Skip to content

Biofeedback Rehabilitation in Parkinson's Disease

Wearable Sensor-based Biofeedback Training for Balance and Gait in Parkinson's Disease: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02713971
Acronym
GAMEPAD_PD
Enrollment
42
Registered
2016-03-21
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2016-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Keywords

Rehabilitation, Balance, Gait, Biofeedback

Brief summary

Background: In this study, a new biofeedback system for balance and gait rehabilitation (Gamepad) was developed. The system, based on wearable inertial sensors, provides users with real-time visual and acoustic feedback about their movement during functional tasks. Gamepad was applied on subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD) in a pilot randomized controlled trial to investigate its feasibility and efficacy versus conventional physiotherapy. The investigators hypothesized that Gamepad system can be easily applied in clinical settings and that biofeedback training with Gamepad provides larger improvements of balance and gait in PD subjects, respect to conventional physiotherapy. Methods: Forty-two PD patients underwent a 20-session training for balance and gait (45 minutes per session, 3 sessions per week). Participants were randomized into Gamepad Group (biofeedback rehabilitation with Gamepad system), and Control Group (conventional physiotherapy). Clinical and instrumental assessments were performed by a blind examiner pre-, post-intervention and at 1-month follow-up.

Interventions

DEVICEGamepad system

Patients executed a set of tailored exercises including the control of weight-shift and body posture during static (e.g. upright sitting and standing), quasi-dynamic (e.g. sit-to-stand and gait initiation) and dynamic tasks (e.g. getting on a step, straight-line walking, walking with turns and over obstacles). Participants executed the tasks using Gamepad system which provided patients with visual and auditory feedback about their performances and assigned a score at the end of each exercise. The physiotherapist progressively adjusted training complexity by changing the reference values, including more difficult taks, changing the perceptive context, and/or including a dual-task.

OTHERConventional physiotherapy

A set of tailored exercises was defined by the clinical staff following current guidelines for physiotherapy in Parkinson's disease. In particular, stretching, joint mobilization, and balance and gait exercises were provided to participants, without any instrumentation producing biofeedback or external cues.

Sponsors

Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Hoehn-Yahr stage 2 to 4. * Ability to stand up more than 10 s and inability to stand on one foot more than 10 s. * Ability to walk for at least 6 m even with an assistive device. * Stable drug usage.

Exclusion criteria

* Mini-Mental State Examination \< 24. * Implanted deep brain stimulator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-treatment score of Berg Balance Scale7 weeksScore of Berg Balance Scale assessed at the specified time frame, adjusted for baseline score through ANCOVA procedure. Berg Balance Scale rates balance from 0 (cannot perform) to 4 (normal performance) on 14 items exploring the ability to sit, stand, lean, turn and maintain the upright position on one leg. Maximum score (i.e. 56 points) indicates unimpaired balance.
Post-treatment score of 10-meter Walk Test7 weeksScore of 10-meter Walk Test assessed at the specified time frame, adjusted for baseline score through ANCOVA procedure. 10-meter Walk Test measures, with a stopwatch, the time (T) taken by the subject to walk between two lines at the distance of 10 meters. Walking speed is thus computed as 10/T (m/s). Both comfortable and fast gait speed can be measured. In the present study only comfortable gait speed was assessed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Follow-up score of 10-meter Walk Test11 weeksScore of 10-meter Walk Test assessed at the specified time frame, adjusted for baseline score through ANCOVA procedure.
Scores of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale - Motor examination (UPDRS-III)7 weeks and 11 weeksScore of UPDRS-III assessed at the specified time frames, adjusted for baseline score through ANCOVA procedure.
Scores of Timed Up and Go test7 weeks and 11 weeksScore of Timed Up and Go test assessed at the specified time frames, adjusted for baseline score through ANCOVA procedure. Timed Up and Go test is a mobility test evaluating the time taken by the subject to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair and sit down.
Scores of Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale (ABC)7 weeks and 11 weeksScore of ABC assessed at the specified time frames, adjusted for baseline score through ANCOVA procedure. Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale is a questionnaire through which the subject rates his/her perceived level of confidence while performing 16 daily living activities. Scores range from 0% (not confident) to 100 % (completely confident).
Scores of Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39(7 weeks and 11 weeksScore of PDQ-39 assessed at the specified time frames, adjusted for baseline score through ANCOVA procedure. Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 is a 39-item, self-report questionnaire, which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality of life over the last month. Scores are from 0 to 100, with 100 representing maximum level of problems.
Tele-healthcare Satisfaction Questionnaire - Wearable Technology (TSQ-WT)7 weeksTSQ-WT consists in six areas (Benefit, Usability, Self-concept, Privacy and loss of control, Quality of life, and Wearing comfort) that evaluate the satisfaction of the subject with the wearable part of a system. Each area includes 5 statements rated by the user on a 5-pint Likert scale between 0 (strongly disagree with the statement) and 4 (strongly agree with the statement). In the present study, only Benefit, Usability and Wearing Comfort areas were administered. TSQ-WT was administered to the Gamepad Group only.
Amplitude of body sway in antero-posterior (Sway AP) and medio-lateral (Sway ML) directions7 weeks and 11 weeksSway AP and ML assessed at the specified time frames, adjusted for baseline score through ANCOVA procedure. Subjects were tested for 30 seconds during upright standing on a stabilometric force platform in four sensory conditions: eyes open, eyes closed, eyes open with foam pads under feet, and eyes closed with foam pads under feet. Center of Pressure (CoP) sway in AP and ML directions was computed as the standard deviation of the time-course of AP and ML CoP displacements recorded by the platform.
Scores of Freezing Of Gait Questionnaire (FOGQ)7 weeks and 11 weeksScore of FOGQ assessed at the specified time frames, adjusted for baseline score through ANCOVA procedure. Freezing Of Gait Questionnaire evaluates freezing severity with a 6-item interview. Each item is rated on a 5-point ordinal scale from 0 (absence of freezing) to 4 (severe freezing).
Follow-up score of Berg Balance Scale11 weeksScore of Berga Balance Scale assessed at the specified time frame, adjusted for baseline score through ANCOVA procedure.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026