Hepatitis B
Conditions
Keywords
HBV vaccination, immunity
Brief summary
This is a follow up study from the published article entitled Comparison of immunogenicity and safety of four doses and four double doses vs. standard doses of hepatitis B vaccination in HIV-infected adults: a randomized, controlled trial by Chaiklang K, Wipasa J, Chaiwarith R, Praparattanapan J, Supparatpinyo K. that was published in PLoS One. 2013 Nov 12;8(11):e80409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080409. eCollection 2013. ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT1289106. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the HBV vaccination regimens using either four standard doses or four double doses compared with the current standard regimen of three doses in HIV-infected adults in northern Thailand. In addition, the investigators evaluated the efficacy of the HBV vaccination with the current standard regimen of three doses between healthy adults and HIV-infected patients.
Detailed description
From February 4, 2011 to May 4, 2012, 132 HIV-infected adults with CD4+ cell counts \>200 cells/mm3, undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA, and negative for all HBV markers were randomly assigned to receive one of three recombinant vaccine (Hepavax-Gene® Berna, Korea) regimens: 20 μg IM at months 0, 1, and 6 (Standard doses group, n=44), 20 μg IM at months 0, 1, 2, 6 (four doses group, n=44), or 40 μg IM at months 0, 1, 2, and 6 (four double doses group, n=44). There was another group of healthy individuals received standard dose of 20 μg IM at months 0, 1, and 6 recruited during the same time and under the same protocol. In brief, at months 7 and 12, the percentages of responders (anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/mL) were 88.6% and 70.4% in the Standard doses group, 93.2% and 86.4% in the four doses group, (P=0.713 and 0.119), and 95.4% and 88.6% in the four double doses group, (P=0.434 and 0.062), respectively. This current study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the different HBV vaccination regimens at 36 months after vaccination. In addition to compare the group using four standard doses or four double doses with the current standard regimen of three doses in HIV-infected adults in northern Thailand, the investigators also compare the efficacy of the current standard regimen of 3 doses between HIV-infected and healthy individuals.
Interventions
BIOLOGICALrecombinant HBV vaccine (Hepavax-Gene® Berna, Korea)
Different HBV vaccine regimen in each group
Sponsors
Chiang Mai University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. Healthy Group 1.1 ≥18 years old, 1.2 were negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), had no history of previous vaccine 1.3 were negative for antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) 1.4 received three intramuscular injections of 20 μg of recombinant HBV vaccine (Hepavax-Gene® Berna, Korea) at months 0, 1, and 6 during February 4, 2011 to May 4, 2012, the same time as the study under ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT1289106. were conducted. 1.4 and were willing to sign an informed consent 2. HIV Group 1 2.1 HIV-1 infection 2.2 ≥18 years old, 2.3 had a CD4+ cell count \>200 cells/mm3, 2.4 undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA, 2.5 were negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), had no history of previous vaccine, 2.6 were negative for antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV), 2.7 had no active opportunistic infections (at the time of screening), 2.8 were participated in ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT1289106.and receiving three intramuscular injections of 20 μg of recombinant HBV vaccine (Hepavax-Gene® Berna, Korea) at months 0, 1, and 6 2.9 were willing to sign an informed consent 3. HIV-Group 2 3.1 HIV-1 infection 3.2 ≥18 years old, 3.3 had a CD4+ cell count \>200 cells/mm3, 3.4 undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA, 3.5 were negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), had no history of previous vaccine, 3.6 were negative for antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV), 3.7 had no active opportunistic infections (at the time of screening), 3.8 were participated in ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT1289106.and receiving four intramuscular doses of 20 μg of the same vaccine at months 0, 1, 2, and 6 3.9 were willing to sign an informed consent 4. HIV Group 3 4.1 HIV-1 infection 4.2 ≥18 years old, 4.3 had a CD4+ cell count \>200 cells/mm3, 4.4 undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA, 4.5 were negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), had no history of previous vaccine, 4.6 were negative for antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV), 4.7 had no active opportunistic infections (at the time of screening), 4.8 were participated in ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT1289106.and receiving four intramuscular double doses (40 μg) at months 0, 1, 2, and 6 4.9 were willing to sign an informed consent
Exclusion criteria
For HIV group 1, 2, and 3 1. active malignancy receiving chemotherapy or radiation, 2. other immunocompromised conditions besides HIV (e.g., solid organ transplant), 3. received immunosuppressive (e.g., corticosteroid ≥ 0•5 mg/kg/day) or immunomodulating treatment in the last six months before screening visit, 4. had renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \<30 mL/min), 5. decompensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class C)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of participants with protective immunity against HBV | 36 months after vaccination | Comparison of proportion of participants who had protective immunity (anti-HBS titer \>=10 mIU/ml) against HBV between healthy v.s. HIV group 1, HIV group 2 v.s. HIV group 1, HIV group 3 v.s. HIV group 1 |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The geometric means of anti-HBs titers | 36 months after vaccination | Comparison of the geometric means of anti-HBS titers between healthy v.s. HIV group 1, HIV group 2 v.s. HIV group 1, HIV group 3 v.s. HIV group 1 |
| Proportion of participants with high level of immune response against HBV | 36 months after vaccination | Comparison of proportion of participants who had anti-HBS titers \>=100 mIU/ml between healthy v.s. HIV group 1, HIV group 2 v.s. HIV group 1, HIV group 3 v.s. HIV group 1 |
Countries
Thailand
Outcome results
None listed