visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-body Temperature Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)36.47 Body Temperature [degree C]Standard Deviation 0.455
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-body Temperature Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)36.44 Body Temperature [degree C]Standard Deviation 0.358
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-body Temperature Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)36.54 Body Temperature [degree C]Standard Deviation 0.463
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-body Temperature Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)36.35 Body Temperature [degree C]Standard Deviation 0.363
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-body Temperature Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)36.72 Body Temperature [degree C]Standard Deviation 0.529
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-body Temperature Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)36.30 Body Temperature [degree C]Standard Deviation 0.141
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-body Temperature Compared to BaselineBaseline36.29 Body Temperature [degree C]Standard Deviation 0.315
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-body Temperature Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)36.35 Body Temperature [degree C]Standard Deviation 0.212
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-body Temperature Compared to BaselineBaseline36.21 Body Temperature [degree C]Standard Deviation 0.415
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-body Temperature Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)36.33 Body Temperature [degree C]Standard Deviation 0.412
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-body Temperature Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)36.52 Body Temperature [degree C]Standard Deviation 0.465
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-body Temperature Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)36.29 Body Temperature [degree C]Standard Deviation 0.289
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-body Temperature Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)36.36 Body Temperature [degree C]Standard Deviation 0.207
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-body Temperature Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)36.33 Body Temperature [degree C]Standard Deviation 0.333
Secondary

Changes in Post-treatment Vital Signs-diastolic Blood Pressure Compared to Baseline

Changes in post-treatment vital signs-diastolic blood pressure will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42

Population: The vital signs-diastolic blood pressure of each subject was examined at all scheduled visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-diastolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)69.10 Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 6.439
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-diastolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)77.60 Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 7.893
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-diastolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)71.50 Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 12.705
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-diastolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)71.35 Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 11.82
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-diastolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)68.22 Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 11.745
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-diastolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)89.50 Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 24.749
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-diastolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineBaseline71.25 Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 13.325
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-diastolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)95.00 Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 2.828
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-diastolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineBaseline69.90 Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 9.91
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-diastolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)69.15 Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 10.282
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-diastolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)76.15 Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 13.374
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-diastolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)70.00 Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 13.739
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-diastolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)78.40 Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 11.014
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-diastolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)77.95 Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 13.323
Secondary

Changes in Post-treatment Vital Signs-pulse Rate Compared to Baseline

Changes in post-treatment vital signs-pulse rate will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42

Population: The vital signs-pulse rate of each subject was examined at all scheduled visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-pulse Rate Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)74.70 Pulse Rate [beats/min]Standard Deviation 9.314
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-pulse Rate Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)84.20 Pulse Rate [beats/min]Standard Deviation 17.021
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-pulse Rate Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)74.25 Pulse Rate [beats/min]Standard Deviation 11.964
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-pulse Rate Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)75.15 Pulse Rate [beats/min]Standard Deviation 12.119
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-pulse Rate Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)77.67 Pulse Rate [beats/min]Standard Deviation 11.554
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-pulse Rate Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)71.00 Pulse Rate [beats/min]Standard Deviation 2.828
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-pulse Rate Compared to BaselineBaseline71.95 Pulse Rate [beats/min]Standard Deviation 10.359
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-pulse Rate Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)76.00 Pulse Rate [beats/min]Standard Deviation 2.828
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-pulse Rate Compared to BaselineBaseline73.90 Pulse Rate [beats/min]Standard Deviation 15.001
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-pulse Rate Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)78.20 Pulse Rate [beats/min]Standard Deviation 13.332
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-pulse Rate Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)73.55 Pulse Rate [beats/min]Standard Deviation 11.821
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-pulse Rate Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)72.33 Pulse Rate [beats/min]Standard Deviation 8.732
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-pulse Rate Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)82.40 Pulse Rate [beats/min]Standard Deviation 7.092
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-pulse Rate Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)74.79 Pulse Rate [beats/min]Standard Deviation 12.376
Secondary

Changes in Post-treatment Vital Signs-systolic Blood Pressure Compared to Baseline

Changes in post-treatment vital signs-systolic blood pressure will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42

Population: The vital signs-systolic blood pressure of each subject was examined at all scheduled visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-systolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)118.85 Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 12.783
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-systolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)119.80 Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 17.584
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-systolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)123.45 Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 16.794
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-systolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)124.60 Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 10.928
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-systolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)117.44 Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 13.436
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-systolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)140.00 Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 12.728
TWB-103 GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-systolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineBaseline116.80 Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 17.665
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-systolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineVisit 8 (Day 42)122.00 Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 5.657
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-systolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineBaseline116.65 Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 15.792
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-systolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)120.30 Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 21.293
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-systolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)121.95 Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 15.278
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-systolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)117.11 Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 15.584
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-systolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)120.00 Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 13.304
Placebo GroupChanges in Post-treatment Vital Signs-systolic Blood Pressure Compared to BaselineAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)121.21 Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Standard Deviation 11.622
Secondary

Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs

The number of participants with AEs and SAEs will be analyzed for all patients in Phase I and II.

Time frame: Screening~ Day 360 from Day 28 or 42

Population: 40 subjects (20 in TWB-103 group and 20 in Placebo group) were included in the population for safety analysis. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were classified as treatment-related AE, Grade 3 or greater AE, AE that required to take special actions, SAE, or SUSAR during the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TWB-103 GroupNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEsGrade≥3 AE0 Participants
TWB-103 GroupNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEsAE Leading to Drug withdrawn0 Participants
TWB-103 GroupNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEsTreatment-Related AE0 Participants
TWB-103 GroupNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEsGrade ≥ 3 Treatment-Related AE0 Participants
TWB-103 GroupNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEsDeath SAE0 Participants
TWB-103 GroupNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEsAE7 Participants
TWB-103 GroupNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEsSUSAR0 Participants
TWB-103 GroupNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEsAE Leading to Action Taken0 Participants
TWB-103 GroupNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEsDeath SUSAR0 Participants
TWB-103 GroupNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEsSAE0 Participants
Placebo GroupNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEsDeath SUSAR0 Participants
Placebo GroupNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEsAE10 Participants
Placebo GroupNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEsTreatment-Related AE0 Participants
Placebo GroupNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEsGrade≥3 AE0 Participants
Placebo GroupNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEsGrade ≥ 3 Treatment-Related AE0 Participants
Placebo GroupNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEsAE Leading to Action Taken0 Participants
Placebo GroupNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEsAE Leading to Drug withdrawn0 Participants
Placebo GroupNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEsSAE0 Participants
Placebo GroupNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEsDeath SAE0 Participants
Placebo GroupNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEsSUSAR0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Complete Wound Closure at Day 7, 10 and 14 After DSW Creation.

Complete wound closure is defined as skin 100% re-epithelialization without drainage or dressing requirements. This endpoint will be in all patients in Phase I and II.

Time frame: Day 7, 10 and 14

Population: Healing rates (complete wound closure) of subjects at Days 7, 10, and 14 after DSW creation were analyzed. Due to the study design, subjects would skip the following treatment visits when their wound was completely closed, resulting in the smaller subject numbers at Visit 5 (N=18) and Visit 6 (N=10). To rectify this issue, post-hoc LOCF analysis was performed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TWB-103 GroupNumber of Participants With Complete Wound Closure at Day 7, 10 and 14 After DSW Creation.Adjusted Visit 4 (Day 7) with LOCF9 Participants
TWB-103 GroupNumber of Participants With Complete Wound Closure at Day 7, 10 and 14 After DSW Creation.Adjusted Visit 5 (Day 10) with LOCF15 Participants
TWB-103 GroupNumber of Participants With Complete Wound Closure at Day 7, 10 and 14 After DSW Creation.Adjusted Visit 6 (Day 14) with LOCF18 Participants
Placebo GroupNumber of Participants With Complete Wound Closure at Day 7, 10 and 14 After DSW Creation.Adjusted Visit 4 (Day 7) with LOCF11 Participants
Placebo GroupNumber of Participants With Complete Wound Closure at Day 7, 10 and 14 After DSW Creation.Adjusted Visit 5 (Day 10) with LOCF15 Participants
Placebo GroupNumber of Participants With Complete Wound Closure at Day 7, 10 and 14 After DSW Creation.Adjusted Visit 6 (Day 14) with LOCF18 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-related AEs and SAEs (Including Infections and Bleeding)

The number of participants with treatment-related AEs and SAEs (including infections and bleeding) will be observed for all patients in Phase I and II

Time frame: Screening~ Day 360 from Day 28 or 42

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TWB-103 GroupNumber of Participants With Treatment-related AEs and SAEs (Including Infections and Bleeding)Treatment-Related AEs0 Participants
TWB-103 GroupNumber of Participants With Treatment-related AEs and SAEs (Including Infections and Bleeding)SAEs0 Participants
Placebo GroupNumber of Participants With Treatment-related AEs and SAEs (Including Infections and Bleeding)Treatment-Related AEs0 Participants
Placebo GroupNumber of Participants With Treatment-related AEs and SAEs (Including Infections and Bleeding)SAEs0 Participants
Secondary

The Healing Percentage of Wounds (Ratio of Healing Area and Original Area) at Days 7, 10 and 14 After DSW Creation

The healing percentage of wounds will be calculated based on the healing area measured on Day 7, 10 and 14, comparing to the original area measured on Day 0 for all patients in Phase I and II.

Time frame: Day 7, 10 and 14

Population: Healing percentage was measured by the study investigator. Due to the study design, subjects would skip the following treatment visits when their wound was completely closed, resulting in the smaller subject numbers at Visit 5 (N=18) and Visit 6 (N=10). To rectify this issue, post-hoc LOCF analysis was performed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
TWB-103 GroupThe Healing Percentage of Wounds (Ratio of Healing Area and Original Area) at Days 7, 10 and 14 After DSW CreationAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7) with LOCF65.36 Healing Percentage (%)Standard Error 8.676
TWB-103 GroupThe Healing Percentage of Wounds (Ratio of Healing Area and Original Area) at Days 7, 10 and 14 After DSW CreationAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10) with LOCF89.20 Healing Percentage (%)Standard Error 5.111
TWB-103 GroupThe Healing Percentage of Wounds (Ratio of Healing Area and Original Area) at Days 7, 10 and 14 After DSW CreationAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14) with LOCF88.56 Healing Percentage (%)Standard Error 5.159
Placebo GroupThe Healing Percentage of Wounds (Ratio of Healing Area and Original Area) at Days 7, 10 and 14 After DSW CreationAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10) with LOCF83.74 Healing Percentage (%)Standard Error 5.111
Placebo GroupThe Healing Percentage of Wounds (Ratio of Healing Area and Original Area) at Days 7, 10 and 14 After DSW CreationAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7) with LOCF62.60 Healing Percentage (%)Standard Error 8.676
Placebo GroupThe Healing Percentage of Wounds (Ratio of Healing Area and Original Area) at Days 7, 10 and 14 After DSW CreationAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14) with LOCF83.51 Healing Percentage (%)Standard Error 5.159
Secondary

The Healing Time From DSW Creation to the First 100% Re-epithelialization With Confirmation for at Least 10 Days Apart, Assessed by the First Additional Evaluator

The healing time from DSW creation to the first 100% re-epithelialization with confirmation for at least 10 days apart assessed by the investigator for all patients in Phase I and II. The first additional evaluator judged the healing status by looking at the photos of DSW.

Time frame: Days 42 or earlier

Population: The additional evaluator who was not aware of the treatment groups would assess the wound based on the photos.~Case first 100% re-epithelialization at any visit till Visit 7 (Day 28 Visit) with confirmation for at least 10 days apart:~Healing Time \[days\] = date of first 100% re-epithelialization - date of DSW creation (Visit 2).~Case else: Censored Healing Time \[days\] = date of last assessment up to Visit 7 - date of DSW creation (Visit 2).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TWB-103 GroupThe Healing Time From DSW Creation to the First 100% Re-epithelialization With Confirmation for at Least 10 Days Apart, Assessed by the First Additional Evaluator20 Healing Time [days]Standard Error 2.2
Placebo GroupThe Healing Time From DSW Creation to the First 100% Re-epithelialization With Confirmation for at Least 10 Days Apart, Assessed by the First Additional Evaluator13 Healing Time [days]Standard Error 0.7
p-value: 0.3975Log Rank
Secondary

The Number of Censored Subjects Assessed by the Investigator and the First Additional Evaluator

The number of censored subjects in Phase I and II assessed by the investigator and the first additional evaluator. The first additional evaluator judged the healing status by looking at the photos of DSW. If the 100% re-epithelialization was not observed by Day 28 visit, the healing time was censored on the day of the last visit up to Day 28 visit. If the 100% re-epithelialization was observed by Day 28 visit but no confirmation was made, the healing time was censored on day of the last visit up to Day 28 visit.

Time frame: Days 42 or earlier

Population: The additional evaluator who was not aware of the treatment groups would assess the wound based on the photos.~Case first 100% re-epithelialization at any visit till Visit 7 (Day 28 Visit) with confirmation for at least 10 days apart:~Healing Time \[days\] = date of first 100% re-epithelialization - date of DSW creation (Visit 2).~Case else: Censored Healing Time \[days\] = date of last assessment up to Visit 7 - date of DSW creation (Visit 2).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TWB-103 GroupThe Number of Censored Subjects Assessed by the Investigator and the First Additional EvaluatorInvestigator1 Participants
TWB-103 GroupThe Number of Censored Subjects Assessed by the Investigator and the First Additional EvaluatorFirst Additional Evaluator10 Participants
Placebo GroupThe Number of Censored Subjects Assessed by the Investigator and the First Additional EvaluatorInvestigator6 Participants
Placebo GroupThe Number of Censored Subjects Assessed by the Investigator and the First Additional EvaluatorFirst Additional Evaluator13 Participants
Secondary

The Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire Score

All patients in Phase I and II will evaluate the pain based on Short-form McGill pain questionnaire at each visit. The visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal line, usually, 10 cm (= 100 mm) in length, scored from 0 (none) to 10 (extreme). On this scale, a higher score in VAS indicates the worse pain.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 42, Day 90/180/270/360 from Day 28 or 42

Population: The pain assessment was measured by employing short-form McGill pain questionnaire at all scheduled visits, except Visit 2 (Day 0). The visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal line, usually, 10 cm (= 100 mm) in length, scored from 0 (none) to 10 (extreme). On this scale, a higher score in VAS indicates the worse pain.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TWB-103 GroupThe Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire ScoreAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)0.80 VAS (0~10 cm)Standard Deviation 0.763
TWB-103 GroupThe Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire ScoreAdjusted Visit 8 (Day 42)0.45 VAS (0~10 cm)Standard Deviation 0.636
TWB-103 GroupThe Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire ScoreAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)0.82 VAS (0~10 cm)Standard Deviation 1.313
TWB-103 GroupThe Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire ScoreVisit 9 (FU 3 Months)0.40 VAS (0~10 cm)Standard Deviation 1.588
TWB-103 GroupThe Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire ScoreAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)0.38 VAS (0~10 cm)Standard Deviation 0.522
TWB-103 GroupThe Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire ScoreVisit 10 (FU 6 Months)0.00 VAS (0~10 cm)Standard Deviation 0
TWB-103 GroupThe Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire ScoreAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)1.79 VAS (0~10 cm)Standard Deviation 2.137
TWB-103 GroupThe Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire ScoreVisit 11 (FU 9 Months)0.05 VAS (0~10 cm)Standard Deviation 0.212
TWB-103 GroupThe Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire ScoreAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)0.37 VAS (0~10 cm)Standard Deviation 0.713
TWB-103 GroupThe Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire ScoreVisit 12 (FU 12 Months)0.04 VAS (0~10 cm)Standard Deviation 0.161
TWB-103 GroupThe Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire ScoreBaseline1.89 VAS (0~10 cm)Standard Deviation 2.833
Placebo GroupThe Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire ScoreVisit 12 (FU 12 Months)0.00 VAS (0~10 cm)Standard Deviation 0
Placebo GroupThe Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire ScoreBaseline1.06 VAS (0~10 cm)Standard Deviation 2.399
Placebo GroupThe Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire ScoreAdjusted Visit 3 (Day 3)1.58 VAS (0~10 cm)Standard Deviation 2.091
Placebo GroupThe Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire ScoreAdjusted Visit 4 (Day 7)0.40 VAS (0~10 cm)Standard Deviation 0.701
Placebo GroupThe Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire ScoreAdjusted Visit 5 (Day 10)1.02 VAS (0~10 cm)Standard Deviation 1.731
Placebo GroupThe Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire ScoreAdjusted Visit 6 (Day 14)1.48 VAS (0~10 cm)Standard Deviation 2.062
Placebo GroupThe Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire ScoreAdjusted Visit 7 (Day 28)0.35 VAS (0~10 cm)Standard Deviation 0.943
Placebo GroupThe Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire ScoreAdjusted Visit 8 (Day 42)0.00 VAS (0~10 cm)Standard Deviation 0
Placebo GroupThe Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire ScoreVisit 9 (FU 3 Months)0.06 VAS (0~10 cm)Standard Deviation 0.236
Placebo GroupThe Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire ScoreVisit 10 (FU 6 Months)0.000 VAS (0~10 cm)Standard Deviation 0
Placebo GroupThe Pain Change From Baseline to Post-wound Creation Visits Based on Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire ScoreVisit 11 (FU 9 Months)0.00 VAS (0~10 cm)Standard Deviation 0

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026