Skip to content

Timing of Serial Ultrasounds

Timing of Serial UltrasouNds in High-Risk Pregnancies: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02719886
Acronym
SUN
Enrollment
228
Registered
2016-03-25
Start date
2016-04-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Interval Growth Ultrasound

Brief summary

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the frequency of the diagnosis of fetal growth abnormalities when ultrasound assessment is performed at 2 versus 4 week intervals.

Detailed description

While there is an agreement that women at risk for abnormalities of fetal growth should have serial ultrasound examinations in the 3rd trimester, there is a lack of consensus on how frequently these exams should be done. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology recommend that an ultrasound to assess fetal growth be performed between 2 to 4 weeks; however, there have been no prospective or randomized trials to determine whether the optimal interval should be closer to 2 weeks or delayed to 4 weeks. Currently, only 60% of fetuses' with abnormal growth are detected antenatally. There is equipoise of whether ultrasound every 2 versus 4 weeks improves the detection and subsequent newborn outcomes or merely leads to an increase in false positives and unnecessary interventions. It has been proposed, that if delivery occurs within 2 weeks of the ultrasound, the antenatal detection of abnormal growth may be more accurate and hence more likely to improve outcomes. Conversely, a shorter interval may result in confusion as to whether there is actual change in growth or merely variation in the measurement technique itself. Moreover, with the cost of ultrasound averaging approximately $200 per examination, the interval between ultrasounds can have major implications on public-health costs as well as the interventions that subsequently follow if an abnormality is detected. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the frequency of the diagnosis of fetal growth abnormalities when ultrasound assessment is performed at 2 versus 4 week intervals.

Interventions

DEVICEUltrasound

Estimation of fetal weight by ultrasound

Sponsors

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Maternal age ≥ 18 years * Singletons * Gestational age ≥ 20 weeks to 27 weeks 6 days * Has insurance, whether private or government issued * High-risk pregnancy requiring serial fetal growth assessment as determined by the treating physician. * Dating of pregnancy by ultrasound ≤ 21 weeks and 6 days of gestation or known date of conception in the setting of in vitro fertilization * No known major anomalies

Exclusion criteria

* Known major fetal anomaly * Multiple gestation (twins or triplets)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Frequency of detection of fetal growth abnormalities, starting at 28 weeks gestational ageup to 72 hours after delivery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Birthweight compared to antenatal estimated fetal weightsAt deliveryComparison of estimated fetal weight by ultrasound to actual birth weight at delivery
Frequency of detection of amniotic fluid abnormality, starting at 28 weeks gestational ageUp to 72 hours after delivery
Cost of interventions resulting from detection of abnormal growth or amniotic fluidup to 72 hours from neonatal discharge from hospitale.g. additional ultrasounds, antenatal testing, hospital admission, induction, antepartum or intrapartum complications
Composite neonatal morbidity (CNM)up to 72 hours from neonatal discharge from hospital
Composite maternal morbidity (CMM)up to 72 hours from mother's discharge from hospital

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactRobyn P Roberts
Robyn.P.Roberts@uth.tmc.edu734-934-4227
Backup ContactMaria Hutchinson
Maria.S.keefer@uth.tmc.edu713-500-0510

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026