Skip to content

Intensive Cryotherapy in the Emergency Department for Acute Musculoskeletal Injuries

Intensive Cryotherapy in the Emergency Department (ICED) Versus Conventional Treatment for Acute Musculoskeletal Injuries: The ICED Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02720315
Enrollment
38
Registered
2016-03-25
Start date
2016-02-01
Completion date
2019-10-30
Last updated
2019-11-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Emergency, Opiate, Pain

Brief summary

Acute musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries, including strains, sprains or contusions, are a common reason patients seek emergency care. Pain control is an essential component of treatment. Within the orthopedic literature, there is robust body of research supporting the use of cryotherapy for post-operative patients and injured athletes. However, within the emergency department (ED), studies have been focused on pharmacologic analgesia. The absence of evidence on optimal method or impact of ice therapy for acute MSK injuries contributes to inconsistent practice patterns that may impede symptom control or increase narcotic usage. The specific aim of the ICED investigation is to evaluate the effectiveness of intensive cryotherapy for the treatment of pain due to acute MSK injuries treated in the ED. Secondary outcomes include length-of-stay (LOS), patient satisfaction, and narcotic usage.

Detailed description

Background Acute musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries, including strains, sprains or contusions, are a common reason patients seek emergency care. Pain control is an essential component of treatment. Within the orthopedic literature, there is robust body of research supporting the use of cryotherapy for post-operative patients and injured athletes. However, within the emergency department (ED), studies have been focused on pharmacologic analgesia. The absence of evidence on optimal method or impact of ice therapy for acute MSK injuries contributes to inconsistent practice patterns that may impede symptom control or increase narcotic usage. Objectives The specific aim of the ICED investigation is to evaluate the effectiveness of intensive cryotherapy for the treatment of pain due to acute MSK injuries treated in the ED. Secondary outcomes include length-of-stay (LOS), and narcotic usage. Methods Adults younger than sixty-six years-old presenting to the ED with acute MSK pain are enrolled through a process of informed consent, unless one or more of the exclusion criteria are met. Crushed ice is double-bagged and applied at the site of injury, where it is wrapped in place for twenty minutes. Pain scores are measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) when the ice is applied, at 20 minutes and at 60 minutes. Treating physicians do not alter their management. Data on LOS and use of pharmacologic analgesics are obtained through chart review. Results Change in VAS will be analyzed with regression analysis and analysis of variance. Patients are grouped into categories of pharmacologic analgesic usage. Patient satisfaction scores and narcotic usage will be analyzed using a Chi Square test, while LOS data compared with an unpaired two-tailed t-test.

Interventions

PROCEDUREIntensive cryotherapy

Application of ice inside a plastic bag wrapped to the patient's site of pain, and held in place for 20min.

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* all people presenting to the ED with musculoskeletal injuries

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with hip fractures * Patients with open fractures * Patients with altered mental status who are unable to consent to participate in the study * Patients activated as a trauma * Patients with fractures or dislocations requiring closed reduction in the emergency department * Minors * Prisoners * Patients with known pregnancy * Patient who are receiving investigational drug as part of another study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in pain level20 minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in analgesic utilization24hrMeasured by chart review to detail the type and quantity of analgesics utilized by the control and the intervention groups.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026