Skip to content

Intervention in Frailty Versus Usual Care in Frail Patients After an Acute Myocardial Infarction

Randomized Comparison Between a Strategy of Intervention in Frailty Versus the Usual Care in Frail Patients After an Acute Myocardial Infarction

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02715453
Acronym
FRAMIP
Enrollment
150
Registered
2016-03-22
Start date
2016-01-31
Completion date
2020-02-29
Last updated
2021-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fragility

Keywords

Frailty, Acute myocardial infarction

Brief summary

Frailty has been associated to a worse outcome in acute coronary syndromes, but the best management of frail patients after an acute coronary syndrome remains unknown. The aim was to investigate the benefit of an intervention on frailty in frail patients after an acute myocardial infarction. Patients survivors after an acute myocardial infarction (with and without ST-segment elevation), older than 70 years and with pre-frailty (1-2 points) or frailty (≥3 points) according to the Fried's scale measured 24 hours before hospital discharge, will be included. The participants will be randomized to 2 strategies: a) intervention on frailty in addition to the usual care by the cardiologist, and b) conventional strategy consisting only of the usual care by the cardiologist. A multidisciplinary team (physicians, nurses and physiotherapists and nutritionists) will carry out the intervention on frailty The study contemplates a 2-year inclusion period and a 3rd year for the follow-up of the last included patient. The main outcome will be the frailty status (Fried's scale) at 3 months and 1 year. The secondary endpoint will be the clinical events, both cardiovascular and not cardiovascular events, including recurrent events (cumulative events analysis), for the total follow up (3 years in the case of the first included patient). The hypothesis is that an intervention on frailty will improve frailty status and the clinical outcomes in frail patients after an acute myocardial infarction.

Interventions

OTHERIntervention on frailty

Multidisciplinary team (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, and nutritionists): * Nutritional evaluation and intervention after randomization and regularly during follow-up * Physiotherapy sessions for 3 months after randomization and home exercise program for 1 year * Psychiatrist or psychologist assistance for 1 year after discharge

Sponsors

University of Valencia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
70 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Admission for acute myocardial infarction and survivors in the hospitalization phase * Age =\>70 years * Prefrail or frail status (Fried scale =\>1 points)

Exclusion criteria

* Cognitive impairment (Pfeiffer test) * Severe concomitant disease that could hamper the participation in the study * Patient refusal to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change on frailty status according to the Fried scale3 months and 1 yearPoints in the Fried scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All-cause mortalityUp to 3 yearsNumber of participants dead
Ischemic events (reinfarction or postdischarge revascularization)Up to 3 yearsNumber of participants with reinfarction (readmission for chest pain with troponin elevation) or postdischarge revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary surgery)
Readmission for acute heart failureUp to 3 yearsNumber of participants with readmission for acute heart failure
Total cardiac (cardiac death, reinfarction, postdischarge revascularization, readmission for acute heart failure, readmission for other cardiac cause) and non-cardiac (all-cause mortality or readmission for non-cardiac cause) clinical eventsUp to 3 yearsNumber of participants with the events
Change of Quality of life (EUROQOL)3 months and 1 yearEUROQOL test
Change of Functional capacity (walk distance test)3 months and 1 yearDistance walked during 6 minutes
Change of Nutritional status (Mini Nutritional Assessment)3 months and 1 yearMini Nutritional Assessment Test
Readmission for non-cardiac causesUp to 3 yearsNumber of participants with readmission for non-cardiac cause

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026