Cardiac Output Measurement
Conditions
Brief summary
In high-risk patients, it is now recommended to guide the intraoperative volume replacement via the stroke volume. Today, the most commonly used technique for estimating the stroke volume is the arterial waveform analysis in the radial artery. This technique has the disadvantage of being invasive and increasing the time dedicated to anesthesia during the surgery. The future is the non-invasive monitoring of stroke volume. Thus, Edwards Life Science has developed a continuous monitoring technology and non-invasive arterial pressure, cardiac output and stroke volume using a digital sensor (ClearSight®). The continuous monitoring of blood pressure by this technique was validated in cardiothoracic surgery but studies about monitoring cardiac output or stroke volume are inconclusive and contradictory. The objective of this study is to compare the use of non-invasive monitoring of stroke volume by Clearsight® with the arterial waveform analysis in the radial artery by Pulsioflex® in major surgery.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients scheduled to undergo major surgery * Patients monitored by a Pulsioflex® device
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with heart rhythm disorder * Patients with Raynaud's disease or vasculitis * Emergency surgery * Significant edema fingers
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Stroke Ejection Volume (SEV) measure by ClearSight® | 24 hours |
| Stroke Ejection Volume (SEV) measure by Pulsioflex® | 24 hours |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Cardiac Output (CO) measure by ClearSight® | 24 hours |
| Cardiac Output (CO) measure by Pulsioflex® | 24 hours |
| Stroke Ejection Volume Variations (SVV) measure by ClearSight® | 24 hours |
| Stroke Ejection Volume Variations (SVV) measure by Pulsioflex® | 24 hours |
Countries
France