Skip to content

The Effects of CBT and tDCS on Fibromyalgia Patients

The Effects of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Fibromyalgia Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02723175
Enrollment
15
Registered
2016-03-30
Start date
2014-12-31
Completion date
2017-09-30
Last updated
2018-11-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain, Fibromyalgia

Keywords

Fibromyalgia, Pain

Brief summary

Investigators are seeking to determine the effects of CBT, anodal tDCS over left DLPFC, and combined CBT+ tDCS on clinical pain and functioning among a sample of patients with fibromyalgia. This study will be the first randomized, double-blind, controlled study of tDCS technology as an adjunctive pain management strategy for fibromyalgia pain. Data from this trial will likely yield information regarding the feasibility and efficacy of tDCS+CBT as a chronic pain-management approach.

Detailed description

Patients with fibromyalgia will complete questionnaires, six cognitive behavioral therapy sessions, quantitative sensory testing before and after the six therapy sessions, and undergo 30 minutes of tDCS during each of the six therapy sessions.

Interventions

DEVICETranscranial Direct Current Stimulation

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is a minimally invasive technique that uses a small amount of electricity (2mA) to temporarily stimulate specific brain areas in awake people.

Sponsors

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
CollaboratorNIH
Medical University of South Carolina
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Meet the American College of Rheumatology criteria for diagnosis of fibromyalgia for at least 1 year. 2. Between the ages of 21 and 85

Exclusion criteria

1. Other chronic pain conditions 2. on chronic opioid therapy 3. history of seizures 4. are or might be pregnant 5. metal/electronic implants or devices above the waist 6. moderate to severe depression (HDRS \>19) 7. moderate to severe anxiety (BAI \>16) 8. Latex allergy 9. Psychiatric illness other than mild depression or anxiety 10. on medications that lower seizure threshold

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post Baseline Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)One week Post TreatmentAfter treatment, Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) will be completed for all participants. The QST involves a comprehensive laboratory pain assessment including heat stimuli using a Pathway Thermo-sensory Analyzer System which is specifically designed for assessing laboratory pain testing. The QST collects the temperature in celsius of when the participant first begins to feel the stimuli (Sensory), starts to feel pain (average pain threshold), and when the participant can no longer tolerate the stimuli (Tolerance). The temperature ranges from 37 degrees celsius to 50 degrees celsius. The minimum temperature on the scale is 37 degrees celsius and the maximum temperature on the scale is 50 degrees celsius. Average pain threshold: A lower temperature represents a lower pain threshold and a higher temperature represents a higher pain threshold. Tolerance: A lower temperature represents a lower pain tolerance and a higher temperature represents a higher pain tolerance.
Baseline Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)Before TreatmentBefore treatment, Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) will be completed for all participants. The QST involves a comprehensive laboratory pain assessment including heat stimuli using a Pathway Thermo-sensory Analyzer System which is specifically designed for assessing laboratory pain testing. The QST collects the temperature in celsius of when the participant first begins to feel the stimuli (Sensory), starts to feel pain (average pain threshold), and when the participant can no longer tolerate the stimuli (Tolerance). The temperature ranges from 37 degrees celsius to 50 degrees celsius. The minimum temperature on the scale is 37 degrees celsius and the maximum temperature on the scale is 50 degrees celsius. Average pain threshold: A lower temperature represents a lower pain threshold and a higher temperature represents a higher pain threshold. Tolerance: A lower temperature represents a lower pain tolerance and a higher temperature represents a higher pain tolerance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at BaselineBefore TreatmentThe Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) is a well-researched, brief self-report anxiety-screening instrument that assesses different aspects of anxiety experience (e.g., physiological, cognitive, behavioral). It was designed to measure participant's level of anxiety. The scale is unidimensional and the total score rages from 0 to 63. Low scores are associated with low levels of anxiety, while high scores are associated with high levels of anxiety.
Brief Pain Inventory-Average Pain at BaselineBefore TreatmentTo assess each participant's average pain at baseline, the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)-short form will be administered. The BPI rapidly assesses the severity of pain and its impact on functioning and has been widely used in both research and clinical settings. Participants rate their average pain in the past 24 hours using a 0-10 numerical rating scale, where 0=no pain and 10=extreme pain.
Percent Change in Average Daily Pain at Treatment Visit 3Treatment Session 3 (week 3)Participants were asked to rate their pain on average every day from the start of Treatment 1 until Treatment 3. Average pain ratings were on 0-10 scale. 0=No Pain at all and 10=Extreme Pain. Daily ratings were averaged at treatment 1 and treatment 3. The change in average daily pain ratings from treatment 1 to treatment 3 was calculated below. Time points at week 1 and week 3 were included to calculate percent change.
Affective Subscale of McGill Pain Questionnaire at BaselineBefore TreatmentParticipants completed the McGill Pain Questionnaire-short form (MPQ) at Baseline. The possible total range of scores (Sensory and Affective subscales together) is 0 to 45. The MPQ has two pain dimensions: 1.Sensory subscale awith 11 words, and 2.Affective subscale with 4 words from the original MPQ. The range of scores for the sensory dimension of pain is 0-33. The data below report the mean score for the affective subscale for both groups. The range of scores for the affective subscale being 0-12 with Higher scores indicating worse pain.
The Short-Form 12 Healthy Survey at BaselineBefore TreatmentTo assess each participant's mental and physical functioning at Baseline, The Short-Form 12 Healthy Survey (SF-12) will be administered. The SF-12 is a multipurpose short form survey with 12 questions, all selected from the SF-36 Health Survey (Ware, Kosinski, and Keller, 1996). The questions were combined, scored, and weighted to create two scales that provide glimpses into mental and physical functioning and overall health-related-quality of life. Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100, where higher score represents higher level of functioning.
The Fibromyalgia (FM) Impact Questionnaire at BaselineBefore TreatmentTo assess the impact of fibromyalgia on each participant's function at baseline, The Fibromyalgia (FM) Impact Questionnaire will be administered. The FM assesses the following symptoms; physical Impairment, well-being, pain, fatigue, rested, stiffness, anxiety, and depression within the past 24 hours. Each symptom scale ranges from 0 to 10. For example, 0=no pain and 10=extreme pain, 0=not fatigued and 10=extremely fatigued. The final score is the total score which ranges from 0 to 80. Higher scores indicate greater impact of fibromyalgia on functioning.
The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at 1 Month Follow up1 month follow upThe Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) will be used for screening purposes to characterize depression in each participant at the one month follow up visit. The BDI is a 21 item participant rated inventory that evaluates depression symptoms, cognition, and physical symptoms of fatigue, weight loss, lack of interest in sex. The BDI scale also assesses suicidal ideation, those patients exhibiting suicidal ideations will be referenced to a therapist in order to further manage their depressive symptoms. The Total score range is 0 to 63; higher score indicates more depression. Individual items are scored on a 4 point scale (0 to 3), with 0=none/absent and 3=most severe.
The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at 3 Month Follow Up3 Month Follow UpThe Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) is a well-researched, brief self-report anxiety-screening instrument that assesses different aspects of anxiety experience (e.g., physiological, cognitive, behavioral). It was designed to measure participant's level of anxiety. The scale is unidimensional and the total score rages from 0 to 63. Low scores are associated with low levels of anxiety, while high scores are associated with high levels of anxiety.
Brief Pain Inventory-Average Pain at 1 Month Follow Up1 Month Follow UpAt the one month follow up visit, The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)-short form will be administered to assess each participant's pain on average in the past 30 days. The BPI rapidly assesses the severity of pain and its impact on functioning and has been widely used in both research and clinical settings. Participants rate their pain on average in the past 30 days using a 0-10 numerical rating scale, where 0=no pain and 10=extreme pain.
Percent Change in Average Daily Pain at Treatment Visit SixTreatment Session 6 (week 6)Participants were asked to rate their pain on average every day from the start of Treatment 3 until Treatment 6. Average pain ratings were on 0-10 scale. 0=No Pain at all and 10=Extreme Pain. Daily ratings were averaged at treatment 3 and treatment 6. The change in average daily pain ratings from treatment 3 to treatment 6 was calculated below. Time points at week 3, and week 6 were included to calculate percent change.
Percent Change in Average Daily Pain at 1 Month Follow Up1 Month Follow UpParticipants were asked to rate their pain on average every day 30 days post treatment 6 (1 month follow up). Average pain ratings were on 0-10 scale. 0=No Pain at all and 10=Extreme Pain. The 30 Daily ratings (Post Treatment 6) were averaged and The change in average daily pain ratings from treatment 6 to the 1 month follow up (30 days post completion of treatment visit 6) was calculated below. Time points week 6, and the 1 month follow up were included to calculate percent change.
Percent Change in Average Daily Pain at 3 Month Follow Up3 Month Follow UpParticipants were asked to rate their pain on average every day for 60 days, post 1 month follow up visit. Average pain ratings were on 0-10 scale. 0=No Pain at all and 10=Extreme Pain. The 3 Month Follow Up included 60 Daily Pain ratings (Collected Post 1 Month Follow Up) that were averaged. The change in average daily pain ratings from the 1 month follow up (30 days post completion of treatment visit 6) to the 3 Month Follow Up (60 days post completion of the 1 month follow up visit) was calculated below. Time points 1 month follow up, and 3 month follow up were included to calculate percent change.
Affective Subscale of McGill Pain Questionnaire at 1 Month Follow Up1 Month Follow UpParticipants completed the McGill Pain Questionnaire-short form (MPQ) at Baseline. The possible total range of scores is 0 to 45. The MPQ has two pain dimensions: 1.Sensory subscale with 11 words, and 2.Affective subscale with 4 words from the original MPQ. The range of scores for the sensory dimension of pain is 0-33. The data below report the mean score for the affective subscale of the McGill Pain Questionnaire for both groups. The range of scores for the affective subscale being 0-12 with Higher scores indicating worse pain.
The Short-Form 12 Healthy Survey at 1 Month Follow Up1 Month Follow UpTo assess each participant's mental and physical functioning at the 1 Month Follow Up visit, The Short-Form 12 Healthy Survey (SF-12) will be administered. The SF-12 is a multipurpose short form survey with 12 questions, all selected from the SF-36 Health Survey (Ware, Kosinski, and Keller, 1996). The questions were combined, scored, and weighted to create two scales that provide glimpses into mental and physical functioning and overall health-related-quality of life. Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100, where higher score represents higher level of functioning.
The Fibromyalgia (FM) Impact Questionnaire at 1 Month Follow Up1 Month Follow UpTo assess the impact of fibromyalgia on each participant's function at the 1 Month Follow Up visit, The Fibromyalgia (FM) Impact Questionnaire will be administered. The FM assesses the following symptoms; physical Impairment, well-being, pain, fatigue, rested, stiffness, anxiety, and depression within the past 24 hours. Each symptom scale ranges from 0 to 10. For example, 0=no pain and 10=extreme pain, 0=not fatigued and 10=extremely fatigued. The final score is the total score which ranges from 0 to 80. Higher scores indicate greater impact of fibromyalgia on functioning.
The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at BaselineBefore TreatmentThe Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) will be used for screening purposes to characterize depression in each participant at baseline. The BDI is a 21 item participant rated inventory that evaluates depression symptoms, cognition, and physical symptoms of fatigue, weight loss, lack of interest in sex. The BDI scale also assesses suicidal ideation, those patients exhibiting suicidal ideations will be referenced to a therapist in order to further manage their depressive symptoms. The Total score range is 0 to 63; higher score indicates more depression. Individual items are scored on a 4 point scale (0 to 3), with 0=none/absent and 3=most severe.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sham tDCS Stimulation
30 minutes of the sham transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is a minimally invasive technique that uses a small amount of electricity (2mA) to temporarily stimulate specific brain areas in awake people.
8
Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFC
30 minutes of the active transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is a minimally invasive technique that uses a small amount of electricity (2mA) to temporarily stimulate specific brain areas in awake people.
7
Total15

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to 1 Month Follow Up32
Overall StudyLost to 3 Month Follow Up11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAnodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFCTotalSham tDCS Stimulation
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants15 Participants8 Participants
Age, Continuous48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.69
49.47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.12
50.75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.25
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
7 Participants14 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
7 Participants15 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants13 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 80 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Baseline Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)

Before treatment, Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) will be completed for all participants. The QST involves a comprehensive laboratory pain assessment including heat stimuli using a Pathway Thermo-sensory Analyzer System which is specifically designed for assessing laboratory pain testing. The QST collects the temperature in celsius of when the participant first begins to feel the stimuli (Sensory), starts to feel pain (average pain threshold), and when the participant can no longer tolerate the stimuli (Tolerance). The temperature ranges from 37 degrees celsius to 50 degrees celsius. The minimum temperature on the scale is 37 degrees celsius and the maximum temperature on the scale is 50 degrees celsius. Average pain threshold: A lower temperature represents a lower pain threshold and a higher temperature represents a higher pain threshold. Tolerance: A lower temperature represents a lower pain tolerance and a higher temperature represents a higher pain tolerance.

Time frame: Before Treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham tDCS StimulationBaseline Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)Sensory39.7063 Degrees CelsiusStandard Deviation 2.37354
Sham tDCS StimulationBaseline Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)Average Pain Threshold43.9563 Degrees CelsiusStandard Deviation 3.19553
Sham tDCS StimulationBaseline Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)Tolerance46.1531 Degrees CelsiusStandard Deviation 3.53357
Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFCBaseline Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)Sensory39.8286 Degrees CelsiusStandard Deviation 1.85452
Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFCBaseline Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)Average Pain Threshold45.2036 Degrees CelsiusStandard Deviation 3.08134
Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFCBaseline Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)Tolerance47.2036 Degrees CelsiusStandard Deviation 2.24743
Primary

Post Baseline Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)

After treatment, Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) will be completed for all participants. The QST involves a comprehensive laboratory pain assessment including heat stimuli using a Pathway Thermo-sensory Analyzer System which is specifically designed for assessing laboratory pain testing. The QST collects the temperature in celsius of when the participant first begins to feel the stimuli (Sensory), starts to feel pain (average pain threshold), and when the participant can no longer tolerate the stimuli (Tolerance). The temperature ranges from 37 degrees celsius to 50 degrees celsius. The minimum temperature on the scale is 37 degrees celsius and the maximum temperature on the scale is 50 degrees celsius. Average pain threshold: A lower temperature represents a lower pain threshold and a higher temperature represents a higher pain threshold. Tolerance: A lower temperature represents a lower pain tolerance and a higher temperature represents a higher pain tolerance.

Time frame: One week Post Treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham tDCS StimulationPost Baseline Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)Sensory39.2350 Degrees CelsiusStandard Deviation 3.53613
Sham tDCS StimulationPost Baseline Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)Average Pain Threshold42.3050 Degrees CelsiusStandard Deviation 4.94057
Sham tDCS StimulationPost Baseline Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)Tolerance44.1050 Degrees CelsiusStandard Deviation 5.50248
Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFCPost Baseline Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)Sensory38.9083 Degrees CelsiusStandard Deviation 2.63726
Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFCPost Baseline Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)Average Pain Threshold44.1042 Degrees CelsiusStandard Deviation 4.10668
Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFCPost Baseline Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)Tolerance46.0417 Degrees CelsiusStandard Deviation 4.35634
Secondary

Affective Subscale of McGill Pain Questionnaire at 1 Month Follow Up

Participants completed the McGill Pain Questionnaire-short form (MPQ) at Baseline. The possible total range of scores is 0 to 45. The MPQ has two pain dimensions: 1.Sensory subscale with 11 words, and 2.Affective subscale with 4 words from the original MPQ. The range of scores for the sensory dimension of pain is 0-33. The data below report the mean score for the affective subscale of the McGill Pain Questionnaire for both groups. The range of scores for the affective subscale being 0-12 with Higher scores indicating worse pain.

Time frame: 1 Month Follow Up

Population: 3 Sham tDCS Participants dropped out leaving 5 total participants in Sham group.~2 Anodal tDCS Participants dropped out leaving 5 total participants in Anodal group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham tDCS StimulationAffective Subscale of McGill Pain Questionnaire at 1 Month Follow Up4.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.64
Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFCAffective Subscale of McGill Pain Questionnaire at 1 Month Follow Up5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.29
Secondary

Affective Subscale of McGill Pain Questionnaire at Baseline

Participants completed the McGill Pain Questionnaire-short form (MPQ) at Baseline. The possible total range of scores (Sensory and Affective subscales together) is 0 to 45. The MPQ has two pain dimensions: 1.Sensory subscale awith 11 words, and 2.Affective subscale with 4 words from the original MPQ. The range of scores for the sensory dimension of pain is 0-33. The data below report the mean score for the affective subscale for both groups. The range of scores for the affective subscale being 0-12 with Higher scores indicating worse pain.

Time frame: Before Treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham tDCS StimulationAffective Subscale of McGill Pain Questionnaire at Baseline5.625 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.24
Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFCAffective Subscale of McGill Pain Questionnaire at Baseline6.714 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.91
Secondary

Brief Pain Inventory-Average Pain at 1 Month Follow Up

At the one month follow up visit, The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)-short form will be administered to assess each participant's pain on average in the past 30 days. The BPI rapidly assesses the severity of pain and its impact on functioning and has been widely used in both research and clinical settings. Participants rate their pain on average in the past 30 days using a 0-10 numerical rating scale, where 0=no pain and 10=extreme pain.

Time frame: 1 Month Follow Up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham tDCS StimulationBrief Pain Inventory-Average Pain at 1 Month Follow Up3.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.21
Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFCBrief Pain Inventory-Average Pain at 1 Month Follow Up3.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.91
Secondary

Brief Pain Inventory-Average Pain at Baseline

To assess each participant's average pain at baseline, the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)-short form will be administered. The BPI rapidly assesses the severity of pain and its impact on functioning and has been widely used in both research and clinical settings. Participants rate their average pain in the past 24 hours using a 0-10 numerical rating scale, where 0=no pain and 10=extreme pain.

Time frame: Before Treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham tDCS StimulationBrief Pain Inventory-Average Pain at Baseline5.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.39
Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFCBrief Pain Inventory-Average Pain at Baseline7.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.27
Secondary

Percent Change in Average Daily Pain at 1 Month Follow Up

Participants were asked to rate their pain on average every day 30 days post treatment 6 (1 month follow up). Average pain ratings were on 0-10 scale. 0=No Pain at all and 10=Extreme Pain. The 30 Daily ratings (Post Treatment 6) were averaged and The change in average daily pain ratings from treatment 6 to the 1 month follow up (30 days post completion of treatment visit 6) was calculated below. Time points week 6, and the 1 month follow up were included to calculate percent change.

Time frame: 1 Month Follow Up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham tDCS StimulationPercent Change in Average Daily Pain at 1 Month Follow Up-36.11 percent changeStandard Deviation 29.33
Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFCPercent Change in Average Daily Pain at 1 Month Follow Up-23.71 percent changeStandard Deviation 28.74
Secondary

Percent Change in Average Daily Pain at 3 Month Follow Up

Participants were asked to rate their pain on average every day for 60 days, post 1 month follow up visit. Average pain ratings were on 0-10 scale. 0=No Pain at all and 10=Extreme Pain. The 3 Month Follow Up included 60 Daily Pain ratings (Collected Post 1 Month Follow Up) that were averaged. The change in average daily pain ratings from the 1 month follow up (30 days post completion of treatment visit 6) to the 3 Month Follow Up (60 days post completion of the 1 month follow up visit) was calculated below. Time points 1 month follow up, and 3 month follow up were included to calculate percent change.

Time frame: 3 Month Follow Up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham tDCS StimulationPercent Change in Average Daily Pain at 3 Month Follow Up-31.15 percent changeStandard Deviation 42.72
Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFCPercent Change in Average Daily Pain at 3 Month Follow Up-48.93 percent changeStandard Deviation 37.73
Secondary

Percent Change in Average Daily Pain at Treatment Visit 3

Participants were asked to rate their pain on average every day from the start of Treatment 1 until Treatment 3. Average pain ratings were on 0-10 scale. 0=No Pain at all and 10=Extreme Pain. Daily ratings were averaged at treatment 1 and treatment 3. The change in average daily pain ratings from treatment 1 to treatment 3 was calculated below. Time points at week 1 and week 3 were included to calculate percent change.

Time frame: Treatment Session 3 (week 3)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham tDCS StimulationPercent Change in Average Daily Pain at Treatment Visit 3-13.29 percent changeStandard Deviation 24.66
Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFCPercent Change in Average Daily Pain at Treatment Visit 3-3.73 percent changeStandard Deviation 12.64
Secondary

Percent Change in Average Daily Pain at Treatment Visit Six

Participants were asked to rate their pain on average every day from the start of Treatment 3 until Treatment 6. Average pain ratings were on 0-10 scale. 0=No Pain at all and 10=Extreme Pain. Daily ratings were averaged at treatment 3 and treatment 6. The change in average daily pain ratings from treatment 3 to treatment 6 was calculated below. Time points at week 3, and week 6 were included to calculate percent change.

Time frame: Treatment Session 6 (week 6)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham tDCS StimulationPercent Change in Average Daily Pain at Treatment Visit Six-24.17 percent changeStandard Deviation 31.51
Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFCPercent Change in Average Daily Pain at Treatment Visit Six-5.32 percent changeStandard Deviation 16.28
Secondary

The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at 3 Month Follow Up

The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) is a well-researched, brief self-report anxiety-screening instrument that assesses different aspects of anxiety experience (e.g., physiological, cognitive, behavioral). It was designed to measure participant's level of anxiety. The scale is unidimensional and the total score rages from 0 to 63. Low scores are associated with low levels of anxiety, while high scores are associated with high levels of anxiety.

Time frame: 3 Month Follow Up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham tDCS StimulationThe Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at 3 Month Follow Up14.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.09
Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFCThe Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at 3 Month Follow Up16.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.41
Secondary

The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at Baseline

The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) is a well-researched, brief self-report anxiety-screening instrument that assesses different aspects of anxiety experience (e.g., physiological, cognitive, behavioral). It was designed to measure participant's level of anxiety. The scale is unidimensional and the total score rages from 0 to 63. Low scores are associated with low levels of anxiety, while high scores are associated with high levels of anxiety.

Time frame: Before Treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham tDCS StimulationThe Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at Baseline12.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.67
Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFCThe Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at Baseline23.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.33
Secondary

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at 1 Month Follow up

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) will be used for screening purposes to characterize depression in each participant at the one month follow up visit. The BDI is a 21 item participant rated inventory that evaluates depression symptoms, cognition, and physical symptoms of fatigue, weight loss, lack of interest in sex. The BDI scale also assesses suicidal ideation, those patients exhibiting suicidal ideations will be referenced to a therapist in order to further manage their depressive symptoms. The Total score range is 0 to 63; higher score indicates more depression. Individual items are scored on a 4 point scale (0 to 3), with 0=none/absent and 3=most severe.

Time frame: 1 month follow up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham tDCS StimulationThe Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at 1 Month Follow up15.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.96
Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFCThe Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at 1 Month Follow up17.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.69
Secondary

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at Baseline

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) will be used for screening purposes to characterize depression in each participant at baseline. The BDI is a 21 item participant rated inventory that evaluates depression symptoms, cognition, and physical symptoms of fatigue, weight loss, lack of interest in sex. The BDI scale also assesses suicidal ideation, those patients exhibiting suicidal ideations will be referenced to a therapist in order to further manage their depressive symptoms. The Total score range is 0 to 63; higher score indicates more depression. Individual items are scored on a 4 point scale (0 to 3), with 0=none/absent and 3=most severe.

Time frame: Before Treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham tDCS StimulationThe Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at Baseline21.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.55
Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFCThe Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at Baseline23.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.82
Secondary

The Fibromyalgia (FM) Impact Questionnaire at 1 Month Follow Up

To assess the impact of fibromyalgia on each participant's function at the 1 Month Follow Up visit, The Fibromyalgia (FM) Impact Questionnaire will be administered. The FM assesses the following symptoms; physical Impairment, well-being, pain, fatigue, rested, stiffness, anxiety, and depression within the past 24 hours. Each symptom scale ranges from 0 to 10. For example, 0=no pain and 10=extreme pain, 0=not fatigued and 10=extremely fatigued. The final score is the total score which ranges from 0 to 80. Higher scores indicate greater impact of fibromyalgia on functioning.

Time frame: 1 Month Follow Up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham tDCS StimulationThe Fibromyalgia (FM) Impact Questionnaire at 1 Month Follow Up3.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.51
Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFCThe Fibromyalgia (FM) Impact Questionnaire at 1 Month Follow Up2.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23
Secondary

The Fibromyalgia (FM) Impact Questionnaire at Baseline

To assess the impact of fibromyalgia on each participant's function at baseline, The Fibromyalgia (FM) Impact Questionnaire will be administered. The FM assesses the following symptoms; physical Impairment, well-being, pain, fatigue, rested, stiffness, anxiety, and depression within the past 24 hours. Each symptom scale ranges from 0 to 10. For example, 0=no pain and 10=extreme pain, 0=not fatigued and 10=extremely fatigued. The final score is the total score which ranges from 0 to 80. Higher scores indicate greater impact of fibromyalgia on functioning.

Time frame: Before Treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham tDCS StimulationThe Fibromyalgia (FM) Impact Questionnaire at Baseline3.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.61
Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFCThe Fibromyalgia (FM) Impact Questionnaire at Baseline3.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Secondary

The Short-Form 12 Healthy Survey at 1 Month Follow Up

To assess each participant's mental and physical functioning at the 1 Month Follow Up visit, The Short-Form 12 Healthy Survey (SF-12) will be administered. The SF-12 is a multipurpose short form survey with 12 questions, all selected from the SF-36 Health Survey (Ware, Kosinski, and Keller, 1996). The questions were combined, scored, and weighted to create two scales that provide glimpses into mental and physical functioning and overall health-related-quality of life. Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100, where higher score represents higher level of functioning.

Time frame: 1 Month Follow Up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham tDCS StimulationThe Short-Form 12 Healthy Survey at 1 Month Follow Up29.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.61
Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFCThe Short-Form 12 Healthy Survey at 1 Month Follow Up31.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.92
Secondary

The Short-Form 12 Healthy Survey at Baseline

To assess each participant's mental and physical functioning at Baseline, The Short-Form 12 Healthy Survey (SF-12) will be administered. The SF-12 is a multipurpose short form survey with 12 questions, all selected from the SF-36 Health Survey (Ware, Kosinski, and Keller, 1996). The questions were combined, scored, and weighted to create two scales that provide glimpses into mental and physical functioning and overall health-related-quality of life. Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100, where higher score represents higher level of functioning.

Time frame: Before Treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham tDCS StimulationThe Short-Form 12 Healthy Survey at Baseline30.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.55
Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFCThe Short-Form 12 Healthy Survey at Baseline31.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.73

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026