Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Safety of Aceneuramic Acid Extended Release (Ace-ER; UX001) Tablets in Glucosamine (UDP-N-acetyl)-2-Epimerase (GNE) Myopathy (GNEM) (Also Known as Hereditary Inclusion Body Myopathy [HIBM]) Patients With Severe Ambulatory Impairment

A Phase 2 Open-label Study to Evaluate the Safety of Aceneuramic Acid Extended Release (Ace-ER) Tablets in GNE Myopathy (GNEM) (Also Known as Hereditary Inclusion Body Myopathy (HIBM)) Patients With Severe Ambulatory Impairment

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02731690
Enrollment
42
Registered
2016-04-07
Start date
2016-04-29
Completion date
2018-01-10
Last updated
2019-02-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Distal Myopathy, Nonaka Type, Distal Myopathy With Rimmed Vacuoles, GNE Myopathy, Hereditary Inclusion Body Myopathy, Inclusion Body Myopathy 2, Quadriceps Sparing Myopathy

Keywords

GNE Myopathy, Nonaka, GNEM, Hereditary Inclusion Body Myopathy, HIBM, DMRV, QSM

Brief summary

The primary objective of this Phase 2 study is to evaluate the safety of open-label 6 g/day Ace-ER in GNEM participants with severe ambulatory impairment.

Interventions

DRUGAceneuramic Acid Extended-Release

oral tablets

Sponsors

Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female, aged ≥ 18 years old * Willing and able to provide written, signed informed consent after the nature of the study has been explained, and before any research-related procedures are conducted * Have a documented diagnosis of GNEM, HIBM, distal myopathy with rimmed vacuoles (DMRV), or Nonaka disease due to previously demonstrated mutations in the gene encoding the GNE/N-acetylmannosamine kinase (MNK) enzyme (genotyping will not be conducted in this study). * Should meet the criteria for severe ambulatory impairment defined below: * Unable to rise from a seated position to standing without help from another person, assistive device(s), stationary object, or other support AND * Unable to walk without the assistance of another person OR if able to walk (use of assistive device(s) permitted), requires at least 2 minutes to walk 40 meters (one full lap of the 6-minute walk test \[6MWT\] course) AND * Use of wheelchair or scooter for activities outside of the home or unable to leave the home independently * Willing and able to comply with all study procedures * Participants of child-bearing potential or with partners of child-bearing potential who have not undergone a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and are sexually active must consent to use highly effective method of contraception as determined by the site investigator (i.e. oral hormonal contraceptives, patch hormonal contraceptives, vaginal ring, intrauterine device, physical double-barrier methods, surgical hysterectomy, vasectomy, tubal ligation or true abstinence (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject) which means not having sex because the subject chooses not to), from the period following the signing of the informed consent through 30 days after last dose of study drug * Females of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at Screening and be willing to have additional pregnancy tests during the study. Females considered not of childbearing potential include those who have been in menopause for at least two years, have had tubal ligation at least one year prior to Screening, or who have had a total hysterectomy or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy

Exclusion criteria

* Ingestion of N-acetyl-D-mannosamine (ManNAc), SA, or related metabolites; intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG); or anything that can be metabolized to produce SA in the body within 60 days prior to the Screening Visit * Prior participation in a clinical trial involving treatment with Ace-ER/placebo and/or Sialic Acid immediate release (SA-IR) in the past year * Has had any hypersensitivity to aceneuramic acid or its excipients that, in the judgment of the investigator, places the subject at increased risk for adverse effects * Has serum transaminase (i.e. aspartate aminotransferase \[AST\] or gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase \[GGT\]) levels greater than 3X the upper limit of normal (ULN) for age/gender, or serum creatinine of greater than 2X ULN at Screening * Pregnant or breastfeeding at Screening or planning to become pregnant (self or partner) at any time during the study * Use of any investigational product or investigational medical device within 30 days prior to Screening, or anticipated requirement for any investigational agent prior to completion of all scheduled study assessments * Has a condition of such severity and acuity, in the opinion of the investigator, that it warrants immediate surgical intervention or other treatment or may not allow safe participation in the study * Has a concurrent disease, active suicidal ideation, or other condition that, in the view of the investigator, places the subject at high risk of poor treatment compliance or of not completing the study, or would interfere with study participation or would affect safety

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation48 Weeks (plus 30 [+5] days for participants not enrolling in extension study)An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug, whether or not considered drug related. An SAE or serious suspected adverse reaction is an AE or suspected adverse reaction that at any dose, in the view of either the Investigator or Ultragenyx, results in any of the following outcomes: death; a life-threatening AE; inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant incapacity or disability (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAEs were defined as any AE that occurred after the first dose of study drug.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline In Physical Examinations48 weeksComplete physical examinations included assessments of general appearance; head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat; the cardiovascular, dermatologic, lymphatic, respiratory, GI, musculoskeletal, and neurologic systems. The neurologic system examination included assessments of cognition, cranial nerves, motor function, coordination and gait, reflexes, and sensory function. Brief physical examinations included assessments of general appearance, cardiovascular and respiratory systems, and a focus on any presenting complaints.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline In Vital Signs48 weeksVital signs included seated systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiration rate, and temperature.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline In Clinical Laboratory Results48 weeksThe clinical laboratory evaluations performed included serum chemistry, complete blood count (hematology), and urinalysis.
Number of Participants With Overall Suicidal Behaviors and/or Ideation at Baseline and Post-Baseline48 weeksAs evaluated by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), a participant-rated questionnaire to assess suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, actual attempts (yes or no responses).
Change From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Mobility Domain Subscale Scores Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Mobility subscale scores have 13 items and range from 0 to 52 with higher scores representing greater mobility. Analyzed using a repeated measure generalized estimation equation (GEE) model, which includes the change from baseline as the dependent variable, visit as a fixed factor, and the baseline value as a covariate. Compound symmetry is used as the covariance structure.
Change From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Upper Extremity Domain Subscale Scores Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Upper Extremity subscale scores have 9 items and range from 0 to 36 with higher scores representing more skilled, independent use of the arms during functional activity performance. Analyzed using a repeated measure GEE model, which includes the change from baseline as the dependent variable, visit as a fixed factor, and the baseline value as a covariate. Compound symmetry is used as the covariance structure.
Number of Participants Taking Prior and Concomitant Medications48 weeksPrior medications are any medications which started before the date of the first dose of investigational product. Concomitant medications are any medications that are taken on or after the date of the first dose of investigational product excluding concomitant medications started after the date of the last dose of investigational product.
Change From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Total Scores Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Total Score were calculated as the sum of the subscale Scores range from 0 to 120 with higher scores representing greater independence with functional activities. Analyzed using a repeated measure GEE model, which includes the change from baseline as the dependent variable, visit as a fixed factor, and the baseline value as a covariate. Compound symmetry is used as the covariance structure.
Change From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Grip) Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48Hand held dynamometry testing was used to measure strength. The maximum voluntary isometric contraction against a dynamometer was used to measure bilateral strength in the following muscle groups: shoulder abductors, wrist extensors and knee extensors. Specialized dynamometers for the measurement of grip and key pinch strength were also used. The total force (in kgf) for each was recorded. Analyzed using a repeated measure GEE model, which includes the change from baseline as the dependent variable, visit as a fixed factor, and the baseline value as a covariate. Compound symmetry is used as the covariance structure.
Change From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Shoulder Abductors) Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48Hand held dynamometry testing was used to measure strength. The maximum voluntary isometric contraction against a dynamometer was used to measure bilateral strength in the following muscle groups: shoulder abductors, wrist extensors and knee extensors. Specialized dynamometers for the measurement of grip and key pinch strength were also used. The total force (in kgf) for each was recorded. Analyzed using a repeated measure GEE model, which includes the change from baseline as the dependent variable, visit as a fixed factor, and the baseline value as a covariate. Compound symmetry is used as the covariance structure.
Change From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Wrist Extensors) Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48Hand held dynamometry testing was used to measure strength. The maximum voluntary isometric contraction against a dynamometer was used to measure bilateral strength in the following muscle groups: shoulder abductors, wrist extensors and knee extensors. Specialized dynamometers for the measurement of grip and key pinch strength were also used. The total force (in kgf) for each was recorded. Analyzed using a repeated measure GEE model, which includes the change from baseline as the dependent variable, visit as a fixed factor, and the baseline value as a covariate. Compound symmetry is used as the covariance structure.
Change From Baseline in HHD Muscle Strength in Knee Extensors Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48Hand held dynamometry testing was used to measure strength. The maximum voluntary isometric contraction against a dynamometer was used to measure bilateral strength in the following muscle groups: shoulder abductors, wrist extensors and knee extensors. Specialized dynamometers for the measurement of grip and key pinch strength were also used. The total force (in kgf) for each was recorded. Analyzed using a repeated measure GEE model, which includes the change from baseline as the dependent variable, visit as a fixed factor, and the baseline value as a covariate. Compound symmetry is used as the covariance structure.
Change From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Key Pinch) Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48Hand held dynamometry testing was used to measure strength. The maximum voluntary isometric contraction against a dynamometer was used to measure bilateral strength in the following muscle groups: shoulder abductors, wrist extensors and knee extensors. Specialized dynamometers for the measurement of grip and key pinch strength were also used. The total force (in kgf) for each was recorded.
Change From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Self-Care Domain Subscale Scores Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Self-Care subscale scores have 8 items range from 0 to 32 with higher scores representing greater independence with functional care activities. Analyzed using a repeated measure GEE model, which includes the change from baseline as the dependent variable, visit as a fixed factor, and the baseline value as a covariate. Compound symmetry is used as the covariance structure.

Countries

Bulgaria, Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
UX001 6g/Day
Open-label UX001 6000 mg (6 g) total daily dose administered orally divided into a 3-times-daily regimen.
42
Total42

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyDiscontinuation of Study by Sponsor26
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUX001 6g/Day
Age, Continuous46.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.97
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
42 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Glucosamine (UDP-N-acetyl)-2-epimerase Myopathy Functional Activities Scale(GNEM-FAS) Mobility Score10.63 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.816
GNEM-FAS Self-Care Domain Score13.00 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.413
GNEM-FAS Total Score38.83 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.116
GNEM-FAS Upper Extremity Domain Score15.20 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.897
Hand-Held Dynamometry (HHD) Raw Strength: Average Grip5.535 kgf
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6778
HHD Lower Extremity Muscle Strength: Average Knee Extension10.50 kgf
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.001
HHD Raw Strength: Average Shoulder Abduction3.880 kgf
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4583
HHD Raw Strength: Average Wrist Extension3.532 kgf
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5177
HHD Raw Strength: Key Pinch1.790 kgf
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1614
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other (Not Specified)
9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 42
other
Total, other adverse events
26 / 42
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 42

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug, whether or not considered drug related. An SAE or serious suspected adverse reaction is an AE or suspected adverse reaction that at any dose, in the view of either the Investigator or Ultragenyx, results in any of the following outcomes: death; a life-threatening AE; inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant incapacity or disability (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAEs were defined as any AE that occurred after the first dose of study drug.

Time frame: 48 Weeks (plus 30 [+5] days for participants not enrolling in extension study)

Population: Safety Analysis Set: all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
UX001 6g/DayNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Leading to DiscontinuationTEAEs30 Participants
UX001 6g/DayNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Leading to DiscontinuationSerious TEAEs1 Participants
UX001 6g/DayNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Leading to DiscontinuationTEAEs Causing Study Drug Discontinuation1 Participants
UX001 6g/DayNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Leading to DiscontinuationTEAEs Causing Study Discontinuation1 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Mobility Domain Subscale Scores Over Time

GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Mobility subscale scores have 13 items and range from 0 to 52 with higher scores representing greater mobility. Analyzed using a repeated measure generalized estimation equation (GEE) model, which includes the change from baseline as the dependent variable, visit as a fixed factor, and the baseline value as a covariate. Compound symmetry is used as the covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48

Population: Full Analysis Set: all participants with a baseline measurement and at least 1 postbaseline measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Mobility Domain Subscale Scores Over TimeWeek 120.16 units on a scale
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Mobility Domain Subscale Scores Over TimeWeek 24-0.65 units on a scale
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Mobility Domain Subscale Scores Over TimeWeek 36-0.69 units on a scale
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Mobility Domain Subscale Scores Over TimeWeek 48-1.03 units on a scale
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.5303GEE model
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.1646GEE model
Comparison: Week 36p-value: 0.1189GEE model
Comparison: Week 48p-value: 0.0706GEE model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Self-Care Domain Subscale Scores Over Time

GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Self-Care subscale scores have 8 items range from 0 to 32 with higher scores representing greater independence with functional care activities. Analyzed using a repeated measure GEE model, which includes the change from baseline as the dependent variable, visit as a fixed factor, and the baseline value as a covariate. Compound symmetry is used as the covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48

Population: Full Analysis Set: all participants with a baseline measurement and at least 1 postbaseline measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Self-Care Domain Subscale Scores Over TimeWeek 12-0.39 units on a scale
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Self-Care Domain Subscale Scores Over TimeWeek 24-0.71 units on a scale
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Self-Care Domain Subscale Scores Over TimeWeek 36-0.83 units on a scale
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Self-Care Domain Subscale Scores Over TimeWeek 48-0.40 units on a scale
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.0568GEE model
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.0533GEE model
Comparison: Week 36p-value: 0.0459GEE model
Comparison: Week 48p-value: 0.5678GEE model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Total Scores Over Time

GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Total Score were calculated as the sum of the subscale Scores range from 0 to 120 with higher scores representing greater independence with functional activities. Analyzed using a repeated measure GEE model, which includes the change from baseline as the dependent variable, visit as a fixed factor, and the baseline value as a covariate. Compound symmetry is used as the covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48

Population: Full Analysis Set: all participants with a baseline measurement and at least 1 postbaseline measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Total Scores Over TimeWeek 120.35 units on a scale
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Total Scores Over TimeWeek 24-1.95 units on a scale
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Total Scores Over TimeWeek 36-2.02 units on a scale
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Total Scores Over TimeWeek 48-3.34 units on a scale
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.581GEE model
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.0465GEE model
Comparison: Week 36p-value: 0.1047GEE model
Comparison: Week 48p-value: 0.0661GEE model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Upper Extremity Domain Subscale Scores Over Time

GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Upper Extremity subscale scores have 9 items and range from 0 to 36 with higher scores representing more skilled, independent use of the arms during functional activity performance. Analyzed using a repeated measure GEE model, which includes the change from baseline as the dependent variable, visit as a fixed factor, and the baseline value as a covariate. Compound symmetry is used as the covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48

Population: Full Analysis Set: all participants with a baseline measurement and at least 1 postbaseline measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Upper Extremity Domain Subscale Scores Over TimeWeek 120.57 units on a scale
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Upper Extremity Domain Subscale Scores Over TimeWeek 24-0.62 units on a scale
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Upper Extremity Domain Subscale Scores Over TimeWeek 36-0.51 units on a scale
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in GNEM-FAS Expanded Version Upper Extremity Domain Subscale Scores Over TimeWeek 48-1.91 units on a scale
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.0715GEE model
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.1697GEE model
Comparison: Week 36p-value: 0.3428GEE model
Comparison: Week 48p-value: 0.0642GEE model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in HHD Muscle Strength in Knee Extensors Over Time

Hand held dynamometry testing was used to measure strength. The maximum voluntary isometric contraction against a dynamometer was used to measure bilateral strength in the following muscle groups: shoulder abductors, wrist extensors and knee extensors. Specialized dynamometers for the measurement of grip and key pinch strength were also used. The total force (in kgf) for each was recorded. Analyzed using a repeated measure GEE model, which includes the change from baseline as the dependent variable, visit as a fixed factor, and the baseline value as a covariate. Compound symmetry is used as the covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48

Population: Full Analysis Set: all participants with a baseline measurement and at least 1 postbaseline measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in HHD Muscle Strength in Knee Extensors Over TimeWeek 120.80 kgf
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in HHD Muscle Strength in Knee Extensors Over TimeWeek 241.35 kgf
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in HHD Muscle Strength in Knee Extensors Over TimeWeek 362.05 kgf
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in HHD Muscle Strength in Knee Extensors Over TimeWeek 482.45 kgf
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.0872GEE model
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.0073GEE model
Comparison: Week 36p-value: 0.0086GEE model
Comparison: Week 48p-value: 0.0489GEE model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Grip) Over Time

Hand held dynamometry testing was used to measure strength. The maximum voluntary isometric contraction against a dynamometer was used to measure bilateral strength in the following muscle groups: shoulder abductors, wrist extensors and knee extensors. Specialized dynamometers for the measurement of grip and key pinch strength were also used. The total force (in kgf) for each was recorded. Analyzed using a repeated measure GEE model, which includes the change from baseline as the dependent variable, visit as a fixed factor, and the baseline value as a covariate. Compound symmetry is used as the covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48

Population: Full Analysis Set: all participants with a baseline measurement and at least 1 postbaseline measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Grip) Over TimeWeek 120.258 kgf
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Grip) Over TimeWeek 240.128 kgf
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Grip) Over TimeWeek 360.038 kgf
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Grip) Over TimeWeek 48-0.261 kgf
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.1615GEE model
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.6201GEE model
Comparison: Week 36p-value: 0.9229GEE model
Comparison: Week 48p-value: 0.6307GEE model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Key Pinch) Over Time

Hand held dynamometry testing was used to measure strength. The maximum voluntary isometric contraction against a dynamometer was used to measure bilateral strength in the following muscle groups: shoulder abductors, wrist extensors and knee extensors. Specialized dynamometers for the measurement of grip and key pinch strength were also used. The total force (in kgf) for each was recorded.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48

Population: Full Analysis Set: all participants with a baseline measurement and at least 1 postbaseline measurement at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Key Pinch) Over TimeWeek 240.112 kgfStandard Deviation 0.6534
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Key Pinch) Over TimeWeek 120.110 kgfStandard Deviation 0.7083
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Key Pinch) Over TimeWeek 360.049 kgfStandard Deviation 0.809
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Key Pinch) Over TimeWeek 480.318 kgfStandard Deviation 0.9509
Secondary

Change From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Shoulder Abductors) Over Time

Hand held dynamometry testing was used to measure strength. The maximum voluntary isometric contraction against a dynamometer was used to measure bilateral strength in the following muscle groups: shoulder abductors, wrist extensors and knee extensors. Specialized dynamometers for the measurement of grip and key pinch strength were also used. The total force (in kgf) for each was recorded. Analyzed using a repeated measure GEE model, which includes the change from baseline as the dependent variable, visit as a fixed factor, and the baseline value as a covariate. Compound symmetry is used as the covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48

Population: Full Analysis Set: all participants with a baseline measurement and at least 1 postbaseline measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Shoulder Abductors) Over TimeWeek 120.339 kgf
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Shoulder Abductors) Over TimeWeek 240.379 kgf
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Shoulder Abductors) Over TimeWeek 360.437 kgf
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Shoulder Abductors) Over TimeWeek 48-0.277 kgf
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.0088GEE model
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.2213GEE model
Comparison: Week 36p-value: 0.018GEE model
Comparison: Week 48p-value: 0.197GEE model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Wrist Extensors) Over Time

Hand held dynamometry testing was used to measure strength. The maximum voluntary isometric contraction against a dynamometer was used to measure bilateral strength in the following muscle groups: shoulder abductors, wrist extensors and knee extensors. Specialized dynamometers for the measurement of grip and key pinch strength were also used. The total force (in kgf) for each was recorded. Analyzed using a repeated measure GEE model, which includes the change from baseline as the dependent variable, visit as a fixed factor, and the baseline value as a covariate. Compound symmetry is used as the covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48

Population: Full Analysis Set: all participants with a baseline measurement and at least 1 postbaseline measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Wrist Extensors) Over TimeWeek 120.235 kgf
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Wrist Extensors) Over TimeWeek 240.152 kgf
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Wrist Extensors) Over TimeWeek 360.358 kgf
UX001 6g/DayChange From Baseline in HHD Raw Strength (Wrist Extensors) Over TimeWeek 48-0.123 kgf
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.0752GEE model
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.6403GEE model
Comparison: Week 36p-value: 0.2316GEE model
Comparison: Week 48p-value: 0.7635GEE model
Secondary

Number of Participants Taking Prior and Concomitant Medications

Prior medications are any medications which started before the date of the first dose of investigational product. Concomitant medications are any medications that are taken on or after the date of the first dose of investigational product excluding concomitant medications started after the date of the last dose of investigational product.

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: Safety Analysis Set: all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
UX001 6g/DayNumber of Participants Taking Prior and Concomitant MedicationsPrior Medications31 Participants
UX001 6g/DayNumber of Participants Taking Prior and Concomitant MedicationsConcomitant Medications33 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline In Clinical Laboratory Results

The clinical laboratory evaluations performed included serum chemistry, complete blood count (hematology), and urinalysis.

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: Safety Analysis Set: all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
UX001 6g/DayNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline In Clinical Laboratory ResultsHematology0 participants
UX001 6g/DayNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline In Clinical Laboratory ResultsClinical Chemistry2 participants
UX001 6g/DayNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline In Clinical Laboratory ResultsUrinalysis0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline In Physical Examinations

Complete physical examinations included assessments of general appearance; head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat; the cardiovascular, dermatologic, lymphatic, respiratory, GI, musculoskeletal, and neurologic systems. The neurologic system examination included assessments of cognition, cranial nerves, motor function, coordination and gait, reflexes, and sensory function. Brief physical examinations included assessments of general appearance, cardiovascular and respiratory systems, and a focus on any presenting complaints.

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: Safety Analysis Set: all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
UX001 6g/DayNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline In Physical Examinations0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline In Vital Signs

Vital signs included seated systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiration rate, and temperature.

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: Safety Analysis Set: all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
UX001 6g/DayNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline In Vital Signs0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Overall Suicidal Behaviors and/or Ideation at Baseline and Post-Baseline

As evaluated by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), a participant-rated questionnaire to assess suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, actual attempts (yes or no responses).

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: Safety Analysis Set: all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
UX001 6g/DayNumber of Participants With Overall Suicidal Behaviors and/or Ideation at Baseline and Post-BaselineOverall Suicidal Ideation: Baseline7 Participants
UX001 6g/DayNumber of Participants With Overall Suicidal Behaviors and/or Ideation at Baseline and Post-BaselineOverall Suicidal Behaviors: Baseline1 Participants
UX001 6g/DayNumber of Participants With Overall Suicidal Behaviors and/or Ideation at Baseline and Post-BaselineOverall Suicidal Behaviors: Post-Baseline0 Participants
UX001 6g/DayNumber of Participants With Overall Suicidal Behaviors and/or Ideation at Baseline and Post-BaselineNon-Suicide Self-Injurious Behavior: Baseline0 Participants
UX001 6g/DayNumber of Participants With Overall Suicidal Behaviors and/or Ideation at Baseline and Post-BaselineNon-Suicide Self-Injurious Behavior: Post-Baseline0 Participants
UX001 6g/DayNumber of Participants With Overall Suicidal Behaviors and/or Ideation at Baseline and Post-BaselineCompleted Suicide: Post-Baseline0 Participants
UX001 6g/DayNumber of Participants With Overall Suicidal Behaviors and/or Ideation at Baseline and Post-BaselineOverall Suicidal Ideation: Post-Baseline1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026