Skip to content

Intubation During Spinal Immobilization

C-MAC Compared to Direct Laryngoscopy in Patients With Immobilized Cervical Spine by Unexperienced Physicians: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02733536
Enrollment
50
Registered
2016-04-11
Start date
2016-12-31
Completion date
2017-04-30
Last updated
2017-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endotracheal Intubation

Keywords

endotracheal intubation, trauma, paramedic

Brief summary

The aim was to evaluate the performance of the C-MAC compared with Macintosh when performed in patients with immobilized cervical spine by unexperienced physicians.

Interventions

1\) Direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh laryngoscope with size 3 blade (Mercury Medical, Clearwater, FL, USA) with a conventional 7.0 mm internal diameter (ID) tracheal tube

DEVICEC-MAC

C-MAC introduced with a h size 3 blade.

Sponsors

Medical University of Warsaw
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* give voluntary consent to participate in the study * limited experience (\<5 intubations) with real-life intubation using direct laryngoscopy * novice phhysicians

Exclusion criteria

* not meet the above criteria * practice with any videolaryngoscopy * wrist or low back diseases * pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time required for successful intubation1 day

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
success rate of intubation attempt1 daysuccess rate of first intubation attempt
Cormack&Lehane grade1 dayglottic view during intubation rate using Cormack&Lehane grade
Dental Compression1 daythe severity of the potential dental trauma was calculated based on previously described modified grading scale (Svoldelli, 2009)
Ease of intubation1 dayTo access subjective opinion about the difficulty of each intubation method, participants were asked to rate it on a visual analog scale (VAS) with a score from 1 (extremely easy) to 10 (extremely difficult).

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026