Skip to content

Dexmedetomidine vs. Midazolam Sedation for Endobronchial Ultrasound

Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine vs. Midazolam Sedation in Patients Undergoing Convex-probe Endobronchial Ultrasound: a Randomized Double Blind Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02713191
Enrollment
197
Registered
2016-03-18
Start date
2016-03-31
Completion date
2017-02-01
Last updated
2017-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Conscious Sedation During Procedure, Endobronchial Ultrasound

Keywords

Bronchoscopy, Sedation, Dexmedetomidine

Brief summary

The randomized controlled trial will compare efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine to midazolam for sedation during endobronchial ultrasound

Detailed description

Benzodiazepines, opioids, and propofol are currently used alone or in combination for achieving sedation during endobronchial ultrasound and other bronchoscopic procedures. However, all these agents carry a risk of respiratory depression. Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective adrenergic alpha-2 agonist, has sedative and analgesic properties but does not cause respiratory depression. This study aims to compare efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine as a sedative to midazolam in patients with hilar/mediastinal lymphadenopathy undergoing convex-probe endobronchial ultrasonography on day care basis. Patients will be randomized to receive either dexmedetomidine plus fentanyl or midazolam plus fentanyl prior to procedure, followed by dexmedetomidine or saline infusion respectively during the procedure. Ramsay sedation score of two will be targeted, failing which patients in both groups will receive midazolam bolus on as-needed basis. Bronchoscopist will remain blinded to group allocation. Patients will be monitored for sedation, oxygenation and hemodynamic parameters throughout. Need for additional midazolam, sedative efficacy, frequency of adverse respiratory and hemodynamic events, and bronchoscopist and patient satisfaction with the procedure will be compared between the two groups.

Interventions

DRUGDexmedetomidine

Dexmedetomidine 1µg/Kg in 100 mL saline intravenously over 10-15 minutes immediately prior to procedure, followed by Dexmedetomidine infusion at 0.6 µg/kg/hour as maintenance dose during entire procedure

DRUGMidazolam bolus

Midazolam 2 mg as slow intravenous bolus immediately prior to procedure

OTHERSaline placebo

100 mL saline infusion over 10-15 minutes immediately prior to procedure

DRUGRescue midazolam

Rescue boluses of 0.5 mg midazolam, if needed during procedure

DRUGFentanyl

1 µg/kg fentanyl as slow intravenous bolus immediately prior to procedure

Sponsors

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 years or more * American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II * Presence of hilar and/or mediastinal lymph nodes on thoracic CT scan

Exclusion criteria

* Known allergy to dexmedetomidine or midazolam or fentanyl * Documented coagulopathy * Pregnancy * Hemodynamic instability (hypotension, arrhythmia, recent acute coronary event) * Neuropsychiatric illness * History of previous endobronchial ultrasound procedure * Refusal to provide consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of midazolam boluses administered to achieve targeted Ramsay sedation score of twoFrom start of endobronchial ultrasound procedure until finish of endobronchial ultrasound procedure, assessed up to two hours

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Mean difference in depth of sedation during procedure as assessed by Ramsay scaleFrom start of endobronchial ultrasound procedure until finish of endobronchial ultrasound procedure, assessed up to two hours
Frequency of adverse hemodynamic events - hypotension, hypertension, tachycardia, bradycardiaFrom start of endobronchial ultrasound procedure until finish of endobronchial ultrasound procedure, assessed up to two hours
Frequency of respiratory events - hypoxia, need for air airway maneuvers to maintain oxygenationFrom start of endobronchial ultrasound procedure until finish of endobronchial ultrasound procedure, assessed up to two hours
Mean difference in patient and physician satisfaction related to procedure as assessed by visual analogue scaleImmediately after endobronchial ultrasound procedure
Mean difference in time taken to discharge patient from post-procedure recovery roomFrom end of endobronchial ultrasound procedure until final patient discharge from recovery room, assessed up to twelve hours

Countries

India

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026