Skip to content

Phase 2A Clinical Trial Evaluating the Potential Activity and Safety of hMaxi-K Gene for ED

A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Design, Randomized, Phase 2A Clinical Trial Evaluating the Potential Activity and Safety of hMaxi-K Gene Transfer in Males With Erectile Dysfunction

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02713789
Enrollment
26
Registered
2016-03-21
Start date
2015-04-30
Completion date
2017-08-24
Last updated
2019-08-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Erectile Dysfunction

Keywords

ED

Brief summary

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a single intracavernous injection of hMaxi K (8000 µg and 16000 µg) or placebo upon penile rigidity or erection in males with erectile dysfunction longer than six months that is attributable to an underlying, stable medical condition.

Detailed description

This study is a double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel design, Phase 2A study evaluating the potential activity and safety of a single administration of hMaxi-K (8000 or 16000 µg) or placebo (PBS sucrose 20%) injected into the corpus cavernosum of the penis in men who have been unable to tolerate, do not wish to continue, or have had unsuccessful results with, prior therapy for ED. The study population is men with erectile dysfunction attributable to an underlying, stable medical condition but who are otherwise in good health. The target population is men with erectile dysfunction and those who have been unable to tolerate, do not wish to continue, or have had unsuccessful results with, prior therapy for ED and with an erectile function domain score of IIEF \< 21 at screening and baseline. Following screening and study drug administration at Week 0 (Visit 2 \[V2\]), eligible participants will be evaluated at Weeks 1 (V3), 4 (V4), 8 (V5), 12 (V6), and 24 (V7). At each study visit, participants will have a physical examination including examination of the penis (all visits), vital signs, electrocardiogram (ECG) (all visits). Laboratory evaluations including chemistry and hematology will be done at V1, V3, V4, V6, and V7. Urinalysis will be done V1, V2 (prior to dosing), V3, V4, V6, and V7. Endocrine parameters and PTT, PT, sed rate and CRP will be evaluated at V1, V3, and V7. The participant will complete the erectile function domain of the IIEF and Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) at screening/baseline and at V2, (SEP and IIEF at V2 prior to dosing) V3, V4, V5, V6, and V7. In all participants, plasma specimens will be collected to assay for the presence of hSlo DNA by PCR (V2-V7). These will be kept frozen at -20°C or less at the site for eventual assay by Sponsor. The primary efficacy outcome measures will include the Erectile Function (EF) domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP), Questions 2 and 3 from SEP. The IIEF EF domain has a 30-point total score, where higher scores reflect better erectile function. SEP is a diary in which participants record each sexual attempt made throughout the study. The two questions from the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) deal with the ability to achieve vaginal penetration (SEP2), and the ability to maintain an erection long enough for successful intercourse (SEP3). The erectile function domain category of the IIEF will be used to evaluate the change in erectile status from baseline following administration of hMaxi-K. Change from baseline on the six questions of the IIEF's Erectile function domain category at every visit after administration of study drug will be calculated and compared among the two dose and one placebo groups. Safety will be assessed by analysis of adverse experiences, and abnormal findings on clinical laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, and physical examinations. 6 months per participant (approximately 2 years to enroll all participants) A total of 35 participants were planned to be enrolled; N=11 on 8000 µg; N=11 on 16000 µg; N=13 on placebo. Both the safety data and data to assess activity will be presented as means and standard deviations or medians and ranges as appropriate for continuous data, and analyzed using either paired t- or Wilcox on Sign Rank tests for within group changes, and with mixed effects or marginal models to determine differences in trends among the three cohorts over time. Incidence of adverse events will be presented as relative frequencies within groups.

Interventions

DRUGhMaxi-K Single Treatment/ 2 escalating dose levels (8000 µg and 16000 µg injection)

Sponsors

Dasman Diabetes Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Ion Channel Innovations
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Urovant Sciences GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Eligible participants must meet the following inclusion criteria: 1. Signed Informed Consent 2. Be adult males over 18 years of age diagnosed with erectile dysfunction and whose ED is attributable to an underlying, stable medical condition such as hypertension and atherosclerosis, antihypertensive medication, type I and type II diabetes mellitus, pelvic surgery and pelvic radiation, cerebrovascular accidents (stroke), multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson's disease; 3. Participants must have been unable to have successful sexual intercourse for 3 months prior to study entry without specific ED therapy such as Vacuum Erection device (VED), ViagraTM (sildenafil), Cialis TM (tadalafil), MuseTM (alprostadil), or intracavernous injection therapy with an erectile function domain score of IIEF\<21 at screening and baseline; 4. Have been unable to tolerate, do not wish to continue, or have had unsuccessful results with, prior therapy for ED, e.g., ViagraTM, intracavernous injection therapy, MuseTM, or VED; 5. If diabetic, documentation of HgA1c less than or equal to 8.0% prior to enrollment; 6. If receiving medication for hypertension, documentation of blood pressure has been stable on the same medication for at least 2 months prior to enrollment; 7. Be heterosexual and in a stable, monogamous relationship of at least six months duration; 8. Agree to attempt intercourse with their partner at least four times per month while participating in the study; 9. Agree not to use other treatments for ED while participating in this study; 10. Have screening laboratory values and ECG that are within the normal range. See exclusion criterion below. 11. A prior penile prosthetic implant; 12. Have a normal physical examination of the penis; 13. If participant had a radical prostatectomy a PSA \<0.4 for at least one year documented by 2 measurements during the preceding year; 14. Be literate, able to give written informed consent, and comply with all study procedures and requirements.

Exclusion criteria

1. A history of sickle-cell disease, sickle cell trait, or any other medical condition that, in the judgment of the investigator, would contraindicate the administration of study medication or interfere with the study evaluations; 2. In the judgment of the investigator any condition that would interfere with participation in the study (including geographical inaccessibility), that would contraindicate the administration of study medication or interfere with the study evaluations. 3. Had within six months prior to enrollment any of the following: * Myocardial infarction * Cerebrovascular accident * Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic \>160 or diastolic \>100mmHg) * Arrhythmia * Congestive heart failure (dyspnea on minimal exertion or while supine) * Unstable angina (chest pain greater than three times weekly while on therapy) * Required treatment with calcium channel, beta-blocker medication, nitrates, or anti-epileptic drugs; 4. Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus as defined by HgA1c \> 8.0 mg% at time of enrollment; 5. Change in medication for diabetes or hypertension within 2 months of study enrollment; 6. Gonadal failure (testosterone \< 200 ng/dl) not treated with hormone replacement; 7. History of malignancy except non-melanomatous skin cancers; 8. A life expectancy of less than 12 months; 9. An indwelling urethral catheter; 10. A prior penile prosthetic implant; 11. Received an investigational drug, investigational therapy, or other form of ED therapy, including approved treatments, within the past 30 days; 12. Peyronie's disease; 13. Any screening laboratory values outside of the normal laboratory range as defined by the central laboratory normal ranges and in the judgment of the investigator is considered clinically significant (hepatic biochemical markers \[AST, ALT, GGT, alkaline phosphatase, and bilirubin\] \> twice the upper limit of the normal reference range may be accepted with written consent of the sponsor). 14. Any clinically significant ECG abnormality NOTE: Sinus bradycardia of 50-59 bpm is permissible. Other abnormalities that can be normal variants (and considered clinically insignificant) may be permissible. However, participants with such abnormalities cannot be randomized without review of their medical history and prior written approval of the sponsor (or designee).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse Experiences as Measured by Changes in Physical Examination of the Penisup to Week 24 ± 3 daysPhysical examination of the penis included inspection and palpation.
Number of Participants With Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Parameters as Measured on Interval Blood and Urine Testsup to Week 24 ± 3 daysClinical significance was determined by the Investigator using central laboratory values.
Number of Participants With Significant Changes on the Cardiogram as Measured by Significant Prolongation of QT Intervals and Cardiac Rhythmup to Week 24 ± 3 daysClinical significance was determined by the Investigator using central laboratory values.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Sexual Desire Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 24Baseline; Week 24The IIEF is a validated, self-administered questionnaire that is a valid measure of male erectile dysfunction. The test contains 15 questions in 5 domains: (1) Erectile duration/function (questions 01 to 05 and 15); (2) Orgasmic function (questions 09 and 10); (3) Sexual desire (questions 11 and 12); (4) Intercourse satisfaction (questions 06, 07, and 08); (5) Overall sexual satisfaction (questions 13 and 14). The domain-specific scores were calculated as the sum of the scores of the questions in the respective domain; thus, the total score of the Sexual Desire domain was the sum of 2 questions. Score range: 1 to 5 (Q11 and Q12). Total score: 2 to 10. Higher scores reflect better erectile function. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.
Change From Baseline in the Intercourse Satisfaction Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 24Baseline; Week 24The IIEF is a validated, self-administered questionnaire that is a valid measure of male erectile dysfunction. The test contains 15 questions in 5 domains: (1) Erectile duration/function (questions 01 to 05 and 15); (2) Orgasmic function (questions 09 and 10); (3) Sexual desire (questions 11 and 12); (4) Intercourse satisfaction (questions 06, 07, and 08); (5) Overall sexual satisfaction (questions 13 and 14). The domain-specific scores were calculated as the sum of the scores of the questions in the respective domain; thus, the total score of the Intercourse Satisfaction domain was the sum of 3 questions. Score range: 0 to 5 (Q06 through Q8). Total score: 0 to 15. Higher scores reflect better erectile function. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Yes Responses to Questions 2 and 3 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) at Week 24Baseline; Week 24SEP is a diary in which participants record each sexual attempt made throughout the study and is composed of 5 questions assessing sexual function. Two questions from the SEP deal with the ability to achieve vaginal penetration (Question 2: Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?), and the ability to maintain an erection (Question 3: Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?). The number of yes response to each question in the SEP was computed as (Sum of all yes responses to respective SEP question /Total number of responses to that SEP question)\*100. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Yes Responses to Questions 1, 4, and 5 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) at Week 24Baseline; Week 24SEP is a diary in which participants record each sexual attempt made throughout the study and is composed of 5 questions assessing sexual function. Question 1: Were you able to achieve at least some erection?; Question 4: Were you satisfied with the hardness of your erection?; Question 5: Overall, were you satisfied with the sexual experience? The number of yes response to each question in the SEP was computed as (Sum of all yes responses to respective SEP question /Total number of responses to that SEP question)\*100. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in the Overall Sexual Satisfaction Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 24Baseline; Week 24The IIEF is a validated, self-administered questionnaire that is a valid measure of male erectile dysfunction. The test contains 15 questions in 5 domains: (1) Erectile duration/function (questions 01 to 05 and 15); (2) Orgasmic function (questions 09 and 10); (3) Sexual desire (questions 11 and 12); (4) Intercourse satisfaction (questions 06, 07, and 08); (5) Overall sexual satisfaction (questions 13 and 14). The domain-specific scores were calculated as the sum of the scores of the questions in the respective domain; thus, the total score of the Overall Sexual Satisfaction domain was the sum of 2 questions. Score range: 1 to 5 (Q13 and Q14). Total score: 2 to 10. Higher scores reflect better erectile function. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.
Change From Baseline in the Erectile Function (EF) Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 24Baseline; Week 24The IIEF is a validated, self-administered questionnaire that is a valid measure of male erectile dysfunction. The test contains 15 questions in 5 domains: (1) Erectile duration/function (questions \[Q\] 01 to 05 and 15); (2) Orgasmic function (questions 09 and 10); (3) Sexual desire (questions 11 and 12); (4) Intercourse satisfaction (questions 06, 07, and 08); (5) Overall sexual satisfaction (questions 13 and 14). The EF domain has been validated to assess erectile changes only. The domain-specific scores were calculated as the sum of the scores of the questions in the respective domain; thus, the total score of the EF domain was the sum of the 6 questions. Score range: 0 to 5 (Q01 to Q05), 1 to 5 (Q15). Total score: 1 to 30. Higher scores reflect better erectile function. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.
Change From Baseline in the Orgasmic Function Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 24Baseline; Week 24The IIEF is a validated, self-administered questionnaire that is a valid measure of male erectile dysfunction. The test contains 15 questions in 5 domains: (1) Erectile duration/function (questions 01 to 05 and 15); (2) Orgasmic function (questions 09 and 10); (3) Sexual desire (questions 11 and 12); (4) Intercourse satisfaction (questions 06, 07, and 08); (5) Overall sexual satisfaction (questions 13 and 14). The domain-specific scores were calculated as the sum of the scores of the questions in the respective domain; thus, the total score of the Orgasmic Function domain was the sum of 2 questions. Score range: 0 to 5 (Q09 and Q10). Total score: 0 to 10. Higher scores reflect better erectile function. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

Countries

Kuwait

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
hMaxi-K 8000 µg
Participants received a single injection of hMaxi-K 8000 micrograms (µg) into the corpus cavernosum of the penis.
8
hMaxi-K 16000 µg
Participants received a single injection of hMaxi-K 16000 µg into the corpus cavernosum of the penis.
10
Placebo
Participants received a single injection of matching placebo (PBS-20% sucrose) into the corpus cavernosum of the penis.
8
Total26

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up011

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristichMaxi-K 8000 µghMaxi-K 16000 µgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous55.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.32
59.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
59.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.31
58.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.73
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Middle Eastern
7 Participants10 Participants8 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants10 Participants8 Participants26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80 / 100 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 810 / 108 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 80 / 101 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Experiences as Measured by Changes in Physical Examination of the Penis

Physical examination of the penis included inspection and palpation.

Time frame: up to Week 24 ± 3 days

Population: Safety Population: all participants who were randomized to any of the treatment groups and who have received at least one dose of study treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
hMaxi-K 8000 µgNumber of Participants With Adverse Experiences as Measured by Changes in Physical Examination of the Penis0 Participants
hMaxi-K 16000 µgNumber of Participants With Adverse Experiences as Measured by Changes in Physical Examination of the Penis0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Experiences as Measured by Changes in Physical Examination of the Penis0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Parameters as Measured on Interval Blood and Urine Tests

Clinical significance was determined by the Investigator using central laboratory values.

Time frame: up to Week 24 ± 3 days

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
hMaxi-K 8000 µgNumber of Participants With Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Parameters as Measured on Interval Blood and Urine Tests0 Participants
hMaxi-K 16000 µgNumber of Participants With Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Parameters as Measured on Interval Blood and Urine Tests0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Parameters as Measured on Interval Blood and Urine Tests0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Significant Changes on the Cardiogram as Measured by Significant Prolongation of QT Intervals and Cardiac Rhythm

Clinical significance was determined by the Investigator using central laboratory values.

Time frame: up to Week 24 ± 3 days

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
hMaxi-K 8000 µgNumber of Participants With Significant Changes on the Cardiogram as Measured by Significant Prolongation of QT Intervals and Cardiac Rhythm0 Participants
hMaxi-K 16000 µgNumber of Participants With Significant Changes on the Cardiogram as Measured by Significant Prolongation of QT Intervals and Cardiac Rhythm2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Significant Changes on the Cardiogram as Measured by Significant Prolongation of QT Intervals and Cardiac Rhythm0 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Erectile Function (EF) Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 24

The IIEF is a validated, self-administered questionnaire that is a valid measure of male erectile dysfunction. The test contains 15 questions in 5 domains: (1) Erectile duration/function (questions \[Q\] 01 to 05 and 15); (2) Orgasmic function (questions 09 and 10); (3) Sexual desire (questions 11 and 12); (4) Intercourse satisfaction (questions 06, 07, and 08); (5) Overall sexual satisfaction (questions 13 and 14). The EF domain has been validated to assess erectile changes only. The domain-specific scores were calculated as the sum of the scores of the questions in the respective domain; thus, the total score of the EF domain was the sum of the 6 questions. Score range: 0 to 5 (Q01 to Q05), 1 to 5 (Q15). Total score: 1 to 30. Higher scores reflect better erectile function. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 24

Population: mITT Population. Only those participants with data available were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
hMaxi-K 8000 µgChange From Baseline in the Erectile Function (EF) Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 24-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.86
hMaxi-K 16000 µgChange From Baseline in the Erectile Function (EF) Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 24-2.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.85
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Erectile Function (EF) Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 24-5.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.08
p-value: 0.384t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.144t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.022t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.137t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.123t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Intercourse Satisfaction Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 24

The IIEF is a validated, self-administered questionnaire that is a valid measure of male erectile dysfunction. The test contains 15 questions in 5 domains: (1) Erectile duration/function (questions 01 to 05 and 15); (2) Orgasmic function (questions 09 and 10); (3) Sexual desire (questions 11 and 12); (4) Intercourse satisfaction (questions 06, 07, and 08); (5) Overall sexual satisfaction (questions 13 and 14). The domain-specific scores were calculated as the sum of the scores of the questions in the respective domain; thus, the total score of the Intercourse Satisfaction domain was the sum of 3 questions. Score range: 0 to 5 (Q06 through Q8). Total score: 0 to 15. Higher scores reflect better erectile function. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 24

Population: mITT Population. Only those participants with data available were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
hMaxi-K 8000 µgChange From Baseline in the Intercourse Satisfaction Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 24-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.93
hMaxi-K 16000 µgChange From Baseline in the Intercourse Satisfaction Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 24-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Intercourse Satisfaction Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 24-2.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.75
p-value: 0.449t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.381t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.011t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.05t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.09t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Orgasmic Function Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 24

The IIEF is a validated, self-administered questionnaire that is a valid measure of male erectile dysfunction. The test contains 15 questions in 5 domains: (1) Erectile duration/function (questions 01 to 05 and 15); (2) Orgasmic function (questions 09 and 10); (3) Sexual desire (questions 11 and 12); (4) Intercourse satisfaction (questions 06, 07, and 08); (5) Overall sexual satisfaction (questions 13 and 14). The domain-specific scores were calculated as the sum of the scores of the questions in the respective domain; thus, the total score of the Orgasmic Function domain was the sum of 2 questions. Score range: 0 to 5 (Q09 and Q10). Total score: 0 to 10. Higher scores reflect better erectile function. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 24

Population: mITT Population. Only those participants with data available were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
hMaxi-K 8000 µgChange From Baseline in the Orgasmic Function Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 24-1.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
hMaxi-K 16000 µgChange From Baseline in the Orgasmic Function Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 241.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Orgasmic Function Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 24-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.57
p-value: 0.16t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.208t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.316t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.221t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.172t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Overall Sexual Satisfaction Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 24

The IIEF is a validated, self-administered questionnaire that is a valid measure of male erectile dysfunction. The test contains 15 questions in 5 domains: (1) Erectile duration/function (questions 01 to 05 and 15); (2) Orgasmic function (questions 09 and 10); (3) Sexual desire (questions 11 and 12); (4) Intercourse satisfaction (questions 06, 07, and 08); (5) Overall sexual satisfaction (questions 13 and 14). The domain-specific scores were calculated as the sum of the scores of the questions in the respective domain; thus, the total score of the Overall Sexual Satisfaction domain was the sum of 2 questions. Score range: 1 to 5 (Q13 and Q14). Total score: 2 to 10. Higher scores reflect better erectile function. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 24

Population: mITT Population. Only those participants with data available were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
hMaxi-K 8000 µgChange From Baseline in the Overall Sexual Satisfaction Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 24-1.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.69
hMaxi-K 16000 µgChange From Baseline in the Overall Sexual Satisfaction Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 240.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.34
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Overall Sexual Satisfaction Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 24-1.11 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.83
p-value: 0.074t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.468t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.109t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.493t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.235t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Sexual Desire Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 24

The IIEF is a validated, self-administered questionnaire that is a valid measure of male erectile dysfunction. The test contains 15 questions in 5 domains: (1) Erectile duration/function (questions 01 to 05 and 15); (2) Orgasmic function (questions 09 and 10); (3) Sexual desire (questions 11 and 12); (4) Intercourse satisfaction (questions 06, 07, and 08); (5) Overall sexual satisfaction (questions 13 and 14). The domain-specific scores were calculated as the sum of the scores of the questions in the respective domain; thus, the total score of the Sexual Desire domain was the sum of 2 questions. Score range: 1 to 5 (Q11 and Q12). Total score: 2 to 10. Higher scores reflect better erectile function. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 24

Population: mITT Population. Only those participants with data available were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
hMaxi-K 8000 µgChange From Baseline in the Sexual Desire Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 24-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.97
hMaxi-K 16000 µgChange From Baseline in the Sexual Desire Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 24-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Sexual Desire Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 240.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.29
p-value: 0.199t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.203t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.5t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.296t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.286t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Yes Responses to Questions 1, 4, and 5 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) at Week 24

SEP is a diary in which participants record each sexual attempt made throughout the study and is composed of 5 questions assessing sexual function. Question 1: Were you able to achieve at least some erection?; Question 4: Were you satisfied with the hardness of your erection?; Question 5: Overall, were you satisfied with the sexual experience? The number of yes response to each question in the SEP was computed as (Sum of all yes responses to respective SEP question /Total number of responses to that SEP question)\*100. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 24

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
hMaxi-K 8000 µgMean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Yes Responses to Questions 1, 4, and 5 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) at Week 24SEP412.5 percentage of responses
hMaxi-K 8000 µgMean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Yes Responses to Questions 1, 4, and 5 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) at Week 24SEP115.6 percentage of responses
hMaxi-K 8000 µgMean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Yes Responses to Questions 1, 4, and 5 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) at Week 24SEP50 percentage of responses
hMaxi-K 16000 µgMean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Yes Responses to Questions 1, 4, and 5 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) at Week 24SEP414.3 percentage of responses
hMaxi-K 16000 µgMean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Yes Responses to Questions 1, 4, and 5 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) at Week 24SEP1-31.0 percentage of responses
hMaxi-K 16000 µgMean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Yes Responses to Questions 1, 4, and 5 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) at Week 24SEP528.6 percentage of responses
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Yes Responses to Questions 1, 4, and 5 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) at Week 24SEP1-50.0 percentage of responses
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Yes Responses to Questions 1, 4, and 5 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) at Week 24SEP50 percentage of responses
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Yes Responses to Questions 1, 4, and 5 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) at Week 24SEP40 percentage of responses
Comparison: SEP1p-value: 0.136ANCOVA
Comparison: SEP1p-value: 0.498ANCOVA
Comparison: SEP4p-value: 0.369ANCOVA
Comparison: SEP4p-value: 0.337ANCOVA
Comparison: SEP5p-value: 0.16ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Yes Responses to Questions 2 and 3 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) at Week 24

SEP is a diary in which participants record each sexual attempt made throughout the study and is composed of 5 questions assessing sexual function. Two questions from the SEP deal with the ability to achieve vaginal penetration (Question 2: Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?), and the ability to maintain an erection (Question 3: Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?). The number of yes response to each question in the SEP was computed as (Sum of all yes responses to respective SEP question /Total number of responses to that SEP question)\*100. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 24

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population: all participants in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population (all participants who were randomized to either of the treatment groups and who received at least one dose of study treatment) who had at least one post-dose efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
hMaxi-K 8000 µgMean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Yes Responses to Questions 2 and 3 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) at Week 24SEP2-18.8 percentage of responses
hMaxi-K 8000 µgMean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Yes Responses to Questions 2 and 3 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) at Week 24SEP3-3.1 percentage of responses
hMaxi-K 16000 µgMean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Yes Responses to Questions 2 and 3 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) at Week 24SEP2-16.7 percentage of responses
hMaxi-K 16000 µgMean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Yes Responses to Questions 2 and 3 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) at Week 24SEP30 percentage of responses
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Yes Responses to Questions 2 and 3 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) at Week 24SEP2-28.6 percentage of responses
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Yes Responses to Questions 2 and 3 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) at Week 24SEP30 percentage of responses
Comparison: SEP2p-value: 0.827ANCOVA
Comparison: SEP2p-value: 0.594ANCOVA
Comparison: SEP3p-value: 0.274ANCOVA
Comparison: SEP3p-value: 0.766ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026