Skip to content

STUDY 15 - Comparing Gemcitabine/Carboplatin and Hydroxychloroquine Versus Carboplatin/Etoposide Therapy Alone in Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)

A Phase II, Multicentre, Randomised Trial Comparing Combination Gemcitabine/Carboplatin and Hydroxychloroquine Versus Carboplatin/Etoposide Therapy Alone in Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02722369
Enrollment
72
Registered
2016-03-30
Start date
2017-03-14
Completion date
2021-03-12
Last updated
2021-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Small Cell Lung Cancer

Brief summary

To determine whether the combination of gemcitabine/carboplatin with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is associated with an improved clinical outcome (progression free and overall survival) compared with chemotherapy alone in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC)

Detailed description

This is a multicentre, randomised, phase II trial which aims to compare the combination of hydroxychloroquine and gemcitabine/carboplatin versus standard carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy, as first line treat in patients with stage IV disease. The standard first line chemotherapy treatment remains a platinum-based chemotherapy and this has been unchanged for 20 years. Novel active treatment approaches are urgently needed to improve survival in SCLC. Patients are randomised to one of two treatment arms; carboplatin/etoposide or gemcitabine/carboplatin/hydroxychloroquine.

Interventions

DRUGGemcitabine

Chemotherapy

DRUGCarboplatin

Chemotherapy

DRUGEtoposide

Chemotherapy

DRUGHydroxychloroquine

Maintenance Agent

Sponsors

University College, London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically or cytologically confirmed SCLC * Stage IV disease * Performance status ECOG 0-2 * Life expectancy \>8 weeks * Age 18 or over * Willing and able to give informed consent * Patient considered able to tolerate chemotherapy * Adequate renal function - defined by GFR ≥50mL/min as measured by EDTA or C&G * Adequate bone marrow reserve: Absolute neutrophil count ≥1.5 x 109/L, haemoglobin ≥90 g/L, platelet count ≥100 x 109/L * Negative pregnancy test for WCBP * Highly effective contraception is mandatory for all patients of reproductive potential * At least one site of measurable disease (target lesion) for RECIST 1.1 evaluation * Hypersensitivity or history of severe allergic reaction to any of the IMPs * Able to swallow medication

Exclusion criteria

* Mixed cell histology (i.e. NSCLC and SCLC) * Prior macular degeneration or diabetic retinopathy * History of glaucoma * Patients with abnormal LFTs (ALP, ALT/AST\*) that are ≥3 x ULN (≥5 x ULN for patients with liver metastases) * Patients with abnormal bilirubin levels that are ≥1.5 x ULN * Prior treatment for this disease e.g. chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy (except palliative radiotherapy to bone metastases) * Documented side effects to chloroquine or related agents * Treatment with chloroquine or related agents within the last year prior to randomisation * Evidence of significant medical condition or laboratory finding which, in the opinion of the investigator, makes it undesirable for the patient to participate in the trial * Previous medical history of prolonged QT interval * A history of prior malignant tumour, unless the patient has been without evidence of disease for at least 3 years or the tumour was a non-melanoma skin tumour or early cervical cancer * Patients with symptomatic brain metastases * Women who are breastfeeding * Concurrent cytochrome P450 enzyme-inducing anticonvulsant drugs e.g. phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, primidone or oxcarbazepine * Patients who are unable to have their digoxin levels regularly monitored * if both ALT and AST performed then both need to be recorded

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Progression free survivalDefined as the time from randomisation to first progression/death (whichever came first), assessed up to 41 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective response as measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) v.1.1From first tumour assessment to progression/trial end (whichever is first), assessed up to 41 monthsComplete Response (CR)/ Partial Response (PR)/ Progressive Disease (PD)/ Stable Disease (SD)
Adverse eventsFrom date of consent to 30 days after final trial treatmentIncluding ophthalmologic and treatment specific toxicities
Quality of life as measured by EQ-5DFrom baseline to progression/trial end (whichever is first), assessed up to 41 monthsThe questionnaire is a standardised questionnaire
Overall survivalFrom date of randomisation to death due to any cause, assessed up to 41 months
Quality of life as measured by QLQ-LC-13From baseline to progression/trial end (whicenver is first), assessed up to 41 monthsThe questionnaire is a standardised questionnaire
Compliance measured by dose intensityFrom first date of trial treatment to progression/trial end (whichever is first), assessed up to 41 monthsCapturing dose delays, modifications and omissions
Compliance measured by dose exposureFrom first date of trial treatment to progression/trial end (whichever is first), assessed up to 41 monthsCapturing dose delays, modifications and omissions
Quality of life as measured by QLQC-30From baseline to progression/trial end (whichever is first), assessed up to 41 monthsThe questionnaire is a standardised questionnaire

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026