Skip to content

Haemoglobin Measurement for Babies

Comparison of Alternative Non-invasive and Invasive Methods of Haemoglobin Measuring With the Gold Standard in Preterm and Term Neonates

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02722759
Enrollment
41
Registered
2016-03-30
Start date
2016-03-31
Completion date
2016-10-31
Last updated
2020-02-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemoglobins, Infant, Non-invasive

Brief summary

In this prospective study different methods of haemoglobin measurement in term and preterm neonates are compared with the gold standard. Non-invasive haemoglobin measurement with the Radical-7® (SpHb, Masimo®), point-of-care haemoglobin-measurement (HcHb, HemoCue@, Radiometer), blood-gas-analysis (BGAHb,ABL800®, Radiometer) are compared with haemoglobin measurement by an automated hematology analyzer (labHb, Siemens Advia®).

Detailed description

Neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care unit or to a normal neonatal ward are enrolled in the study, if parents have given their written informed consent. Non-invasive SpHb measurements are recorded prior to routine venous sampling. Routine venous sampling includes labHb and BGAHb. Additionally HcHb is taken from the routine venous sampling (HcHbart/ven) and from an additionally capillary puncture of earlobe or heel (HcHbcap). Every neonate can participate in two measurements.

Interventions

Sponsors

Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Days to 4 Weeks
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

gender both age limits minimum age 3 days of life maximum age 44 postmenstrual weeks accepts no healthy volunteers Inclusion Criteria: written informed consent of the parents \-

Exclusion criteria

* allergy against sensor patch * medical or psychological factors that inhibit a correct finazilation of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
accuracy of different methods (SpHb, HcHb,BGAHb) of haemoglobin measurement compared with the gold standard labHbthrough study completion, an average of 3 monthsaccuracy is assessed by Bland-Altman-method of comparison, by Root mean square error and by out of range

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
influence of weight and gender on accuracy of SpHbthrough study completion, an average of 3 monthscorrelation of PI with the accuracy of SpHb
influence of PI (perfusion index) on accuracy of SpHbthrough study completion, an average of 3 monthscorrelation of PI with the accuracy of SpHb
handling of the SpHb-devicethrough study completion, an average of 3 monthsmeasurement of how often the Radical-7 has to be replaced and of the time until a stable Signal appears
influence of concentration of Hb on accuracy of SpHb,BGAHb, HcHbthrough study completion, an average of 3 monthscorrelation of concentration of Hb with the accuracy of SpHb
agreement of concentration of HbF of BGAHb with HbF of labHbthrough study completion, an average of 3 monthsaccuracy is assessed by Bland-Altman-method of comparison
influence of concentration of HbF on accuracy of SpHb,BGAHb, HcHbthrough study completion, an average of 3 monthscorrelation of concentration of HbF with the accuracy of SpHb

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026