Skip to content

Usability of the CP950 Sound Processor

Usability of the CP950 Sound Processor With Experienced Cochlear Implant Users

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02727842
Acronym
C950
Enrollment
30
Registered
2016-04-05
Start date
2016-04-30
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2018-09-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hearing Loss

Keywords

cochlear implant, Sound Processor

Brief summary

Studying usability and gaining feedback of the CP950 Sound Processor in experienced cochlear implant recipients.

Detailed description

One month protocol, with 2 study visits. The aim of the study to is to gain patient and audiologist feedback on their experience and usability with the device and wireless programming pod.

Interventions

DEVICECP950 Sound Processor

An off-the-ear processor configuration with identical functionality to the commercially approved CP910/920 processor

DEVICEWireless programming pod

The CP950 Sound Processor will be programmed by the wireless programming pod, which is needed as the interface to commercially approved programming software

Sponsors

Cochlear
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. At least 6 months experience with a Nucleus 24 series or later implant in at least one implanted ear 2. Subjects age 12 and older who are cognitively and developmentally able to complete all study related questionnaires as deemed by the principal investigator or delegated staff 3. At least 3 months experience with the CP810,CP920 or CP910 sound processor 4. Ability to use 2 zinc air batteries with their current program (MAP) 5. Willingness to participate in and to comply with all requirements of the protocol for the duration of the trial

Exclusion criteria

1. Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject, regarding the possible benefits, risks and limitations that are inherent to the procedure and prosthetic device 2. Additional disabilities that would prevent participation in evaluations 3. Implant types not currently supported by the CP950 sound processor (i.e.,N22)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Satisfaction Through Usability of the CP950 Sound Processor as Measured by the CP950 Take Home Questionnaire1 monthTo evaluate usability of the CP950 sound processor using the CP950 Take Home Questionnaire for existing cochlear implant users. Specifically: 1. Patient Reported Hearing Performance 2. Retention & Comfort 3. Ease of use 4. Use of remote controls 5. Look & feel 6. Reliability 7. Maintenance & use

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment Group
All patients will receive the CP950 Sound Processor and be part of the treatment group for one month which is programmed via the wireless programming pod CP950 Sound Processor: An off-the-ear processor configuration with identical functionality to the commercially approved CP910/920 processor Wireless programming pod: The CP950 Sound Processor will be programmed by the wireless programming pod, which is needed as the interface to commercially approved programming software
30
Total30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment Group
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
1 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
11 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
18 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Patient Satisfaction Through Usability of the CP950 Sound Processor as Measured by the CP950 Take Home Questionnaire

To evaluate usability of the CP950 sound processor using the CP950 Take Home Questionnaire for existing cochlear implant users. Specifically: 1. Patient Reported Hearing Performance 2. Retention & Comfort 3. Ease of use 4. Use of remote controls 5. Look & feel 6. Reliability 7. Maintenance & use

Time frame: 1 month

Population: All enrolled subjects

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All SubjectsPatient Satisfaction Through Usability of the CP950 Sound Processor as Measured by the CP950 Take Home QuestionnaireSatisfiaction with retention accessory22 Participants
All SubjectsPatient Satisfaction Through Usability of the CP950 Sound Processor as Measured by the CP950 Take Home QuestionnaireSatisfaction with hearing performance28 Participants
All SubjectsPatient Satisfaction Through Usability of the CP950 Sound Processor as Measured by the CP950 Take Home QuestionnaireAgreed sound processor is comfortable27 Participants
All SubjectsPatient Satisfaction Through Usability of the CP950 Sound Processor as Measured by the CP950 Take Home QuestionnaireAgreed sound processor is easy to use28 Participants
All SubjectsPatient Satisfaction Through Usability of the CP950 Sound Processor as Measured by the CP950 Take Home QuestionnaireSatisfied with look and feel of processor27 Participants
All SubjectsPatient Satisfaction Through Usability of the CP950 Sound Processor as Measured by the CP950 Take Home QuestionnaireAgreed sound processor was reliable29 Participants
All SubjectsPatient Satisfaction Through Usability of the CP950 Sound Processor as Measured by the CP950 Take Home QuestionnaireAgreed sound processor is easy to clean24 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026