Skip to content

A Dispensing Clinical Trial of Comfilcon A Extended Range Multifocal Lenses

A Dispensing Clinical Trial of Comfilcon A Extended Range Multifocal Lenses

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02719353
Enrollment
14
Registered
2016-03-25
Start date
2016-03-31
Completion date
2016-08-31
Last updated
2020-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Presbyopia

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to validate the clinical of comfilcon A extended range high add center near (CN) multifocal lenses in existing contact lens wearers against the current comfilcon A high add multifocal lenses.

Detailed description

This study is a 13-subject, randomized, prospective, single site, daily wear, single-masked (to the subject), bilateral, 4-day cross-over, dispensing study comparing the comfilcon A extended range multifocal test lens against the comfilcon A multifocal control lens.

Interventions

Sponsors

CooperVision, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

A person is eligible for inclusion in the study if he/she: * Has had a self-reported oculo-visual examination in the last two years * Is 50 years of age or greater and has full legal capacity to volunteer * Is able to read and understand the informed consent * Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule * Has a spherical distance contact lens prescription between -1.00 and -5.00D (Diopters) (inclusive) * Near Add Power requirement of +2.25D or greater * Has spectacle cylinder 0.75 D in both eyes * Has normal binocularity (no amblyopia, no strabismus, no habitually uncorrected anisometropia ≥ 2.00D) * Has monocular best-corrected distance visual acuity of 20/30 or better in each eye * Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease * Has not worn gas permeable contact lenses for 1 month prior to the study

Exclusion criteria

A person will be excluded from the study if he/she: * Has never worn contact lenses before * Has any systemic disease affecting ocular health * Is using any systemic or topical medications that will affect ocular health * Has any ocular pathology or abnormality that would affect the wearing of contact lenses * Is aphakic (i.e. missing their natural lens inside their eye) * Has uncorrected anisometropia (i.e. difference in the prescription between the eyes) of ≥2.00 D * Has undergone corneal refractive surgery * Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Acuity4 daysVisual acuity was measured at distance, intermediate and near conditions for test and control lens was assessed by LogMAR.
Visual Performance4 daysSubjective assessment of visual performance for test and control lens is assessed on a scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time and cannot function, 100= excellent vision all of the time).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lens Handling4 DaysSubjective ratings for handling (ease of insertion and removal) was assessed for test and control lens on a scale 0-100, 0=very difficult to handle, 100=easy to handle).
Average Daily Wearing Time4 daysAverage daily wearing time for test and control lens is assessed in hours.
Lens Fit4 daysLens fit acceptance (general fit characteristics) is assessed for test and control lens on a 0-4 grading system in 0.25 steps where 0 represented very poor fit.
Bulbar Hyperemia4 daysBulbar hyperemia was assessed on a scale of 0-4 and was used in 0.50 steps, with 0 indicating no hyperemia and 4 indicating severe hyperemia.
Subjective Satisfaction4 daysSubjective satisfaction for test and control lens was assessed on a scale 0-100, 0=extremely dissatisfied, 100=very satisfied)
Limbal Hyperemia4 daysLimbal hyperemia was assessed on a scale of 0-4 and was used in 0.50 steps, with 0 indicating no hyperemia and 4 indicating severe hyperemia.
Subjective Ratings for ComfortBaselineSubjective ratings for comfort was assessed for test and control lens on a Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, causes pain, 100=cannot be felt ever).
Subjective Preference for Distance Vision4 daysSubjective preference for distance vision for test and control contact lenses.
Subjective Preference for Intermediate Vision4 daysSubjective preference for intermediate vision for test and control contact lenses.
Subjective Preference for Overall Vision4 daysSubjective preference for overall vision for test and control contact lenses.
Subjective Preference for Comfort4 daysSubjective preference for comfort for test and control contact lenses.
Subjective Overall Lens Preference4 daysSubjective overall lens preference for test and control contact lenses.
Subjective Preference for Near Vision4 daysSubjective preference for near vision for test and control contact lenses. comfort, vision, handling, satisfaction.
Subjective Ratings for DrynessBaselineSubjective ratings for dryness was assessed for test and control lens on a scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, extremely dry, 100=no dryness experienced at any time).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Study
Subjects will be randomized to wear the test contact lenses or control contact lenses first as per the randomization table bilaterally for four days then cross-over to alternated pair lenses. comfilcon A Extended Range test lens: contact lenses comfilcon A control lens: contact lenses
14
Total14

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
First InterventionPhysician Decision01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Study
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
14 Participants
Age, Continuous57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 130 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 130 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 130 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Visual Acuity

Visual acuity was measured at distance, intermediate and near conditions for test and control lens was assessed by LogMAR.

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensVisual AcuityIntermediate-0.15 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.16
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensVisual AcuityNear-0.02 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.09
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensVisual AcuityDistance-0.01 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.09
Comfilcon A Control LensVisual AcuityIntermediate-0.13 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.1
Comfilcon A Control LensVisual AcuityDistance-0.07 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.1
Comfilcon A Control LensVisual AcuityNear0.01 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.07
Primary

Visual Performance

Subjective assessment of visual performance for test and control lens is assessed on a scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time and cannot function, 100= excellent vision all of the time).

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensVisual PerformanceDistance72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensVisual PerformanceIntermediate85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensVisual PerformanceNear79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
Comfilcon A Control LensVisual PerformanceDistance77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
Comfilcon A Control LensVisual PerformanceIntermediate88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
Comfilcon A Control LensVisual PerformanceNear80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
Secondary

Average Daily Wearing Time

Average daily wearing time for test and control lens is assessed in hours.

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensAverage Daily Wearing Time10 Hours/dayStandard Deviation 2
Comfilcon A Control LensAverage Daily Wearing Time9 Hours/dayStandard Deviation 3
Secondary

Bulbar Hyperemia

Bulbar hyperemia was assessed on a scale of 0-4 and was used in 0.50 steps, with 0 indicating no hyperemia and 4 indicating severe hyperemia.

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensBulbar Hyperemia0.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
Comfilcon A Control LensBulbar Hyperemia0.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.42
Secondary

Lens Fit

Lens fit acceptance (general fit characteristics) is assessed for test and control lens on a 0-4 grading system in 0.25 steps where 0 represented very poor fit.

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensLens Fit3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Comfilcon A Control LensLens Fit3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Secondary

Lens Handling

Subjective ratings for handling (ease of insertion and removal) was assessed for test and control lens on a scale 0-100, 0=very difficult to handle, 100=easy to handle).

Time frame: 4 Days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensLens Handling89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25
Comfilcon A Control LensLens Handling95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
Secondary

Limbal Hyperemia

Limbal hyperemia was assessed on a scale of 0-4 and was used in 0.50 steps, with 0 indicating no hyperemia and 4 indicating severe hyperemia.

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensLimbal Hyperemia0.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
Comfilcon A Control LensLimbal Hyperemia0.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
Secondary

Subjective Overall Lens Preference

Subjective overall lens preference for test and control contact lenses.

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Overall Lens PreferenceTest4 Participants
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Overall Lens PreferenceNo Preference0 Participants
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Overall Lens PreferenceControl9 Participants
Secondary

Subjective Preference for Comfort

Subjective preference for comfort for test and control contact lenses.

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for ComfortTest4 Participants
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for ComfortNo Preference3 Participants
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for ComfortControl6 Participants
Secondary

Subjective Preference for Distance Vision

Subjective preference for distance vision for test and control contact lenses.

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for Distance VisionTest3 Participants
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for Distance VisionNo Preference2 Participants
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for Distance VisionControl8 Participants
Secondary

Subjective Preference for Intermediate Vision

Subjective preference for intermediate vision for test and control contact lenses.

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for Intermediate VisionTest3 Participants
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for Intermediate VisionNo Preference4 Participants
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for Intermediate VisionControl6 Participants
Secondary

Subjective Preference for Near Vision

Subjective preference for near vision for test and control contact lenses. comfort, vision, handling, satisfaction.

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for Near VisionTest4 Participants
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for Near VisionNo Preference4 Participants
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for Near VisionControl5 Participants
Secondary

Subjective Preference for Overall Vision

Subjective preference for overall vision for test and control contact lenses.

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for Overall VisionTest3 Participants
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for Overall VisionNo Preference1 Participants
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Preference for Overall VisionControl9 Participants
Secondary

Subjective Ratings for Comfort

Subjective ratings for comfort was assessed for test and control lens on a Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, causes pain, 100=cannot be felt ever).

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Ratings for Comfort96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
Comfilcon A Control LensSubjective Ratings for Comfort91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
Secondary

Subjective Ratings for Comfort

Subjective ratings for comfort was assessed for test and control lens on a Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, causes pain, 100=cannot be felt ever).

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Ratings for Comfort87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
Comfilcon A Control LensSubjective Ratings for Comfort89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Secondary

Subjective Ratings for Dryness

Subjective ratings for dryness was assessed for test and control lens on a scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, extremely dry, 100=no dryness experienced at any time).

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Ratings for Dryness83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
Comfilcon A Control LensSubjective Ratings for Dryness88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Secondary

Subjective Ratings for Dryness

Subjective ratings for dryness was assessed for test and control lens on a scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, extremely dry, 100=no dryness experienced at any time).

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Ratings for Dryness94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
Comfilcon A Control LensSubjective Ratings for Dryness94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
Secondary

Subjective Satisfaction

Subjective satisfaction for test and control lens was assessed on a scale 0-100, 0=extremely dissatisfied, 100=very satisfied)

Time frame: 4 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Extended Range Test LensSubjective Satisfaction71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
Comfilcon A Control LensSubjective Satisfaction74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026