Skip to content

A Dispensing Clinical Trial of Comfilcon A Extended Range Multifocal Lenses

A Dispensing Clinical Trial of Comfilcon A Extended Range Multifocal Lenses

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02719366
Enrollment
12
Registered
2016-03-25
Start date
2016-03-31
Completion date
2016-08-31
Last updated
2020-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Presbyopia

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to validate the clinical of comfilcon A extended range high add center near (CN) multifocal lenses in existing contact lens wearers against the current comfilcon A high add multifocal lenses.

Detailed description

This study is a 20-subject, randomized, prospective, single site, daily wear, single-masked (to the subject), bilateral, 4-day cross-over, dispensing study comparing the comfilcon A extended range multifocal test lens against the comfilcon A multifocal control lens.

Interventions

contact lenses

Sponsors

CooperVision, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

A person is eligible for inclusion in the study if he/she: * Has had a self-reported oculo-visual examination in the last two years * Is 50 years of age or greater and has full legal capacity to volunteer * Is able to read and understand the informed consent * Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule * Has a spherical distance contact lens prescription between -1.00 and -5.00D (Diopters) (inclusive) * Near Add Power requirement of +2.25D or greater * Has spectacle cylinder 0.75 D in both eyes * Has normal binocularity (no amblyopia, no strabismus, no habitually uncorrected anisometropia ≥ 2.00D) * Has monocular best-corrected distance visual acuity of 20/30 or better in each eye * Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease * Has not worn gas permeable contact lenses for 1 month prior to the study

Exclusion criteria

A person will be excluded from the study if he/she: * Has never worn contact lenses before * Has any systemic disease affecting ocular health * Is using any systemic or topical medications that will affect ocular health * Has any ocular pathology or abnormality that would affect the wearing of contact lenses * Is aphakic (i.e. missing their natural lens inside their eye) * Has uncorrected anisometropia (i.e. difference in the prescription between the eyes) of ≥2.00 D * Has undergone corneal refractive surgery * Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Acuity4 daysVisual acuity for test and control lens was measured at Distance, Intermediate, and Near conditions by LogMAR.
Visual Performance4 daysSubjective assessment of visual performance for Distance, Intermediate and Near conditions was collected on a scale of 0-100 (Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time and cannot function, 100= excellent vision all of the time).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective Preference for Comfort4 daysSubjective preference for comfort for test and control contact lenses.
Subjective Satisfaction4 daysSubjective satisfaction for test and control lens. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely dissatisfied, 100=very satisfied)
Subjective Preference for Near Vision4 daysSubjective preference for Near Vision for test and control contact lenses.
Subjective Preference for Intermediate Vision4 daysSubjective preference for intermediate vision for test and control contact lenses.
Subjective Preference for Distance Vision4 daysSubjective preference for distance vision for test and control contact lenses.
ComfortBaselineSubjective ratings for comfort was assessed on a scale of 0-100 (Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, causes pain, 100=cannot be felt ever).
Average Daily Wearing Time4 daysAverage daily wearing time for test and control lens is assessed in hours.
Lens Fit4 daysLens fit acceptance (general fit characteristics) is assessed for test and control lens on a 0-4 scale in 0.25 steps 0- very poor fit.
Lens Handling4 DaysSubjective ratings for handling (ease of insertion and removal) was assessed on a Scale of 0-100 (0=very difficult to handle, 100=easy to handle).
Bulbar Hyperemia4 daysBulbar hyperemia was assessed on a scale of 0-4 and was used in 0.50 steps, with 0 indicating no hyperemia and 4 indicating severe hyperemia
Limbal Hyperemia4 daysLimbal hyperemia was assessed on a scale of 0-4 and was used in 0.50 steps, with 0 indicating no hyperemia and 4 indicating severe hyperemia
Subjective Overall Vision Preference4 daysSubjective overall vision preference for test and control contact lenses.
DrynessBaselineSubjective ratings for dryness was assessed on a scale of 0-100 (Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, extremely dry, 100=no dryness experienced at any time).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Study
Subjects will be randomized to wear the test contact lenses or control contact lenses bilaterally first for four days then cross-over to alternate study lenses. comfilcon A Extended Range test lens: contact lenses comfilcon A control lens: contact lenses
12
Total12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Study
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants
Age, Continuous59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 120 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Visual Acuity

Visual acuity for test and control lens was measured at Distance, Intermediate, and Near conditions by LogMAR.

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensVisual AcuityDistance-0.07 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.07
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensVisual AcuityIntermediate0.06 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.14
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensVisual AcuityNear0.09 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.06
Comfilcon A Control LensVisual AcuityDistance-0.05 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.09
Comfilcon A Control LensVisual AcuityIntermediate0.10 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.11
Comfilcon A Control LensVisual AcuityNear0.05 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.12
Primary

Visual Performance

Subjective assessment of visual performance for Distance, Intermediate and Near conditions was collected on a scale of 0-100 (Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time and cannot function, 100= excellent vision all of the time).

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensVisual PerformanceIntermediate77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensVisual PerformanceDistance65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensVisual PerformanceNear76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
Comfilcon A Control LensVisual PerformanceDistance64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
Comfilcon A Control LensVisual PerformanceIntermediate78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
Comfilcon A Control LensVisual PerformanceNear65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
Secondary

Average Daily Wearing Time

Average daily wearing time for test and control lens is assessed in hours.

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensAverage Daily Wearing Time11 Hours/DayStandard Deviation 3
Comfilcon A Control LensAverage Daily Wearing Time11 Hours/DayStandard Deviation 2
Secondary

Bulbar Hyperemia

Bulbar hyperemia was assessed on a scale of 0-4 and was used in 0.50 steps, with 0 indicating no hyperemia and 4 indicating severe hyperemia

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensBulbar Hyperemia1.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Comfilcon A Control LensBulbar Hyperemia1.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Secondary

Comfort

Subjective ratings for comfort was assessed on a scale of 0-100 (Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, causes pain, 100=cannot be felt ever).

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensComfort92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
Comfilcon A Control LensComfort88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Secondary

Comfort

Subjective ratings for comfort was assessed on a scale of 0-100 (Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, causes pain, 100=cannot be felt ever).

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensComfort82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
Comfilcon A Control LensComfort80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
Secondary

Dryness

Subjective ratings for dryness was assessed on a scale of 0-100 (Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, extremely dry, 100=no dryness experienced at any time).

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensDryness84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Comfilcon A Control LensDryness81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
Secondary

Dryness

Subjective ratings for dryness was assessed on a scale of 0-100 (Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, extremely dry, 100=no dryness experienced at any time).

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensDryness86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
Comfilcon A Control LensDryness87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
Secondary

Lens Fit

Lens fit acceptance (general fit characteristics) is assessed for test and control lens on a 0-4 scale in 0.25 steps 0- very poor fit.

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensLens Fit3.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1
Comfilcon A Control LensLens Fit3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Secondary

Lens Handling

Subjective ratings for handling (ease of insertion and removal) was assessed on a Scale of 0-100 (0=very difficult to handle, 100=easy to handle).

Time frame: 4 Days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensLens Handling90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
Comfilcon A Control LensLens Handling88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
Secondary

Limbal Hyperemia

Limbal hyperemia was assessed on a scale of 0-4 and was used in 0.50 steps, with 0 indicating no hyperemia and 4 indicating severe hyperemia

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensLimbal Hyperemia0.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Comfilcon A Control LensLimbal Hyperemia0.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
Secondary

Subjective Overall Vision Preference

Subjective overall vision preference for test and control contact lenses.

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Overall Vision PreferenceTest Lens6 Participants
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Overall Vision PreferenceControl Lens4 Participants
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Overall Vision PreferenceNo Preference2 Participants
Secondary

Subjective Preference for Comfort

Subjective preference for comfort for test and control contact lenses.

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for ComfortTest Lens4 Participants
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for ComfortControl Lens2 Participants
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for ComfortNo Preference6 Participants
Secondary

Subjective Preference for Distance Vision

Subjective preference for distance vision for test and control contact lenses.

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for Distance VisionTest Lens6 Participants
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for Distance VisionControl Lens4 Participants
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for Distance VisionNo Preference2 Participants
Secondary

Subjective Preference for Intermediate Vision

Subjective preference for intermediate vision for test and control contact lenses.

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for Intermediate VisionTest Lens5 Participants
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for Intermediate VisionControl Lens5 Participants
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for Intermediate VisionNo Preference2 Participants
Secondary

Subjective Preference for Near Vision

Subjective preference for Near Vision for test and control contact lenses.

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for Near VisionTest Lens4 Participants
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for Near VisionControl Lens4 Participants
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for Near VisionNo Preference4 Participants
Secondary

Subjective Satisfaction

Subjective satisfaction for test and control lens. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely dissatisfied, 100=very satisfied)

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Satisfaction68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
Comfilcon A Control LensSubjective Satisfaction75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026