Skip to content

Advancing Symptom Alleviation With Palliative Treatment

Palliative Care to Improve Quality of Life in CHF and COPD

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02713347
Acronym
ADAPT
Enrollment
306
Registered
2016-03-18
Start date
2016-09-01
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2024-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Emphysema, Heart Failure, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Pulmonary Fibrosis, Interstitial Lung Disease

Keywords

Quality of Life, Symptom Assessment, Palliative Care, Disease Management, Delivery of Health Care, Advance Care Planning

Brief summary

Chronic heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and interstitial lung disease (i.e., pulmonary fibrosis) are common serious illnesses. Despite disease-specific medical care, people with these illnesses often left with poor quality of life (i.e., burdensome symptoms, impaired function). Furthermore, while these illnesses are leading causes of hospitalization and mortality, few people with these illnesses engage in advance care planning, the process of considering and communicating healthcare values and goals. The investigators are conducting a randomized clinical trial to study a symptom management, psychosocial care and advance care planning intervention to improve quality of life. The study is important because it aims to improve quality of life and provision of care according to peoples' goals and preferences in common, burdensome illnesses. Furthermore, this study will generate information that supports the broader dissemination and implementation of the intervention and informs the development of future palliative care and team-based interventions in the VA.

Detailed description

Chronic heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (i.e., pulmonary fibrosis) have commonalities that make them ideal for early palliative care provided alongside disease-specific treatments. Quality of life is reduced in these illnesses because, despite disease-specific treatments, the same symptoms (e.g., shortness of breath, fatigue) often persist in these illnesses. Quality of life is also reduced because between 50-60% of people with either illness have clinically significant depressive symptoms. Finally, while CHF, COPD, and interstitial lung disease are leading causes of hospitalization and mortality, few people with these illnesses engage in advance care planning. Providing palliative care concomitantly with other medical care offers an important opportunity to improve quality of life and advance care planning for people with CHF, COPD, or interstitial lung disease. For other conditions such as lung cancer, when provided early, prior to the end of life, palliative care improves quality of life, depressive symptoms, and survival while reducing health care utilization. While palliative care has been well-studied in patients with advanced cancer, it has not been adequately studied in CHF, COPD, or interstitial lung disease. The goal of this project is to determine whether the benefits of early palliative care extend to CHF, COPD or interstitial lung disease. The investigators developed and demonstrated early success with a patient-centered palliative care intervention to improve quality of life (i.e., symptoms, function) and advance care planning in CHF and COPD. The intervention consists of the following components: (1) algorithm-guided management of breathlessness, fatigue, and pain, provided by a nurse; the algorithms supplement disease-focused treatments with palliative and behavioral treatments; (2) a 6-session psychosocial care program targeting adjustment to illness and depression, provided by a social worker; and (3) engagement of patients and providers in advance care planning. The nurse and social worker are teamed with a palliative care specialist and representative primary care provider in brief weekly meetings. The team is integrated into primary care through nurse interaction with primary care providers and through electronic medical record communication. The investigators will conduct a hybrid effectiveness and implementation study. Population-based sampling methods will be used to enroll 300 Veterans with CHF, COPD, or interstitial lung disease who have poor quality of life and are at high risk for hospitalization or death. The primary aim is to test the effectiveness of the intervention in a randomized controlled trial (intervention vs. enhanced usual care) in two VA health care systems. In a secondary aim, the investigators will examine the implementation of the intervention to guide future implementation and dissemination, increase the relevance to operational partners, and maximize the effectiveness of subsequent palliative care and team-based interventions. Aim 1: Determine the effect of the intervention on (a) quality of life as a primary outcome, and (b) depression, symptom burden, advance care planning communication and documentation, disease-specific health status, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and mortality as secondary outcomes. Aim 2: Examine the implementation of the intervention. Aim 2a: Assess the degree, barriers, and facilitators of implementation of various components. Identify which intervention components and processes are most critical from the perspectives of patients, intervention team members, and primary care providers whose patients received the intervention. Aim 2b. Evaluate the resources (e.g., personnel time and other costs) associated with the intervention, and estimate the resources needed for implementation and maintenance in other VA settings. The proposed study is significant because it addresses patient-centered needs in illnesses that are major sources of disability. The study is innovative because it tests the effectiveness of palliative care in CHF, COPD, and interstitial lung disease, leading causes of death among Veterans. In addition, the intervention is integrated into primary care, and the intervention components are structured to ease replication, implementation, and dissemination.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALADAPT Intervention

The intervention includes 3 components: 1. nurse (RN) follows structured algorithms to help patients with symptoms, specifically breathlessness, fatigue, and pain. 2. social worker provides structured counseling targeting adjustment to illness and depression and advance care planning. 3. collaborative care model of care delivery, in which the nurse and social worker meet weekly with a primary care provider and palliative care specialist. This team makes medical recommendations to the intervention subjects' providers and supervises the nurse and social worker. The team has as-needed consultation with a cardiologist or pulmonologist. The nurse and social worker visits are in-person or by phone.

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Statistician

Intervention model description

Parallel

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Veterans enrolled in VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System or VA Puget - Sound Health Care System * Diagnosis of CHF, pulmonary fibrosis, or COPD in 2 years prior to enrollment * High risk for hospitalization and death * Poor quality of life * Symptomatic * Primary care or other provider who is willing to facilitate intervention medical recommendations * Able to read and understand English * Consistent access to and able to use a standard telephone

Exclusion criteria

* Previous diagnosis of dementia * Active substance abuse * Comorbid metastatic cancer * Nursing home resident * Heart or lung transplant or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) * Currently receiving hospice, palliative or home-based primary care * Currently pregnant * Currently a prisoner

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Function Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G)6 monthsThe FACT-G is a widely used, valid, reliable, and responsive self-report measure of health-related quality of life that includes domains of physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. The primary outcome will be the difference in FACT-G score at 6 months. The total score range is 0-108 with a higher score meaning greater quality of life.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)6 monthsThe PHQ-8 is a 8-item valid and reliable instrument that provides a continuous measure of depressive symptoms and is 88% sensitive and specific for a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. The PHQ-8 was developed in medically-ill outpatients. Score range 0-24 points with a higher score indicating more depressive symptoms.
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire- Short Form (KCCQ-SF)6 monthsThe KCCQ-SF is a self-administered questionnaire that measures heart failure-specific health status. The KCCQ-SF is reliable, sensitive to clinical change, and predicts hospitalization and mortality. The KCCQ-SF will be administered to participants with heart failure. Score range 0-100 and higher scores indicate better health status.
Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ)6 monthsThe CCQ is a self-administered 10-item measure of COPD symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. It is well-validated, reliable, and responsive and will be administered to participants with COPD. Score range 0-6 with higher scores indicate worse health status.
Quality of Life at the End of Life (QUAL-EC)6 monthsThe QUAL-EC is a valid and reliable self-report measure of several domains, each scored separately, of quality of life in advanced illness. Each item is rated from 1 to 5, and mean scores for multiple items in a domain, i.e., subscale were estimated. Minimum score for each subscale is 1, maximum is 5. A higher score is a better perception of quality of life for each subscale.
Advance Care Planning Communication and Documentation6 monthsAdvance care planning discussions and advance directive documentation in the electronic medical record will be assessed via electronic medical record review. An advance directive includes either a living will and/or durable power of attorney for health care.
Mortality12 monthsThe following events will be assessed during the study period through medical record review to supplement patient report: mortality.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7)6 monthsThe GAD-7 is a valid and reliable self-report measure of anxiety tested in medically ill outpatient populations. Score range 0-21 and higher scores indicate more anxiety symptoms.
General Symptom Distress Scale (GSDS)6 monthsThe General Symptom Distress Scale (GSDS) is a single item measure of overall symptom distress that is reliable and valid and asks, In general, how distressing are all of your symptoms to you? Minimum value 0 Maximum value 10 Higher scores mean more distress
PEG (Pain)6 monthsThe PEG measures pain intensity and interference (Krebs, 2009). Scale range 0-10 and higher score indicates more pain.
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)6 monthsThe ISI measures insomnia severity (Bastien, 2000). There are 6 items and a mean was used. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 4. A higher score indicates more severe insomnia.
PROMIS Fatigue6 monthsThe Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System- Fatigue (PROMIS fatigue) measures fatigue severity. Scale range 0-4 and a higher score indicates more fatigue.
K-BILD6 monthsQuality of life measure for interstitial lung disease. Score range 15-105 (lower score indicates lower health status).
Goal Concordance6 monthsTwo questions with Likert scale responses of 1 to 10: (1) Kind of medical care is most important to you; answers range from 0 = I prefer medical care that focuses on extending life, even if it means having more pain and discomfort, to 10 = I prefer medical care that focuses on relieving pain and discomfort, even if it means not living as long. (2) Medical care right now; answers range from 0 = My current medical care is focused on extending life, even if it means having more pain and discomfort to 10 = My current medical care is focused on relieving pain and discomfort, even if it means not living as long. Goal concordant = answers of 0-3 for both questions, 4-6 for both questions, or 7-10 for both questions. Patients who answered I am not sure of the goals of my medical care were considered unsure of care focus.
Hospitalization6 monthsThe following events will be assessed during the study period through medical record review to supplement patient report: hospitalizations.
Advance Care Planning Engagement6 monthsThis survey was designed to measure behaviors related to surrogate decision makers, values and quality of life, and informed decision making. Specifically, the Advance Care Planning-4 (ACP-4) measure (Sudore et al) was used. Minimum value is 1, maximum value is 5. Higher scores indicate higher levels of readiness to engage in advance care planning.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ADAPT Intervention
The intervention includes 3 components: 1. nurse (RN) follows structured algorithms to help patients with symptoms, specifically breathlessness, fatigue, and pain. 2. social worker provides structured counseling targeting adjustment to illness and depression and advance care planning. 3. collaborative care model of care delivery, in which the nurse and social worker meet weekly with a primary care provider and palliative care specialist. This team makes medical recommendations to the intervention subjects' providers and supervises the nurse and social worker. The team has as-needed consultation with a cardiologist or pulmonologist. The nurse and social worker visits are in-person or by phone. ADAPT Intervention: The intervention includes 3 components: 1. nurse (RN) follows structured algorithms to help patients with symptoms, specifically breathlessness, fatigue, and pain. 2. social worker provides structured counseling targeting adjustment to illness and depression and advance care planning. 3. collaborative care model of care delivery, in which the nurse and social worker meet weekly with a primary care provider and palliative care specialist. This team makes medical recommendations to the intervention subjects' providers and supervises the nurse and social worker. The team has as-needed consultation with a cardiologist or pulmonologist. The nurse and social worker visits are in-person or by phone.
154
Enhanced Usual Care
Patients in the control group will continue to receive care at the discretion of their providers, which may include referrals to and ongoing care from cardiology, pulmonary, palliative care, or mental health. They will also have the same amount of interaction with research assistants as the intervention patients, completing questionnaires and participating in study visits at the same frequency. Patients' providers will be given the results of baseline depression surveys if they screen positive for depression, and patients will be given an information sheet that outlines self-care for CHF or COPD.
152
Total306

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicADAPT InterventionEnhanced Usual CareTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
106 Participants118 Participants224 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
48 Participants34 Participants82 Participants
Age, Continuous68.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
68.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
68.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants8 Participants18 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
128 Participants127 Participants255 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
16 Participants17 Participants33 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
13 Participants7 Participants20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
16 Participants14 Participants30 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
118 Participants127 Participants245 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
154 Participants152 Participants306 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants15 Participants30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
139 Participants137 Participants276 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
6 / 1545 / 152
other
Total, other adverse events
70 / 15434 / 152
serious
Total, serious adverse events
39 / 15431 / 152

Outcome results

Primary

Function Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G)

The FACT-G is a widely used, valid, reliable, and responsive self-report measure of health-related quality of life that includes domains of physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. The primary outcome will be the difference in FACT-G score at 6 months. The total score range is 0-108 with a higher score meaning greater quality of life.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Total number reported here may be inconsistent from the participant flow number because (1) participants could skip completion of a survey and maintain enrollment in the study, and (2) FACT-G surveys may not have been completed enough for analysis (i.e., there were too many missing FACT-G items to score the measure).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ADAPT InterventionFunction Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G)59.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 4
Enhanced Usual CareFunction Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G)54.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 4
Secondary

Advance Care Planning Communication and Documentation

Advance care planning discussions and advance directive documentation in the electronic medical record will be assessed via electronic medical record review. An advance directive includes either a living will and/or durable power of attorney for health care.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ADAPT InterventionAdvance Care Planning Communication and DocumentationDocumented Advance Care Planning Discussion106 Participants
ADAPT InterventionAdvance Care Planning Communication and DocumentationDocumented Advance Directive58 Participants
Enhanced Usual CareAdvance Care Planning Communication and DocumentationDocumented Advance Care Planning Discussion5 Participants
Enhanced Usual CareAdvance Care Planning Communication and DocumentationDocumented Advance Directive62 Participants
Secondary

Advance Care Planning Engagement

This survey was designed to measure behaviors related to surrogate decision makers, values and quality of life, and informed decision making. Specifically, the Advance Care Planning-4 (ACP-4) measure (Sudore et al) was used. Minimum value is 1, maximum value is 5. Higher scores indicate higher levels of readiness to engage in advance care planning.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ADAPT InterventionAdvance Care Planning Engagement4.21 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Enhanced Usual CareAdvance Care Planning Engagement3.68 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Secondary

Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ)

The CCQ is a self-administered 10-item measure of COPD symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. It is well-validated, reliable, and responsive and will be administered to participants with COPD. Score range 0-6 with higher scores indicate worse health status.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ADAPT InterventionClinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ)3.08 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Enhanced Usual CareClinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ)3.21 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Secondary

Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7)

The GAD-7 is a valid and reliable self-report measure of anxiety tested in medically ill outpatient populations. Score range 0-21 and higher scores indicate more anxiety symptoms.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ADAPT InterventionGeneralized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7)5.82 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.43
Enhanced Usual CareGeneralized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7)6.92 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.42
Secondary

General Symptom Distress Scale (GSDS)

The General Symptom Distress Scale (GSDS) is a single item measure of overall symptom distress that is reliable and valid and asks, In general, how distressing are all of your symptoms to you? Minimum value 0 Maximum value 10 Higher scores mean more distress

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ADAPT InterventionGeneral Symptom Distress Scale (GSDS)5.56 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.64
Enhanced Usual CareGeneral Symptom Distress Scale (GSDS)6.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.64
Secondary

Goal Concordance

Two questions with Likert scale responses of 1 to 10: (1) Kind of medical care is most important to you; answers range from 0 = I prefer medical care that focuses on extending life, even if it means having more pain and discomfort, to 10 = I prefer medical care that focuses on relieving pain and discomfort, even if it means not living as long. (2) Medical care right now; answers range from 0 = My current medical care is focused on extending life, even if it means having more pain and discomfort to 10 = My current medical care is focused on relieving pain and discomfort, even if it means not living as long. Goal concordant = answers of 0-3 for both questions, 4-6 for both questions, or 7-10 for both questions. Patients who answered I am not sure of the goals of my medical care were considered unsure of care focus.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Number analyzed = # of patients who we had complete data at 6 months and who were not unsure of their goals of care at the 6-month time point.~The count of participants in the outcome measure data table is the number of patients who were considered goal concordant at 6 months for the control/intervention groups; this is the number of people who meet the criteria listed (Patients who answered 0-3 for both questions, 4-6 for both questions, or 7-10 for both questions).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ADAPT InterventionGoal Concordance52 Participants
Enhanced Usual CareGoal Concordance55 Participants
Secondary

Hospitalization

The following events will be assessed during the study period through medical record review to supplement patient report: hospitalizations.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ADAPT InterventionHospitalizationHospitalized Twice or More9 participants
ADAPT InterventionHospitalizationHospitalized Once24 participants
Enhanced Usual CareHospitalizationHospitalized Twice or More9 participants
Enhanced Usual CareHospitalizationHospitalized Once17 participants
Secondary

Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)

The ISI measures insomnia severity (Bastien, 2000). There are 6 items and a mean was used. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 4. A higher score indicates more severe insomnia.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ADAPT InterventionInsomnia Severity Index (ISI)2.11 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Enhanced Usual CareInsomnia Severity Index (ISI)2.26 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Secondary

Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire- Short Form (KCCQ-SF)

The KCCQ-SF is a self-administered questionnaire that measures heart failure-specific health status. The KCCQ-SF is reliable, sensitive to clinical change, and predicts hospitalization and mortality. The KCCQ-SF will be administered to participants with heart failure. Score range 0-100 and higher scores indicate better health status.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ADAPT InterventionKansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire- Short Form (KCCQ-SF)47.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.47
Enhanced Usual CareKansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire- Short Form (KCCQ-SF)43.05 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.52
Secondary

K-BILD

Quality of life measure for interstitial lung disease. Score range 15-105 (lower score indicates lower health status).

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ADAPT InterventionK-BILD54.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.4
Enhanced Usual CareK-BILD50.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8
Secondary

Mortality

The following events will be assessed during the study period through medical record review to supplement patient report: mortality.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Number of deaths is reported

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ADAPT InterventionMortality6 participants
Enhanced Usual CareMortality5 participants
Secondary

Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)

The PHQ-8 is a 8-item valid and reliable instrument that provides a continuous measure of depressive symptoms and is 88% sensitive and specific for a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. The PHQ-8 was developed in medically-ill outpatients. Score range 0-24 points with a higher score indicating more depressive symptoms.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ADAPT InterventionPatient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)10.02 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.43
Enhanced Usual CarePatient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)11.58 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.42
Secondary

PEG (Pain)

The PEG measures pain intensity and interference (Krebs, 2009). Scale range 0-10 and higher score indicates more pain.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ADAPT InterventionPEG (Pain)4.76 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
Enhanced Usual CarePEG (Pain)5.04 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
Secondary

PROMIS Fatigue

The Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System- Fatigue (PROMIS fatigue) measures fatigue severity. Scale range 0-4 and a higher score indicates more fatigue.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ADAPT InterventionPROMIS Fatigue2.15 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Enhanced Usual CarePROMIS Fatigue2.22 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Secondary

Quality of Life at the End of Life (QUAL-EC)

The QUAL-EC is a valid and reliable self-report measure of several domains, each scored separately, of quality of life in advanced illness. Each item is rated from 1 to 5, and mean scores for multiple items in a domain, i.e., subscale were estimated. Minimum score for each subscale is 1, maximum is 5. A higher score is a better perception of quality of life for each subscale.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Survey completeness differed by measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ADAPT InterventionQuality of Life at the End of Life (QUAL-EC)QUAL-E: Life Completion3.01 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
ADAPT InterventionQuality of Life at the End of Life (QUAL-EC)QUAL-E: Relationship With Healthcare Provider3.05 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
ADAPT InterventionQuality of Life at the End of Life (QUAL-EC)QUAL-E: Preparation3.86 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
ADAPT InterventionQuality of Life at the End of Life (QUAL-EC)QUAL-E: Feel At Peace3.35 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Enhanced Usual CareQuality of Life at the End of Life (QUAL-EC)QUAL-E: Feel At Peace3.18 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Enhanced Usual CareQuality of Life at the End of Life (QUAL-EC)QUAL-E: Life Completion2.88 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
Enhanced Usual CareQuality of Life at the End of Life (QUAL-EC)QUAL-E: Preparation3.55 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
Enhanced Usual CareQuality of Life at the End of Life (QUAL-EC)QUAL-E: Relationship With Healthcare Provider2.87 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.22

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026