Skip to content

Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of HOE901-U300 With Lantus in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

6-Month, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, 2-Arm, Parallel-group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of a New Formulation of Insulin Glargine and Lantus® Injected Once Daily in Children and Adolescents Age 6 - 17 Years With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus With a 6-month Safety Extension Period

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02735044
Acronym
EDITION JUNIOR
Enrollment
463
Registered
2016-04-12
Start date
2016-04-14
Completion date
2018-12-20
Last updated
2022-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Brief summary

Primary Objective: To compare the efficacy of a new formulation of insulin glargine (HOE901-U300) to Lantus in terms of change of HbA1c from baseline to endpoint (month 6) in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. . Secondary Objectives: To compare HOE901-U300 and Lantus in terms of: * Percentage of participants reaching target HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG). * To assess the safety of HOE901-U300 including analysis of events of hypoglycemia, events of hyperglycemia with ketosis, and development of anti-insulin-antibodies.

Detailed description

The study duration per participant was approximately 58 weeks that consisted of a 2 week screening period, a main 6-month comparative efficacy and safety treatment period, a 6-month comparative safety extension period, and a 4-week post treatment follow up period.

Interventions

DRUGInsulin glargine,300 U/mL

Subcutaneous injection in the morning or evening using a prefilled pen. Dose titration to achieve fasting self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) from 90 to 130 milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) (5.0 to 7.2 millimol per liter \[mmol/L\])

DRUGInsulin glargine (100 units /mL)

Subcutaneous injection in the morning or evening using a prefilled pen. Dose titration to achieve fasting SMPG from 90 to 130 mg/dL (5.0 to 7.2 mmol/L)

Fast-acting mealtime insulin analogs

Sponsors

Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

: * Children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) for at least 1 year confirmed by typical symptoms at diagnosis and/or by antibody testing \[presence of anti-GAD (glutamic acid decarboxylase) or anti-IA2 (islet antigen 2/tyrosine phosphatase) or anti-islet cell antibodies\] and/or clinical features (eg, history of ketoacidosis)\]. * Signed written informed consent obtained from parent(s)/legal guardian and written or oral assent obtained from participant.

Exclusion criteria

* Age \<6 years and \>=18 years at randomization. * Less than 1 year on insulin treatment prior to screening visit. * Less than 6 months on basal plus mealtime insulin and self-monitoring of blood glucose prior to screening visit. * Participants using premix insulins in the last 3 months before screening visit or participants using human regular insulin as mealtime insulin in the last 3 months before screening visit. * Use of an insulin pump in the last 6 months before screening visit or plans to switch to pump within the next 6 months after screening visit. * Any contraindication to use of insulin glargine as defined in the national product label. * No willingness to inject insulin glargine (Lantus or HOE901-U300) once daily. * HbA1c \<7.5% or \>11% at screening. * Initiation of any glucose-lowering medications in the last 3 months before screening visit. * Hospitalization or care in the emergency ward for diabetic ketoacidosis or history of severe hypoglycemia (as defined by need for glucagon or IV glucose) and accompanied by seizure and/or unconsciousness and/or coma in the last 3 months prior to screening visit. * Postmenarchal girls not protected by highly-effective method(s) of birth control and/or who were unwilling or unable to be tested for pregnancy. Abstinence from sexual intercourse was considered as an acceptable form of birth control. * Pregnant or breast-feeding adolescents, or adolescents who intended to become pregnant during the study period, or who were at risk of getting pregnant due to any psychosocial reason during the study period. The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in HbA1c to Month 6Baseline to Month 6Change in HbA1c was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Month 6 value. Adjusted least-square (LS) means and standard errors (SE) were obtained using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) after multiple imputations of missing data using post-baseline HbA1c data available on the main 6-month randomized period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c Values of <7.5% at Month 6Month 6Participants without any available HbA1c assessment at month 6 and/or with a premature study discontinuation during the main 6-month randomized period were considered as a failure (non-responders) in the analysis. Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) method with randomization strata of screening HbA1c (\<8.5%; \>=8.5%) and randomization strata of age at screening (\<12 years, \>=12 years).
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c Values of <7.5% Without Any Episode of Severe and/or Documented Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose ([SMPG] <54 mg/dL [3.0 mmol/L]) Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During the Last 3 Months of the Main 6-month Randomized Periodupto Month 6Participants without any available HbA1c assessment at month 6 and/or with a premature study discontinuation during the main 6-month randomized period were considered as a failure (non-responders) in the analysis. Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) method with randomization strata of screening HbA1c (\<8.5%; \>=8.5%) and randomization strata of age at screening (\<12 years, \>=12 years).
Percentage of Participants With FPG of <=130 mg/dL (7.2 mmol/L) at Month 6Month 6Participants without any available FPG assessment at month 6 and/or with a premature study discontinuation during the main 6-month randomized period were considered as a failure (non-responders) in the analysis. Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) method with randomization strata of screening HbA1c (\<8.5%; \>=8.5%) and randomization strata of age at screening (\<12 years, \>=12 years).
Percentage of Participants With FPG of <=130 mg/dL (7.2 mmol/L) Without Any Episode of Severe and/or Documented (SMPG <54 mg/dL [3.0 mmol/L]) Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During the Last 3 Months of the Main 6-month Randomized Periodupto Month 6Participants without any available HbA1c assessment at month 6 and/or with a premature study discontinuation during the main 6-month randomized period were considered as a failure (non-responders) in the analysis. Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) method with randomization strata of screening HbA1c (\<8.5%; \>=8.5%) and randomization strata of age at screening (\<12 years, \>=12 years).
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Month 6Baseline to Month 6Change in FPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Month 6 value. Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained using ANCOVA after multiple imputation to address missing data in the main 6 month randomized period.
Change From Baseline in Variability of 24-Hour Mean Plasma Glucose Based on 8-point SMPG Profiles at Month 6Baseline, Month 68-point SMPG profiles were measured at the following 8 points: between 01:00 and 04:00 (clock time) at night, pre-breakfast, 2 hours after breakfast, pre-lunch, 2 hours after lunch, pre-dinner, 2 hours after dinner, and bedtime. Variability was assessed by the coefficient of variation (standard deviation divided by mean) calculated over the 8-point SMPG. Analysis was performed using a ANCOVA model including the fixed categorical effects of treatment group, randomization strata of screening HbA1c (\<8.5%; \>=8.5%) and randomization strata of age at screening (\<12 years, \>=12 years).
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in 8-Point SMPG Profile Per Time PointBaseline to Month 68-point SMPG profiles were measured for following 8 time points at Baseline and Month 6: between 01:00 and 04:00 (clock time) at night, pre-breakfast, 2 hours after breakfast, pre-lunch, 2 hours after lunch, pre-dinner, 2 hours after dinner, and bedtime.
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Hypoglycemic Events (Any Hypoglycemia, Severe Hypoglycemia, Documented Symptomatic, Probable Symptomatic, Asymptomatic Hypoglycemia, Pseudo-hypoglycemia and Severe and/or Confirmed Hypoglycemia) at Month 12Month 12Severe hypoglycemia: an event in which the child/adolescent having altered mental status and cannot assist in their care, is semiconscious or unconscious, or in coma ± convulsions and may require parenteral therapy (glucagon or glucose). Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia: an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of \<=70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L). Asymptomatic hypoglycemia: an event not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured plasma glucose concentration \<=70 mg/dL. Probable symptomatic hypoglycemia: an event during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were not accompanied by plasma glucose determination but was presumably caused by a plasma glucose concentration \<=70 mg/dL. Pseudo-hypoglycemia:an event with any of the typical symptoms of hypoglycaemia with plasma glucose concentration \>70 mg/dL.
Percentage of Participants With Any Hyperglycemia With Ketosis at Month 12Month 12Hyperglycemia with ketosis was defined as SMPG \>=252 mg/dL (14 mmol/L) with accompanying self-measured blood ketones \>=1.5 mmol/L.
Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Mean Plasma Glucose Based on 8-point SMPG Profiles to Month 6Baseline to Month 68-point SMPG profiles were measured at the following 8 points: between 01:00 and 04:00 (clock time) at night, pre-breakfast, 2 hours after breakfast, pre-lunch, 2 hours after lunch, pre-dinner, 2 hours after dinner, and bedtime. Analysis was performed using a ANCOVA model including the fixed categorical effects of treatment group, randomization strata of screening HbA1c (\<8.5%; \>=8.5%), randomization strata of age at screening (\<12 years, \>=12 years) and the baseline 24-hour average 8-point profile SMPG.

Countries

Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Mexico, North Macedonia, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 105 centers in 24 countries. A total of 616 participants were screened between 14 April 2016 and 31 October 2017, of which 153 were screen failures. Screen failures were mainly due to glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level outside of defined ranges per eligibility criteria.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 463 participants were randomized in the study. Randomization was stratified by age group (\<12 years and \>=12 years) and by HbA1c (\<8.5% and \>=8.5%). Assignment to arms was done centrally using interactive voice system in 1:1 ratio.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
HOE901-U300
Insulin glargine 300 U/mL SC injection once daily in the morning or evening for 12 months.
233
Lantus
Insulin glargine 100 U/mL SC injection once daily in the morning or evening for 12 months.
230
Total463

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event33
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy10
Overall StudyOther, not specified above511
Overall StudyPoor compliance to protocol77
Overall StudyRandomized and not treated02

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLantusTotalHOE901-U300
Age, Continuous12.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
12.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
12.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
Body Mass Index (BMI)69.13 BMI percentile
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.64
68.32 BMI percentile
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.61
67.52 BMI percentile
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.62
Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C)8.61 percentage of A1C
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.87
8.63 percentage of A1C
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.88
8.65 percentage of A1C
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.88
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
6 Participants17 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants14 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
211 Participants422 Participants211 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
121 Participants226 Participants105 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
109 Participants237 Participants128 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 2330 / 228
other
Total, other adverse events
105 / 233118 / 228
serious
Total, serious adverse events
35 / 23331 / 228

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in HbA1c to Month 6

Change in HbA1c was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Month 6 value. Adjusted least-square (LS) means and standard errors (SE) were obtained using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) after multiple imputations of missing data using post-baseline HbA1c data available on the main 6-month randomized period.

Time frame: Baseline to Month 6

Population: Analysis was performed on intent-to-treat (ITT) population that included all randomized participants, regardless of whether the treatment kit was used, and was analyzed according to the allocated treatment group. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signified number of participants with available data for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
HOE901-U300Change From Baseline in HbA1c to Month 6-0.399 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Error 0.063
LantusChange From Baseline in HbA1c to Month 6-0.402 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Error 0.064
Comparison: Analysis was performed using ANCOVA models which included the treatment group, the randomization stratum of age group at screening visit (\<12 years and \>=12 years), and the continuous fixed covariates of the baseline HbA1c value.95% CI: [-0.172, 0.179]
Comparison: A step-wise closed testing approach was used to control the type I error. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA models which included the treatment group, the randomization stratum of age group at screening visit (\<12 years and \>=12 years), and the continuous fixed covariates of the baseline HbA1c value.p-value: 0.965ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Mean Plasma Glucose Based on 8-point SMPG Profiles to Month 6

8-point SMPG profiles were measured at the following 8 points: between 01:00 and 04:00 (clock time) at night, pre-breakfast, 2 hours after breakfast, pre-lunch, 2 hours after lunch, pre-dinner, 2 hours after dinner, and bedtime. Analysis was performed using a ANCOVA model including the fixed categorical effects of treatment group, randomization strata of screening HbA1c (\<8.5%; \>=8.5%), randomization strata of age at screening (\<12 years, \>=12 years) and the baseline 24-hour average 8-point profile SMPG.

Time frame: Baseline to Month 6

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signified number of participants with available data for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
HOE901-U300Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Mean Plasma Glucose Based on 8-point SMPG Profiles to Month 60.139 mmol/LStandard Error 0.249
LantusChange From Baseline in 24-Hour Mean Plasma Glucose Based on 8-point SMPG Profiles to Month 6-0.266 mmol/LStandard Error 0.25
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Month 6

Change in FPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Month 6 value. Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained using ANCOVA after multiple imputation to address missing data in the main 6 month randomized period.

Time frame: Baseline to Month 6

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signified number of participants with available data for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
HOE901-U300Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Month 6-0.563 millimole per liter (mmol/L)Standard Error 0.372
LantusChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Month 6-0.549 millimole per liter (mmol/L)Standard Error 0.372
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Variability of 24-Hour Mean Plasma Glucose Based on 8-point SMPG Profiles at Month 6

8-point SMPG profiles were measured at the following 8 points: between 01:00 and 04:00 (clock time) at night, pre-breakfast, 2 hours after breakfast, pre-lunch, 2 hours after lunch, pre-dinner, 2 hours after dinner, and bedtime. Variability was assessed by the coefficient of variation (standard deviation divided by mean) calculated over the 8-point SMPG. Analysis was performed using a ANCOVA model including the fixed categorical effects of treatment group, randomization strata of screening HbA1c (\<8.5%; \>=8.5%) and randomization strata of age at screening (\<12 years, \>=12 years).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signified number of participants with available data for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
HOE901-U300Change From Baseline in Variability of 24-Hour Mean Plasma Glucose Based on 8-point SMPG Profiles at Month 61.469 percentage of mean variabilityStandard Error 1.409
LantusChange From Baseline in Variability of 24-Hour Mean Plasma Glucose Based on 8-point SMPG Profiles at Month 60.789 percentage of mean variabilityStandard Error 1.415
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in 8-Point SMPG Profile Per Time Point

8-point SMPG profiles were measured for following 8 time points at Baseline and Month 6: between 01:00 and 04:00 (clock time) at night, pre-breakfast, 2 hours after breakfast, pre-lunch, 2 hours after lunch, pre-dinner, 2 hours after dinner, and bedtime.

Time frame: Baseline to Month 6

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HOE901-U300Change From Baseline to Month 6 in 8-Point SMPG Profile Per Time Point2 hours after breakfast-0.26 mmol/LStandard Deviation 7.18
HOE901-U300Change From Baseline to Month 6 in 8-Point SMPG Profile Per Time PointBetween 01:00 and 04:00 at night0.84 mmol/LStandard Deviation 6.94
HOE901-U300Change From Baseline to Month 6 in 8-Point SMPG Profile Per Time PointPre-breakfast-0.41 mmol/LStandard Deviation 5.48
HOE901-U300Change From Baseline to Month 6 in 8-Point SMPG Profile Per Time PointPre-lunch0.43 mmol/LStandard Deviation 6.99
HOE901-U300Change From Baseline to Month 6 in 8-Point SMPG Profile Per Time Point2 hours after lunch0.49 mmol/LStandard Deviation 7.64
HOE901-U300Change From Baseline to Month 6 in 8-Point SMPG Profile Per Time PointPre-dinner0.29 mmol/LStandard Deviation 8.05
HOE901-U300Change From Baseline to Month 6 in 8-Point SMPG Profile Per Time Point2 hours after dinner0.51 mmol/LStandard Deviation 8.53
HOE901-U300Change From Baseline to Month 6 in 8-Point SMPG Profile Per Time PointBedtime0.86 mmol/LStandard Deviation 7.6
LantusChange From Baseline to Month 6 in 8-Point SMPG Profile Per Time PointBedtime-0.60 mmol/LStandard Deviation 7
LantusChange From Baseline to Month 6 in 8-Point SMPG Profile Per Time Point2 hours after lunch-0.55 mmol/LStandard Deviation 7.2
LantusChange From Baseline to Month 6 in 8-Point SMPG Profile Per Time PointBetween 01:00 and 04:00 at night-0.60 mmol/LStandard Deviation 7.08
LantusChange From Baseline to Month 6 in 8-Point SMPG Profile Per Time Point2 hours after dinner0.60 mmol/LStandard Deviation 6.86
LantusChange From Baseline to Month 6 in 8-Point SMPG Profile Per Time PointPre-breakfast-1.71 mmol/LStandard Deviation 6.56
LantusChange From Baseline to Month 6 in 8-Point SMPG Profile Per Time Point2 hours after breakfast-0.62 mmol/LStandard Deviation 6.78
LantusChange From Baseline to Month 6 in 8-Point SMPG Profile Per Time PointPre-dinner-0.02 mmol/LStandard Deviation 6.78
LantusChange From Baseline to Month 6 in 8-Point SMPG Profile Per Time PointPre-lunch1.11 mmol/LStandard Deviation 6.85
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Any Hyperglycemia With Ketosis at Month 12

Hyperglycemia with ketosis was defined as SMPG \>=252 mg/dL (14 mmol/L) with accompanying self-measured blood ketones \>=1.5 mmol/L.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Analysis was performed on the safety population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With Any Hyperglycemia With Ketosis at Month 129.9 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With Any Hyperglycemia With Ketosis at Month 1213.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least One Hypoglycemic Events (Any Hypoglycemia, Severe Hypoglycemia, Documented Symptomatic, Probable Symptomatic, Asymptomatic Hypoglycemia, Pseudo-hypoglycemia and Severe and/or Confirmed Hypoglycemia) at Month 12

Severe hypoglycemia: an event in which the child/adolescent having altered mental status and cannot assist in their care, is semiconscious or unconscious, or in coma ± convulsions and may require parenteral therapy (glucagon or glucose). Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia: an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of \<=70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L). Asymptomatic hypoglycemia: an event not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured plasma glucose concentration \<=70 mg/dL. Probable symptomatic hypoglycemia: an event during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were not accompanied by plasma glucose determination but was presumably caused by a plasma glucose concentration \<=70 mg/dL. Pseudo-hypoglycemia:an event with any of the typical symptoms of hypoglycaemia with plasma glucose concentration \>70 mg/dL.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Analysis was performed on the safety population which included all randomized participants who actually received who received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of IMP, and was analyzed according to treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With at Least One Hypoglycemic Events (Any Hypoglycemia, Severe Hypoglycemia, Documented Symptomatic, Probable Symptomatic, Asymptomatic Hypoglycemia, Pseudo-hypoglycemia and Severe and/or Confirmed Hypoglycemia) at Month 12Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia94.8 percentage of participants
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With at Least One Hypoglycemic Events (Any Hypoglycemia, Severe Hypoglycemia, Documented Symptomatic, Probable Symptomatic, Asymptomatic Hypoglycemia, Pseudo-hypoglycemia and Severe and/or Confirmed Hypoglycemia) at Month 12Asymptomatic Hypoglycemia88.4 percentage of participants
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With at Least One Hypoglycemic Events (Any Hypoglycemia, Severe Hypoglycemia, Documented Symptomatic, Probable Symptomatic, Asymptomatic Hypoglycemia, Pseudo-hypoglycemia and Severe and/or Confirmed Hypoglycemia) at Month 12Severe Hypoglycemia8.6 percentage of participants
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With at Least One Hypoglycemic Events (Any Hypoglycemia, Severe Hypoglycemia, Documented Symptomatic, Probable Symptomatic, Asymptomatic Hypoglycemia, Pseudo-hypoglycemia and Severe and/or Confirmed Hypoglycemia) at Month 12Pseudo-hypoglycemia15.9 percentage of participants
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With at Least One Hypoglycemic Events (Any Hypoglycemia, Severe Hypoglycemia, Documented Symptomatic, Probable Symptomatic, Asymptomatic Hypoglycemia, Pseudo-hypoglycemia and Severe and/or Confirmed Hypoglycemia) at Month 12Probable Symptomatic Hypoglycemia10.3 percentage of participants
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With at Least One Hypoglycemic Events (Any Hypoglycemia, Severe Hypoglycemia, Documented Symptomatic, Probable Symptomatic, Asymptomatic Hypoglycemia, Pseudo-hypoglycemia and Severe and/or Confirmed Hypoglycemia) at Month 12Severe and/or documented hypoglycemia99.1 percentage of participants
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With at Least One Hypoglycemic Events (Any Hypoglycemia, Severe Hypoglycemia, Documented Symptomatic, Probable Symptomatic, Asymptomatic Hypoglycemia, Pseudo-hypoglycemia and Severe and/or Confirmed Hypoglycemia) at Month 12Any hypoglycemia99.1 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With at Least One Hypoglycemic Events (Any Hypoglycemia, Severe Hypoglycemia, Documented Symptomatic, Probable Symptomatic, Asymptomatic Hypoglycemia, Pseudo-hypoglycemia and Severe and/or Confirmed Hypoglycemia) at Month 12Severe and/or documented hypoglycemia98.2 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With at Least One Hypoglycemic Events (Any Hypoglycemia, Severe Hypoglycemia, Documented Symptomatic, Probable Symptomatic, Asymptomatic Hypoglycemia, Pseudo-hypoglycemia and Severe and/or Confirmed Hypoglycemia) at Month 12Any hypoglycemia98.7 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With at Least One Hypoglycemic Events (Any Hypoglycemia, Severe Hypoglycemia, Documented Symptomatic, Probable Symptomatic, Asymptomatic Hypoglycemia, Pseudo-hypoglycemia and Severe and/or Confirmed Hypoglycemia) at Month 12Severe Hypoglycemia11.0 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With at Least One Hypoglycemic Events (Any Hypoglycemia, Severe Hypoglycemia, Documented Symptomatic, Probable Symptomatic, Asymptomatic Hypoglycemia, Pseudo-hypoglycemia and Severe and/or Confirmed Hypoglycemia) at Month 12Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia93.9 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With at Least One Hypoglycemic Events (Any Hypoglycemia, Severe Hypoglycemia, Documented Symptomatic, Probable Symptomatic, Asymptomatic Hypoglycemia, Pseudo-hypoglycemia and Severe and/or Confirmed Hypoglycemia) at Month 12Probable Symptomatic Hypoglycemia13.6 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With at Least One Hypoglycemic Events (Any Hypoglycemia, Severe Hypoglycemia, Documented Symptomatic, Probable Symptomatic, Asymptomatic Hypoglycemia, Pseudo-hypoglycemia and Severe and/or Confirmed Hypoglycemia) at Month 12Asymptomatic Hypoglycemia89.5 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With at Least One Hypoglycemic Events (Any Hypoglycemia, Severe Hypoglycemia, Documented Symptomatic, Probable Symptomatic, Asymptomatic Hypoglycemia, Pseudo-hypoglycemia and Severe and/or Confirmed Hypoglycemia) at Month 12Pseudo-hypoglycemia14.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With FPG of <=130 mg/dL (7.2 mmol/L) at Month 6

Participants without any available FPG assessment at month 6 and/or with a premature study discontinuation during the main 6-month randomized period were considered as a failure (non-responders) in the analysis. Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) method with randomization strata of screening HbA1c (\<8.5%; \>=8.5%) and randomization strata of age at screening (\<12 years, \>=12 years).

Time frame: Month 6

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With FPG of <=130 mg/dL (7.2 mmol/L) at Month 627.47 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With FPG of <=130 mg/dL (7.2 mmol/L) at Month 626.52 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With FPG of <=130 mg/dL (7.2 mmol/L) Without Any Episode of Severe and/or Documented (SMPG <54 mg/dL [3.0 mmol/L]) Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During the Last 3 Months of the Main 6-month Randomized Period

Participants without any available HbA1c assessment at month 6 and/or with a premature study discontinuation during the main 6-month randomized period were considered as a failure (non-responders) in the analysis. Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) method with randomization strata of screening HbA1c (\<8.5%; \>=8.5%) and randomization strata of age at screening (\<12 years, \>=12 years).

Time frame: upto Month 6

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With FPG of <=130 mg/dL (7.2 mmol/L) Without Any Episode of Severe and/or Documented (SMPG <54 mg/dL [3.0 mmol/L]) Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During the Last 3 Months of the Main 6-month Randomized Period9.44 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With FPG of <=130 mg/dL (7.2 mmol/L) Without Any Episode of Severe and/or Documented (SMPG <54 mg/dL [3.0 mmol/L]) Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During the Last 3 Months of the Main 6-month Randomized Period7.39 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HbA1c Values of <7.5% at Month 6

Participants without any available HbA1c assessment at month 6 and/or with a premature study discontinuation during the main 6-month randomized period were considered as a failure (non-responders) in the analysis. Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) method with randomization strata of screening HbA1c (\<8.5%; \>=8.5%) and randomization strata of age at screening (\<12 years, \>=12 years).

Time frame: Month 6

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With HbA1c Values of <7.5% at Month 626.18 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With HbA1c Values of <7.5% at Month 623.48 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HbA1c Values of <7.5% Without Any Episode of Severe and/or Documented Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose ([SMPG] <54 mg/dL [3.0 mmol/L]) Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During the Last 3 Months of the Main 6-month Randomized Period

Participants without any available HbA1c assessment at month 6 and/or with a premature study discontinuation during the main 6-month randomized period were considered as a failure (non-responders) in the analysis. Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) method with randomization strata of screening HbA1c (\<8.5%; \>=8.5%) and randomization strata of age at screening (\<12 years, \>=12 years).

Time frame: upto Month 6

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HOE901-U300Percentage of Participants With HbA1c Values of <7.5% Without Any Episode of Severe and/or Documented Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose ([SMPG] <54 mg/dL [3.0 mmol/L]) Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During the Last 3 Months of the Main 6-month Randomized Period4.29 percentage of participants
LantusPercentage of Participants With HbA1c Values of <7.5% Without Any Episode of Severe and/or Documented Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose ([SMPG] <54 mg/dL [3.0 mmol/L]) Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During the Last 3 Months of the Main 6-month Randomized Period4.78 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026