Skip to content

Implementation of Evidence Based Practices for Colonoscopy: The Strategies to Improve Colonoscopy Study

Understanding Variability in Success of Quality Improvement for Colonoscopy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02723370
Acronym
STIC
Enrollment
46184
Registered
2016-03-30
Start date
2013-05-31
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2017-01-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colonoscopy

Keywords

Quality of Healthcare, Colorectal neoplasms, Health Literacy, Teach-Back Communication, Evidence Based Practice, Colonoscopy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of physician education about evidence based practices for colonoscopy alone, versus physician education plus a multi-component staff implementation strategy to improve adequacy of bowel preparation. Additionally the investigators will examine implementation factors that influence adoption of the evidence based practices.

Detailed description

Over 14 million colonoscopies are performed annually in the U.S. About 25% of patients that undergo colonoscopy have inadequate bowel preparation, an impediment to identifying cancer and pre-cancerous growths. The adenoma miss rate for patients with inadequate bowel preparation can be as high as 48%. The primary goal of the Strategies to Improve Colonoscopy (STIC) study is to conduct formative research on a multi-component implementation strategy to increase staff adoption of evidence-based practices (i.e. split-dosing of the medication, low-literacy materials, teach-back) for educating patients and improving the adequacy of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Investigators will compare the effect of physician education about evidence based practices for colonoscopy alone, versus education plus a staff implementation toolkit to improve quality of colonoscopy (i.e. adequacy of bowel preparation). Physicians in both study groups will receive education on the evidence-based practices. Staff who work for physicians in the initial intervention group will receive a multi-component implementation strategy for the evidence-based practices, consisting of staff education, a supply of low-literacy patient education materials for split-dosing the medication of their choice, poster and pocket-card with teach-back prompts, a consultation to integrate materials and teach-back into workflow, and a website with additional training and patient materials. The initial intervention period will be followed by a replication study where the delayed intervention group will receive the intervention. Investigators will compare change in colonoscopy quality outcomes from before to after implementation of interventions for the two study groups: a) overall; and for b) Medicaid versus other insurance using administrative and medical record data with interrupted time series analysis. Investigators will also examine factors that influence adoption of the evidence based practices using structured physician, staff and patient surveys.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALStaff multi-component implementation strategy

Staff will receive a multi-component implementation strategy for evidence based practices (EBPs) for colonoscopy, including split-dosing of bowel preparation, low literacy education materials for patients, and teach-back procedure. The implementation strategy includes a supply of low-literacy patient education materials for split-dosing the medication of their choice, poster and pocket-card with teach-back prompts, consultation to integrate materials and teach-back into workflow and a website with additional training and patient materials.

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
BJC HealthCare
CollaboratorOTHER
Washington University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Physicians who perform colonoscopies at 6 participating endoscopy centers * Staff who work for participating physicians and provide education for bowel preparation before colonoscopy * Patients who had an outpatient colonoscopy at a participating endoscopy center during study period

Exclusion criteria

\- none

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percent of patients with adequate of bowel preparation as indicated by a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score > 6 or an Aronchick scale score of fair or better.5 month intervention period

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adoption of Evidence Based PracticesAt baseline and after 5 month intervention periodStaff report of how frequently they use the EBPs and toolkit. 5 point likert scale from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always).

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026