Skip to content

Mitral Valve Replacement With MValve Dock and Lotus

Mitral Valve Replacement With the MValve Dock and A Percutaneous Transcatheter Heart Valve

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02719912
Acronym
DOCK 1
Enrollment
30
Registered
2016-03-25
Start date
2016-06-30
Completion date
2018-07-31
Last updated
2016-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mitral Valve Regurgitation

Brief summary

This study evaluates the MValve mitral prosthesis in conjunction with a Lotus transcatheter heart valve (THV) for mitral valve replacement in subjects at high risk for conventional mitral valve replacement or repair surgery.

Detailed description

This study is a prospective first in man feasibility study intended to evaluate preliminary safety and effectiveness of the MValve Mitral Dock with Lotus transcatheter heart valve for mitral valve replacement in subjects who are at high risk for surgical valve repair or replacement. The surgical technique adapts the valve-in-valve approach for mitral replacement in degenerated mitral prostheses to failing native mitral valves. The MValve Dock is designed to provide a structural platform within the mitral annulus so that the Lotus THV can be implanted in a secure fashion in the mitral annulus. The investigational device anchors to the mitral annulus commissures, sparing the native valve leaflets and sub annular apparatus. This study is designed to treat subjects with moderate-to-severe MR who are not deemed candidates for mitral valve surgery.

Interventions

DEVICEmitral valve replacement

transcatheter mitral valve replacement

Sponsors

MValve Technologies Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Symptomatic ≥3+ degenerative or functional mitral regurgitation of either ischemic or non-ischemic etiology based by a qualifying echocardiography obtained within 90 days prior to the procedure. * New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class III or IV. * High risk for conventional open mitral valve repair or replacement surgery in the consideration of the site Heart Team. * Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) is ≥30% within 30 days prior to the procedure. * Mitral valve annular commissure to commissure (C/C) dimension between 30-35 mm by echocardiography. * Left atrial diameter \<5.5 cm by echocardiography

Exclusion criteria

* Prior mitral valve replacement or repair surgery. * Prior transapical surgery. * Severe aortic or tricuspid valve disease. - Severe symptomatic carotid stenosis (\>70% by ultrasound). * ACC/AHA Stage D heart failure. * Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, restrictive cardiomyopathy, constrictive pericarditis, or any other structural heart disease causing heart failure other than dilated cardiomyopathy of either ischemic or non-ischemic etiology. * Infiltrative cardiomyopathies (amyloidosis, hemochromatosis, sarcoidosis). * Physical evidence of right-sided congestive heart failure with echocardiographic evidence of moderate or severe right ventricular dysfunction. * Severe mitral annular calcification. * Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \< 30. * Hemodynamic instability defined as systolic pressure \< 90 mm Hg with or without afterload reduction, cardiogenic shock, or the need for inotropic support or intra-aortic balloon pump or other hemodynamic support device, or any mechanical heart assistance.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite serious adverse cardiac events and stroke30 daysdeath, myocardial infarction, stroke, repeat surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Mitral regurgitation grade1 year

Countries

Brazil, France, Germany, Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026