Skip to content

Influences of Balance Training With a Dynamometric Platform in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Valoración de la Puesta en Marcha en Artroplastias Totales de Rodilla Mediante un Trabajo Postural en Plataforma Dinamometrica

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02734225
Acronym
TKA_DP
Enrollment
69
Registered
2016-04-12
Start date
2009-03-31
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2016-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

total knee replacement, total knee arthroplasty, rehabilitation, physical therapy, balance

Brief summary

Knee osteoarthritis produces degeneration and joint wear that greatly affects the patient's proprioceptive system increasing instability. After total knee arthroplasty intervention, it is recommended that the patient performs a rehabilitation procedure to minimize deficits caused by surgery. In this job it is essential to insist on the importance of recovering balance after total knee arthroplasty intervention, and assess a specifically designed protocol to restore its function. An intervention which includes a dynamometric platform as a training method was proposed. The randomized clinical trial compared a control group that performed balance exercises on parallel bars, unstable plates, ramps and stairs against an experimental group that included dynamometric platforms training as a differentiator.

Interventions

OTHERFunctional Recovery

Rehabilitation protocol based on muscle strengthening with isometric, isotonic and counter-resistance with progressive load exercises. Intervention consisted of warm-up phase with passive, active-assisted and active movements, and a work-out phase

OTHERBalance Training

Balance and proprioception training using parallel bars, unstable plates, ramps and stairs

OTHERDynamometric Platform Training

Stability tests, weight changes and stability limits, performing both anterior-posterior and medial-lateral movements simultaneously in some cases

Sponsors

Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria INCLIVA
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Valencia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 65 and 85. * Subjects with knee osteoarthritis that have not been operated before. * Patients operated with the same total replacement prosthesis. * Patients operated with the same surgical procedure. * Time before intervention over 4 weeks. * Time to start rehabilitation after surgery must be less than 4 weeks. * The Result in Berg scale must be greater than 21, indicating a medium-low risk of falling. * the Result of the Mini-Mental State Examination must be equal or greater than 20, which means they do not have moderate or severe cognitive impairment. * Once the informed consent is read and explained, patients must accept and agree to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient does no accept sign the informed consent. * Patient with morphological alterations hip or ankle (also knee). * Patient that presents knee flexion out of the range between 70 ° and -20 ° because of the risk posed to suffer a fall. * Patient with suspected deep vein thrombosis. * Patient with post-surgical infection of the operated knee. * Patient with psychiatric disorders: depression, anxious syndrome, etc. * Patient with pathology of central origin (i.e. cerebellar) that could interfere with the results of the test of balance or strength * Patient with vestibular pathology that could interfere with the results of the test of balance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Berg Balance ScaleChange from baseline (two weeks after intervention) to after four weeks of trainingBalance among older people with impairment in balance function by assessing the performance of functional tasks from the total score achieved in the 14 items test

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional Reach (cm)Change from baseline (two weeks after intervention) to after four weeks of trainingAssesses a patient's stability by measuring the maximum distance an individual can reach forward while standing in a fixed position
Timed Up and Go Test (s)Change from baseline (two weeks after intervention) to after four weeks of trainingDynamic balance assessment. Also points at the risk of falling. Time of getting up from a chair, walk three meters, come back and sit again, measured in seconds
Romberg TestsChange from baseline (two weeks after intervention) to after four weeks of trainingTotal score achieved with open and closed eyes and on firm surface
Knee Range of Mobility (º)Change from baseline (two weeks after intervention) to after four weeks of trainingKnee Range of Mobility (Flexion, Extension) in degrees
Kendall and Lovet scaleChange from baseline (two weeks after intervention) to after four weeks of trainingMuscle Balance estimated with with Kendall and Lovet scale (score from 0 to 5)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026