Emphysema, Heart Failure, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Pulmonary Fibrosis, Interstitial Lung Disease
Conditions
Keywords
Quality of Life, Symptom Assessment, Palliative Care, Disease Management, Delivery of Health Care, Advance Care Planning
Brief summary
Chronic heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and interstitial lung disease (i.e., pulmonary fibrosis) are common serious illnesses. Despite disease-specific medical care, people with these illnesses often left with poor quality of life (i.e., burdensome symptoms, impaired function). Furthermore, while these illnesses are leading causes of hospitalization and mortality, few people with these illnesses engage in advance care planning, the process of considering and communicating healthcare values and goals. The investigators are conducting a randomized clinical trial to study a symptom management, psychosocial care and advance care planning intervention to improve quality of life. The study is important because it aims to improve quality of life and provision of care according to peoples' goals and preferences in common, burdensome illnesses. Furthermore, this study will generate information that supports the broader dissemination and implementation of the intervention and informs the development of future palliative care and team-based interventions in the VA.
Detailed description
Chronic heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (i.e., pulmonary fibrosis) have commonalities that make them ideal for early palliative care provided alongside disease-specific treatments. Quality of life is reduced in these illnesses because, despite disease-specific treatments, the same symptoms (e.g., shortness of breath, fatigue) often persist in these illnesses. Quality of life is also reduced because between 50-60% of people with either illness have clinically significant depressive symptoms. Finally, while CHF, COPD, and interstitial lung disease are leading causes of hospitalization and mortality, few people with these illnesses engage in advance care planning. Providing palliative care concomitantly with other medical care offers an important opportunity to improve quality of life and advance care planning for people with CHF, COPD, or interstitial lung disease. For other conditions such as lung cancer, when provided early, prior to the end of life, palliative care improves quality of life, depressive symptoms, and survival while reducing health care utilization. While palliative care has been well-studied in patients with advanced cancer, it has not been adequately studied in CHF, COPD, or interstitial lung disease. The goal of this project is to determine whether the benefits of early palliative care extend to CHF, COPD or interstitial lung disease. The investigators developed and demonstrated early success with a patient-centered palliative care intervention to improve quality of life (i.e., symptoms, function) and advance care planning in CHF and COPD. The intervention consists of the following components: (1) algorithm-guided management of breathlessness, fatigue, and pain, provided by a nurse; the algorithms supplement disease-focused treatments with palliative and behavioral treatments; (2) a 6-session psychosocial care program targeting adjustment to illness and depression, provided by a social worker; and (3) engagement of patients and providers in advance care planning. The nurse and social worker are teamed with a palliative care specialist and representative primary care provider in brief weekly meetings. The team is integrated into primary care through nurse interaction with primary care providers and through electronic medical record communication. The investigators will conduct a hybrid effectiveness and implementation study. Population-based sampling methods will be used to enroll 300 Veterans with CHF, COPD, or interstitial lung disease who have poor quality of life and are at high risk for hospitalization or death. The primary aim is to test the effectiveness of the intervention in a randomized controlled trial (intervention vs. enhanced usual care) in two VA health care systems. In a secondary aim, the investigators will examine the implementation of the intervention to guide future implementation and dissemination, increase the relevance to operational partners, and maximize the effectiveness of subsequent palliative care and team-based interventions. Aim 1: Determine the effect of the intervention on (a) quality of life as a primary outcome, and (b) depression, symptom burden, advance care planning communication and documentation, disease-specific health status, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and mortality as secondary outcomes. Aim 2: Examine the implementation of the intervention. Aim 2a: Assess the degree, barriers, and facilitators of implementation of various components. Identify which intervention components and processes are most critical from the perspectives of patients, intervention team members, and primary care providers whose patients received the intervention. Aim 2b. Evaluate the resources (e.g., personnel time and other costs) associated with the intervention, and estimate the resources needed for implementation and maintenance in other VA settings. The proposed study is significant because it addresses patient-centered needs in illnesses that are major sources of disability. The study is innovative because it tests the effectiveness of palliative care in CHF, COPD, and interstitial lung disease, leading causes of death among Veterans. In addition, the intervention is integrated into primary care, and the intervention components are structured to ease replication, implementation, and dissemination.
Interventions
The intervention includes 3 components: 1. nurse (RN) follows structured algorithms to help patients with symptoms, specifically breathlessness, fatigue, and pain. 2. social worker provides structured counseling targeting adjustment to illness and depression and advance care planning. 3. collaborative care model of care delivery, in which the nurse and social worker meet weekly with a primary care provider and palliative care specialist. This team makes medical recommendations to the intervention subjects' providers and supervises the nurse and social worker. The team has as-needed consultation with a cardiologist or pulmonologist. The nurse and social worker visits are in-person or by phone.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Statistician
Intervention model description
Parallel
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Veterans enrolled in VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System or VA Puget - Sound Health Care System * Diagnosis of CHF, pulmonary fibrosis, or COPD in 2 years prior to enrollment * High risk for hospitalization and death * Poor quality of life * Symptomatic * Primary care or other provider who is willing to facilitate intervention medical recommendations * Able to read and understand English * Consistent access to and able to use a standard telephone
Exclusion criteria
* Previous diagnosis of dementia * Active substance abuse * Comorbid metastatic cancer * Nursing home resident * Heart or lung transplant or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) * Currently receiving hospice, palliative or home-based primary care * Currently pregnant * Currently a prisoner
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Function Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G) | 6 months | The FACT-G is a widely used, valid, reliable, and responsive self-report measure of health-related quality of life that includes domains of physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. The primary outcome will be the difference in FACT-G score at 6 months. The total score range is 0-108 with a higher score meaning greater quality of life. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) | 6 months | The PHQ-8 is a 8-item valid and reliable instrument that provides a continuous measure of depressive symptoms and is 88% sensitive and specific for a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. The PHQ-8 was developed in medically-ill outpatients. Score range 0-24 points with a higher score indicating more depressive symptoms. |
| Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire- Short Form (KCCQ-SF) | 6 months | The KCCQ-SF is a self-administered questionnaire that measures heart failure-specific health status. The KCCQ-SF is reliable, sensitive to clinical change, and predicts hospitalization and mortality. The KCCQ-SF will be administered to participants with heart failure. Score range 0-100 and higher scores indicate better health status. |
| Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) | 6 months | The CCQ is a self-administered 10-item measure of COPD symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. It is well-validated, reliable, and responsive and will be administered to participants with COPD. Score range 0-6 with higher scores indicate worse health status. |
| Quality of Life at the End of Life (QUAL-EC) | 6 months | The QUAL-EC is a valid and reliable self-report measure of several domains, each scored separately, of quality of life in advanced illness. Each item is rated from 1 to 5, and mean scores for multiple items in a domain, i.e., subscale were estimated. Minimum score for each subscale is 1, maximum is 5. A higher score is a better perception of quality of life for each subscale. |
| Advance Care Planning Communication and Documentation | 6 months | Advance care planning discussions and advance directive documentation in the electronic medical record will be assessed via electronic medical record review. An advance directive includes either a living will and/or durable power of attorney for health care. |
| Mortality | 12 months | The following events will be assessed during the study period through medical record review to supplement patient report: mortality. |
| Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) | 6 months | The GAD-7 is a valid and reliable self-report measure of anxiety tested in medically ill outpatient populations. Score range 0-21 and higher scores indicate more anxiety symptoms. |
| General Symptom Distress Scale (GSDS) | 6 months | The General Symptom Distress Scale (GSDS) is a single item measure of overall symptom distress that is reliable and valid and asks, In general, how distressing are all of your symptoms to you? Minimum value 0 Maximum value 10 Higher scores mean more distress |
| PEG (Pain) | 6 months | The PEG measures pain intensity and interference (Krebs, 2009). Scale range 0-10 and higher score indicates more pain. |
| Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) | 6 months | The ISI measures insomnia severity (Bastien, 2000). There are 6 items and a mean was used. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 4. A higher score indicates more severe insomnia. |
| PROMIS Fatigue | 6 months | The Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System- Fatigue (PROMIS fatigue) measures fatigue severity. Scale range 0-4 and a higher score indicates more fatigue. |
| K-BILD | 6 months | Quality of life measure for interstitial lung disease. Score range 15-105 (lower score indicates lower health status). |
| Goal Concordance | 6 months | Two questions with Likert scale responses of 1 to 10: (1) Kind of medical care is most important to you; answers range from 0 = I prefer medical care that focuses on extending life, even if it means having more pain and discomfort, to 10 = I prefer medical care that focuses on relieving pain and discomfort, even if it means not living as long. (2) Medical care right now; answers range from 0 = My current medical care is focused on extending life, even if it means having more pain and discomfort to 10 = My current medical care is focused on relieving pain and discomfort, even if it means not living as long. Goal concordant = answers of 0-3 for both questions, 4-6 for both questions, or 7-10 for both questions. Patients who answered I am not sure of the goals of my medical care were considered unsure of care focus. |
| Hospitalization | 6 months | The following events will be assessed during the study period through medical record review to supplement patient report: hospitalizations. |
| Advance Care Planning Engagement | 6 months | This survey was designed to measure behaviors related to surrogate decision makers, values and quality of life, and informed decision making. Specifically, the Advance Care Planning-4 (ACP-4) measure (Sudore et al) was used. Minimum value is 1, maximum value is 5. Higher scores indicate higher levels of readiness to engage in advance care planning. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| ADAPT Intervention The intervention includes 3 components:
1. nurse (RN) follows structured algorithms to help patients with symptoms, specifically breathlessness, fatigue, and pain.
2. social worker provides structured counseling targeting adjustment to illness and depression and advance care planning.
3. collaborative care model of care delivery, in which the nurse and social worker meet weekly with a primary care provider and palliative care specialist. This team makes medical recommendations to the intervention subjects' providers and supervises the nurse and social worker. The team has as-needed consultation with a cardiologist or pulmonologist.
The nurse and social worker visits are in-person or by phone.
ADAPT Intervention: The intervention includes 3 components:
1. nurse (RN) follows structured algorithms to help patients with symptoms, specifically breathlessness, fatigue, and pain.
2. social worker provides structured counseling targeting adjustment to illness and depression and advance care planning.
3. collaborative care model of care delivery, in which the nurse and social worker meet weekly with a primary care provider and palliative care specialist. This team makes medical recommendations to the intervention subjects' providers and supervises the nurse and social worker. The team has as-needed consultation with a cardiologist or pulmonologist. The nurse and social worker visits are in-person or by phone. | 154 |
| Enhanced Usual Care Patients in the control group will continue to receive care at the discretion of their providers, which may include referrals to and ongoing care from cardiology, pulmonary, palliative care, or mental health. They will also have the same amount of interaction with research assistants as the intervention patients, completing questionnaires and participating in study visits at the same frequency. Patients' providers will be given the results of baseline depression surveys if they screen positive for depression, and patients will be given an information sheet that outlines self-care for CHF or COPD. | 152 |
| Total | 306 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | ADAPT Intervention | Enhanced Usual Care | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 106 Participants | 118 Participants | 224 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 48 Participants | 34 Participants | 82 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 68.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 | 68.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4 | 68.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 10 Participants | 8 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 128 Participants | 127 Participants | 255 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 16 Participants | 17 Participants | 33 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 13 Participants | 7 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 16 Participants | 14 Participants | 30 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 118 Participants | 127 Participants | 245 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 154 Participants | 152 Participants | 306 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 15 Participants | 15 Participants | 30 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 139 Participants | 137 Participants | 276 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 6 / 154 | 5 / 152 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 70 / 154 | 34 / 152 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 39 / 154 | 31 / 152 |
Outcome results
Function Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G)
The FACT-G is a widely used, valid, reliable, and responsive self-report measure of health-related quality of life that includes domains of physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. The primary outcome will be the difference in FACT-G score at 6 months. The total score range is 0-108 with a higher score meaning greater quality of life.
Time frame: 6 months
Population: Total number reported here may be inconsistent from the participant flow number because (1) participants could skip completion of a survey and maintain enrollment in the study, and (2) FACT-G surveys may not have been completed enough for analysis (i.e., there were too many missing FACT-G items to score the measure).
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADAPT Intervention | Function Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G) | 59.0 score on a scale | Standard Error 4 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Function Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G) | 54.0 score on a scale | Standard Error 4 |
Advance Care Planning Communication and Documentation
Advance care planning discussions and advance directive documentation in the electronic medical record will be assessed via electronic medical record review. An advance directive includes either a living will and/or durable power of attorney for health care.
Time frame: 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADAPT Intervention | Advance Care Planning Communication and Documentation | Documented Advance Care Planning Discussion | 106 Participants |
| ADAPT Intervention | Advance Care Planning Communication and Documentation | Documented Advance Directive | 58 Participants |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Advance Care Planning Communication and Documentation | Documented Advance Care Planning Discussion | 5 Participants |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Advance Care Planning Communication and Documentation | Documented Advance Directive | 62 Participants |
Advance Care Planning Engagement
This survey was designed to measure behaviors related to surrogate decision makers, values and quality of life, and informed decision making. Specifically, the Advance Care Planning-4 (ACP-4) measure (Sudore et al) was used. Minimum value is 1, maximum value is 5. Higher scores indicate higher levels of readiness to engage in advance care planning.
Time frame: 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADAPT Intervention | Advance Care Planning Engagement | 4.21 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.34 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Advance Care Planning Engagement | 3.68 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.34 |
Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ)
The CCQ is a self-administered 10-item measure of COPD symptoms, functioning, and emotional well-being. It is well-validated, reliable, and responsive and will be administered to participants with COPD. Score range 0-6 with higher scores indicate worse health status.
Time frame: 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADAPT Intervention | Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) | 3.08 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.1 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) | 3.21 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.1 |
Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7)
The GAD-7 is a valid and reliable self-report measure of anxiety tested in medically ill outpatient populations. Score range 0-21 and higher scores indicate more anxiety symptoms.
Time frame: 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADAPT Intervention | Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) | 5.82 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.43 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) | 6.92 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.42 |
General Symptom Distress Scale (GSDS)
The General Symptom Distress Scale (GSDS) is a single item measure of overall symptom distress that is reliable and valid and asks, In general, how distressing are all of your symptoms to you? Minimum value 0 Maximum value 10 Higher scores mean more distress
Time frame: 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADAPT Intervention | General Symptom Distress Scale (GSDS) | 5.56 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.64 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | General Symptom Distress Scale (GSDS) | 6.0 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.64 |
Goal Concordance
Two questions with Likert scale responses of 1 to 10: (1) Kind of medical care is most important to you; answers range from 0 = I prefer medical care that focuses on extending life, even if it means having more pain and discomfort, to 10 = I prefer medical care that focuses on relieving pain and discomfort, even if it means not living as long. (2) Medical care right now; answers range from 0 = My current medical care is focused on extending life, even if it means having more pain and discomfort to 10 = My current medical care is focused on relieving pain and discomfort, even if it means not living as long. Goal concordant = answers of 0-3 for both questions, 4-6 for both questions, or 7-10 for both questions. Patients who answered I am not sure of the goals of my medical care were considered unsure of care focus.
Time frame: 6 months
Population: Number analyzed = # of patients who we had complete data at 6 months and who were not unsure of their goals of care at the 6-month time point.~The count of participants in the outcome measure data table is the number of patients who were considered goal concordant at 6 months for the control/intervention groups; this is the number of people who meet the criteria listed (Patients who answered 0-3 for both questions, 4-6 for both questions, or 7-10 for both questions).
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| ADAPT Intervention | Goal Concordance | 52 Participants |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Goal Concordance | 55 Participants |
Hospitalization
The following events will be assessed during the study period through medical record review to supplement patient report: hospitalizations.
Time frame: 6 months
Population: participants
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADAPT Intervention | Hospitalization | Hospitalized Twice or More | 9 participants |
| ADAPT Intervention | Hospitalization | Hospitalized Once | 24 participants |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Hospitalization | Hospitalized Twice or More | 9 participants |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Hospitalization | Hospitalized Once | 17 participants |
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
The ISI measures insomnia severity (Bastien, 2000). There are 6 items and a mean was used. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 4. A higher score indicates more severe insomnia.
Time frame: 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADAPT Intervention | Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) | 2.11 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.26 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) | 2.26 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.26 |
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire- Short Form (KCCQ-SF)
The KCCQ-SF is a self-administered questionnaire that measures heart failure-specific health status. The KCCQ-SF is reliable, sensitive to clinical change, and predicts hospitalization and mortality. The KCCQ-SF will be administered to participants with heart failure. Score range 0-100 and higher scores indicate better health status.
Time frame: 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADAPT Intervention | Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire- Short Form (KCCQ-SF) | 47.6 score on a scale | Standard Error 3.47 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire- Short Form (KCCQ-SF) | 43.05 score on a scale | Standard Error 3.52 |
K-BILD
Quality of life measure for interstitial lung disease. Score range 15-105 (lower score indicates lower health status).
Time frame: 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADAPT Intervention | K-BILD | 54.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.4 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | K-BILD | 50.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.8 |
Mortality
The following events will be assessed during the study period through medical record review to supplement patient report: mortality.
Time frame: 12 months
Population: Number of deaths is reported
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| ADAPT Intervention | Mortality | 6 participants |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Mortality | 5 participants |
Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)
The PHQ-8 is a 8-item valid and reliable instrument that provides a continuous measure of depressive symptoms and is 88% sensitive and specific for a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. The PHQ-8 was developed in medically-ill outpatients. Score range 0-24 points with a higher score indicating more depressive symptoms.
Time frame: 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADAPT Intervention | Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) | 10.02 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.43 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) | 11.58 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.42 |
PEG (Pain)
The PEG measures pain intensity and interference (Krebs, 2009). Scale range 0-10 and higher score indicates more pain.
Time frame: 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADAPT Intervention | PEG (Pain) | 4.76 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.72 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | PEG (Pain) | 5.04 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.72 |
PROMIS Fatigue
The Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System- Fatigue (PROMIS fatigue) measures fatigue severity. Scale range 0-4 and a higher score indicates more fatigue.
Time frame: 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADAPT Intervention | PROMIS Fatigue | 2.15 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.26 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | PROMIS Fatigue | 2.22 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.26 |
Quality of Life at the End of Life (QUAL-EC)
The QUAL-EC is a valid and reliable self-report measure of several domains, each scored separately, of quality of life in advanced illness. Each item is rated from 1 to 5, and mean scores for multiple items in a domain, i.e., subscale were estimated. Minimum score for each subscale is 1, maximum is 5. A higher score is a better perception of quality of life for each subscale.
Time frame: 6 months
Population: Survey completeness differed by measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADAPT Intervention | Quality of Life at the End of Life (QUAL-EC) | QUAL-E: Life Completion | 3.01 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.23 |
| ADAPT Intervention | Quality of Life at the End of Life (QUAL-EC) | QUAL-E: Relationship With Healthcare Provider | 3.05 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.22 |
| ADAPT Intervention | Quality of Life at the End of Life (QUAL-EC) | QUAL-E: Preparation | 3.86 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.22 |
| ADAPT Intervention | Quality of Life at the End of Life (QUAL-EC) | QUAL-E: Feel At Peace | 3.35 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.29 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Quality of Life at the End of Life (QUAL-EC) | QUAL-E: Feel At Peace | 3.18 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.29 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Quality of Life at the End of Life (QUAL-EC) | QUAL-E: Life Completion | 2.88 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.23 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Quality of Life at the End of Life (QUAL-EC) | QUAL-E: Preparation | 3.55 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.22 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Quality of Life at the End of Life (QUAL-EC) | QUAL-E: Relationship With Healthcare Provider | 2.87 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.22 |