Skip to content

The Efficacy and Safety of Using the Novel Tyto Device

The Efficacy and Safety of Using the Novel Tyto Device for Remote Physical Examination by a Physician as Compared to a Standard Medical Physical Examination

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02723890
Enrollment
136
Registered
2016-03-31
Start date
2016-07-31
Completion date
2018-04-30
Last updated
2018-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Diseases, Ear Infection, Pharyngitis, Respiratory Diseases

Brief summary

To investigate the efficacy and safety of using the novel Tyto device for remote physical examination by co-investigators as compared to a standard medical physical examination by physicians.

Detailed description

A single center, prospective, qualitative study. Patients referred to the emergency department will be triaged according to The Canadian Triage & Acuity Scale (CTAS). Patients presenting with complaints suitable for examination with the Tyto device (ear/throat/respiratory/cardiac complaints) and meeting the inclusion criteria will be informed and asked for consent. Patients participating in the study will be referred to a room dedicated for the purpose. A minimum of a hundred volunteer patients will be selected and enrolled for a preliminary Pilot Study. Final study design and its extent will be determined accordingly. Physical examinations using the Tyto device will be performed by the co-investigators, and sent online to the principle investigator for remote analysis. The emergency department physician will examine the patient using conventional examination instruments (i.e. stethoscope, otoscope). The data collected will be recorded on predetermined case report form (CRF), timed, stored and analyzed by the principle and co-investigators. The findings of the co-investigators' examination will be compared to the conventional examination instruments used by the emergency department physician. Results will be checked and compared categorically (0-inconclusive; 1-normal; 2-pathological findings)

Interventions

DEVICETyto Device

Sponsors

Rabin Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who present to the Emergency department and are categorized between 2-5 on the Canadian Triage & Acuity Scale (CTAS) scoring scale.

Exclusion criteria

* CTAS 1. * Pregnant adolescent. * Multi-drug resistant carriers. * Intellectual disability disorders. * Unsigned informed consent. * Patients with CTAS score of 2-3, will be first addressed by a physician to ascertain their eligibility to be enrolled to the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The concordance of diagnosis and physical findings using the Tyto device on the heart, lung ear and throat as compared to standard physical examination (normal heart and lung sounds, arrhythmia, crackles, normal appearance of ear and throat or otherwise)up to 6 hrsduring the visit to the emergency department.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0up to 6 hrsduring the visit to the emergency department.

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026