Skip to content

Effects of tDCS and tUS on Pain Perception in OA of the Knee

Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Transcranial Ultrasound (TUS) on the Perception of Pain and Functional Limitations Due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02723929
Enrollment
64
Registered
2016-03-31
Start date
2016-09-30
Completion date
2026-12-07
Last updated
2025-09-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain, Osteoarthritis

Keywords

transcranial direct current stimulation, transcranial ultrasound, non-invasive brain stimulation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in conjunction with transcranial ultrasound (TUS) on pain perception and functional limitations in people with osteoarthritis of the knee. The investigators hypothesize that there will be a decrease in pain levels with active stimulation, when compared to sham stimulation.

Interventions

DEVICEactive low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation/active transcranial ultrasound

Subjects will undergo 20 minutes of low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation of up to 2mA. During active stimulation, the current will be active for the full 20 minutes. Subjects will also undergo 20 minutes of transcranial ultrasound. During active stimulation, the ultrasound will be active for the full 20 minutes.

DEVICESham low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation/sham transcranial ultrasound

Subjects will undergo 20 minutes of low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation, as in the active condition; however, during sham stimulation (placebo) the current will not be active for the full 20 minutes. Subjects will also undergo 20 minutes of transcranial ultrasound in the same par. During active stimulation, the ultrasound will be active for 20 minutes - however, during sham stimulation (placebo) the ultrasound will not be active for the full 20 minutes.

Sponsors

Highland Instruments, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

tDCS and tUS

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Able to provide informed consent to participate in the study. 2. Subjects between 18-85 years old. 3. Diagnosis of chronic osteoarthritis with pain of either knee as self-reported. 4. Existing knee pain of at least 3 on a 0-10 VAS scale on average over the past 6 months. 5. Pain of at least 3 on a 0-10 VAS scale on average over the week prior to the first stimulation session. 6. Pain resistant to common analgesics and medications for chronic pain used as initial pain management such as Tylenol, Aspirin, Ibuprofen, Soma, Parafon Forte DCS, Zanaflex, and Codeine. 7. Having the ability to feel pain as self-reported.

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnancy or trying to become pregnant in the next 6 months. 2. History of alcohol or drug abuse within the past 6 months as self-reported 3. Contraindications to transcranial brain stimulation or TUS, i.e. implanted brain medical devices or implanted brain metallic devices. 4. Unstable medical conditions (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes, uncompensated cardiac issues, heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). 5. Epilepsy. 6. Use of carbamazepine within the past 6 months as self-reported. 7. Suffering from severe depression (with a score of \>30 in the Beck Depression Inventory) 8. History of unexplained fainting spells as self-reported. 9. Head injury resulting in more than a momentary loss of consciousness 10. History of neurosurgery as self-reported.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Pain Scale as Measured by VASBaseline and 8 weeksChanges in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain were measured in order to determine whether transcranial direct current stimulation in conjunction with transcranial ultrasound is effective in reducing pain in subjects with Osteoarthritis of the Knee. The VAS scale goes from 0 up to 10, where 0 means no pain at all and 10 means the worst imaginable pain and is reported following the full course of therapy. Since we are using a difference, smaller values (negative) represent a better outcome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Pain Scale as Measured by VASBaseline and 4 weeks post-stimulationChanges in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain were measured in order to determine whether transcranial direct current stimulation in conjunction with transcranial ultrasound is effective in reducing pain in subjects with Osteoarthritis of the Knee. The VAS scale goes from 0 up to 10, where 0 means no pain at all and 10 means the worst imaginable pain. Since we are using a difference, smaller values (negative) represent a better outcome.
Percentage Change in Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Controls (DNIC) From BaselineBaseline and 8 weeksThis measures the endogenous pain modulatory pathway. This study will evaluate DNIC in pain patients using pressure as the test stimulus, and cold water as the conditioning stimulus. DNIC will be induced approximately 1-min later by having subjects immerse their hand into a water bath maintained at 10-12˚C for approximately 1 min. Parallel to the last 30s of DNIC conditioning (cold water immersion), the pressure test stimulus will be reapplied. DNIC response will be calculated as the difference between the average of pain ratings from the test stimulus minus the average of pain ratings during the conditioned stimulus. Larger percentage change means a better outcome.
Average Daily Dose of Acetaminophen Equivalent8 weeksAnalgesic use (average daily dose of acetaminophen equivalent)
Percentage Change From Baseline in the Step TestBaseline and 8 weeksThe subject was asked to stand unsupported with their feet parallel to each other in front of a step. We assessed the number of times the participant could place their foot up onto the step and return it to the floor over a 15-sec interval. Larger percentage change means a better outcome.
Percentage Change in Functional Reach Test From BaselineBaseline and 8 weeksSubject will be instructed to stand next to, but not touch the wall, and position the arm that is closer to the wall at 90 degrees of shoulder flexion with a closed fist. Smoothness of wrist movement is assessed as the subject was asked to outstretch their arm in a maximal forward reach, while maintaining a fixed base of support. Smoothness is dimensionless and is calculated as mean speed divided by peak speed. Larger percentage change means a better outcome.
Percentage Change From Baseline in the Single Leg Standing Balance TestBaseline and 8 weeksWe will record the time (seconds) for which a subject is able to stand unsupported on one foot while looking straight ahead with hands on hips. Larger percentage change means a better outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

64 subjects were enrolled and randomized

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active Electrical Stim/Active Ultrasound
Subjects will undergo active low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation in conjunction with active transcranial ultrasound for 20 minutes. active low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation/active transcranial ultrasound: Subjects will undergo 20 minutes of low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation of up to 2mA. During active stimulation, the current will be active for the full 20 minutes. Subjects will also undergo 20 minutes of transcranial ultrasound. During active stimulation, the ultrasound will be active for the full 20 minutes.
30
Sham Electrical Stim/Sham Ultrasound
Subjects will undergo sham (placebo) low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation in conjunction with sham transcranial ultrasound for 20 minutes. Sham low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation/sham transcranial ultrasound: Subjects will undergo 20 minutes of low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation, as in the active condition; however, during sham stimulation (placebo) the current will not be active for the full 20 minutes. Subjects will also undergo 20 minutes of transcranial ultrasound in the same par. During active stimulation, the ultrasound will be active for 20 minutes - however, during sham stimulation (placebo) the ultrasound will not be active for the full 20 minutes.
34
Total64

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive Electrical Stim/Active UltrasoundSham Electrical Stim/Sham UltrasoundTotal
Age, Continuous61.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
61.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
25 Participants26 Participants51 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants6 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 Participants34 Participants64 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants18 Participants34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants16 Participants30 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 300 / 34
other
Total, other adverse events
23 / 3029 / 34
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 34

Outcome results

Primary

Changes in Pain Scale as Measured by VAS

Changes in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain were measured in order to determine whether transcranial direct current stimulation in conjunction with transcranial ultrasound is effective in reducing pain in subjects with Osteoarthritis of the Knee. The VAS scale goes from 0 up to 10, where 0 means no pain at all and 10 means the worst imaginable pain and is reported following the full course of therapy. Since we are using a difference, smaller values (negative) represent a better outcome

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Electrical Stim/Active UltrasoundChanges in Pain Scale as Measured by VAS-2.21 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Sham Electrical Stim/Sham UltrasoundChanges in Pain Scale as Measured by VAS-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Secondary

Average Daily Dose of Acetaminophen Equivalent

Analgesic use (average daily dose of acetaminophen equivalent)

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Electrical Stim/Active UltrasoundAverage Daily Dose of Acetaminophen Equivalent390.7 Acetaminophen equivalent in mgStandard Error 47.1
Sham Electrical Stim/Sham UltrasoundAverage Daily Dose of Acetaminophen Equivalent1116.4 Acetaminophen equivalent in mgStandard Error 98.6
Secondary

Changes in Pain Scale as Measured by VAS

Changes in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain were measured in order to determine whether transcranial direct current stimulation in conjunction with transcranial ultrasound is effective in reducing pain in subjects with Osteoarthritis of the Knee. The VAS scale goes from 0 up to 10, where 0 means no pain at all and 10 means the worst imaginable pain. Since we are using a difference, smaller values (negative) represent a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks post-stimulation

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Electrical Stim/Active UltrasoundChanges in Pain Scale as Measured by VAS-2.91 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Sham Electrical Stim/Sham UltrasoundChanges in Pain Scale as Measured by VAS-1.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in the Single Leg Standing Balance Test

We will record the time (seconds) for which a subject is able to stand unsupported on one foot while looking straight ahead with hands on hips. Larger percentage change means a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Electrical Stim/Active UltrasoundPercentage Change From Baseline in the Single Leg Standing Balance Test17.5 Percentage change from baselineStandard Error 4.5
Sham Electrical Stim/Sham UltrasoundPercentage Change From Baseline in the Single Leg Standing Balance Test3.0 Percentage change from baselineStandard Error 3.1
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in the Step Test

The subject was asked to stand unsupported with their feet parallel to each other in front of a step. We assessed the number of times the participant could place their foot up onto the step and return it to the floor over a 15-sec interval. Larger percentage change means a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Electrical Stim/Active UltrasoundPercentage Change From Baseline in the Step Test27.0 Percentage change from baselineStandard Error 2
Sham Electrical Stim/Sham UltrasoundPercentage Change From Baseline in the Step Test18.7 Percentage change from baselineStandard Error 1.8
Secondary

Percentage Change in Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Controls (DNIC) From Baseline

This measures the endogenous pain modulatory pathway. This study will evaluate DNIC in pain patients using pressure as the test stimulus, and cold water as the conditioning stimulus. DNIC will be induced approximately 1-min later by having subjects immerse their hand into a water bath maintained at 10-12˚C for approximately 1 min. Parallel to the last 30s of DNIC conditioning (cold water immersion), the pressure test stimulus will be reapplied. DNIC response will be calculated as the difference between the average of pain ratings from the test stimulus minus the average of pain ratings during the conditioned stimulus. Larger percentage change means a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Electrical Stim/Active UltrasoundPercentage Change in Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Controls (DNIC) From Baseline12 Percentage change from baselineStandard Error 2.9
Sham Electrical Stim/Sham UltrasoundPercentage Change in Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Controls (DNIC) From Baseline4.0 Percentage change from baselineStandard Error 1.8
Secondary

Percentage Change in Functional Reach Test From Baseline

Subject will be instructed to stand next to, but not touch the wall, and position the arm that is closer to the wall at 90 degrees of shoulder flexion with a closed fist. Smoothness of wrist movement is assessed as the subject was asked to outstretch their arm in a maximal forward reach, while maintaining a fixed base of support. Smoothness is dimensionless and is calculated as mean speed divided by peak speed. Larger percentage change means a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Electrical Stim/Active UltrasoundPercentage Change in Functional Reach Test From Baseline12.4 Percentage change from baselineStandard Error 2.8
Sham Electrical Stim/Sham UltrasoundPercentage Change in Functional Reach Test From Baseline3.3 Percentage change from baselineStandard Error 2.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026