Skip to content

Efficacy of Once-daily Budesonide/Formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5/160 µg in Step Down Asthma

A 12-week, Randomized, Parallel-group, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy of Once-daily Budesonide/Formoterol Turbuhaler (160/4.5 μg/d) and Twice-daily Budesonide Giona Easyhaler (400 μg/d) During Step-down Period in Well Controlled Asthma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02725242
Enrollment
77
Registered
2016-03-31
Start date
2016-03-31
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy of Once-daily Budesonide/formoterol Turbuhaler 160/4.5 µg/d in the period of step down in well controlled asthmatic patient.

Detailed description

The study will measure the efficacy of once daily low dose ICS/ LABA in well controlled asthmatic patient comparing with low dose ICS in step down circumstance.

Interventions

DRUGBudesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 μg/d)

After the patients who have all criteria, they will be randomization to take Budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 μg/d)

After the patients who have all criteria, they will be randomization to take Budesonide (200 ug) twice daily

Sponsors

Hat Yai Medical Education Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Asthmatic patients who have well controlled asthma at least 12 weeks with using budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 μg/d) twice daily * Age more than 18 year-old * Patients who able to do spirometry without contraindication * History smoking less than 10 pack-years

Exclusion criteria

* History of using systemic steroid previous 4 week and respiratory infection * History of pulmonary tuberculosis with residual lung lesion by chest radiograph * recent serious medical condition such as myocardial infarction, stroke, pneumonia etc.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) scoreBaseline and week 12Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) that is 6 items of self-administered and 1 item of FEV1%. It has 7-point scale (=no impairment, 6= maximum impairment for symptoms and rescue use; and 7 categories for FEV1%). Scores range between 0 (totally controlled) and 6 (severely uncontrolled).
Change from baseline in Asthma Controlled Test (ACT) scoreBaseline, week 4, week 8 and week 121\. Asthma Controlled Test (ACT); grouped in five domains; frequency of shortness of breath, general asthma symptoms, use of rescue medications, the effect of asthma on daily functioning, and overall self-assessment of asthma control. 5-point scale (for symptoms and activities: 1=all the time to 5= not at all; for asthma control rating: 1=not controlled at all to 5=completely controlled). The scores range from 5 (poor control of asthma) to 25 (complete control of asthma), with higher scores reflecting greater asthma control. An ACT score \>19 indicates well-controlled asthma

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline in Peak expiratory flow (PEF)Baseline, week 4, week 8 and week 12The mean value of PEF (Litre per minute) for baseline, week 4, 8 and 12 was analysed.
Change from baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)Baseline and week 12The mean value for baseline and week 12 was analysed.
Percentage of participants who were categorized from asthma controlled assessment following GINA guidelineBaseline, week 4, week 8 and week 12

Countries

Thailand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026