Skip to content

A Study of PEGylated Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase in Combination With Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine Compared With Placebo Plus Nab-Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine in Participants With Hyaluronan-High Stage IV Previously Untreated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study of PEGylated Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (PEGPH20) in Combination With Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine Compared With Placebo Plus Nab-Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine in Subjects With Hyaluronan-High Stage IV Previously Untreated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02715804
Enrollment
492
Registered
2016-03-22
Start date
2016-03-14
Completion date
2019-11-04
Last updated
2020-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma

Keywords

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA), Pancreatic ductal carcinoma, PEGylated Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (PEGPH20), Nab-paclitaxel, Gemcitabine, Metastatic, Stage IV

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of PEGylated Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (PEGPH20) combined with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (PAG treatment), compared with placebo combined with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG treatment), in participants with hyaluronan (HA)-high Stage IV previously untreated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA).

Detailed description

Participants will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to PAG or AG treatment.

Interventions

OTHERBiological: PEGylated Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (PEGPH20)

PEGPH20 will be administered as per the dose and schedule specified in the respective arms.

DRUGPlacebo

Matching placebo for PEGPH20

DRUGnab-Paclitaxel

Nab-paclitaxel will be administered as per the dose and schedule specified in the respective arms.

DRUGGemcitabine

Gemcitabine will be administered as per the dose and schedule specified in the respective arms.

Sponsors

Halozyme Therapeutics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Participants must satisfy all the following inclusion criteria to be enrolled in the study: 1. Signed, written Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee-approved Informed Consent Form (ICF). 2. Stage IV PDA with histological or cytological confirmation of PDA. 3. Participants must be determined to be HA-high based on archived or fresh tumor core biopsy or sample obtained after the participant has documented metastatic disease. Biopsies/samples must meet the following requirements: 1. Pancreas tumor biopsies/samples obtained on or after the date that metastatic disease is documented or tumor biopsies/samples from a metastatic lesion are acceptable. 2. Tumor biopsies or samples must meet the requirements provided in the Study Laboratory Manual with regard to tumor tissue architecture. Note: cytology samples from fine needle aspirates without maintained tissue architecture or brushing biopsies are not acceptable. 3. Tumor tissue (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded \[FFPE\] block preferred) must include enough tumor to make a minimum of 5-10 unstained, consecutive FFPE slides (10 slides are preferred) of 1 archival block that meet specific tissue sample requirements. 4. Radiographic confirmation of Stage IV PDA with at least 1 tumor metastasis measurable on computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 criteria, excluding the primary pancreatic lesion. 5. If a participant has had adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy and/or therapy for locally advanced disease (chemotherapy for non-metastatic pancreatic cancer in combination with or without radiation therapy), tumor recurrence or disease progression must have occurred no sooner than 6 months after completing the last dose of the aforementioned therapies, provided all toxicities have returned to baseline or less than or equal to (≤) Grade 1. 6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1. 7. Life expectancy greater than or equal to (≥) 3 months. 8. Age ≥18 years. 9. A negative urine or serum pregnancy test within 7 days before Cycle 1, Day 1 (C1D1; first dose of study medication) if female participant is of childbearing potential. 10. Screening clinical laboratory values as follows: 1. Total bilirubin ≤1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) (participants with Gilbert syndrome are eligible independent of bilirubin levels). 2. Aspartate aminotransferase (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase) and alanine aminotransferase (serum glutamic pyruvate transaminase) ≤2.5 times ULN, (if liver metastases are present, then ≤5 times ULN is allowed). 3. Serum creatinine ≤2.0 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) or calculated creatinine clearance ≥40 milliliters/minute (mL/min). 4. Serum albumin ≥2.5 grams/deciliter (g/dL). 5. Prothrombin time or international normalized ratio (INR) within normal limits (±15%), unless participant takes warfarin, in which case prothrombin time or INR result must be within therapeutic range. 6. Partial thromboplastin time (PTT) within normal limits (±15%). 7. Hemoglobin ≥9 g/dL (transfusion and erythropoietic agents allowed). 8. Absolute neutrophil count ≥1,500 cells/cubic millimeter (cells/mm\^3). 9. Platelet count ≥100,000/mm\^3. 11. For women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) and for men, agreement to use a highly effective contraceptive method from the time of screening throughout the study until 1 month (WOCBP) or 6 months (men) after administration of the last dose of any study medication. Highly effective contraceptive methods consist of prior sterilization, intrauterine device (IUD), intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS), oral or injectable contraceptives, barrier methods, and/or true sexual abstinence.

Exclusion criteria

Participants are ineligible for enrollment if they meet any of the following

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall SurvivalFrom randomization until death from any cause (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Objective ResponseFrom the date of randomization until CR or PR (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)ORR was defined as percentage of participants who achieved either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by the blinded CIV based on RECIST version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; Any pathological or non-pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<) 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Duration of Response (DOR)From date of first objective response (CR or PR) until date of first disease progression (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)DOR was defined as the time from the first objective response of CR or PR until disease progression (as determined by the blinded CIV based on RECIST version 1.1) or death within 14 days of last dose of study treatment or randomization. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; Any pathological or non-pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study thus far, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, or the appearance of one or more new lesions; and unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)From administration of first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as AEs that begin or worsen in severity during or after the participant's first dose of study treatment and no later than 30 days after the date of the last dose of study treatment and/or any treatment-related AE regardless of the onset date. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported AE section'.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)From the date of randomization until disease progression or death from any cause (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)PFS was defined as the time from randomization until the first occurrence of radiological disease progression, as determined by the blinded Central Imaging Vendor (CIV) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1, or death from any cause during the treatment period. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study thus far, nadir (this included baseline sum if that was the smallest on study); Sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm); Appearance of one or more new lesions; Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Surviving participants without disease progression were censored for PFS analysis at the date of last evaluable post-baseline tumor assessment. Surviving participants without any post-baseline disease assessment were censored on Day 1. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG)From administration of first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)ECGs including clinical significance was evaluated by the Investigator. Criteria for clinical significance were as per investigator's discretion.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsFrom administration of first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)Vital signs included measurement of blood pressure (systolic blood pressure \[SBP\] and diastolic blood pressure \[DBP\]), heart rate, and body weight. Criteria for clinical significance abnormalities were: Heart rate: \<50 beats per minute (bpm), \>120 bpm, \>=30 bpm increase from baseline, \>=30 bpm decrease from baseline. SBP: \>140 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and increase from baseline \>20 mmHg, \>180 mmHg, \<90 mmHg and decrease from baseline \>10 mmHg. DBP: \>90 mmHg and increase from baseline \>20 mmHg, \>105 mmHg, \<60 mmHg and decrease from baseline \>10 mmHg. Change in weight: \>=5% increase from baseline, \>=5% decrease from baseline.
Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyFrom administration of first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)Severity grade associated with a laboratory parameter value was determined using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. Grade 1=mild, Grade 2=moderate, Grade 3=severe, Grade 4=life-threatening. Grade 0 indicates evaluable lab records but not fall into any CTCAE grade for certain CTCAE term. A worst post-baseline grade shift was defined as the worst change that occurred at any measured timepoint during study. Hematology abnormalities: anemia(hemoglobin decreased), lymphocyte count decreased, lymphocyte count increased, neutropenia(neutrophil count decreased), thrombocytopenia(platelet count decreased), and leukopenia(white blood cell decreased). Chemistry abnormalities: hypoalbuminemia, alkaline phosphatase increased, alanine aminotransferase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, hyperbilirubinemia, hypo- and hypercalcemia, creatinine increased, hypo- and hyperglycaemia, hypo- and hyperkalemia, hypo- and hypermagnesemia, hypo- and hypernatremia.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Netherlands, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 492 participants were enrolled from 14 March 2016 through 26 December 2018 in 20 countries.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 492 participants were enrolled and randomized in 2:1 ratio to received either PAG (PEGPH20 + Nab-paclitaxel + Gemcitabine) or AG (Placebo + Nab-paclitaxel + Gemcitabine).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine
Participants received 3.0 μg/kg PEGPH20 as an IV infusion, twice weekly for Weeks 1 to 3 of Cycle 1 (each cycle consisted of 4 weeks \[Week 4 of every cycle was a rest week with no treatment\]), then once weekly for Weeks 1 to 3 of Cycle 2 and beyond in combination with 125 mg/m\^2 nab-paclitaxel as an IV infusion and 1000 mg/m\^2 gemcitabine as an IV infusion, once weekly for Weeks 1 to 3 of all treatment cycles. Treatment was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal of consent (Maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks).
327
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine
Participants received placebo matching to PEGPH20 as an IV infusion, twice weekly for Weeks 1 to 3 of Cycle 1 (each cycle consisting of 4 weeks \[Week 4 of every cycle will be a rest week with no treatment\]), then once weekly for Weeks 1 to 3 of Cycle 2 and beyond in combination with 125 mg/m\^2 nab-paclitaxel as an IV infusion and 1000 mg/m\^2 gemcitabine as an IV infusion, once weekly for Weeks 1 to 3 of all treatment cycles. Treatment was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal of consent (Maximum exposure: 83.9 weeks).
165
Total492

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath222106
Overall StudyOther than specified23
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject54

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineAG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineTotal
Age, Continuous63.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.62
62.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
63.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
24 Participants11 Participants35 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
267 Participants138 Participants405 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
36 Participants16 Participants52 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
33 Participants24 Participants57 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
11 Participants5 Participants16 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
17 Participants10 Participants27 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White/Caucasian
266 Participants126 Participants392 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
147 Participants85 Participants232 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
180 Participants80 Participants260 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
222 / 325106 / 156
other
Total, other adverse events
198 / 32573 / 156
serious
Total, serious adverse events
187 / 32580 / 156

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods.

Time frame: From randomization until death from any cause (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineOverall Survival11.2 months
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineOverall Survival11.5 months
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was defined as the time from the first objective response of CR or PR until disease progression (as determined by the blinded CIV based on RECIST version 1.1) or death within 14 days of last dose of study treatment or randomization. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; Any pathological or non-pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study thus far, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, or the appearance of one or more new lesions; and unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods.

Time frame: From date of first objective response (CR or PR) until date of first disease progression (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants with objective response.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineDuration of Response (DOR)6.1 months
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineDuration of Response (DOR)7.4 months
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG)

ECGs including clinical significance was evaluated by the Investigator. Criteria for clinical significance were as per investigator's discretion.

Time frame: From administration of first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, and analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG)8 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG)4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs

Vital signs included measurement of blood pressure (systolic blood pressure \[SBP\] and diastolic blood pressure \[DBP\]), heart rate, and body weight. Criteria for clinical significance abnormalities were: Heart rate: \<50 beats per minute (bpm), \>120 bpm, \>=30 bpm increase from baseline, \>=30 bpm decrease from baseline. SBP: \>140 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and increase from baseline \>20 mmHg, \>180 mmHg, \<90 mmHg and decrease from baseline \>10 mmHg. DBP: \>90 mmHg and increase from baseline \>20 mmHg, \>105 mmHg, \<60 mmHg and decrease from baseline \>10 mmHg. Change in weight: \>=5% increase from baseline, \>=5% decrease from baseline.

Time frame: From administration of first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, and analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsHeart rate: <50 bpm7 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsHeart rate: >120 bpm47 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsHeart rate: >=30 bpm increase from baseline102 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsHeart rate: >=30 bpm decrease from baseline38 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsSBP: >140 mmHg and increase from baseline >20 mmHg75 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsSBP: >180 mmHg6 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsSBP: <90 mmHg and decrease from baseline >10 mmHg60 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsDBP: >90 mmHg and increase from baseline >20 mmHg21 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsDBP: >105 mmHg8 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsDBP: <60 mmHg and decrease from baseline >10 mmHg142 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsChange in weight: >=5% increase from baseline85 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsChange in weight: >=5% decrease from baseline151 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsChange in weight: >=5% increase from baseline52 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsHeart rate: <50 bpm4 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsSBP: <90 mmHg and decrease from baseline >10 mmHg17 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsHeart rate: >120 bpm13 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsDBP: <60 mmHg and decrease from baseline >10 mmHg56 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsHeart rate: >=30 bpm increase from baseline26 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsDBP: >90 mmHg and increase from baseline >20 mmHg10 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsHeart rate: >=30 bpm decrease from baseline19 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsChange in weight: >=5% decrease from baseline57 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsSBP: >140 mmHg and increase from baseline >20 mmHg37 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsDBP: >105 mmHg6 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsSBP: >180 mmHg4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as AEs that begin or worsen in severity during or after the participant's first dose of study treatment and no later than 30 days after the date of the last dose of study treatment and/or any treatment-related AE regardless of the onset date. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported AE section'.

Time frame: From administration of first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, and analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)325 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)156 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study

Severity grade associated with a laboratory parameter value was determined using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. Grade 1=mild, Grade 2=moderate, Grade 3=severe, Grade 4=life-threatening. Grade 0 indicates evaluable lab records but not fall into any CTCAE grade for certain CTCAE term. A worst post-baseline grade shift was defined as the worst change that occurred at any measured timepoint during study. Hematology abnormalities: anemia(hemoglobin decreased), lymphocyte count decreased, lymphocyte count increased, neutropenia(neutrophil count decreased), thrombocytopenia(platelet count decreased), and leukopenia(white blood cell decreased). Chemistry abnormalities: hypoalbuminemia, alkaline phosphatase increased, alanine aminotransferase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, hyperbilirubinemia, hypo- and hypercalcemia, creatinine increased, hypo- and hyperglycaemia, hypo- and hyperkalemia, hypo- and hypermagnesemia, hypo- and hypernatremia.

Time frame: From administration of first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, and analyzed according to the treatment they actually received. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAspartate aminotransferase increased:Post-baselineGrade 1168 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyNeutropenia: Post-baselineGrade 398 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAspartate aminotransferase increased:Post-baselineGrade 249 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyponatremia (sodium): Post-baselineGrade 41 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAspartate aminotransferase increased:Post-baselineGrade 325 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyNeutropenia: Post-baselineGrade 454 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAspartate aminotransferase increased:Post-baselineGrade 40 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLymphocyte count decreased: Post-baselineGrade 033 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperbilirubinemia: Post-baselineGrade 0237 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyThrombocytopenia: Post-baselineGrade 052 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperbilirubinemia: Post-baselineGrade 136 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypernatremia (sodium): Post-baselineGrade 30 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperbilirubinemia: Post-baselineGrade 231 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyThrombocytopenia: Post-baselineGrade 1134 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperbilirubinemia: Post-baselineGrade 312 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLymphocyte count decreased: Post-baselineGrade 183 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperbilirubinemia: Post-baselineGrade 43 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyThrombocytopenia: Post-baselineGrade 276 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypocalcemia (calcium): Post-baselineGrade 0224 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyponatremia (sodium): Post-baselineGrade 1167 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypocalcemia (calcium): Post-baselineGrade 168 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyThrombocytopenia: Post-baselineGrade 351 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypocalcemia (calcium): Post-baselineGrade 222 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLymphocyte count decreased: Post-baselineGrade 2102 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypocalcemia (calcium): Post-baselineGrade 34 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyThrombocytopenia: Post-baselineGrade 49 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypocalcemia (calcium): Post-baselineGrade 40 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypernatremia (sodium): Post-baselineGrade 41 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypercalcemia (calcium): Post-baselineGrade 0278 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLeukopenia: Post-baselineGrade 074 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypercalcemia (calcium): Post-baselineGrade 134 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLymphocyte count decreased: Post-baselineGrade 390 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypercalcemia (calcium): Post-baselineGrade 23 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLeukopenia: Post-baselineGrade 130 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypercalcemia (calcium): Post-baselineGrade 33 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypernatremia (sodium): Post-baselineGrade 0308 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypercalcemia (calcium): Post-baselineGrade 40 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLeukopenia: Post-baselineGrade 2100 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyCreatinine increased: Post-baselineGrade 0267 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLymphocyte count decreased: Post-baselineGrade 413 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyCreatinine increased: Post-baselineGrade 145 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLeukopenia: Post-baselineGrade 387 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyCreatinine increased: Post-baselineGrade 26 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAnemia: Post-baselineGrade 06 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyCreatinine increased: Post-baselineGrade 30 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLeukopenia: Post-baselineGrade 430 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyCreatinine increased: Post-baselineGrade 40 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLymphocyte count increased: Post-baselineGrade 0302 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypoglycemia (glucose): Post-baselineGrade 0292 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypoalbuminemia (Albumin): Post-baselineGrade 019 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypoglycemia (glucose): Post-baselineGrade 117 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyponatremia (sodium): Post-baselineGrade 354 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypoglycemia (glucose): Post-baselineGrade 27 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypoalbuminemia (Albumin): Post-baselineGrade 1102 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypoglycemia (glucose): Post-baselineGrade 33 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLymphocyte count increased: Post-baselineGrade 10 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypoglycemia (glucose): Post-baselineGrade 41 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypoalbuminemia (Albumin): Post-baselineGrade 2185 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperglycemia (glucose): Post-baselineGrade 031 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAnemia: Post-baselineGrade 184 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperglycemia (glucose): Post-baselineGrade 190 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypoalbuminemia (Albumin): Post-baselineGrade 312 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperglycemia (glucose): Post-baselineGrade 2119 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLymphocyte count increased: Post-baselineGrade 219 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperglycemia (glucose): Post-baselineGrade 376 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypoalbuminemia (Albumin): Post-baselineGrade 40 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperglycemia (glucose): Post-baselineGrade 44 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypernatremia (sodium): Post-baselineGrade 19 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypokalemia (potassium): Post-baselineGrade 0202 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAlkaline phosphatase increased: Post-baselineGrade 0135 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypokalemia (potassium): Post-baselineGrade 189 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLymphocyte count increased: Post-baselineGrade 30 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypokalemia (potassium): Post-baselineGrade 20 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAlkaline phosphatase increased: Post-baselineGrade 1114 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypokalemia (potassium): Post-baselineGrade 324 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAlkaline phosphatase increased: Post-baselineGrade 250 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypokalemia (potassium): Post-baselineGrade 44 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAnemia: Post-baselineGrade 2164 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperkalemia (potassium): Post-baselineGrade 0245 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAlkaline phosphatase increased: Post-baselineGrade 319 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperkalemia (potassium): Post-baselineGrade 144 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLymphocyte count increased: Post-baselineGrade 40 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperkalemia (potassium): Post-baselineGrade 221 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAlkaline phosphatase increased: Post-baselineGrade 40 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperkalemia (potassium): Post-baselineGrade 37 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyponatremia (sodium): Post-baselineGrade 20 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperkalemia (potassium): Post-baselineGrade 42 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAlanine aminotransferase increased: Post-baselineGrade 069 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypomagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baselineGrade 0209 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyNeutropenia: Post-baselineGrade 085 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypomagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baselineGrade 195 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAlanine aminotransferase increased: Post-baselineGrade 1155 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypomagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baselineGrade 29 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAnemia: Post-baselineGrade 367 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypomagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baselineGrade 34 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAlanine aminotransferase increased: Post-baselineGrade 243 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypomagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baselineGrade 41 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyNeutropenia: Post-baselineGrade 127 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypermagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baselineGrade 0306 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAlanine aminotransferase increased: Post-baselineGrade 351 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypermagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baselineGrade 18 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypernatremia (sodium): Post-baselineGrade 20 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypermagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baselineGrade 20 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAlanine aminotransferase increased: Post-baselineGrade 40 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypermagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baselineGrade 34 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyNeutropenia: Post-baselineGrade 257 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypermagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baselineGrade 40 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAspartate aminotransferase increased:Post-baselineGrade 077 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyponatremia (sodium): Post-baselineGrade 096 Participants
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAnemia: Post-baselineGrade 40 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyponatremia (sodium): Post-baselineGrade 049 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyponatremia (sodium): Post-baselineGrade 185 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyponatremia (sodium): Post-baselineGrade 20 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyponatremia (sodium): Post-baselineGrade 321 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyponatremia (sodium): Post-baselineGrade 40 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypernatremia (sodium): Post-baselineGrade 0153 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypernatremia (sodium): Post-baselineGrade 12 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypernatremia (sodium): Post-baselineGrade 20 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypernatremia (sodium): Post-baselineGrade 30 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypernatremia (sodium): Post-baselineGrade 40 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAnemia: Post-baselineGrade 03 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAnemia: Post-baselineGrade 141 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAnemia: Post-baselineGrade 274 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAnemia: Post-baselineGrade 337 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAnemia: Post-baselineGrade 40 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLymphocyte count decreased: Post-baselineGrade 017 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLymphocyte count decreased: Post-baselineGrade 146 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLymphocyte count decreased: Post-baselineGrade 246 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLymphocyte count decreased: Post-baselineGrade 340 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLymphocyte count decreased: Post-baselineGrade 46 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLymphocyte count increased: Post-baselineGrade 0150 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLymphocyte count increased: Post-baselineGrade 10 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLymphocyte count increased: Post-baselineGrade 25 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLymphocyte count increased: Post-baselineGrade 30 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLymphocyte count increased: Post-baselineGrade 40 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyNeutropenia: Post-baselineGrade 031 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyNeutropenia: Post-baselineGrade 111 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyNeutropenia: Post-baselineGrade 230 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyNeutropenia: Post-baselineGrade 348 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyNeutropenia: Post-baselineGrade 435 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyThrombocytopenia: Post-baselineGrade 032 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyThrombocytopenia: Post-baselineGrade 163 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyThrombocytopenia: Post-baselineGrade 236 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyThrombocytopenia: Post-baselineGrade 320 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyThrombocytopenia: Post-baselineGrade 44 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLeukopenia: Post-baselineGrade 032 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLeukopenia: Post-baselineGrade 115 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLeukopenia: Post-baselineGrade 243 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLeukopenia: Post-baselineGrade 351 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyLeukopenia: Post-baselineGrade 414 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypoalbuminemia (Albumin): Post-baselineGrade 046 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypoalbuminemia (Albumin): Post-baselineGrade 162 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypoalbuminemia (Albumin): Post-baselineGrade 244 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypoalbuminemia (Albumin): Post-baselineGrade 33 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypoalbuminemia (Albumin): Post-baselineGrade 40 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAlkaline phosphatase increased: Post-baselineGrade 057 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAlkaline phosphatase increased: Post-baselineGrade 226 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAlkaline phosphatase increased: Post-baselineGrade 310 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAlkaline phosphatase increased: Post-baselineGrade 40 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAlanine aminotransferase increased: Post-baselineGrade 033 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAlanine aminotransferase increased: Post-baselineGrade 172 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAlanine aminotransferase increased: Post-baselineGrade 232 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAlanine aminotransferase increased: Post-baselineGrade 317 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAlanine aminotransferase increased: Post-baselineGrade 41 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAspartate aminotransferase increased:Post-baselineGrade 028 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAspartate aminotransferase increased:Post-baselineGrade 196 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAspartate aminotransferase increased:Post-baselineGrade 217 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAspartate aminotransferase increased:Post-baselineGrade 313 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAspartate aminotransferase increased:Post-baselineGrade 41 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperbilirubinemia: Post-baselineGrade 0125 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperbilirubinemia: Post-baselineGrade 19 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperbilirubinemia: Post-baselineGrade 215 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperbilirubinemia: Post-baselineGrade 36 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperbilirubinemia: Post-baselineGrade 40 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypocalcemia (calcium): Post-baselineGrade 0119 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypocalcemia (calcium): Post-baselineGrade 130 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypocalcemia (calcium): Post-baselineGrade 26 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypocalcemia (calcium): Post-baselineGrade 30 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypocalcemia (calcium): Post-baselineGrade 40 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypercalcemia (calcium): Post-baselineGrade 0148 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypercalcemia (calcium): Post-baselineGrade 16 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypercalcemia (calcium): Post-baselineGrade 20 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypercalcemia (calcium): Post-baselineGrade 31 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypercalcemia (calcium): Post-baselineGrade 40 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyCreatinine increased: Post-baselineGrade 0135 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyCreatinine increased: Post-baselineGrade 116 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyCreatinine increased: Post-baselineGrade 24 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyCreatinine increased: Post-baselineGrade 30 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyCreatinine increased: Post-baselineGrade 40 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypoglycemia (glucose): Post-baselineGrade 0140 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypoglycemia (glucose): Post-baselineGrade 19 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypoglycemia (glucose): Post-baselineGrade 21 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypoglycemia (glucose): Post-baselineGrade 31 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypoglycemia (glucose): Post-baselineGrade 44 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperglycemia (glucose): Post-baselineGrade 024 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperglycemia (glucose): Post-baselineGrade 145 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperglycemia (glucose): Post-baselineGrade 244 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperglycemia (glucose): Post-baselineGrade 340 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperglycemia (glucose): Post-baselineGrade 42 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypokalemia (potassium): Post-baselineGrade 0104 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypokalemia (potassium): Post-baselineGrade 138 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypokalemia (potassium): Post-baselineGrade 20 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypokalemia (potassium): Post-baselineGrade 311 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypokalemia (potassium): Post-baselineGrade 42 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperkalemia (potassium): Post-baselineGrade 0122 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperkalemia (potassium): Post-baselineGrade 119 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperkalemia (potassium): Post-baselineGrade 211 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperkalemia (potassium): Post-baselineGrade 33 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHyperkalemia (potassium): Post-baselineGrade 40 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypomagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baselineGrade 0113 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypomagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baselineGrade 136 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypomagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baselineGrade 25 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypomagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baselineGrade 30 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypomagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baselineGrade 40 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypermagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baselineGrade 0150 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypermagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baselineGrade 14 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypermagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baselineGrade 20 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypermagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baselineGrade 30 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyHypermagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baselineGrade 40 Participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the StudyAlkaline phosphatase increased: Post-baselineGrade 162 Participants
Secondary

Objective Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

ORR was defined as percentage of participants who achieved either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by the blinded CIV based on RECIST version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; Any pathological or non-pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<) 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Time frame: From the date of randomization until CR or PR (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineObjective Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Objective Response47.1 percentage of participants
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineObjective Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Objective Response36.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from randomization until the first occurrence of radiological disease progression, as determined by the blinded Central Imaging Vendor (CIV) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1, or death from any cause during the treatment period. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study thus far, nadir (this included baseline sum if that was the smallest on study); Sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm); Appearance of one or more new lesions; Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Surviving participants without disease progression were censored for PFS analysis at the date of last evaluable post-baseline tumor assessment. Surviving participants without any post-baseline disease assessment were censored on Day 1. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From the date of randomization until disease progression or death from any cause (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineProgression-Free Survival (PFS)7.1 months
AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineProgression-Free Survival (PFS)7.1 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026