Skip to content

Fecal Microbiota Therapy Versus Standard Therapy in NASH Related Cirrhosis.

Fecal Microbiota Therapy Versus Standard Therapy in NASH Related Cirrhosis: A Randomized Control Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02721264
Enrollment
112
Registered
2016-03-29
Start date
2016-03-01
Completion date
2018-06-30
Last updated
2018-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non Alcoholic Steatohepatitis

Brief summary

Patients of NASH (Non Alcoholic Steatohepatitis) cirrhosis with current or prior histological evidence of steatosis or steatohepatitis admitted under the Department of Hepatology at Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, who meet the inclusion criteria and who provide informed consent will be included in the study.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALFecal Microbiota Transplant
OTHERStandard Medical Treatment

Sponsors

Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age more then 18 years. 2. All patients with cirrhosis with current or previous histological evidence of steatosis or steatohepatitis. 3. Histologic evidence of definite or probable NASH based upon a liver biopsy prior to enrollment and a NAFLD activity score (NAS) ≥5 with ≥1 in each component of the NAS score (steatosis, scored 0-3, ballooning degeneration, 0-2, and lobular inflammation, 0-3). 4. No past history of upper GI bleeding, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy

Exclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of liver disease other than NASH cirrhosis 2. History of gastrointestinal bleeding, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy 3. Ongoing bacterial infection requiring antibiotic treatment. 4. Current or history of significant alcohol consumption for a period of more than 3 consecutive months within 1 year prior to screening 5. Treatment with antibiotics or probiotics in the preceding 3 months. 6. Inability to safely obtain a liver biopsy or perform an upper GI endoscopy 7. Psychiatric disorder 8. HIV 9. Pregnant women 10. Patients on SBP (Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis) prophylaxis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Reduction in Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient in the two groups from baseline.1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Spontaneous Bacterial peritonitis cases in both groups.1 year
ACLF (Acute on Chronic Liver failure) cases in both groups.1 year
Reduction in hepatic and systemic inflammatory markers like TNF-α in both groups1 year
Assess improvement in insulin resistance (Fasting plasma and insulin levels, HOMA-IR)1 yearHOMA IR \<2.5
Improvement in liver function test as compared to baseline.1 yearImprovement is defined as Serum bilirubin,AST,ALT,serum Albumin within normal limits
development of new onset of ascites in both groups.1 year
Incidence of new onset upper gastrointestinal bleed in both groups1 year
Reduction in hepatic and systemic inflammatory markers like C Reactive Protein in both groups1 year
Reduction in hepatic and systemic inflammatory markers like serum endotoxins in both groups.1 year
Histological and permeability changes in the duodenal biopsy in both groups.1 year
Improvement in Liver Stiffness Measurement as compared to baseline.1 yearLSM \< 10 Kpa

Countries

India

Contacts

Primary ContactDr Abhinav Verma, MD
abhinav.3183@gmail.com011-46300000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026