Skip to content

Mechanical Bowel Preparation for Elective Colorectal Anastomosis

Mechanical Bowel Preparation for Elective Colorectal Anastomosis: Randomized Clinical Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02731963
Enrollment
81
Registered
2016-04-08
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2016-02-29
Last updated
2016-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anastomosis

Keywords

Outcomes, Bowel preparation

Brief summary

Colorectal surgery is highly associated with septic complications, therefore, multiple approaches have been used to reduce this complications, one of the most used is mechanical bowel preparation. Lately multiple studies have suggested that mechanical bowel preparation might not be necessary.

Detailed description

Objective: Compare elective colorectal anastomosis with or without mechanical bowel preparation on outcomes, particularly anastomotic leak, surgical site infection, and ileum. Materials and methods: A clinical trial was conducted including patients with colorectal pathology who underwent elective colorectal anastomosis. Patients were randomized into two groups; with mechanical bowel preparation (Group 1), and without mechanical bowel preparation (Group 2). Surgical, and non-surgical outcomes were evaluated, including anastomotic leak, surgical site infection, ileum, acute kidney injury, pneumonia, and mortality. The statistical analysis was performed according to the nature of variables, for continuous data using measures of central tendency and dispersion and for the qualitative data with frequencies and percentages. Inferential analysis with student's t-test, and/or Mann-Whitney's U test; chi-square distribution, and/or Fisher's exact test respectively.

Interventions

DRUGPolyethylene glycol

Patients with colorectal pathology who underwent elective colorectal anastomosis, that were randomized into two groups; one of them received mechanical bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol (study group), and the other one received clear liquid diet(control group) .

Sponsors

Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Entitlement to the Mexican Institute of Social Security * Signed informed consent * Patients with colorectal pathology who needed primary elective colorectal anastomosis * Body mass index \>18, and \< 31

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who dropped out from the study or withdrew the informed consent * Patients who did not accepted the surgical procedure * Patients who had been submitted to surgery before entering the protocol * Patients who need a colostomy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants with Anastomotic leak6 weeksFollowing the surgical procedure, anastomotic leak was evaluated with fecal discharge on drainage and confirmed with computerized tomography.
Number of Participants with Surgical site infection6 weeksFollowing the surgical procedure, surgical site infection was evaluated if the patient presented specific signs and symptoms for this condition (redness, delayed healing, fever, pain, tenderness, warmth, or swelling), and confirmation with culture of the purulent discharge.
Number of Participants with Postoperative ileus6 weeksFollowing the surgical procedure, ileus was evaluated if the patient presented distended and tympanic abdomen, and absence or hypoactive bowel sounds, and confirmed with a plain abdominal radiography.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants with Pneumonia6 weeksFollowing the surgical procedure, pneumonia was evaluated if the patient presented specific signs and symptoms for this condition (fever, shaking chills, cough productive of sputum), and confirmation with chest radiography.
Number of Participants with Fistula6 weeksFollowing the surgical procedure, fistula was evaluated with fecal discharge on drainage and confirmed with CT fistulography.
Number of Participants with Acute kidney injury6 weeksFollowing the surgical procedure, acute kidney injury was evaluated with kidney function studies (BUN, creatinine)
Number of Participants with Abdominal sepsis6 weeksFollowing the surgical procedure, abdominal sepsis was evaluated if the patient presented specific signs and symptoms for this condition (fever, abdominal pain, ascites, worsening), and confirmation with computerized tomography.
Number of Participants with Abscess6 weeksFollowing the surgical procedure, abscesses were evaluated if the patient presented specific signs and symptoms for this condition (fever, abdominal pain, ascites), and confirmation with computerized tomography.

Countries

Mexico

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026