Skip to content

Carvedilol in Preventing Heart Failure in Childhood Cancer Survivors

Pharmacologic Reversal of Ventricular Remodeling in Childhood Cancer Survivors at Risk for Heart Failure (PREVENT-HF): A Phase 2b Randomized Placebo-Controlled (Carvedilol) Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02717507
Enrollment
196
Registered
2016-03-23
Start date
2016-04-04
Completion date
2025-03-31
Last updated
2025-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm, Malignant Solid Neoplasm

Brief summary

This phase IIb trial studies how well low-dose carvedilol works in preventing heart failure in cancer survivors exposed to high dose anthracyclines for management of childhood cancer. Patients who received high-dose anthracycline chemotherapy are at a much greater risk for developing heart failure compared to survivors who didn't get any anthracycline chemotherapy. Heart failure happens when the heart muscle has been weakened and can't pump blood as well as it should. Carvedilol may help lower the risk of cardiovascular complications.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To determine the impact of a two-year course of low-dose carvedilol on surrogate echocardiographic indices of heart failure (HF) risk, including: Left ventricular (LV) posterior wall thickness-dimension ratio (LV T-D); LV systolic and diastolic function, and afterload; Natriuretic peptides, troponins, and galectin-3. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To establish safety and tolerability of this two-year course of low-dose carvedilol, assessing both objective measures (hepatic function) and patient reported outcomes. II. To examine the modifying effect of demographic, clinical, and molecular characteristics on the risk: benefit ratio from this two-year carvedilol intervention. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE: I. To evaluate the long-term efficacy of carvedilol in preventing cardiomyopathy and/or heart failure in high-risk childhood cancer survivors. OUTLINE: This is a dose-escalation study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM I: Patients receive low-dose carvedilol orally (PO) once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) for 24 months. ARM II: Patients receive placebo PO QD or BID for 24 months. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 3 years.

Interventions

DRUGCarvedilol

Given PO

OTHERLaboratory Biomarker Analysis

Correlative studies

Correlative studies

OTHERPharmacological Study

Correlative studies

OTHERPlacebo Administration

Given PO

OTHERQuality-of-Life Assessment

Ancillary studies

OTHERQuestionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Children's Oncology Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males and females must weigh \>= 40 Kg * Patient must have had a cancer diagnosis \< 22 years of age, irrespective of current age * Patient must have a lifetime cumulative anthracycline dose of \>= 250 mg/m\^2 DOXOrubicin equivalent without the protection of dexrazoxane (Zinecard) therapy; the anthracycline dose threshold must be met as part of the treatment of a cancer that was diagnosed at \< 22 years of age * Note: Institutional records (e.g., clinic note, treatment summary, chemotherapy roadmap) can be used to document lifetime receipt of anthracycline dose * Patient must have completed cancer treatment \>= 2 years prior to study enrollment

Exclusion criteria

* Receiving treatment for cardiomyopathy or heart failure * Ejection fraction of \< 50% (by radionuclide angiogram or echocardiogram) or shortening fraction of \< 25% (by echocardiogram) * Note: for instances where both are reported, and one is below the threshold, the site will have the option to re-measure it centrally at the core lab * Uncorrected primary obstructive or severe regurgitative valvular disease: * Nondilated (restrictive); or * Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; or * Significant systemic ventricular outflow obstruction * Sustained or symptomatic ventricular dysrhythmias uncontrolled with drug therapy or implantable device * Significant conduction defects (i.e. second or third degree atrio-ventricular block or sick sinus syndrome) * Bradycardia: heart rate \< 50 beats per minute (BPM) * Use of an investigational drug or beta adrenergic blockers, including metoprolol, sotalol, within 30 days of enrollment * History of drug sensitivity or allergic reaction to alpha or beta-blockers * Low resting systolic blood pressure: \< 90 mmHg * Use of any other blood pressure lowering medication for treatment of hypertension within 30 days of enrollment except calcium channel blockers and diuretics * History or current clinical evidence of moderate-to-severe obstructive pulmonary disease or reactive airway diseases (i.e. asthma) requiring therapy * Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 3 times upper limit of institutional normal * Gastrointestinal, or biliary disorders that could impair absorption, metabolism, or excretion of orally administered medications * Endocrine disorders (such as primary aldosteronism, pheochromocytoma, hyper- or hypothyroidism) not controlled with medication * Uncontrolled diabetes (controlled diabetes per the American Diabetes Association and International Diabetes Center's Glycemic Target Goals is hemoglobin A1C \< 7%) * Anemia (hematocrit \< 28%) * Currently using select CYP2D6 inhibitor or inducer medications * Inability to swallow pills * Female patients who are pregnant are not eligible; women of childbearing potential require a negative pregnancy test prior to starting study drug * Lactating females are not eligible unless they have agreed to not breastfeed their infants * Sexually active female patients of reproductive potential are not eligible unless they agree to use an effective contraceptive method during study and for 2 months after stopping the study drug; abstinence is an acceptable method of birth control * All patients and/or their parents or legal guardians must sign a written informed consent * All institutional, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and National Cancer Institute (NCI) requirements for human studies must be met

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average Left-Ventricular Wall Thickness-Dimension Ratio Z-score (LVWT/Dz)Baseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiationZ-score of the ratio of left ventricular (LV) posterior wall dimension of systole to internal LV dimension in diastole, calculated for each subject by subtracting the reference healthy population mean, then dividing by the standard deviation. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean of the reference population. Negative Z- score indicates worse outcome. The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average Left Ventricular End-systolic DimensionBaseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiationThickness of cardiac muscle (in cm) of the left ventricle at the end of systole. The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.
Average Left Ventricular End-systolic VolumeBaseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiationThe amount of blood (in ml) in the heart's left ventricle just after the heart contracts. The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.
Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic DimensionBaseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiationThickness of cardiac muscle (in cm) of the left ventricle at the end of diastole. The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.
Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic VolumeBaseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiationThe amount of blood (in ml) in the heart's left ventricle just before the heart contracts. The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.
Average Left Ventricular MassBaseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiationThe weight of the left ventricle adjusted for body surface area (in g/m2). The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.
Average Fractional ShorteningBaseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiationA measure to assess preload and afterload (in %). The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.
Average Ejection FractionBaseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiationThe percentage of blood leaving the heart at the end of diastole. The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.
Average Peak Early Atrial Divided by Peak Late Atrial VelocitiesBaseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiationRatio of peak velocity blood flow from left ventricular relaxation in early diastole (E wave) to peak velocity flow in late diastole caused by atrial contraction (A wave). Number shown for Unit of Measure refers to this ratio. Normal: \>1. Impaired: \<1. The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.
Average N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic PeptideBaseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiationB-type natriuretic peptide- a biomarker for heart failure (in pg/ml). The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.
Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Wall StressBaseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiationEchocardiographic measure of left ventricular (LV) afterload based on LV pressure (P), volume (V), and wall thickness (T), calculated by the formula (P x V)/T, which equals the number referred to below in the Measure Type. The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.
Average Cardiac Troponin IBaseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiationTroponin I is a biomarker for myocardial cell injury (in ng/ml). The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.
Average Galectin-3Baseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiationA protein produced by activated macrophages, and a member of a family of β-galactoside-binding lectings and promotes cardiac fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis following myocadial injury (in ng/ml). The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.
Proportion of Patients With Reportable Adverse Events as Described in the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).From baseline to month 24 since baselinePatients with toxicities reported via CTEP-AERS and all Grade ≥ 2 adverse events (AEs) that can be attributed probably or definitely to the study drug are considered to have AEs. The proportion of patients with AEs are reported by arm with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Average BilirubinBaseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiationA liver function measurement (in mg/dL). The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.
Average Aspartate AminotransferaseBaseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiationA liver function measurement (in U/L). Normal range is 14-20 for men, 10-36 for women. The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.
Average Alanine AminotransferaseBaseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiationA liver function measurement (in U/L). Normal range is 8-48 IU/L. The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.
Proportion of Participants With Average Adherence > 90%Average adherence across 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiation are calculated.The number of pills taken out of the total prescribed in a 3-month period, averaged across all study time points. The proportion of participants with average adherence rate \>90% is computed by arm and corresponding 95% confidence intervals are reported.
Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Responses at days 14 to 730 were combinedIn a questionnaire, patients responded Yes/No to certain symptoms. If answered Yes, they selected slightly, moderately, quite a bit, or extremely regarding how bothersome the symptom was. The proportion of participants responding with any of these three categories was calculated by arm, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals are reported.
Average Cardiac N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic PeptideBaseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiationN-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide- a biomarker for heart failure (in pg/ml). The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.

Countries

Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

196 pts were enrolled (109 pts enrolled with Childrens Oncology Group (COG) and 87 pts enrolled on a pilot study at City of Hope (COH) 182 of those pts started tx (14 excluded: 6 ineligible and 8 pts started tx). (The (109) enrollment number in the protocol section reflects the number of pts enrolled on the COG portion of the study. Per Section 9.2 of the protocol (pt accrual and expected duration of the trial), 87 pts had already been accrued through a different mechanism the pilot study)

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm I (Carvedilol)
Patients receive low-dose carvedilol orally (PO) once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) for 24 months.
89
Arm II (Placebo)
Patients receive placebo PO QD or BID for 24 months.
93
Total182

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyCardiac Event26
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up58
Overall StudyPregnancy11
Overall StudyProtocol Violation22
Overall StudyRelapse11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2020

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm I (Carvedilol)Arm II (Placebo)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
15 Participants16 Participants31 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
74 Participants77 Participants151 Participants
Age, Continuous26.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
27.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
27.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
23 Participants22 Participants45 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
65 Participants69 Participants134 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants6 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
77 Participants82 Participants159 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
89 participants93 participants182 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
43 Participants48 Participants91 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
46 Participants45 Participants91 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 890 / 93
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 890 / 93
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 890 / 93

Outcome results

Primary

Average Left-Ventricular Wall Thickness-Dimension Ratio Z-score (LVWT/Dz)

Z-score of the ratio of left ventricular (LV) posterior wall dimension of systole to internal LV dimension in diastole, calculated for each subject by subtracting the reference healthy population mean, then dividing by the standard deviation. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean of the reference population. Negative Z- score indicates worse outcome. The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.

Time frame: Baseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiation

Population: We excluded 31 participants who did not have a second time point assessment of echocardiography, resulting in 151 analyzable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left-Ventricular Wall Thickness-Dimension Ratio Z-score (LVWT/Dz)6m-0.2167 z-scoreStandard Error 0.167
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left-Ventricular Wall Thickness-Dimension Ratio Z-score (LVWT/Dz)18m-0.2375 z-scoreStandard Error 0.21
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left-Ventricular Wall Thickness-Dimension Ratio Z-score (LVWT/Dz)12m-0.2416 z-scoreStandard Error 0.1721
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left-Ventricular Wall Thickness-Dimension Ratio Z-score (LVWT/Dz)24m0.0213 z-scoreStandard Error 0.2353
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left-Ventricular Wall Thickness-Dimension Ratio Z-score (LVWT/Dz)BL-0.1372 z-scoreStandard Error 0.1711
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left-Ventricular Wall Thickness-Dimension Ratio Z-score (LVWT/Dz)24m-0.1834 z-scoreStandard Error 0.2145
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left-Ventricular Wall Thickness-Dimension Ratio Z-score (LVWT/Dz)BL-0.0893 z-scoreStandard Error 0.1917
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left-Ventricular Wall Thickness-Dimension Ratio Z-score (LVWT/Dz)6m0.3215 z-scoreStandard Error 0.154
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left-Ventricular Wall Thickness-Dimension Ratio Z-score (LVWT/Dz)12m-0.2367 z-scoreStandard Error 0.1822
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left-Ventricular Wall Thickness-Dimension Ratio Z-score (LVWT/Dz)18m-0.1974 z-scoreStandard Error 0.1976
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that change in LVWT/Dz across time do not vary by arm. Assuming a type I error=0.05, 2-sided test, 15% attrition/year, and correlation range of 0.6-0.8 between measurements, we projected that a sample size of 125/arm would provide 80% power to detect an effect size of 0.23-0.32 for LVWT/Dz at 24m.p-value: 0.1595% CI: [-0.057, 0.383]Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE)
Secondary

Average Alanine Aminotransferase

A liver function measurement (in U/L). Normal range is 8-48 IU/L. The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.

Time frame: Baseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiation

Population: We excluded 31 participants who did not have a second time point assessment of echocardiography, resulting in 151 analyzable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Alanine Aminotransferase24m29.86 IU/LStandard Error 3.064
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Alanine AminotransferaseBL29.122 IU/LStandard Error 2.31
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Alanine Aminotransferase6m28.014 IU/LStandard Error 2.533
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Alanine Aminotransferase12m30.148 IU/LStandard Error 2.985
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Alanine Aminotransferase18m27.196 IU/LStandard Error 2.645
Arm II (Placebo)Average Alanine Aminotransferase18m30.536 IU/LStandard Error 3.567
Arm II (Placebo)Average Alanine Aminotransferase12m31.155 IU/LStandard Error 2.742
Arm II (Placebo)Average Alanine AminotransferaseBL30.467 IU/LStandard Error 1.948
Arm II (Placebo)Average Alanine Aminotransferase24m29.245 IU/LStandard Error 2.626
Arm II (Placebo)Average Alanine Aminotransferase6m32.158 IU/LStandard Error 2.516
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that change in Average Alanine aminotransferase across time-points described above does not differ by treatment arm, tested using a longitudinal GEE analysis of Average Alanine aminotransferase with a treatment by time interaction.p-value: 0.7295% CI: [-5.595, 8.091]Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE)
Secondary

Average Aspartate Aminotransferase

A liver function measurement (in U/L). Normal range is 14-20 for men, 10-36 for women. The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.

Time frame: Baseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiation

Population: We excluded 31 participants who did not have a second time point assessment of echocardiography, resulting in 151 analyzable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Aspartate Aminotransferase6m24.068 IU/LStandard Error 1.293
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Aspartate Aminotransferase18m24.375 IU/LStandard Error 1.637
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Aspartate Aminotransferase12m25.426 IU/LStandard Error 1.423
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Aspartate Aminotransferase24m24.561 IU/LStandard Error 1.488
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Aspartate AminotransferaseBL26.608 IU/LStandard Error 1.726
Arm II (Placebo)Average Aspartate Aminotransferase24m27.038 IU/LStandard Error 1.509
Arm II (Placebo)Average Aspartate AminotransferaseBL25.773 IU/LStandard Error 1.089
Arm II (Placebo)Average Aspartate Aminotransferase6m26.342 IU/LStandard Error 1.252
Arm II (Placebo)Average Aspartate Aminotransferase12m27.014 IU/LStandard Error 1.432
Arm II (Placebo)Average Aspartate Aminotransferase18m28.411 IU/LStandard Error 2.665
p-value: 0.9795% CI: [-4.877, 4.685]Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE)
Secondary

Average Bilirubin

A liver function measurement (in mg/dL). The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.

Time frame: Baseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiation

Population: We excluded 31 participants who did not have a second time point assessment of echocardiography, resulting in 151 analyzable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Bilirubin6m0.5973 mg/dLStandard Error 0.0453
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Bilirubin18m0.593 mg/dLStandard Error 0.0665
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Bilirubin12m0.563 mg/dLStandard Error 0.0487
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Bilirubin24m0.5561 mg/dLStandard Error 0.0436
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average BilirubinBL0.5634 mg/dLStandard Error 0.0428
Arm II (Placebo)Average Bilirubin24m0.5449 mg/dLStandard Error 0.0354
Arm II (Placebo)Average BilirubinBL0.4989 mg/dLStandard Error 0.0272
Arm II (Placebo)Average Bilirubin6m0.4942 mg/dLStandard Error 0.0262
Arm II (Placebo)Average Bilirubin12m0.4969 mg/dLStandard Error 0.0302
Arm II (Placebo)Average Bilirubin18m0.507 mg/dLStandard Error 0.04
p-value: 0.8295% CI: [-0.18, 0.229]Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE)
Secondary

Average Cardiac N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide

N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide- a biomarker for heart failure (in pg/ml). The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.

Time frame: Baseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiation

Population: We excluded 31 participants who did not have a second time point assessment of echocardiography, resulting in 151 analyzable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Cardiac N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide6m90.7536 pg/mLStandard Error 11.7877
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Cardiac N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide18m99.4912 pg/mLStandard Error 15.7275
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Cardiac N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide12m87.7167 pg/mLStandard Error 13.38
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Cardiac N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide24m101.8333 pg/mLStandard Error 14.2521
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Cardiac N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic PeptideBL85.6301 pg/mLStandard Error 13.3731
Arm II (Placebo)Average Cardiac N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide24m107.8490 pg/mLStandard Error 26.6515
Arm II (Placebo)Average Cardiac N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic PeptideBL115.7222 pg/mLStandard Error 22.243
Arm II (Placebo)Average Cardiac N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide6m128.9565 pg/mLStandard Error 23.736
Arm II (Placebo)Average Cardiac N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide12m115.6364 pg/mLStandard Error 26.823
Arm II (Placebo)Average Cardiac N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide18m93.2105 pg/mLStandard Error 18.5618
p-value: 0.5595% CI: [-11.608, 21.835]Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE)
Secondary

Average Cardiac Troponin I

Troponin I is a biomarker for myocardial cell injury (in ng/ml). The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.

Time frame: Baseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiation

Population: We excluded 31 participants who did not have a second time point assessment of echocardiography, resulting in 151 analyzable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Cardiac Troponin I6m0.00265 ng/mLStandard Error 0.001
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Cardiac Troponin I18m0.00737 ng/mLStandard Error 0.0017
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Cardiac Troponin IBL0.00446 ng/mLStandard Error 0.0024
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Cardiac Troponin I24m0.01111 ng/mLStandard Error 0.002
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Cardiac Troponin I12m0.00467 ng/mLStandard Error 0.0014
Arm II (Placebo)Average Cardiac Troponin I24m0.01132 ng/mLStandard Error 0.002
Arm II (Placebo)Average Cardiac Troponin I12m0.00742 ng/mLStandard Error 0.0034
Arm II (Placebo)Average Cardiac Troponin IBL0.0011 ng/mLStandard Error 0.0008
Arm II (Placebo)Average Cardiac Troponin I18m0.00684 ng/mLStandard Error 0.0017
Arm II (Placebo)Average Cardiac Troponin I6m0.00174 ng/mLStandard Error 0.0009
p-value: 0.5195% CI: [-0.004, 0.002]Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE)
Secondary

Average Ejection Fraction

The percentage of blood leaving the heart at the end of diastole. The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.

Time frame: Baseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiation

Population: We excluded 31 participants who did not have a second time point assessment of echocardiography, resulting in 151 analyzable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Ejection Fraction6m58.16 PercentStandard Error 0.59
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Ejection Fraction18m57.35 PercentStandard Error 0.69
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Ejection Fraction12m58.07 PercentStandard Error 0.62
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Ejection Fraction2458.16 PercentStandard Error 0.79
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Ejection FractionBL57.6 PercentStandard Error 0.69
Arm II (Placebo)Average Ejection Fraction2457.5 PercentStandard Error 0.62
Arm II (Placebo)Average Ejection FractionBL57.42 PercentStandard Error 0.58
Arm II (Placebo)Average Ejection Fraction6m56.84 PercentStandard Error 0.6
Arm II (Placebo)Average Ejection Fraction12m56.61 PercentStandard Error 0.7
Arm II (Placebo)Average Ejection Fraction18m57.6 PercentStandard Error 0.71
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that change in LVEF across time do not vary by arm. Assuming a type I error=0.05, 2-sided test, 15% attrition/year, and correlation range of 1.2-1.6 between measurements, we projected that a sample size of 125/arm would provide 80% power to detect an effect size of 0.23-0.32 for LVEF at 24m.p-value: 0.4995% CI: [-0.472, 0.991]Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE)
Secondary

Average Fractional Shortening

A measure to assess preload and afterload (in %). The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.

Time frame: Baseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiation

Population: We excluded 31 participants who did not have a second time point assessment of echocardiography, resulting in 151 analyzable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Fractional Shortening12m29.6121 percentStandard Error 0.483
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Fractional Shortening18m27.8219 percentStandard Error 0.4951
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Fractional Shortening6m28.5409 percentStandard Error 0.4738
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Fractional Shortening2428.0302 percentStandard Error 0.5073
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Fractional ShorteningBL28.5362 percentStandard Error 0.4549
Arm II (Placebo)Average Fractional Shortening2428.5953 percentStandard Error 0.5901
Arm II (Placebo)Average Fractional ShorteningBL28.4339 percentStandard Error 0.4764
Arm II (Placebo)Average Fractional Shortening6m27.6866 percentStandard Error 0.5799
Arm II (Placebo)Average Fractional Shortening18m27.8891 percentStandard Error 0.596
Arm II (Placebo)Average Fractional Shortening12m28.1085 percentStandard Error 0.4918
p-value: 0.8495% CI: [-0.652, 0.532]Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE)
Secondary

Average Galectin-3

A protein produced by activated macrophages, and a member of a family of β-galactoside-binding lectings and promotes cardiac fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis following myocadial injury (in ng/ml). The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.

Time frame: Baseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiation

Population: We excluded 31 participants who did not have a second time point assessment of echocardiography, resulting in 151 analyzable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Galectin-36m4.3252 ng/mLStandard Error 0.2519
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Galectin-318m3.4548 ng/mLStandard Error 0.2482
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Galectin-312m3.7345 ng/mLStandard Error 0.234
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Galectin-324m3.8073 ng/mLStandard Error 0.3099
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Galectin-3BL4.4464 ng/mLStandard Error 0.2625
Arm II (Placebo)Average Galectin-324m4.0791 ng/mLStandard Error 0.2853
Arm II (Placebo)Average Galectin-3BL5.2538 ng/mLStandard Error 0.6531
Arm II (Placebo)Average Galectin-36m4.3735 ng/mLStandard Error 0.2746
Arm II (Placebo)Average Galectin-312m4.3415 ng/mLStandard Error 0.327
Arm II (Placebo)Average Galectin-318m4.0214 ng/mLStandard Error 0.2506
p-value: 0.9295% CI: [-0.468, 0.424]Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE)
Secondary

Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic Dimension

Thickness of cardiac muscle (in cm) of the left ventricle at the end of diastole. The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.

Time frame: Baseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiation

Population: We excluded 31 participants who did not have a second time point assessment of echocardiography, resulting in 151 analyzable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic Dimension6m4.6035 cmStandard Error 0.0431
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic Dimension18m4.6032 cmStandard Error 0.0568
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic Dimension12m4.636 cmStandard Error 0.0556
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic Dimension244.5147 cmStandard Error 0.0614
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic DimensionBL4.5836 cmStandard Error 0.0501
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic Dimension244.5976 cmStandard Error 0.067
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic DimensionBL4.5269 cmStandard Error 0.0565
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic Dimension6m4.565 cmStandard Error 0.0463
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic Dimension12m4.5884 cmStandard Error 0.0768
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic Dimension18m4.5462 cmStandard Error 0.0663
p-value: 0.0195% CI: [-141, -0.024]Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE)
Secondary

Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume

The amount of blood (in ml) in the heart's left ventricle just before the heart contracts. The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.

Time frame: Baseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiation

Population: We excluded 31 participants who did not have a second time point assessment of echocardiography, resulting in 151 analyzable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume6m99.3216 mlStandard Error 2.9788
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume18m101.174 mlStandard Error 3.5977
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume12m102.378 mlStandard Error 2.975
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume24m100.659 mlStandard Error 4.0356
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic VolumeBL99.7507 mlStandard Error 3.0157
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume24m98.9602 mlStandard Error 4.6469
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic VolumeBL93.3155 mlStandard Error 3.0337
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume6m95.7434 mlStandard Error 3.2631
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume12m96.5002 mlStandard Error 3.3889
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume18m99.4656 mlStandard Error 4.0815
p-value: 0.3695% CI: [-7.499, 2.704]Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE)
Secondary

Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Dimension

Thickness of cardiac muscle (in cm) of the left ventricle at the end of systole. The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.

Time frame: Baseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiation

Population: We excluded 31 participants who did not have a second time point assessment of echocardiography, resulting in 151 analyzable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Dimension6m3.2901 centimeterStandard Error 0.0382
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Dimension18m3.32 centimeterStandard Error 0.0436
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Dimension12m3.262 centimeterStandard Error 0.043
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Dimension24m3.2441 centimeterStandard Error 0.0435
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic DimensionBL03.2765 centimeterStandard Error 0.043
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Dimension24m3.286 centimeterStandard Error 0.0607
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic DimensionBL3.2396 centimeterStandard Error 0.0459
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Dimension6m3.3023 centimeterStandard Error 0.0442
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Dimension12m3.2964 centimeterStandard Error 0.0571
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Dimension18m3.2798 centimeterStandard Error 0.0579
p-value: 0.0595% CI: [-0.09, 0.001]Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE)
Secondary

Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume

The amount of blood (in ml) in the heart's left ventricle just after the heart contracts. The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.

Time frame: Baseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiation

Population: We excluded 31 participants who did not have a second time point assessment of echocardiography, resulting in 151 analyzable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume6m41.6128 mlStandard Error 1.4041
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume18m43.1453 mlStandard Error 1.605
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume12m42.8437 mlStandard Error 1.3498
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume24m42.0086 mlStandard Error 1.7268
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic VolumeBL42.2193 mlStandard Error 1.3907
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume24m42.442 mlStandard Error 2.3661
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic VolumeBL39.7354 mlStandard Error 1.3633
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume6m41.3839 mlStandard Error 1.5337
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume12m41.8113 mlStandard Error 1.6275
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume18m42.5634 mlStandard Error 2.1281
p-value: 0.1795% CI: [-5.34, 0.951]Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE)
Secondary

Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Wall Stress

Echocardiographic measure of left ventricular (LV) afterload based on LV pressure (P), volume (V), and wall thickness (T), calculated by the formula (P x V)/T, which equals the number referred to below in the Measure Type. The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.

Time frame: Baseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiation

Population: We excluded 31 participants who did not have a second time point assessment of echocardiography, resulting in 151 analyzable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Wall Stress6m90.3088 g/cm^2Standard Error 2.0577
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Wall Stress18m93.9267 g/cm^2Standard Error 2.4333
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Wall Stress12m88.984 g/cm^2Standard Error 2.0069
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Wall Stress24m89.2513 g/cm^2Standard Error 2.4341
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Wall StressBL93.2892 g/cm^2Standard Error 2.222
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Wall Stress24m94.0647 g/cm^2Standard Error 3.6562
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Wall StressBL90.6135 g/cm^2Standard Error 2.9775
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Wall Stress6m96.8356 g/cm^2Standard Error 2.9025
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Wall Stress12m96.0616 g/cm^2Standard Error 3.0406
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular End-systolic Wall Stress18m91.6458 g/cm^2Standard Error 3.1257
p-value: 0.0395% CI: [-7.105, -0.424]Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE)
Secondary

Average Left Ventricular Mass

The weight of the left ventricle adjusted for body surface area (in g/m2). The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.

Time frame: Baseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiation

Population: We excluded 31 participants who did not have a second time point assessment of echocardiography, resulting in 151 analyzable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular Mass12m60.2116 g/m^2Standard Error 1.6786
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular Mass6m58.2839 g/m^2Standard Error 1.3859
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular Mass18m57.7053 g/m^2Standard Error 1.6667
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular Mass24m58.3315 g/m^2Standard Error 1.6478
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Left Ventricular MassBL57.4862 g/m^2Standard Error 1.2135
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular Mass24m59.1026 g/m^2Standard Error 1.8092
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular MassBL57.9322 g/m^2Standard Error 1.5767
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular Mass6m57.0924 g/m^2Standard Error 1.29
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular Mass12m59.4508 g/m^2Standard Error 1.4995
Arm II (Placebo)Average Left Ventricular Mass18m59.1793 g/m^2Standard Error 1.6168
p-value: 0.5995% CI: [-1.134, 1.999]Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE)
Secondary

Average N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide

B-type natriuretic peptide- a biomarker for heart failure (in pg/ml). The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.

Time frame: Baseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiation

Population: We excluded 31 participants who did not have a second time point assessment of echocardiography, resulting in 151 analyzable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide6m31.8406 pg/mLStandard Error 3.3339
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide18m35.807 pg/mLStandard Error 3.7939
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide12m26.8203 pg/mLStandard Error 3.4625
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide24m34.625 pg/mLStandard Error 3.0875
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic PeptideBL27.3836 pg/mLStandard Error 2.0697
Arm II (Placebo)Average N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide24m33.3774 pg/mLStandard Error 3.6481
Arm II (Placebo)Average N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic PeptideBL31.4324 pg/mLStandard Error 3.424
Arm II (Placebo)Average N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide6m34.1857 pg/mLStandard Error 3.4737
Arm II (Placebo)Average N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide12m33.2941 pg/mLStandard Error 4.095
Arm II (Placebo)Average N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide18m32.2807 pg/mLStandard Error 4.0405
p-value: 0.2495% CI: [-1.387, 5.63]Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE)
Secondary

Average Peak Early Atrial Divided by Peak Late Atrial Velocities

Ratio of peak velocity blood flow from left ventricular relaxation in early diastole (E wave) to peak velocity flow in late diastole caused by atrial contraction (A wave). Number shown for Unit of Measure refers to this ratio. Normal: \>1. Impaired: \<1. The mean is reported by arm at each timepoint with corresponding standard errors.

Time frame: Baseline before treatment, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiation

Population: We excluded 31 participants who did not have a second time point assessment of echocardiography, resulting in 151 analyzable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Peak Early Atrial Divided by Peak Late Atrial Velocities6m1.642 ratioStandard Error 0.048
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Peak Early Atrial Divided by Peak Late Atrial Velocities18m1.732 ratioStandard Error 0.063
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Peak Early Atrial Divided by Peak Late Atrial Velocities12m1.723 ratioStandard Error 0.065
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Peak Early Atrial Divided by Peak Late Atrial Velocities24m1.603 ratioStandard Error 0.063
Arm I (Carvedilol)Average Peak Early Atrial Divided by Peak Late Atrial VelocitiesBL1.728 ratioStandard Error 0.067
Arm II (Placebo)Average Peak Early Atrial Divided by Peak Late Atrial Velocities24m1.64 ratioStandard Error 0.074
Arm II (Placebo)Average Peak Early Atrial Divided by Peak Late Atrial VelocitiesBL1.732 ratioStandard Error 0.071
Arm II (Placebo)Average Peak Early Atrial Divided by Peak Late Atrial Velocities6m1.769 ratioStandard Error 0.069
Arm II (Placebo)Average Peak Early Atrial Divided by Peak Late Atrial Velocities12m1.722 ratioStandard Error 0.079
Arm II (Placebo)Average Peak Early Atrial Divided by Peak Late Atrial Velocities18m1.732 ratioStandard Error 0.081
p-value: 0.8295% CI: [-0.065, 0.082]Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE)
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Average Adherence > 90%

The number of pills taken out of the total prescribed in a 3-month period, averaged across all study time points. The proportion of participants with average adherence rate \>90% is computed by arm and corresponding 95% confidence intervals are reported.

Time frame: Average adherence across 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after treatment initiation are calculated.

Population: We excluded 31 participants who did not have a second time point assessment of echocardiography, resulting in 151 analyzable participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Participants With Average Adherence > 90%0.483 proportion of participants
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Participants With Average Adherence > 90%0.517 proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.

In a questionnaire, patients responded Yes/No to certain symptoms. If answered Yes, they selected slightly, moderately, quite a bit, or extremely regarding how bothersome the symptom was. The proportion of participants responding with any of these three categories was calculated by arm, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals are reported.

Time frame: Responses at days 14 to 730 were combined

Population: We excluded 31 participants who did not have a second time point assessment of echocardiography, resulting in 151 analyzable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Heart racing or skipping beats0.08 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Sensation that I have to urinate much of the time0.0667 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Insomnia0.1733 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Discoloration of urine (i.e., bloody)0 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Feeling nervous0.1467 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Decreased libido0.0667 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Difficulty concentrating0.1067 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Unusually heavy menstrual flows (N/A if postmenopausal or male)0.2 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Dizziness and/or lightheadedness0.16 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Skin rash0.0933 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Interrupted sleep0.2 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Itchy skin0.1467 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Feeling downhearted, sad, and/or tearful0.2 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Dry Mouth0.0667 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Diarrhea0.0533 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Easy bruising0.0133 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Mood swings0.12 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Nosebleeds0.0667 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Tendency to take naps0.12 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Sunburn easily0.0933 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Feeling shaky or having tremors0.0533 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Weight gain0.0533 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Feeling unusually tired0.2267 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Fluid retention0.0267 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Falling asleep at inappropriate times0.0267 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Swollen feet0 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Decreased bodily movement0.0133 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Increased sweating0.0933 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Ringing in the ears0.0533 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Feeling weak in parts of your body0.0933 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Dizziness upon standing (from sitting or lying down)0.1467 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Shortness of breath or wheezing0.0933 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Difficulty breathing0.0267 Proportion of patients
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Chest pain or heaviness0.08 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Unusually heavy menstrual flows (N/A if postmenopausal or male)0.111 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Feeling downhearted, sad, and/or tearful0.1184 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Feeling unusually tired0.2237 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Heart racing or skipping beats0.0395 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Feeling shaky or having tremors0.0789 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Decreased bodily movement0.0395 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Feeling nervous0.1711 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Mood swings0.0921 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Dizziness and/or lightheadedness0.1316 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Dizziness upon standing (from sitting or lying down)0.1579 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Insomnia0.1711 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Difficulty concentrating0.1316 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Interrupted sleep0.2105 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Diarrhea0.1316 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Tendency to take naps0.1053 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Falling asleep at inappropriate times0.0395 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Ringing in the ears0.0921 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Difficulty breathing0 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Sensation that I have to urinate much of the time0.0789 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Discoloration of urine (i.e., bloody)0.0395 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Decreased libido0.0526 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Chest pain or heaviness0.0921 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Skin rash0.0789 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Itchy skin0.1447 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Dry Mouth0.1711 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Easy bruising0.0921 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Nosebleeds0.0526 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Sunburn easily0.0526 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Weight gain0.0789 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Fluid retention0.0395 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Swollen feet0.0921 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Increased sweating0.0789 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Feeling weak in parts of your body0.1316 Proportion of patients
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients Who Responded Moderately, Quite a Bit, or Extremely to the Question of How Bothersome the Listed Symptom Was at Any Post-day 0 Assessment Time Point.Shortness of breath or wheezing0.0395 Proportion of patients
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With Reportable Adverse Events as Described in the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).

Patients with toxicities reported via CTEP-AERS and all Grade ≥ 2 adverse events (AEs) that can be attributed probably or definitely to the study drug are considered to have AEs. The proportion of patients with AEs are reported by arm with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.

Time frame: From baseline to month 24 since baseline

Population: We excluded 31 participants who did not have a second time point assessment of echocardiography, resulting in 151 analyzable participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm I (Carvedilol)Proportion of Patients With Reportable Adverse Events as Described in the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).0.0267 Proportion of patients with AE
Arm II (Placebo)Proportion of Patients With Reportable Adverse Events as Described in the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).0 Proportion of patients with AE

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026