Skip to content

Study of Cefiderocol (S-649266) or Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Severe Infections Caused by Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Pathogens

A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Clinical Study of S-649266 or Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Severe Infections Caused by Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Pathogens

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02714595
Acronym
CREDIBLE - CR
Enrollment
152
Registered
2016-03-21
Start date
2016-09-07
Completion date
2019-04-22
Last updated
2021-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP), Bloodstream Infections (BSI), Hospital Acquired Pneumonia (HAP), Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI), Sepsis, Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP)

Keywords

cefiderocol, Bloodstream infections (BSI), Complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), Ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), Hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP), Sepsis, multi-drug resistant pathogens, S-649266, Gram-negative pathogens, Healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP), carbapenem resistant pathogens

Brief summary

This study is designed to provide evidence of efficacy of cefiderocol in the treatment of serious infections in adult patients caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens.

Detailed description

This study is designed to provide evidence of efficacy of cefiderocol in the treatment of serious infections in adult patients with either hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), or bloodstream infections (BSI)/sepsis caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens.

Interventions

2 g intravenously over 3 hours every 8 hours for a period of 7 to 14 days, or 2 g every 6 hours for participants with creatinine clearance \>120 mL/min.

Standard of care with either a polymyxin-based or non-polymyxin-based regimen as determined by the investigator and consisting of one to three marketed antibacterial agent(s).

Sponsors

Shionogi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with clinically documented infection (HAP/VAP/HCAP, cUTI, or BSI/sepsis) caused by a Gram-negative pathogen with evidence of carbapenem resistance * Patients who have been treated previously with an empiric antibiotic regiment and failed treatment, both clinically and microbiologically, are eligible for the study, if they have an identified carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen which has either been shown to be nonsusceptible in vitro to each of the antibiotic(s) of the empiric antibiotic regimen or been grown from a culture performed after at least 2 days of the empiric antibiotic regimen * Patient is male (no contraception required) or female and meets one of the following criteria: * Surgically sterile by hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy or bilateral salpingectomy or tubal ligation for the purpose of contraception for at least 6 weeks with appropriate documentation of such surgery * Postmenopausal (defined as older than 45 years of age with cessation of regular menstrual periods for 6 months and confirmed by a follicle-stimulating hormone level of \> 40 mIU/mL, or amenorrhea for at least 12 months) * Of childbearing potential and using combined (estrogen and progestogen) or progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (including oral, intravaginal, injectable, implantable, and transdermal contraceptives), or an intrauterine device (IUD), or intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS) for the entire duration of the study * Of childbearing potential and practice abstinence as a preferred and usual lifestyle, and agrees to continue practicing abstinence from Screening and for the entire duration of the study * Of childbearing potential, whose sole heterosexual partner has been successfully vasectomized and agrees to not have other heterosexual partners for the entire duration of the study * Patients meeting specific criteria for each infection site

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients who have a history of any moderate or severe hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any β-lactam (Note: for β-lactams, a history of a mild rash followed by uneventful re-exposure is not a contraindication to enrollment) 2. Patients who need more than 3 systemic antibiotics as part of best available therapy (BAT) for the treatment of the Gram-negative infection (patients with mixed Gram-positive or anaerobic infections may receive appropriate concomitant narrow spectrum antibiotics \[eg, vancomycin, linezolid, metronidazole, clindamycin\]) 3. Patients with coinfection caused by invasive aspergillosis, mucormycosis or other highly lethal mold 4. Patients who have central nervous system (CNS) infection (eg, meningitis, brain abscess, shunt infection) 5. Patients with infection requiring \> 3 weeks of antibiotic treatment (eg, bone and joint infection, endocarditis) 6. Patients with cystic fibrosis or moderate to severe bronchiectasis 7. Patients in refractory septic shock defined as persistent hypotension despite adequate fluid resuscitation or despite vasopressive therapy at the time of Randomization 8. Patients with severe neutropenia, ie, polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) \< 100 cells/μL 9. Female patients who have a positive pregnancy test at Screening or who are lactating 10. Patients with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score \> 30 11. Patients who have received a potentially effective antibiotic regimen for the carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infection for a continuous duration of more than 24 hours in cUTI, or 36 hours in HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/sepsis during the 72 hours leading to Randomization 12. Patients with any condition or circumstance that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the study data 13. Patients who have received another investigational drug or device within 30 days prior to study entry 14. Patients who have previously been randomized in this study or received S-649266 15. Patients receiving peritoneal dialysis 16. Patients meeting specific

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/SepsisTest of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. HAP/VAP/HCAP: Clinical cure was defined as resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection. BSI/Sepsis: Clinical cure was defined as resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen. Participants with missing data were considered as non-responders.
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With cUTITest of cure, defined as 7 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Days 14 to 21Microbiological outcome per Baseline pathogen was determined by the sponsor as defined for each infection site. For cUTI eradication was defined as a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ colony-forming units (CFU)/mL was reduced to \< 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up (FU) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/SepsisFollow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. Sustained clinical cure for HAP/VAP/HCAP: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of pneumonia in a participant assessed as cured at TOC. BSI/Sepsis: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms associated with reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the original BSI/sepsis in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure in Participants With cUTITest of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) in Participants With cUTIEnd of treatment, Day 7 to 14Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up in Participants With cUTIFollow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. Sustained clinical cure for cUTI: Continued resolution or improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and OverallEnd of treatment, Day 7 to 14Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection. BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen. cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and OverallTest of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection. BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen. cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and OverallFollow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. Sustained clinical cure for HAP/VAP/HCAP: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of pneumonia in a participant assessed as cured at TOC. BSI/Sepsis: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms associated with reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the original BSI/sepsis in a participant assessed as cured at TOC. cUTI: Continued resolution or improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenEnd of treatment, Day 7 to 14Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection. BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen. cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenTest of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection. BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen. cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenFollow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. Sustained clinical cure for HAP/VAP/HCAP: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of pneumonia in a participant assessed as cured at TOC. BSI/Sepsis: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms associated with reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the original BSI/sepsis in a participant assessed as cured at TOC. cUTI: Continued resolution or improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenEnd of treatment, Day 7 to 14Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection. BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen. cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenTest of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection. BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen. cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenFollow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. Sustained clinical cure for HAP/VAP/HCAP: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of pneumonia in a participant assessed as cured at TOC. BSI/Sepsis: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms associated with reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the original BSI/sepsis in a participant assessed as cured at TOC. cUTI: Continued resolution or improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/SepsisEnd of treatment, Day 7 to 14Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria established for each infection site: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy). If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication. Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/SepsisTest of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria established for each infection site: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy). If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication. Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/SepsisFollow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen at FU were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Sustained eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen after TOC. If an appropriate clinical culture could not be obtained and the participant had a successful clinical response after TOC, the response was presumed sustained eradication. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture or other primary source after TOC as applicable. For sepsis, if the participant has a successful clinical outcome after TOC and an appropriate clinical culture could not be obtained, the response was presumed sustained eradication. Overall per-participant response was defined as sustained eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens after documented eradication at TOC.
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With cUTIEnd of treatment, Day 7 to 14Microbiological outcome per Baseline pathogen was determined by the sponsor as defined for each infection site. For cUTI eradication was defined as a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to \< 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With cUTIFollow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28Microbiological outcome per Baseline pathogen at follow-up was determined by the sponsor as defined for each infection site. For cUTI sustained eradication was defined as a culture taken any time after documented eradication at TOC and a urine culture obtained at FU showed that the Baseline uropathogen found at entry at ≥10⁵ CFU/mL remained \<10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant sustained eradication was defined as sustained eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and OverallEnd of treatment, Day 7 to 14Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication. cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to \< 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and OverallTest of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication. cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to \< 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and OverallFollow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen at FU were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Sustained eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen after TOC. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture or other primary source after TOC as applicable. For HAP/VAP/HCAP and sepsis if an appropriate clinical culture could not be obtained and the participant had a successful clinical response after TOC, the response was presumed sustained eradication. cUTI: a culture taken any time after documented eradication at TOC, and a urine culture obtained at FU showed that the Baseline uropathogen found at entry at ≥10⁵ CFU/mL remained \< 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant response was defined as sustained eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens after documented eradication at TOC.
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenEnd of treatment, Day 7 to 14Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication. cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to \< 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenTest of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication. cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to \< 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenFollow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen at FU were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Sustained eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen after TOC. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture or other primary source after TOC as applicable. For HAP/VAP/HCAP and sepsis if an appropriate clinical culture could not be obtained and the participant had a successful clinical response after TOC, the response was presumed sustained eradication. cUTI: a culture taken any time after documented eradication at TOC, and a urine culture obtained at FU showed that the Baseline uropathogen found at entry at ≥10⁵ CFU/mL remained \< 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant response was defined as sustained eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens after documented eradication at TOC.
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenEnd of treatment, Day 7 to 14Microbiological outcome per Baseline carbapenem-resistant pathogen were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication. cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to \< 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenTest of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21Microbiological outcome per Baseline carbapenem-resistant pathogen were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication. cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to \< 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenFollow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen at FU were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Sustained eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen after TOC. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture or other primary source after TOC as applicable. For HAP/VAP/HCAP and sepsis if an appropriate clinical culture could not be obtained and the participant had a successful clinical response after TOC, the response was presumed sustained eradication. cUTI: a culture taken any time after documented eradication at TOC, and a urine culture obtained at FU showed that the Baseline uropathogen found at entry at ≥10⁵ CFU/mL remained \< 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant response was defined as sustained eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens after documented eradication at TOC.
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative BacteremiaEnd of treatment, Day 7 to 14The percentage of participants who experienced eradication of the Baseline documented carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia, defined as absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture.
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative BacteremiaTest of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21The percentage of participants who experienced eradication of the Baseline documented carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia, defined as absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture.
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative BacteremiaFollow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28The percentage of participants who experienced sustained eradication of the Baseline documented carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia, defined as absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture after TOC.
Percentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at TOCTest of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21The composite clinical and microbiological response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with both clinical cure and microbiologic eradication, as defined above for each site of infection.
Percentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at Follow-upFollow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28The composite clinical and microbiological response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with both sustained clinical cure and sustained microbiologic eradication, as defined above for each site of infection.
All-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28Day 14 and Day 28The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants who experienced mortality regardless of the cause at or before Day 14 and Day 28, respectively.
Percentage of Participants Alive and With No Change in Antibiotic Treatment Due to Either Lack of Therapeutic Benefit or Drug-related Toxicity at TOCTest of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Percentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at EOTEnd of treatment, Day 7 to 14The composite clinical and microbiological response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with both clinical cure and microbiologic eradication, as defined above for each site of infection.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) in Participants With Pneumonia (HAP/VAP/HCAP)Baseline, end of treatment (Day 7-14), test of cure (7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21) and follow-up (14 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28)Clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) is a surrogate for diagnosis and treatment response. Points (0, 1, or 2) are assigned for observed findings for 5 variables including body temperature, white blood cell count, tracheal secretions, ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2), and chest radiograph infiltrates. The total score ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores may indicate a higher likelihood of mortality; a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement
Change From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)Baseline, end of treatment (Day 7 to 14), test of cure (7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21) and follow-up (14 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28)The SOFA score is a scoring system to determine the extent of a patient's organ function or rate of failure. The score is based on six different scores, one each for the respiratory, cardiovascular, hepatic, coagulation, renal, and neurological systems. Each score is from 0 to 4, and the total score ranges from 0 to 24, where higher scores indicate a higher likelihood of mortality. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement.
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsFrom first dose of study drug up to 28 days after last dose; maximum treatment duration was 29 days in the cefiderocol group and 22 days in the BAT group.The severity of each adverse event (AE) was graded by the investigator according to the following definitions: * Mild: Symptom or finding is minor and does not interfere with usual daily activities * Moderate: The event causes discomfort and interferes with usual daily activity or affects clinical status * Severe: The event causes interruption of usual daily activities or has a clinically significant effect The relationship of AEs to study treatment was determined by the investigator according to the following definition: ● Related: An AE which can be reasonably explained as having been caused by the study treatment. A serious AE is defined as any AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: * Death * Life-threatening condition * Hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * Persistent or significant disability/incapacity * Congenital anomaly/birth defect * Other medically important condition
Survival TimeDays 1 to 10, 11 to 20, 21 to 30, 31 to 40, 41-50, and 51 to 60.Survival time was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival curve. The table below presents deaths that occurred in10-day time intervals through the end of study
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/SepsisEnd of treatment, Day 7 to 14Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. HAP/VAP/HCAP: Clinical cure was defined as resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection. BSI/Sepsis: Clinical cure was defined as resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen.

Countries

Brazil, Croatia, France, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Israel, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study enrolled hospitalized patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP), bloodstream infection (BSI), sepsis, or complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, and was conducted at 95 sites in 16 countries.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive therapy with cefiderocol or best available therapy (BAT), stratified by primary clinical diagnosis (HAP/VAP/HCAP, BSI/sepsis, cUTI), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (≤ 15 or ≥ 16-≤ 30), and region (North America, South America region, Europe, Asia-Pacific).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cefiderocol
Participants received 2 g cefiderocol administered intravenously over 3 hours, every 8 hours for 7-14 days.
80
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
Participants received best available therapy, as chosen by the investigator, and may have included up to three antibacterial agents for carbapenem resistant Gram-negative bacteria, intravenously administered per country-specific guidelines for 7-14 days.
38
Total118

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath309
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyOther-Miscellaneous01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCefiderocolBest Available Therapy (BAT)Total
Age, Continuous63.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.7
62.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.3
62.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.2
Age, Customized
< 65 years
30 Participants21 Participants51 Participants
Age, Customized
≥ 65 years
50 Participants17 Participants67 Participants
Clinical Diagnosis
BSI/Sepsis
23 Participants14 Participants37 Participants
Clinical Diagnosis
cUTI
17 Participants5 Participants22 Participants
Clinical Diagnosis
HAP/VAP/HCAP
40 Participants19 Participants59 Participants
Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS)5.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
5.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
5.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants2 Participants12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
64 Participants35 Participants99 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants1 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
24 Participants9 Participants33 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
8 Participants2 Participants10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
48 Participants27 Participants75 Participants
Region
Asia-Pacific
24 Participants9 Participants33 Participants
Region
Europe
45 Participants23 Participants68 Participants
Region
North America
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Region
South America
7 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score5.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
5.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
5.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants9 Participants34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
55 Participants29 Participants84 Participants
Total APACHE II Score
≤ 15
41 Participants21 Participants62 Participants
Total APACHE II Score
≥ 16
39 Participants17 Participants56 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
34 / 1019 / 49
other
Total, other adverse events
88 / 10143 / 49
serious
Total, serious adverse events
50 / 10123 / 49

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis

Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. HAP/VAP/HCAP: Clinical cure was defined as resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection. BSI/Sepsis: Clinical cure was defined as resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen. Participants with missing data were considered as non-responders.

Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat (CR Micro-ITT) Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study treatment, who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen, and whose baseline Gram-negative pathogen was carbapenem-resistant as confirmed by central laboratory testing.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis52.6 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis43.5 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis42.9 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With cUTI

Microbiological outcome per Baseline pathogen was determined by the sponsor as defined for each infection site. For cUTI eradication was defined as a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ colony-forming units (CFU)/mL was reduced to \< 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.

Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Days 14 to 21

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With cUTI52.9 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With cUTI20.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

All-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28

The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants who experienced mortality regardless of the cause at or before Day 14 and Day 28, respectively.

Time frame: Day 14 and Day 28

Population: The safety population includes randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolAll-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28Day 1424.4 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolAll-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28Day 2831.1 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyAll-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28Day 1413.6 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyAll-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28Day 2818.2 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolAll-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28Day 1416.7 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolAll-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28Day 2823.3 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyAll-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28Day 145.9 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyAll-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28Day 2817.6 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolAll-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28Day 2815.4 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolAll-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28Day 1411.5 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyAll-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28Day 2820.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyAll-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28Day 1420.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolAll-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28Day 2828.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolAll-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28Day 1421.3 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyAll-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28Day 1410.3 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyAll-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28Day 2817.9 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolAll-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28Day 1418.8 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolAll-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28Day 2824.8 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyAll-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28Day 1412.2 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyAll-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28Day 2818.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) in Participants With Pneumonia (HAP/VAP/HCAP)

Clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) is a surrogate for diagnosis and treatment response. Points (0, 1, or 2) are assigned for observed findings for 5 variables including body temperature, white blood cell count, tracheal secretions, ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2), and chest radiograph infiltrates. The total score ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores may indicate a higher likelihood of mortality; a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement

Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment (Day 7-14), test of cure (7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21) and follow-up (14 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28)

Population: Carbapenem-resistant microbiological intention-to-treat population; Participants with pneumonia and CPIS measurement at Baseline and at each post-baseline time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolChange From Baseline in Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) in Participants With Pneumonia (HAP/VAP/HCAP)End of treatment-2.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolChange From Baseline in Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) in Participants With Pneumonia (HAP/VAP/HCAP)Test of cure-3.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolChange From Baseline in Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) in Participants With Pneumonia (HAP/VAP/HCAP)Follow-up-3.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyChange From Baseline in Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) in Participants With Pneumonia (HAP/VAP/HCAP)End of treatment-1.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyChange From Baseline in Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) in Participants With Pneumonia (HAP/VAP/HCAP)Test of cure-2.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyChange From Baseline in Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) in Participants With Pneumonia (HAP/VAP/HCAP)Follow-up-2.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)

The SOFA score is a scoring system to determine the extent of a patient's organ function or rate of failure. The score is based on six different scores, one each for the respiratory, cardiovascular, hepatic, coagulation, renal, and neurological systems. Each score is from 0 to 4, and the total score ranges from 0 to 24, where higher scores indicate a higher likelihood of mortality. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment (Day 7 to 14), test of cure (7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21) and follow-up (14 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28)

Population: Carbapenem-resistant microbiological intention-to-treat population with SOFA measurement at Baseline and at each post-baseline time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)Follow-up-2.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)End of treatment-0.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)Test of cure-1.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)Follow-up-2.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)End of treatment-1.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)Test of cure-1.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)End of treatment-2.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)Test of cure-2.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)Follow-up-3.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)End of treatment-0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)Follow-up-0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)Test of cure0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
cUTI: CefiderocolChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)Follow-up-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
cUTI: CefiderocolChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)Test of cure-0.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
cUTI: CefiderocolChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)End of treatment-0.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
cUTI: Best Available TherapyChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)Follow-up-2.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
cUTI: Best Available TherapyChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)Test of cure-1.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
cUTI: Best Available TherapyChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)End of treatment-1.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)Follow-up-1.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)End of treatment-1.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)Test of cure-1.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)Test of cure-0.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)End of treatment-1.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyChange From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)Follow-up-1.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

The severity of each adverse event (AE) was graded by the investigator according to the following definitions: * Mild: Symptom or finding is minor and does not interfere with usual daily activities * Moderate: The event causes discomfort and interferes with usual daily activity or affects clinical status * Severe: The event causes interruption of usual daily activities or has a clinically significant effect The relationship of AEs to study treatment was determined by the investigator according to the following definition: ● Related: An AE which can be reasonably explained as having been caused by the study treatment. A serious AE is defined as any AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: * Death * Life-threatening condition * Hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * Persistent or significant disability/incapacity * Congenital anomaly/birth defect * Other medically important condition

Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 28 days after last dose; maximum treatment duration was 29 days in the cefiderocol group and 22 days in the BAT group.

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny adverse event (AE)92 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsMild adverse events23 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsModerate adverse events26 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsSevere adverse events43 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsDrug-related adverse events15 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsDiscontinuations due to adverse events10 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsDiscontinuations due to drug-related AEs3 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsSerious adverse events (SAE)50 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsDrug-related serious adverse events1 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsDeath due to serious adverse events34 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsSerious adverse events (SAE)23 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny adverse event (AE)47 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsDiscontinuations due to adverse events3 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsMild adverse events9 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsDeath due to serious adverse events9 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsModerate adverse events16 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsDiscontinuations due to drug-related AEs2 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsSevere adverse events22 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsDrug-related serious adverse events5 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsDrug-related adverse events11 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Alive and With No Change in Antibiotic Treatment Due to Either Lack of Therapeutic Benefit or Drug-related Toxicity at TOC

Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants Alive and With No Change in Antibiotic Treatment Due to Either Lack of Therapeutic Benefit or Drug-related Toxicity at TOC62.5 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants Alive and With No Change in Antibiotic Treatment Due to Either Lack of Therapeutic Benefit or Drug-related Toxicity at TOC60.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at EOT

The composite clinical and microbiological response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with both clinical cure and microbiologic eradication, as defined above for each site of infection.

Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population; participants with missing data were considered non-responders

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at EOT30.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at EOT26.3 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at EOT56.5 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at EOT21.4 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at EOT70.6 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at EOT20.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at EOT39.7 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at EOT24.2 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at EOT46.3 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at EOT23.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at Follow-up

The composite clinical and microbiological response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with both sustained clinical cure and sustained microbiologic eradication, as defined above for each site of infection.

Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at Follow-up20.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at Follow-up15.8 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at Follow-up26.1 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at Follow-up14.3 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at Follow-up41.2 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at Follow-up20.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at Follow-up22.2 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at Follow-up15.2 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at Follow-up26.3 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at Follow-up15.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at TOC

The composite clinical and microbiological response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with both clinical cure and microbiologic eradication, as defined above for each site of infection.

Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population; participants with missing data were considered non-responders

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at TOC22.5 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at TOC21.1 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at TOC30.4 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at TOC21.4 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at TOC47.1 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at TOC20.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at TOC25.4 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at TOC21.2 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at TOC30.0 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at TOC21.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline Pathogen

Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection. BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen. cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.

Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population with the relevant pathogen at Baseline; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae70.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii61.5 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa63.6 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia20.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli100.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii70.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae40.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa83.3 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae63.6 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii70.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli100.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa100.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii42.9 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa33.3 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae75.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli100.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae90.9 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae66.7 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii63.9 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae66.7 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa69.2 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia20.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli100.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa66.7 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii58.8 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae55.6 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli0 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae75.0 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia20.0 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa64.7 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii62.2 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli100.0 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa63.6 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli0 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii58.8 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae58.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) in Participants With cUTI

Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.

Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population; participants with missing data were considered as non-responders

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) in Participants With cUTI76.5 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) in Participants With cUTI60.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis

Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. HAP/VAP/HCAP: Clinical cure was defined as resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection. BSI/Sepsis: Clinical cure was defined as resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen.

Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population; participants with missing data were counted as non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis60.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis63.2 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis69.6 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis50.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall

Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection. BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen. cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.

Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall63.5 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall57.6 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall66.3 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall57.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen

Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection. BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen. cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.

Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population with the relevant carbapenem-resistant pathogen at Baseline; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia20.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii61.5 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae83.3 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii70.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa80.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae40.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii70.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa100.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae60.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa33.3 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii42.9 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae75.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae90.9 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii0.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae66.7 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii63.9 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia20.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa62.5 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae68.8 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii58.8 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae55.6 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa62.5 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia20.0 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae77.8 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa58.3 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii62.2 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae58.3 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii58.8 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa60.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline Pathogen

Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection. BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen. cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.

Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population with the relevant pathogen at Baseline; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa45.5 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae60.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae40.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii60.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa66.7 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli50.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae54.5 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii30.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa100.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii42.9 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae50.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa33.3 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae81.8 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli100.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae66.7 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia5.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa53.8 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii44.4 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae57.1 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa55.6 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii52.9 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae44.4 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli0.0 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii43.2 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli60.0 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa52.9 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae65.6 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia0.0 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae50.0 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa54.5 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii52.9 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure in Participants With cUTI

Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.

Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population; participants with missing data were considered non-responders

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure in Participants With cUTI70.6 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure in Participants With cUTI60.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall

Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection. BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen. cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.

Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population; participants with missing data were considered non-responders

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall47.6 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall48.5 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall52.5 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall50.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen

Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection. BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen. cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.

Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population with the relevant carbapenem-resistant pathogen at Baseline; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae66.7 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa60.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii60.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae40.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae50.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa100.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii30.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa33.3 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii42.9 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae50.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae81.8 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii0.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae66.7 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae56.3 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa62.5 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii44.4 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii52.9 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae44.4 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia0.0 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa58.3 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii43.2 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae66.7 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae50.0 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii52.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen

Microbiological outcome per Baseline carbapenem-resistant pathogen were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication. cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to \< 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.

Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population with the relevant carbapenem-resistant pathogen at Baseline; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae33.3 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia20.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa33.3 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii34.6 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae20.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa40.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii30.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa0.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii60.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae70.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii28.6 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae75.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa33.3 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii0.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae81.8 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae0.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia20. percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa25.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii41.7 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae56.3 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa37.5 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae22.2 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii29.4 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia20.0 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii40.5 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa33.3 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae66.7 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa40.0 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae16.7 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii29.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Pathogen

Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication. cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to \< 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.

Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population with the relevant Gram-negative pathogen at Baseline; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa36.4 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli100.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia20.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii34.6 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae20.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii30.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa33.3 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli0.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii60.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli100.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa0.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae72.7 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae25.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa33.3 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii28.6 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii0.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae81.8 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli100.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii41.7 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa30.8 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae61.9 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia20.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli100.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii29.4 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa33.3 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae22.2 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli100.0 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae68.8 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa35.3 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii40.5 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia20.0 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii29.4 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa36.4 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli0.0 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae16.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With cUTI

Microbiological outcome per Baseline pathogen was determined by the sponsor as defined for each infection site. For cUTI eradication was defined as a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to \< 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.

Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With cUTI70.6 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With cUTI20.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacteremia

The percentage of participants who experienced eradication of the Baseline documented carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia, defined as absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture.

Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population with documented carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia at Baseline (all infection sites combined); participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacteremia54.5 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacteremia30.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall

Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication. cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to \< 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.

Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall41.3 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall27.3 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall47.5 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall26.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis

Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria established for each infection site: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy). If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication. Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.

Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis30.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis26.3 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis60.9 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis28.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen

Microbiological outcome per Baseline carbapenem-resistant pathogen were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication. cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to \< 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.

Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population with the relevant carbapenem-resistant pathogen at Baseline; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii30.8 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa20.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii30.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae20.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa0.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae50.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii20.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii28.6 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae50.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa0.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa25.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae72.7 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii0.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae0.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae31.3 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii27.8 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae33.3 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa12.5 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii29.4 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa8.3 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia0.0 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae48.1 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii27.0 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii29.4 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae25.0 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa20.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Pathogen

Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication. cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to \< 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.

Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population with the relevant Gram-negative pathogen at Baseline; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa9.1 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii30.8 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae20.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii30.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa16.7 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli100.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae54.5 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii20.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa0.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii28.6 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae50.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa0.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae72.7 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii0.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli0.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa25.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa7.7 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae38.1 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii27.8 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii29.4 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa11.1 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae33.3 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli40.0 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae50.0 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia0.0 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa11.8 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii27.0 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii29.4 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa18.2 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae25.0 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacteremia

The percentage of participants who experienced eradication of the Baseline documented carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia, defined as absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture.

Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population with documented carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia at Baseline (all infection sites combined); participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacteremia31.8 percentge of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacteremia30.8 percentge of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall

Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication. cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to \< 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.

Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population; participants with missing data were considered non-responders

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall25.4 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall24.2 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall31.3 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall23.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis

Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria established for each infection site: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy). If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication. Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.

Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis22.5 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis21.1 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis30.4 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis28.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen

Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. Sustained clinical cure for HAP/VAP/HCAP: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of pneumonia in a participant assessed as cured at TOC. BSI/Sepsis: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms associated with reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the original BSI/sepsis in a participant assessed as cured at TOC. cUTI: Continued resolution or improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.

Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population with the relevant carbapenem-resistant pathogen at Baseline; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae66.7 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa20.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii40.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae40.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa100.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii30.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae40.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae25.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii28.6 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa33.3 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae63.6 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa25.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii0.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae66.7 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii44.4 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa62.5 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae33.3 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii35.3 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa25.0 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia0.0 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii43.2 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae55.6 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa30.0 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii35.3 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae41.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Pathogen

Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. Sustained clinical cure for HAP/VAP/HCAP: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of pneumonia in a participant assessed as cured at TOC. BSI/Sepsis: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms associated with reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the original BSI/sepsis in a participant assessed as cured at TOC. cUTI: Continued resolution or improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.

Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population with the relevant pathogen at Baseline; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae60.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa45.5 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii60.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa16.7 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae40.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae45.5 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli50.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii30.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa100.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa33.3 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii28.6 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae25.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa25.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii0.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli100.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae63.6 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae66.7 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii44.4 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa53.8 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae52.4 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii35.3 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae33.3 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa55.6 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia0.0 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa47.1 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli60.0 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae56.3 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii43.2 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae41.7 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli0.0 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa27.3 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii35.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up (FU) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis

Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. Sustained clinical cure for HAP/VAP/HCAP: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of pneumonia in a participant assessed as cured at TOC. BSI/Sepsis: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms associated with reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the original BSI/sepsis in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.

Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up (FU) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up (FU) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis31.6 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up (FU) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis39.1 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up (FU) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis28.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up in Participants With cUTI

Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. Sustained clinical cure for cUTI: Continued resolution or improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.

Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population); participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up in Participants With cUTI52.9 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up in Participants With cUTI60.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall

Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. Sustained clinical cure for HAP/VAP/HCAP: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of pneumonia in a participant assessed as cured at TOC. BSI/Sepsis: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms associated with reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the original BSI/sepsis in a participant assessed as cured at TOC. cUTI: Continued resolution or improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.

Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall46.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall30.3 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall47.5 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall34.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen

Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen at FU were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Sustained eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen after TOC. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture or other primary source after TOC as applicable. For HAP/VAP/HCAP and sepsis if an appropriate clinical culture could not be obtained and the participant had a successful clinical response after TOC, the response was presumed sustained eradication. cUTI: a culture taken any time after documented eradication at TOC, and a urine culture obtained at FU showed that the Baseline uropathogen found at entry at ≥10⁵ CFU/mL remained \< 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant response was defined as sustained eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens after documented eradication at TOC.

Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population with the relevant carbapenem-resistant pathogen at Baseline; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii26.9 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae20.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa20.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii20.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae40.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa0.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii20.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii14.3 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae50.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa0.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae63.6 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii0.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa0.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae0.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii25.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae25.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa12.5 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae33.3 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii17.6 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii24.3 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae40.7 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa0.0 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia0.0 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa20.0 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae25.0 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii17.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Pathogen

Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen at FU were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Sustained eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen after TOC. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture or other primary source after TOC as applicable. For HAP/VAP/HCAP and sepsis if an appropriate clinical culture could not be obtained and the participant had a successful clinical response after TOC, the response was presumed sustained eradication. cUTI: a culture taken any time after documented eradication at TOC, and a urine culture obtained at FU showed that the Baseline uropathogen found at entry at ≥10⁵ CFU/mL remained \< 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant response was defined as sustained eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens after documented eradication at TOC.

Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population with the relevant Gram-negative pathogen at Baseline; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii26.9 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa9.1 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae20.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa16.7 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii20.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae20.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli50.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae45.5 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa0.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii20.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii14.3 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa0.0 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae50.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa0.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli0.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae63.6 percentage of participants
cUTI: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii0.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae0.0 percentage of participants
cUTI: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia0.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli50.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa7.7 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae33.3 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii25.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii17.6 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa11.1 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae33.3 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli0.0 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenStenotrophomonas maltophilia0.0 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli40.0 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa5.9 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae43.8 percentage of participants
Overall: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii24.3 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenAcinetobacter baumannii17.6 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenPseudomonas aeruginosa18.2 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenKlebsiella pneumoniae25.0 percentage of participants
Overall: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline PathogenEscherichia coli0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With cUTI

Microbiological outcome per Baseline pathogen at follow-up was determined by the sponsor as defined for each infection site. For cUTI sustained eradication was defined as a culture taken any time after documented eradication at TOC and a urine culture obtained at FU showed that the Baseline uropathogen found at entry at ≥10⁵ CFU/mL remained \<10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant sustained eradication was defined as sustained eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.

Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With cUTI41.2 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With cUTI20.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacteremia

The percentage of participants who experienced sustained eradication of the Baseline documented carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia, defined as absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture after TOC.

Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population with documented carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia at Baseline (all infection sites combined); participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacteremia27.3 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacteremia23.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall

Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen at FU were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Sustained eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen after TOC. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture or other primary source after TOC as applicable. For HAP/VAP/HCAP and sepsis if an appropriate clinical culture could not be obtained and the participant had a successful clinical response after TOC, the response was presumed sustained eradication. cUTI: a culture taken any time after documented eradication at TOC, and a urine culture obtained at FU showed that the Baseline uropathogen found at entry at ≥10⁵ CFU/mL remained \< 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant response was defined as sustained eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens after documented eradication at TOC.

Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall22.2 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall18.2 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall26.3 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall18.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis

Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen at FU were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis: HAP/VAP/HCAP: Sustained eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen after TOC. If an appropriate clinical culture could not be obtained and the participant had a successful clinical response after TOC, the response was presumed sustained eradication. BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture or other primary source after TOC as applicable. For sepsis, if the participant has a successful clinical outcome after TOC and an appropriate clinical culture could not be obtained, the response was presumed sustained eradication. Overall per-participant response was defined as sustained eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens after documented eradication at TOC.

Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population; participants with missing data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis20.0 percentage of participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis15.8 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis26.1 percentage of participants
BSI/Sepsis: Best Available TherapyPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis21.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Survival Time

Survival time was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival curve. The table below presents deaths that occurred in10-day time intervals through the end of study

Time frame: Days 1 to 10, 11 to 20, 21 to 30, 31 to 40, 41-50, and 51 to 60.

Population: Carbapenem-resistant Microbiological Intent-to-treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolSurvival TimeDays 11 to 209 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolSurvival TimeDays 31 to 404 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolSurvival TimeDays 1 to 1012 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolSurvival TimeDays 41 to 501 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolSurvival TimeDays 21 to 301 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: CefiderocolSurvival TimeDays 51 to 600 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapySurvival TimeDays 21 to 302 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapySurvival TimeDays 1 to 103 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapySurvival TimeDays 11 to 203 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapySurvival TimeDays 51 to 600 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapySurvival TimeDays 31 to 400 Participants
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Best Available TherapySurvival TimeDays 41 to 500 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026