Skip to content

The Efficacy and Safety of Combined Therapy With Red Yeast Rice and Low-dose Statin:Comparing With Standardized Statin

Comparison Between Combined Therapy With Red Yeast Rice and Low-dose Statin and Standardized Statin: a Single-center, Non-inferiority, Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02726555
Enrollment
240
Registered
2016-04-01
Start date
2015-11-30
Completion date
2026-05-31
Last updated
2024-08-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atherosclerosis, Dyslipidemia

Keywords

Red yeast rice, Atorvastatin, Mild cardiovascular disease

Brief summary

Double-dose statin regimen achieves merely 6% of decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, whereas the risk of side effects increased largely. The investigators' previous pilot study (NCT01686451) has suggested that red yeast rice was of similar lipid-lowering efficacy while was associated with less fatigue than statins. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined therapy with red yeast rice and low-dose atorvastatin in persons with mild atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and who qualified for statin therapy according to national guidelines.

Detailed description

Both Red Yeast Rice and Statins are cholesterol-lowering medications are often prescribed for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The investigators' previous pilot study (NCT01686451) has suggested that red yeast rice was of similar lipid-lowering efficacy while was associated with less fatigue than statins. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of combined therapy with red yeast rice at 1.2 g/day and atorvastatin at 10 mg/day with atorvastatin at 20 mg/day in persons with mild atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and who qualified for statin therapy according to national guidelines. This study will enroll individuals with established mild atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and who do not currently take lipid-lowering medications. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive combined therapy with red yeast rice at 1.2 g/day and atorvastatin at 10 mg/day or atorvastatin at 20 mg/day for 24 weeks. Study visits will occur at screening, baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24. Blood will be collected for laboratory testing, and standardized questionnaires will assess noncardiovascular endpoints. Pill count will be used to assess adherence of treatment. Medication side effects will be monitored and tests of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransaminase (AST) and creatine phosphate kinase (CPK) will be performed. Medication efficacy will be assessed and test of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) will be performed.

Interventions

DRUGRed yeast rice and atorvastatin

Participants will receive 2 capsules of 300mg red yeast rice and 2 capsules of 10mg atorvastatin for 24 weeks.

DRUGAtorvastatin alone

Participants will receive 2 capsules of placebo and 2 capsules of 10mg atorvastatin for 24 weeks.

Sponsors

Wenzhou Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with established mild atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, defined as coronary and/or carotid and/or peripheral artery lesions \<40% lumen diameter stenosis, diagnosed by coronary angiography and carotid and/or peripheral artery ultrasound respectively, together with LDL cholesterol level \> 70 mg/dL (1.80 mmol/L). 2. Female patients must be postmenopausal as defined by no menstruation for at least 12 months, or surgically sterilized for at least three months prior to beginning the study, or have a negative pregnancy test and agree to avoid pregnancy during the study and one month after the end of the study by using two reliable methods of contraception. 3. Patients must have been informed of all aspects of the study and signed an informed consent form before any study-related activities. 4. Patients must be willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests, and other study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Patients who have met all the above inclusion criteria will be screened for the following

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levelMeasured at screening, baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levelMeasured at screening, baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment on serum total cholesterol (TC) levelMeasured at screening, baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on serum triglyceride (TG) levelMeasured at screening, baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on serum non-HDL cholesterol levelMeasured at screening, baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMs)Measured at week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24SAMs included all muscle-related complaints (e.g. pain, weakness, or cramps). Reported events are muscle-related complaints confirmed by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) according to the nature of the muscle symptoms, the elevation in creatine kinase (CK) levels and their temporal association with statin initiation, discontinuation, and re-challenge.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on Calculation problems scoreMeasured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24Calculation problems score is self-rated, ranging from 0-10. For the severity scale, 0=not present, 10=most severe.
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on Depression/hopelessness scoreMeasured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24Depression/hopelessness score is self-rated, ranging from 0-10. For the severity scale, 0=not present, 10=most severe.
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on serum fasting blood glucose levelMeasured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on Sleep problems scoreMeasured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24Sleep problems score is self-rated, ranging from 0-10. For the severity scale, 0=not present, 10=most severe.
Safety will be assessed by the incidence of adverse events (AEs), discontinuation due to the AEs, clinically relevant changes on laboratory test results, vital signs, physical examinations, and 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG).Screening, Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, week 16, and week 24ECG and Physical exam only at Screening and Week 24
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on Anxiety scoreMeasured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24Anxiety included restless, impatience, irritability, nervous, anxious. Anxiety score is self-rated, ranging from 0-10. For the severity scale, 0=not present, 10=most severe.
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on serum glycosylated hemoglobin levelMeasured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on Physical Activity LevelMeasured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24Physical activity level will be estimated by short version of international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ).
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on fatigue scoresMeasured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24Fatigue score is self-rated, ranging from 0-10. For the severity scale, 0=not present, 10=most severe.
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on Memory problems scoreMeasured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24Memory problems score is self-rated, ranging from 0-10. For the severity scale, 0=not present, 10=most severe.
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on Attention/concentration problems scoreMeasured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24Attention/concentration problems score is self-rated, ranging from 0-10. For the severity scale, 0=not present, 10=most severe.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactKangting Ji, MD
jikt@wzmc.edu.cn+8613676403180

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026