Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma
Conditions
Keywords
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA), Pancreatic ductal carcinoma, PEGylated Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (PEGPH20), Nab-paclitaxel, Gemcitabine, Metastatic, Stage IV
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of PEGylated Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (PEGPH20) combined with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (PAG treatment), compared with placebo combined with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG treatment), in participants with hyaluronan (HA)-high Stage IV previously untreated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA).
Detailed description
Participants will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to PAG or AG treatment.
Interventions
PEGPH20 will be administered as per the dose and schedule specified in the respective arms.
Matching placebo for PEGPH20
Nab-paclitaxel will be administered as per the dose and schedule specified in the respective arms.
Gemcitabine will be administered as per the dose and schedule specified in the respective arms.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Participants must satisfy all the following inclusion criteria to be enrolled in the study: 1. Signed, written Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee-approved Informed Consent Form (ICF). 2. Stage IV PDA with histological or cytological confirmation of PDA. 3. Participants must be determined to be HA-high based on archived or fresh tumor core biopsy or sample obtained after the participant has documented metastatic disease. Biopsies/samples must meet the following requirements: 1. Pancreas tumor biopsies/samples obtained on or after the date that metastatic disease is documented or tumor biopsies/samples from a metastatic lesion are acceptable. 2. Tumor biopsies or samples must meet the requirements provided in the Study Laboratory Manual with regard to tumor tissue architecture. Note: cytology samples from fine needle aspirates without maintained tissue architecture or brushing biopsies are not acceptable. 3. Tumor tissue (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded \[FFPE\] block preferred) must include enough tumor to make a minimum of 5-10 unstained, consecutive FFPE slides (10 slides are preferred) of 1 archival block that meet specific tissue sample requirements. 4. Radiographic confirmation of Stage IV PDA with at least 1 tumor metastasis measurable on computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 criteria, excluding the primary pancreatic lesion. 5. If a participant has had adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy and/or therapy for locally advanced disease (chemotherapy for non-metastatic pancreatic cancer in combination with or without radiation therapy), tumor recurrence or disease progression must have occurred no sooner than 6 months after completing the last dose of the aforementioned therapies, provided all toxicities have returned to baseline or less than or equal to (≤) Grade 1. 6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1. 7. Life expectancy greater than or equal to (≥) 3 months. 8. Age ≥18 years. 9. A negative urine or serum pregnancy test within 7 days before Cycle 1, Day 1 (C1D1; first dose of study medication) if female participant is of childbearing potential. 10. Screening clinical laboratory values as follows: 1. Total bilirubin ≤1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) (participants with Gilbert syndrome are eligible independent of bilirubin levels). 2. Aspartate aminotransferase (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase) and alanine aminotransferase (serum glutamic pyruvate transaminase) ≤2.5 times ULN, (if liver metastases are present, then ≤5 times ULN is allowed). 3. Serum creatinine ≤2.0 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) or calculated creatinine clearance ≥40 milliliters/minute (mL/min). 4. Serum albumin ≥2.5 grams/deciliter (g/dL). 5. Prothrombin time or international normalized ratio (INR) within normal limits (±15%), unless participant takes warfarin, in which case prothrombin time or INR result must be within therapeutic range. 6. Partial thromboplastin time (PTT) within normal limits (±15%). 7. Hemoglobin ≥9 g/dL (transfusion and erythropoietic agents allowed). 8. Absolute neutrophil count ≥1,500 cells/cubic millimeter (cells/mm\^3). 9. Platelet count ≥100,000/mm\^3. 11. For women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) and for men, agreement to use a highly effective contraceptive method from the time of screening throughout the study until 1 month (WOCBP) or 6 months (men) after administration of the last dose of any study medication. Highly effective contraceptive methods consist of prior sterilization, intrauterine device (IUD), intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS), oral or injectable contraceptives, barrier methods, and/or true sexual abstinence.
Exclusion criteria
Participants are ineligible for enrollment if they meet any of the following
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival | From randomization until death from any cause (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG) | Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Objective Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Objective Response | From the date of randomization until CR or PR (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG) | ORR was defined as percentage of participants who achieved either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by the blinded CIV based on RECIST version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; Any pathological or non-pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<) 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. |
| Duration of Response (DOR) | From date of first objective response (CR or PR) until date of first disease progression (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG) | DOR was defined as the time from the first objective response of CR or PR until disease progression (as determined by the blinded CIV based on RECIST version 1.1) or death within 14 days of last dose of study treatment or randomization. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; Any pathological or non-pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study thus far, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, or the appearance of one or more new lesions; and unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) | From administration of first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as AEs that begin or worsen in severity during or after the participant's first dose of study treatment and no later than 30 days after the date of the last dose of study treatment and/or any treatment-related AE regardless of the onset date. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported AE section'. |
| Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | From the date of randomization until disease progression or death from any cause (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG) | PFS was defined as the time from randomization until the first occurrence of radiological disease progression, as determined by the blinded Central Imaging Vendor (CIV) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1, or death from any cause during the treatment period. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study thus far, nadir (this included baseline sum if that was the smallest on study); Sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm); Appearance of one or more new lesions; Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Surviving participants without disease progression were censored for PFS analysis at the date of last evaluable post-baseline tumor assessment. Surviving participants without any post-baseline disease assessment were censored on Day 1. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG) | From administration of first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG) | ECGs including clinical significance was evaluated by the Investigator. Criteria for clinical significance were as per investigator's discretion. |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | From administration of first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG) | Vital signs included measurement of blood pressure (systolic blood pressure \[SBP\] and diastolic blood pressure \[DBP\]), heart rate, and body weight. Criteria for clinical significance abnormalities were: Heart rate: \<50 beats per minute (bpm), \>120 bpm, \>=30 bpm increase from baseline, \>=30 bpm decrease from baseline. SBP: \>140 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and increase from baseline \>20 mmHg, \>180 mmHg, \<90 mmHg and decrease from baseline \>10 mmHg. DBP: \>90 mmHg and increase from baseline \>20 mmHg, \>105 mmHg, \<60 mmHg and decrease from baseline \>10 mmHg. Change in weight: \>=5% increase from baseline, \>=5% decrease from baseline. |
| Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | From administration of first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG) | Severity grade associated with a laboratory parameter value was determined using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. Grade 1=mild, Grade 2=moderate, Grade 3=severe, Grade 4=life-threatening. Grade 0 indicates evaluable lab records but not fall into any CTCAE grade for certain CTCAE term. A worst post-baseline grade shift was defined as the worst change that occurred at any measured timepoint during study. Hematology abnormalities: anemia(hemoglobin decreased), lymphocyte count decreased, lymphocyte count increased, neutropenia(neutrophil count decreased), thrombocytopenia(platelet count decreased), and leukopenia(white blood cell decreased). Chemistry abnormalities: hypoalbuminemia, alkaline phosphatase increased, alanine aminotransferase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, hyperbilirubinemia, hypo- and hypercalcemia, creatinine increased, hypo- and hyperglycaemia, hypo- and hyperkalemia, hypo- and hypermagnesemia, hypo- and hypernatremia. |
Countries
Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Netherlands, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
A total of 492 participants were enrolled from 14 March 2016 through 26 December 2018 in 20 countries.
Pre-assignment details
A total of 492 participants were enrolled and randomized in 2:1 ratio to received either PAG (PEGPH20 + Nab-paclitaxel + Gemcitabine) or AG (Placebo + Nab-paclitaxel + Gemcitabine).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine Participants received 3.0 μg/kg PEGPH20 as an IV infusion, twice weekly for Weeks 1 to 3 of Cycle 1 (each cycle consisted of 4 weeks \[Week 4 of every cycle was a rest week with no treatment\]), then once weekly for Weeks 1 to 3 of Cycle 2 and beyond in combination with 125 mg/m\^2 nab-paclitaxel as an IV infusion and 1000 mg/m\^2 gemcitabine as an IV infusion, once weekly for Weeks 1 to 3 of all treatment cycles. Treatment was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal of consent (Maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks). | 327 |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine Participants received placebo matching to PEGPH20 as an IV infusion, twice weekly for Weeks 1 to 3 of Cycle 1 (each cycle consisting of 4 weeks \[Week 4 of every cycle will be a rest week with no treatment\]), then once weekly for Weeks 1 to 3 of Cycle 2 and beyond in combination with 125 mg/m\^2 nab-paclitaxel as an IV infusion and 1000 mg/m\^2 gemcitabine as an IV infusion, once weekly for Weeks 1 to 3 of all treatment cycles. Treatment was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal of consent (Maximum exposure: 83.9 weeks). | 165 |
| Total | 492 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 222 | 106 |
| Overall Study | Other than specified | 2 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 5 | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 63.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.62 | 62.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 | 63.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 24 Participants | 11 Participants | 35 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 267 Participants | 138 Participants | 405 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 36 Participants | 16 Participants | 52 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 33 Participants | 24 Participants | 57 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 11 Participants | 5 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 17 Participants | 10 Participants | 27 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White/Caucasian | 266 Participants | 126 Participants | 392 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 147 Participants | 85 Participants | 232 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 180 Participants | 80 Participants | 260 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 222 / 325 | 106 / 156 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 198 / 325 | 73 / 156 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 187 / 325 | 80 / 156 |
Outcome results
Overall Survival
Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Time frame: From randomization until death from any cause (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)
Population: ITT population included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Overall Survival | 11.2 months |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Overall Survival | 11.5 months |
Duration of Response (DOR)
DOR was defined as the time from the first objective response of CR or PR until disease progression (as determined by the blinded CIV based on RECIST version 1.1) or death within 14 days of last dose of study treatment or randomization. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; Any pathological or non-pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study thus far, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, or the appearance of one or more new lesions; and unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Time frame: From date of first objective response (CR or PR) until date of first disease progression (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)
Population: ITT population included all randomized participants. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants with objective response.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Duration of Response (DOR) | 6.1 months |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Duration of Response (DOR) | 7.4 months |
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG)
ECGs including clinical significance was evaluated by the Investigator. Criteria for clinical significance were as per investigator's discretion.
Time frame: From administration of first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)
Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, and analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG) | 8 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG) | 4 Participants |
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs
Vital signs included measurement of blood pressure (systolic blood pressure \[SBP\] and diastolic blood pressure \[DBP\]), heart rate, and body weight. Criteria for clinical significance abnormalities were: Heart rate: \<50 beats per minute (bpm), \>120 bpm, \>=30 bpm increase from baseline, \>=30 bpm decrease from baseline. SBP: \>140 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and increase from baseline \>20 mmHg, \>180 mmHg, \<90 mmHg and decrease from baseline \>10 mmHg. DBP: \>90 mmHg and increase from baseline \>20 mmHg, \>105 mmHg, \<60 mmHg and decrease from baseline \>10 mmHg. Change in weight: \>=5% increase from baseline, \>=5% decrease from baseline.
Time frame: From administration of first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)
Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, and analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Heart rate: <50 bpm | 7 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Heart rate: >120 bpm | 47 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Heart rate: >=30 bpm increase from baseline | 102 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Heart rate: >=30 bpm decrease from baseline | 38 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | SBP: >140 mmHg and increase from baseline >20 mmHg | 75 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | SBP: >180 mmHg | 6 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | SBP: <90 mmHg and decrease from baseline >10 mmHg | 60 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | DBP: >90 mmHg and increase from baseline >20 mmHg | 21 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | DBP: >105 mmHg | 8 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | DBP: <60 mmHg and decrease from baseline >10 mmHg | 142 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Change in weight: >=5% increase from baseline | 85 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Change in weight: >=5% decrease from baseline | 151 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Change in weight: >=5% increase from baseline | 52 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Heart rate: <50 bpm | 4 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | SBP: <90 mmHg and decrease from baseline >10 mmHg | 17 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Heart rate: >120 bpm | 13 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | DBP: <60 mmHg and decrease from baseline >10 mmHg | 56 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Heart rate: >=30 bpm increase from baseline | 26 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | DBP: >90 mmHg and increase from baseline >20 mmHg | 10 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Heart rate: >=30 bpm decrease from baseline | 19 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Change in weight: >=5% decrease from baseline | 57 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | SBP: >140 mmHg and increase from baseline >20 mmHg | 37 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | DBP: >105 mmHg | 6 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | SBP: >180 mmHg | 4 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as AEs that begin or worsen in severity during or after the participant's first dose of study treatment and no later than 30 days after the date of the last dose of study treatment and/or any treatment-related AE regardless of the onset date. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported AE section'.
Time frame: From administration of first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)
Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, and analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) | 325 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) | 156 Participants |
Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study
Severity grade associated with a laboratory parameter value was determined using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. Grade 1=mild, Grade 2=moderate, Grade 3=severe, Grade 4=life-threatening. Grade 0 indicates evaluable lab records but not fall into any CTCAE grade for certain CTCAE term. A worst post-baseline grade shift was defined as the worst change that occurred at any measured timepoint during study. Hematology abnormalities: anemia(hemoglobin decreased), lymphocyte count decreased, lymphocyte count increased, neutropenia(neutrophil count decreased), thrombocytopenia(platelet count decreased), and leukopenia(white blood cell decreased). Chemistry abnormalities: hypoalbuminemia, alkaline phosphatase increased, alanine aminotransferase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, hyperbilirubinemia, hypo- and hypercalcemia, creatinine increased, hypo- and hyperglycaemia, hypo- and hyperkalemia, hypo- and hypermagnesemia, hypo- and hypernatremia.
Time frame: From administration of first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)
Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, and analyzed according to the treatment they actually received. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for specified categories.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Aspartate aminotransferase increased:Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 168 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Neutropenia: Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 98 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Aspartate aminotransferase increased:Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 49 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyponatremia (sodium): Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Aspartate aminotransferase increased:Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 25 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Neutropenia: Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 54 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Aspartate aminotransferase increased:Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Lymphocyte count decreased: Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 33 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperbilirubinemia: Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 237 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Thrombocytopenia: Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 52 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperbilirubinemia: Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 36 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypernatremia (sodium): Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperbilirubinemia: Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 31 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Thrombocytopenia: Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 134 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperbilirubinemia: Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 12 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Lymphocyte count decreased: Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 83 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperbilirubinemia: Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 3 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Thrombocytopenia: Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 76 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypocalcemia (calcium): Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 224 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyponatremia (sodium): Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 167 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypocalcemia (calcium): Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 68 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Thrombocytopenia: Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 51 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypocalcemia (calcium): Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 22 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Lymphocyte count decreased: Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 102 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypocalcemia (calcium): Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 4 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Thrombocytopenia: Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 9 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypocalcemia (calcium): Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypernatremia (sodium): Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypercalcemia (calcium): Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 278 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Leukopenia: Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 74 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypercalcemia (calcium): Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 34 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Lymphocyte count decreased: Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 90 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypercalcemia (calcium): Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Leukopenia: Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 30 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypercalcemia (calcium): Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypernatremia (sodium): Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 308 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypercalcemia (calcium): Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Leukopenia: Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 100 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Creatinine increased: Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 267 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Lymphocyte count decreased: Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 13 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Creatinine increased: Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 45 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Leukopenia: Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 87 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Creatinine increased: Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 6 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Anemia: Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 6 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Creatinine increased: Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Leukopenia: Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 30 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Creatinine increased: Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Lymphocyte count increased: Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 302 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypoglycemia (glucose): Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 292 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypoalbuminemia (Albumin): Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 19 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypoglycemia (glucose): Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 17 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyponatremia (sodium): Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 54 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypoglycemia (glucose): Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 7 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypoalbuminemia (Albumin): Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 102 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypoglycemia (glucose): Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Lymphocyte count increased: Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypoglycemia (glucose): Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypoalbuminemia (Albumin): Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 185 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperglycemia (glucose): Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 31 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Anemia: Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 84 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperglycemia (glucose): Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 90 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypoalbuminemia (Albumin): Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 12 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperglycemia (glucose): Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 119 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Lymphocyte count increased: Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 19 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperglycemia (glucose): Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 76 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypoalbuminemia (Albumin): Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperglycemia (glucose): Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 4 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypernatremia (sodium): Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 9 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypokalemia (potassium): Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 202 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Alkaline phosphatase increased: Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 135 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypokalemia (potassium): Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 89 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Lymphocyte count increased: Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypokalemia (potassium): Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Alkaline phosphatase increased: Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 114 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypokalemia (potassium): Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 24 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Alkaline phosphatase increased: Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 50 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypokalemia (potassium): Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 4 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Anemia: Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 164 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperkalemia (potassium): Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 245 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Alkaline phosphatase increased: Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 19 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperkalemia (potassium): Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 44 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Lymphocyte count increased: Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperkalemia (potassium): Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 21 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Alkaline phosphatase increased: Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperkalemia (potassium): Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 7 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyponatremia (sodium): Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperkalemia (potassium): Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Alanine aminotransferase increased: Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 69 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypomagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 209 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Neutropenia: Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 85 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypomagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 95 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Alanine aminotransferase increased: Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 155 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypomagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 9 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Anemia: Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 67 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypomagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 4 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Alanine aminotransferase increased: Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 43 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypomagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Neutropenia: Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 27 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypermagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 306 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Alanine aminotransferase increased: Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 51 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypermagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 8 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypernatremia (sodium): Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypermagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Alanine aminotransferase increased: Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypermagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 4 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Neutropenia: Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 57 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypermagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Aspartate aminotransferase increased:Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 77 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyponatremia (sodium): Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 96 Participants |
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Anemia: Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyponatremia (sodium): Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 49 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyponatremia (sodium): Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 85 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyponatremia (sodium): Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyponatremia (sodium): Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 21 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyponatremia (sodium): Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypernatremia (sodium): Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 153 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypernatremia (sodium): Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypernatremia (sodium): Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypernatremia (sodium): Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypernatremia (sodium): Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Anemia: Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 3 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Anemia: Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 41 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Anemia: Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 74 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Anemia: Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 37 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Anemia: Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Lymphocyte count decreased: Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 17 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Lymphocyte count decreased: Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 46 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Lymphocyte count decreased: Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 46 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Lymphocyte count decreased: Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 40 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Lymphocyte count decreased: Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 6 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Lymphocyte count increased: Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 150 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Lymphocyte count increased: Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Lymphocyte count increased: Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 5 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Lymphocyte count increased: Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Lymphocyte count increased: Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Neutropenia: Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 31 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Neutropenia: Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 11 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Neutropenia: Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 30 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Neutropenia: Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 48 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Neutropenia: Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 35 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Thrombocytopenia: Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 32 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Thrombocytopenia: Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 63 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Thrombocytopenia: Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 36 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Thrombocytopenia: Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 20 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Thrombocytopenia: Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 4 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Leukopenia: Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 32 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Leukopenia: Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 15 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Leukopenia: Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 43 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Leukopenia: Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 51 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Leukopenia: Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 14 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypoalbuminemia (Albumin): Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 46 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypoalbuminemia (Albumin): Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 62 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypoalbuminemia (Albumin): Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 44 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypoalbuminemia (Albumin): Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypoalbuminemia (Albumin): Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Alkaline phosphatase increased: Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 57 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Alkaline phosphatase increased: Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 26 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Alkaline phosphatase increased: Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 10 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Alkaline phosphatase increased: Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Alanine aminotransferase increased: Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 33 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Alanine aminotransferase increased: Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 72 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Alanine aminotransferase increased: Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 32 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Alanine aminotransferase increased: Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 17 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Alanine aminotransferase increased: Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Aspartate aminotransferase increased:Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 28 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Aspartate aminotransferase increased:Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 96 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Aspartate aminotransferase increased:Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 17 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Aspartate aminotransferase increased:Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 13 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Aspartate aminotransferase increased:Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperbilirubinemia: Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 125 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperbilirubinemia: Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 9 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperbilirubinemia: Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 15 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperbilirubinemia: Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 6 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperbilirubinemia: Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypocalcemia (calcium): Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 119 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypocalcemia (calcium): Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 30 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypocalcemia (calcium): Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 6 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypocalcemia (calcium): Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypocalcemia (calcium): Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypercalcemia (calcium): Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 148 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypercalcemia (calcium): Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 6 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypercalcemia (calcium): Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypercalcemia (calcium): Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypercalcemia (calcium): Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Creatinine increased: Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 135 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Creatinine increased: Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 16 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Creatinine increased: Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 4 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Creatinine increased: Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Creatinine increased: Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypoglycemia (glucose): Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 140 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypoglycemia (glucose): Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 9 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypoglycemia (glucose): Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypoglycemia (glucose): Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypoglycemia (glucose): Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 4 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperglycemia (glucose): Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 24 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperglycemia (glucose): Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 45 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperglycemia (glucose): Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 44 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperglycemia (glucose): Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 40 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperglycemia (glucose): Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypokalemia (potassium): Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 104 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypokalemia (potassium): Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 38 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypokalemia (potassium): Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypokalemia (potassium): Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 11 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypokalemia (potassium): Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperkalemia (potassium): Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 122 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperkalemia (potassium): Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 19 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperkalemia (potassium): Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 11 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperkalemia (potassium): Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hyperkalemia (potassium): Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypomagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 113 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypomagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 36 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypomagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 5 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypomagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypomagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypermagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baseline | Grade 0 | 150 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypermagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 4 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypermagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baseline | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypermagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baseline | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Hypermagnesemia (magnesium): Post-baseline | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Hematology and Chemistry (Clinical Laboratory Parameters) Severity Grade During the Study | Alkaline phosphatase increased: Post-baseline | Grade 1 | 62 Participants |
Objective Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
ORR was defined as percentage of participants who achieved either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by the blinded CIV based on RECIST version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; Any pathological or non-pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<) 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Time frame: From the date of randomization until CR or PR (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)
Population: ITT population included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Objective Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Objective Response | 47.1 percentage of participants |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Objective Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Objective Response | 36.4 percentage of participants |
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization until the first occurrence of radiological disease progression, as determined by the blinded Central Imaging Vendor (CIV) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1, or death from any cause during the treatment period. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study thus far, nadir (this included baseline sum if that was the smallest on study); Sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm); Appearance of one or more new lesions; Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Surviving participants without disease progression were censored for PFS analysis at the date of last evaluable post-baseline tumor assessment. Surviving participants without any post-baseline disease assessment were censored on Day 1. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From the date of randomization until disease progression or death from any cause (maximum exposure: 150.1 weeks for PAG, and 83.9 weeks for AG)
Population: ITT population included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | 7.1 months |
| AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | 7.1 months |