Skip to content

High Flow Nasal Cannula Use in Infants With Bronchiolitis

High Flow Humified Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy in Infants Younger Than 6 Months of Age With Viral Bronchiolitis Compared to Usual Oxygen Therapy : a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02737280
Enrollment
18
Registered
2016-04-13
Start date
2016-03-31
Completion date
2018-09-30
Last updated
2018-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bronchiolitis

Keywords

infant, high flow nasal cannulae, oxygen therapy, bronchiolitis

Brief summary

Infants with viral bronchiolitis are currently treated with oxygen therapy if oxygen saturation is low. In earlier observational clinical studies, the use of high flow nasal cannulae therapy in infants with bronchiolitis has been associated with a decreased rate of intubation and intensive care. This study is a randomized controlled trial in two pediatric university hospitals in Finland comparing high flow nasal cannulae therapy to usual oxygen therapy in infants with bronchiolitis.

Detailed description

Infants with viral bronchiolitis are currently treated with oxygen therapy if oxygen saturation is low. In earlier observational clinical studies, the use of high flow nasal cannulae therapy in infants with bronchiolitis has been associated with a decreased rate of intubation and intensive care. This study is a randomized controlled trial in five pediatric university hospitals in Finland comparing high flow nasal cannulae therapy to usual oxygen therapy in infants with bronchiolitis. The investigators will recruit 160 infants who require oxygen therapy (oxygen saturation \<92%) during hospitalization due to a viral bronchiolitis. The participants are randomized to receive oxygen therapy either with high flow or ordinary nasal cannula.The infants are closely observed by study physicians for clinical parameters. The primary end point is treatment failure (need for change of respiratory support method). Secondary endpoints are respiratory rate (RR) and oxygen saturation (%) at specific measuring points, time from randomisation to end of oxygen therapy and time from randomisation to discharge.

Interventions

DEVICEAirvo (TM, Fisher & Paykel Healthcare) - High flow oxygen therapy

High flow nasal cannula therapy with Airvo (TM, Fisher & Paykel Healthcare) device

DEVICEMedKit Finland - Usual oxygen therapy

Oxygen therapy with normal nasal cannula (for example MedKit Finland) 0-2 l/min

Sponsors

University of Oulu
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 6 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Admission to pediatric ward due to a presumed viral bronchiolitis * Need of oxygen therapy (oxygen saturation \< 92%)

Exclusion criteria

* Pertussis * Needs intubation or CPAP on admission * Severe congenital heart defect * Down's syndrome

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of patients with treatment failure720 hoursTreatment failure = need for change of respiratory support method

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Respiratory rate measured by the study physician/nurseAt 30 min, 60 min, 90 min, 4 hours, 8 hours
Oxygen saturation (%)At 30 min, 60 min, 90 min, 4 hours, 8 hours
Time from randomisation to end of oxygen therapyAt 30 min, 60 min, 90 min, 4 hours, 8 hours
Time from hospital admission to discharge (hours)720 hoursThe date and time for admission and discharge will be registered for each participant and time from hospital admission to discharge is then calculated in hours and compared between the study groups.
Number of participants needing admission to intensive care unit (ICU)720 hoursThe number of participants needing admission to intensive care unit (ICU) will be registered in both treatment groups and that number divided by the total number of participants in the groups (percentages) are then compared between the study groups.

Countries

Finland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026