Skip to content

Treg Therapy in Subclinical Inflammation in Kidney Transplantation

Treg Adoptive Therapy in Subclinical Inflammation in Kidney Transplantation (CTOT-21)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02711826
Acronym
TASK
Enrollment
32
Registered
2016-03-17
Start date
2016-09-20
Completion date
2023-08-04
Last updated
2025-04-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adult Living Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients, Kidney Transplant, Living Kidney Donor, Renal Transplant

Keywords

graft inflammation, Treg, polyclonally expanded Tregs (polyTregs), calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), mTOR inhibitors

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is: * To see if polyTregs can reduce inflammation in a transplanted kidney. * To find out what effects, good or bad, polyTregs will have in the kidney recipient. * To find out what effects, good or bad, taking everolimus after polyTregs will have in the kidney recipient.

Detailed description

Inflammation occurs when the body's defense system recognizes a foreign object (such as a transplanted kidney), and responds by sending white blood cells to attack the foreign object. These cells and the substances they produce can damage the transplanted kidney. There is currently no standard treatment for inflammation in the kidney; some transplant centers do not treat inflammation at all. Rejection is a more severe form of inflammation and injury. Both inflammation and rejection are diagnosed by looking at a piece of kidney (a kidney biopsy) under a microscope. Kidneys that have inflammation and/or rejection do not work as well or last as long as kidneys without injury. People who have a transplant take immunosuppressive drugs (IS) to prevent inflammation and rejection. Although kidney transplant recipients usually do well in the first five years after transplant, transplant researchers are interested in finding ways to prevent inflammation and rejection without IS, or with lower doses of IS in order to avoid side effects. While some white blood cells cause inflammation, other types of white blood cells, called T regulatory cells (Tregs), can control inflammation. Tregs may have an important role in controlling or preventing inflammation and rejection. A person's Tregs can be grown in the laboratory to increase their number (polyTreg). These Tregs can be given back through a needle placed in a vein (IV). PolyTregs, when given to the recipient, might reduce inflammation in the transplanted kidney. However, this effect has not yet been shown. One of the IS drugs used in kidney transplant is Everolimus. Everolimus has been shown to help Tregs survive better than other types of IS drugs. This is a randomized open-label trial to determine the safety and efficacy of a single dose of autologous polyTregs in renal transplant recipients with subclinical inflammation (SCI) in the 3 to 7 months post-transplant allograft protocol biopsy compared to control patients treated with CNI-based immunosuppression. The efficacy of the Treg therapy will be assessed by the reduction of graft inflammation on biopsies performed at 7 months after study group allocation compared to the eligibility biopsy.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALPolyclonal Regulatory T Cells

Participants randomized to polyTregs group will receive a single infusion of 550 ± 450 x 10\^6 polyTregs.

DRUGEverolimus
DRUGTacrolimus
DRUGMycophenolate mofetil

All enrolled participants will be on MMF (or MPA below) at the time of study entry at a minimum dose of 1000mg per day.

DRUGMycophenolic acid

All enrolled participants will be on MPA (or MMF above) at the time of study entry at a minimum dose of 720mg per day.

DRUGAcetaminophen

650 mg acetaminophen, administered 30-60 minutes prior to infusion as pre-medication.

DRUGDiphenhydramine

25-50 mg diphenhydramine intravenously or by mouth, administered 30-60 minutes prior to infusion as pre-medication.

PROCEDUREBiopsy, Kidney
PROCEDUREBlood Draw
PROCEDURELeukapheresis
PROCEDUREIS regimen conversion

Conversion from Tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), to Everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor.

Sponsors

Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation
CollaboratorNETWORK
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Individuals who meet all of the following criteria are eligible for enrollment as study participants: 1. Subject must be able to understand and provide informed consent; 2. Age ≥18 years of age at the time of study entry; 3. Recipients of non- Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) identical living or deceased renal transplants; 4. Protocol renal allograft biopsy at 5 months (± 8 weeks) after transplantation with Banff i1 and/or ti1 with concomitant t scores t0, t1,t2 or t3; Banff i2 and/or ti2 with concomitant t scores t0 or t1; and without v \> 0, \[ptc + g\] ≥2, C4d \>1 (by immunofluorescence, IF), or C4d \> 0 (by immunohistochemistry, IHC); confirmed by central pathologist. Subjects must not be treated for pathologic criteria (e.g. steroids). 5. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥30 ml/min at the time of study entry; 6. Maintenance immunosuppression consisting of tacrolimus, MMF/MPA (≥1000 mg/720 mg daily) ± prednisone (≤10 mg/day); 7. Current immunizations including TdAP, hepatitis B, pneumococcal and seasonal influenza vaccines prior to study treatment, completed prior to randomization and no less than 14 days prior to planned manufacturing collection; 8. Documented Hepatitis B (HB) serologies must be: 1. Positive HB surface antibody, negative HB core antibody and negative HB surface antigen for recipients immune to hepatitis B 2. Negative HB surface antibody, negative HB core antibody and negative HB surface antigen for non-immune/ HBV naïve recipients provided donor had negative HB core antibody and negative HB surface antigen at the time of donation. 9. Negative TB test (PPD, interferon-gamma release assay, ELISPOT testing) within 1 year prior to enrollment. Subjects with a history of TB (positive TB test without active infection) must have completed one of the latent TB infection treatment regimens endorsed by the CDC (Division of TB Elimination, 2016). Alternative regimens for latent TB infection eradication will be adjudicated by the site's infectious disease specialist. 10. Female subjects of childbearing potential must have reviewed the Mycophenolate Mycophenolate Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) and have a negative pregnancy test upon study entry (Reference:https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/ucm318880.htm); and 11. Female subjects with child-bearing potential, must agree to use FDA approved methods of birth control for the duration of the study; subjects must consult with their physician and determine the most suitable method(s) that are greater than 80% effective (http://www.fda.gov/birthcontrol). Treg Infusion Inclusion Criteria: 1. Individuals randomized to the polyTreg and darTreg groups who continue to meet all of the enrollment criteria; and 2. Negative SARS-COV2 by RTP-PCR testing within 1 week of Treg infusion. mTOR Conversion Inclusion Criteria: Individuals who meet all of these criteria are eligible for mTOR conversion: 1. Received at least 300 x 10\^6 polyTreg infusion; 2. Resolution of inflammation on the 2 week post-infusion biopsy as compared to the baseline biopsy, confirmed by central pathologist.

Exclusion criteria

Individuals who meet any of these criteria are not eligible for enrollment as study participants: 1. Inability or unwillingness of a participant to give written informed consent or comply with study protocol; 2. History of malignancy; except adequately treated basal cell carcinoma; 3. History of graft loss from acute rejection within 1 year after any previous transplant; 4. History of transplant renal artery stenosis; 5. History of cellular rejection prior to enrollment that did not respond to steroids and/or subsequent creatinine after treatment for rejection greater than 15% above baseline; 6. Known hypersensitivity to mTOR inhibitors or contraindication to everolimus (including history of wound healing complications); 7. Any chronic illness requiring uninterrupted anti-coagulation after kidney transplantation; 8. Post-transplant DSA \>5000 MFI or post-transplant treatment with IVIg for DSA. * Note: Enrolled subjects with post-transplant DSA \>2000 MFI will not be eligible for mTOR conversion. 9. Positive HIV 1 or HIV 2 serology prior to transplantation; 10. Positive HBSAg or HBcAb serology; 11. Proteinuria with urine protein-to-creatinine ratio \> 1.0 g/g; 12. Any condition requiring chronic use of corticosteroids \>10mg/day at the time of study entry; 13. Subjects requiring treatment for pathologic findings on study eligibility biopsy (see inclusion 5). 14. Active infection at the time of study entry; 15. History of active TB or latent TB without adequate treatment; 16. Serum BK virus \>1,000 copies/ml by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) at the time of study entry; 17. Hematocrit \<27%; Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) \< 1,000/μL; and/or lymphocyte count \<500/μL at the time of study entry; 18. Participation in any other studies with investigational drugs or regimens in the preceding year; 19. Any condition or prior treatment which, in the opinion of the investigator, precludes study participation. 20. Unable to provide adequate biopsy specimen (paraffin embedded formalin fixed) from eligibility biopsy (3-7 months post -transplant) for quantitative analysis. 21. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) naïve recipient of a kidney from an EBV positive donor; and/or historically EBV naïve recipient with primary EBV infection at the time of screening (e.g., anti-VCA IgM positive and EBNA negative), a positive EBV PCR. 22. Hepatitis C Virus AB positive subjects with negative HCV PCR are eligible if they have spontaneously cleared infection or are in sustained virologic remission for at least 12 weeks after treatment. 23. Positive SARS-CoV2 testing by RT-PCR Treg Infusion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Banff 2A or Higher Acute Cell-mediated Rejection and/or Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection405 days post-group allocationAcute cell-mediated rejection was defined using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of greater than or equal to 2A were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, or 3, with 1A being the mildest form of cellular rejection and 3 being the most severe form of cellular rejection. Antibody mediated rejection was defined as diffusely positive staining for C4d, presence of circulating anti-donor antibodies, and morphologic evidence of acute tissue injury.
Timing of Banff 2A or Higher Acute Cell-mediated Rejection and/or Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection405 days post-group allocationAcute cell-mediated rejection was defined using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of greater than or equal to 2A were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as 1A, 1B, 2IA, 2IB, or 3, with 1A being the mildest form of cellular rejection and 3 being the most severe form of cellular rejection. Antibody mediated rejection was defined as diffusely positive staining for C4d, presence of circulating anti-donor antibodies, and morphologic evidence of acute tissue injury.
Incidence of Study Defined Grade 3 or Higher Infection405 days after randomization for participants in the maintenance group; 365 days after Treg infusion for the participants in the polyTregs or darTregs groupsThis outcome measure includes infections reported as adverse events. Severe infection was defined in the study as a Grade 3 or higher infection. Severity is graded as 1 through 5, with 1 being least severe to 5 being most severe. Grade 3 is any infection associated with hemodynamic compromise requiring pressors; any infection necessitating ICU level of care; any infection necessitating operative intervention; any infection involving the central nervous system; any infection with a positive fungal blood culture; any proven or probable aspergillus infection; any tissue invasive fungal infection; any pneumocystis jiroveci infection. Grade 4 is any life-threatening infection. Grade 5 is any infection resulting in death.
Timing of Study Defined Grade 3 or Higher Infection405 days after randomization for participants in the maintenance group; 365 days after Treg infusion for the participants in the polyTregs or darTregs groups.This outcome measure includes infections reported as adverse events. Severe infection was defined in the study as a Grade 3 or higher infection. Severity is graded as 1 through 5, with 1 being least severe to 5 being most severe. Grade 3 is any infection associated with hemodynamic compromise requiring pressors; any infection necessitating ICU level of care; any infection necessitating operative intervention; any infection involving the central nervous system; any infection with a positive fungal blood culture; any proven or probable aspergillus infection; any tissue invasive fungal infection; any pneumocystis jiroveci infection. Grade 4 is any life-threatening infection. Grade 5 is any infection resulting in death.
Percent Change in InflammationAt baseline biopsy and at 7 months post-group allocationThe change in inflammation was measured by the percentage area of the renal cortex occupied by inflammatory cells on biopsy 7 months after group allocation. This change was expressed as the percent change relative to the baseline biopsy. The measurements were obtained using computer-assisted quantitative image analysis.
Immunologic Profiles of Kidney Transplant RecipientsAt 2 weeks post-polyTregs infusion (for polyTregs infusion group) and at 7 months post-group allocation (both groups)CRM (Common Response Module) score is a geometric mean of CRM gene expression. This score is used to identify evidence of rejection or inflammation in participants at the time of biopsy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Acute Rejection Using Banff Grading405 days post-group allocationAcute cell-mediated rejection was defined using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of greater than or equal to 1A were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, or 3, with 1A being the mildest form of cellular rejection and 3 being the most severe form of cellular rejection.
Severity of Acute Rejection Using Banff Grading405 days post-group allocationAcute cell-mediated rejection was defined using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of greater than or equal to 1A were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, or 3, with 1A being the mildest form of cellular rejection and 3 being the most severe form of cellular rejection.
Timing of Acute Rejection Using Banff Grading405 days post-group allocationAcute cell-mediated rejection was defined using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of greater than or equal to 1A were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, or 3, with 1A being the mildest form of cellular rejection and 3 being the most severe form of cellular rejection.
Incidence of BK Viremia405 days post-group allocationBK viremia was determined using locally reported serum PCR results. PCR results reported as positive and \>0 copies/mL were considered as meeting the endpoint. Only positive results following Treg infusion were considered for participants in the polyTregs and darTregs groups.
Timing of BK Viremia405 days post-group allocationBK viremia was determined using locally reported serum PCR results. PCR results reported as positive and \>0 copies/mL were considered as meeting the endpoint. Only positive results following Treg infusion were considered for participants in the polyTregs and darTregs groups.
Incidence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Reactivation405 days post-group allocationCMV reactivation was defined as CMV viremia and determined using locally reported serum, plasma, or whole blood PCR results. PCR results reported as \>0 IU/mL were considered as meeting the endpoint. Only positive results following Treg infusion were considered for participants in the polyTregs and darTregs groups.
Timing of CMV Reactivation405 days post-group allocationCMV reactivation was defined as CMV viremia and determined using locally reported serum, plasma, or whole blood PCR results. PCR results reported as \>0 IU/mL were considered as meeting the endpoint. Only positive results following Treg infusion were considered for participants in the polyTregs and darTregs groups.
Incidence of polyTregs Infusion Reactions365 days after Treg infusion for the participants in the polyTregs groupAn infusion reaction is characterized by an adverse reaction to the infusion of pharmacological substance, as defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 set forth by the National Cancer Institute.
Timing of > 10% Decrease in eGFR Compared to Baseline405 days post-group allocationGlomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) 2021 equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicate moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or end stage kidney failure. The percent change in eGFR was calculated at each post-baseline timepoint as \[(post-baseline eGFR minus baseline (i.e., screening) eGFR) divided by baseline eGFR\] multiplied by 100 and rounded to the nearest hundredth for each participant. A participant was considered to have met the endpoint if at least one instance of a greater than 10% decrease from baseline was observed.
Incidence of Acute Rejection After Converting to mTOR Therapy Following polyTregs Infusion69 days post-group allocation to 405 days post-group allocationAcute cell-mediated rejection was defined using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of greater than or equal to 2A were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, or 3, with 1A being the mildest form of cellular rejection and 3 being the most severe form of cellular rejection.
Timing of Acute Rejection After Converting to mTOR Therapy Following polyTregs Infusion69 days post-group allocation to 405 days post-group allocationAcute cell-mediated rejection was defined using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of greater than or equal to 2A were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, or 3, with 1A being the mildest form of cellular rejection and 3 being the most severe form of cellular rejection.
Proportion of Participants Exhibiting >=25% Relative Decrease of Inflammation Between Baseline Kidney Biopsy and the Week 2 Kidney BiopsyBaseline biopsy to week 2 kidney biopsyThe change in inflammation was measured by the percentage area of the renal cortex occupied by inflammatory cells on biopsy 2 weeks after polyTregs infusion. This change was expressed as the percent change relative to the baseline biopsy. The measurements were obtained using computer-assisted quantitative image analysis.
Proportion of Participants Exhibiting >=50% Relative Decrease of Inflammation Between Baseline Kidney Biopsy and the Week 2 Kidney BiopsyBaseline biopsy to week 2 kidney biopsyThe change in inflammation was measured by the percentage area of the renal cortex occupied by inflammatory cells on biopsy 2 weeks after polyTregs infusion. This change was expressed as the percent change relative to the baseline biopsy. The measurements were obtained using computer-assisted quantitative image analysis.
Proportion of Participants Exhibiting >=25% Relative Decrease of Inflammation Between Baseline Kidney Biopsy and the 6 Month Kidney BiopsyBaseline biopsy to 7 months post-group allocationThe change in inflammation was measured by the percentage area of the renal cortex occupied by inflammatory cells on biopsy 7 months after study group allocation. This change was expressed as the percent change relative to the baseline biopsy. The measurements were obtained using computer-assisted quantitative image analysis.
Incidence of > 10% Decrease in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Compared to Baseline405 days post-group allocationGlomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) 2021 equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicate moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or end stage kidney failure. The percent change in eGFR was calculated at each post-baseline timepoint as \[(post-baseline eGFR minus baseline (i.e., screening) eGFR) divided by baseline eGFR\] multiplied by 100 and rounded to the nearest hundredth for each participant. A participant was considered to have met the endpoint if at least one instance of a greater than 10% decrease from baseline was observed.
Severity of polyTregs Infusion Reactions365 days after Treg infusion for the participants in the polyTregs groupSeverity of infusion reactions were defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 set forth by the National Cancer Institute. Severity of adverse events is graded as 1 through 5, with 1 being least severe to 5 being most severe.
Timing of polyTregs Infusion Reactions365 days after Treg infusion for the participants in the polyTregs groupAn infusion reaction is characterized by an adverse reaction to the infusion of pharmacological substance, as defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 set forth by the National Cancer Institute.
Incidence of Culture-proven and Clinically Diagnosed Infection.405 days after randomization for participants in the maintenance group; 365 days after Treg infusion for the participants in the polyTregs or darTregs groupsA culture-proven and clinically diagnosed infection in this study was defined as any locally reported infection due to bacterial organism, due to fungal organism, due to CMV, or which met adverse event criteria, except for COVID-19.
Severity of Culture-proven and Clinically Diagnosed Infection405 days after randomization for participants in the maintenance group; 365 days after Treg infusion for the participants in the polyTregs or darTregs groupsA culture-proven and clinically diagnosed infection was defined as any locally reported infection due to bacterial organism, fungal organism, CMV, or which met adverse event criteria, except for COVID-19. Severe infection was defined in the study as a Grade 3 or higher infection. Severity is graded as 1 through 5 with 1 being least severe to 5 being most severe. Grade 3 is any infection associated with hemodynamic compromise requiring pressors; any infection necessitating ICU level of care; any infection necessitating operative intervention; any infection involving the central nervous system; any infection with a positive fungal blood culture; any proven or probable aspergillus infection; any tissue invasive fungal infection; any pneumocystis jiroveci infection. Grade 4 is any life-threatening infection. Grade 5 is any infection resulting in death. If a culture proven and clinically diagnosed infection did not qualify for AE reporting, then it did not have a severity grade.
Timing of Culture-proven and Clinically Diagnosed Infection405 days after randomization for participants in the maintenance group; 365 days after Treg infusion for the participants in the polyTregs or darTregs groupsA culture-proven and clinically diagnosed infection in this study was defined as any locally reported infection due to bacterial organism, fungal organism, CMV, or which met adverse event criteria, except for COVID-19.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

27 adult, kidney transplant candidates were enrolled across 7 US sites between September 2016 and May 2022. Of these 27 enrolled transplant candidates, 18 participants were randomized and 16 initiated study treatment. Additionally, 5 living donors consented at 2 US sites between September 2016 and September 2018.

Pre-assignment details

Potential participants signed informed consent before undergoing any study procedures. Screening criteria, including results from a 5 month post-transplant standard of care biopsy, were evaluated to determine study eligibility and candidacy for randomization. Living donors were asked to consent for a blood draw and minimal medical information.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Maintenance
Participants in this group continued standard CNI-based maintenance immunosuppression therapy with no intervention.
8
polyTregs
Participants in the polyclonally expanded regulatory T cells (polyTregs) group received a single infusion of 550 ± 450 x 10⁶ polyTregs administered via a peripheral intravenous line primed with saline by gravity in approximately 20 to 30 minutes.
7
darTregs
Participants in the donor alloantigen reactive regulatory T cells (darTregs) group received a single infusion of 400 ± 100 x 10⁶ darTregs administered via a peripheral intravenous line primed with saline by gravity in approximately 20 to 30 minutes.
1
Enrolled, Living Donor
Living donors of the prospective transplant recipient were consented and enrolled into the study.
5
Total21

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyFailure to manufacture cellular product00500
Overall StudyInfusion canceled for active infection01000
Overall StudyPhysician Decision00010
Overall StudyScreen failures00040
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01040

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMaintenancepolyTregsdarTregsEnrolled, Living DonorTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants6 Participants1 Participants4 Participants18 Participants
Age, Continuous47.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.78
52.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.94
58.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
48.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.66
49.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.73
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants4 Participants1 Participants4 Participants15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants3 Participants0 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants2 Participants1 Participants2 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 participants7 participants1 participants5 participants21 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants4 Participants0 Participants3 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80 / 80 / 20 / 5
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 84 / 80 / 20 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 84 / 81 / 20 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Immunologic Profiles of Kidney Transplant Recipients

CRM (Common Response Module) score is a geometric mean of CRM gene expression. This score is used to identify evidence of rejection or inflammation in participants at the time of biopsy.

Time frame: At 2 weeks post-polyTregs infusion (for polyTregs infusion group) and at 7 months post-group allocation (both groups)

Population: Data were not collected for this endpoint.

Primary

Incidence of Banff 2A or Higher Acute Cell-mediated Rejection and/or Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection

Acute cell-mediated rejection was defined using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of greater than or equal to 2A were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, or 3, with 1A being the mildest form of cellular rejection and 3 being the most severe form of cellular rejection. Antibody mediated rejection was defined as diffusely positive staining for C4d, presence of circulating anti-donor antibodies, and morphologic evidence of acute tissue injury.

Time frame: 405 days post-group allocation

Population: Intent-to-treat population who initiated study treatment, subset to participants with available central pathology read data.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MaintenanceIncidence of Banff 2A or Higher Acute Cell-mediated Rejection and/or Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection0 Participants
polyTregsIncidence of Banff 2A or Higher Acute Cell-mediated Rejection and/or Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection0 Participants
darTregsIncidence of Banff 2A or Higher Acute Cell-mediated Rejection and/or Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection0 Participants
Primary

Incidence of Study Defined Grade 3 or Higher Infection

This outcome measure includes infections reported as adverse events. Severe infection was defined in the study as a Grade 3 or higher infection. Severity is graded as 1 through 5, with 1 being least severe to 5 being most severe. Grade 3 is any infection associated with hemodynamic compromise requiring pressors; any infection necessitating ICU level of care; any infection necessitating operative intervention; any infection involving the central nervous system; any infection with a positive fungal blood culture; any proven or probable aspergillus infection; any tissue invasive fungal infection; any pneumocystis jiroveci infection. Grade 4 is any life-threatening infection. Grade 5 is any infection resulting in death.

Time frame: 405 days after randomization for participants in the maintenance group; 365 days after Treg infusion for the participants in the polyTregs or darTregs groups

Population: Intent-to-treat population who initiated study treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MaintenanceIncidence of Study Defined Grade 3 or Higher Infection2 Participants
polyTregsIncidence of Study Defined Grade 3 or Higher Infection3 Participants
darTregsIncidence of Study Defined Grade 3 or Higher Infection1 Participants
p-value: 0.425Fisher Exact
Primary

Percent Change in Inflammation

The change in inflammation was measured by the percentage area of the renal cortex occupied by inflammatory cells on biopsy 7 months after group allocation. This change was expressed as the percent change relative to the baseline biopsy. The measurements were obtained using computer-assisted quantitative image analysis.

Time frame: At baseline biopsy and at 7 months post-group allocation

Population: Intent-to-treat population who initiated treatment, subset to participants from the Maintenance and polyTregs groups with available LCA data from the biopsy 7 months post-group allocation. darTregs group excluded from efficacy analysis per the protocol and statistical analysis plan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
MaintenancePercent Change in Inflammation-59.16 Percent change
polyTregsPercent Change in Inflammation-78.95 Percent change
p-value: 0.201Kruskal-Wallis
Primary

Timing of Banff 2A or Higher Acute Cell-mediated Rejection and/or Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection

Acute cell-mediated rejection was defined using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of greater than or equal to 2A were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as 1A, 1B, 2IA, 2IB, or 3, with 1A being the mildest form of cellular rejection and 3 being the most severe form of cellular rejection. Antibody mediated rejection was defined as diffusely positive staining for C4d, presence of circulating anti-donor antibodies, and morphologic evidence of acute tissue injury.

Time frame: 405 days post-group allocation

Population: Intent-to-treat population who initiated study treatment, subset to participants with available central pathology read data who had severe acute cell-mediated rejection and/or acute antibody mediated rejection. No participants met the criteria for inclusion in this analysis population.

Primary

Timing of Study Defined Grade 3 or Higher Infection

This outcome measure includes infections reported as adverse events. Severe infection was defined in the study as a Grade 3 or higher infection. Severity is graded as 1 through 5, with 1 being least severe to 5 being most severe. Grade 3 is any infection associated with hemodynamic compromise requiring pressors; any infection necessitating ICU level of care; any infection necessitating operative intervention; any infection involving the central nervous system; any infection with a positive fungal blood culture; any proven or probable aspergillus infection; any tissue invasive fungal infection; any pneumocystis jiroveci infection. Grade 4 is any life-threatening infection. Grade 5 is any infection resulting in death.

Time frame: 405 days after randomization for participants in the maintenance group; 365 days after Treg infusion for the participants in the polyTregs or darTregs groups.

Population: Intent-to-treat population who initiated study treatment and experienced a severe infection

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
MaintenanceTiming of Study Defined Grade 3 or Higher Infection179.0 Days
polyTregsTiming of Study Defined Grade 3 or Higher Infection116.0 Days
darTregsTiming of Study Defined Grade 3 or Higher Infection84.0 Days
p-value: 0.7Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Incidence of > 10% Decrease in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Compared to Baseline

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) 2021 equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicate moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or end stage kidney failure. The percent change in eGFR was calculated at each post-baseline timepoint as \[(post-baseline eGFR minus baseline (i.e., screening) eGFR) divided by baseline eGFR\] multiplied by 100 and rounded to the nearest hundredth for each participant. A participant was considered to have met the endpoint if at least one instance of a greater than 10% decrease from baseline was observed.

Time frame: 405 days post-group allocation

Population: Intent-to-treat population who initiated treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MaintenanceIncidence of > 10% Decrease in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Compared to Baseline5 Participants
polyTregsIncidence of > 10% Decrease in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Compared to Baseline6 Participants
darTregsIncidence of > 10% Decrease in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Compared to Baseline1 Participants
Secondary

Incidence of Acute Rejection After Converting to mTOR Therapy Following polyTregs Infusion

Acute cell-mediated rejection was defined using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of greater than or equal to 2A were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, or 3, with 1A being the mildest form of cellular rejection and 3 being the most severe form of cellular rejection.

Time frame: 69 days post-group allocation to 405 days post-group allocation

Population: Intent-to-treat population who initiated treatment, subset to participants who received the polyTregs infusion and converted to mTOR therapy. No participants met the criteria for inclusion in this analysis population.

Secondary

Incidence of Acute Rejection Using Banff Grading

Acute cell-mediated rejection was defined using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of greater than or equal to 1A were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, or 3, with 1A being the mildest form of cellular rejection and 3 being the most severe form of cellular rejection.

Time frame: 405 days post-group allocation

Population: Intent-to-treat population who initiated study treatment, subset to participants with available central pathology read data.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MaintenanceIncidence of Acute Rejection Using Banff Grading0 Participants
polyTregsIncidence of Acute Rejection Using Banff Grading0 Participants
darTregsIncidence of Acute Rejection Using Banff Grading0 Participants
Secondary

Incidence of BK Viremia

BK viremia was determined using locally reported serum PCR results. PCR results reported as positive and \>0 copies/mL were considered as meeting the endpoint. Only positive results following Treg infusion were considered for participants in the polyTregs and darTregs groups.

Time frame: 405 days post-group allocation

Population: Intent-to-treat population who initiated study treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MaintenanceIncidence of BK Viremia0 Participants
polyTregsIncidence of BK Viremia1 Participants
darTregsIncidence of BK Viremia0 Participants
Secondary

Incidence of Culture-proven and Clinically Diagnosed Infection.

A culture-proven and clinically diagnosed infection in this study was defined as any locally reported infection due to bacterial organism, due to fungal organism, due to CMV, or which met adverse event criteria, except for COVID-19.

Time frame: 405 days after randomization for participants in the maintenance group; 365 days after Treg infusion for the participants in the polyTregs or darTregs groups

Population: Intent-to-treat population who initiated study treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MaintenanceIncidence of Culture-proven and Clinically Diagnosed Infection.2 Participants
polyTregsIncidence of Culture-proven and Clinically Diagnosed Infection.3 Participants
darTregsIncidence of Culture-proven and Clinically Diagnosed Infection.1 Participants
Secondary

Incidence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Reactivation

CMV reactivation was defined as CMV viremia and determined using locally reported serum, plasma, or whole blood PCR results. PCR results reported as \>0 IU/mL were considered as meeting the endpoint. Only positive results following Treg infusion were considered for participants in the polyTregs and darTregs groups.

Time frame: 405 days post-group allocation

Population: Intent-to-treat population who initiated treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MaintenanceIncidence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Reactivation0 Participants
polyTregsIncidence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Reactivation0 Participants
darTregsIncidence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Reactivation1 Participants
Secondary

Incidence of polyTregs Infusion Reactions

An infusion reaction is characterized by an adverse reaction to the infusion of pharmacological substance, as defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 set forth by the National Cancer Institute.

Time frame: 365 days after Treg infusion for the participants in the polyTregs group

Population: Intent-to-treat population, subset to participants who received the polyTregs infusion

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
polyTregsIncidence of polyTregs Infusion Reactions0 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Exhibiting >=25% Relative Decrease of Inflammation Between Baseline Kidney Biopsy and the 6 Month Kidney Biopsy

The change in inflammation was measured by the percentage area of the renal cortex occupied by inflammatory cells on biopsy 7 months after study group allocation. This change was expressed as the percent change relative to the baseline biopsy. The measurements were obtained using computer-assisted quantitative image analysis.

Time frame: Baseline biopsy to 7 months post-group allocation

Population: Intent-to-treat population who initiated treatment, subset to participants with available LCA data from the biopsy 7 months post-group allocation

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MaintenanceProportion of Participants Exhibiting >=25% Relative Decrease of Inflammation Between Baseline Kidney Biopsy and the 6 Month Kidney Biopsy3 Participants
polyTregsProportion of Participants Exhibiting >=25% Relative Decrease of Inflammation Between Baseline Kidney Biopsy and the 6 Month Kidney Biopsy5 Participants
darTregsProportion of Participants Exhibiting >=25% Relative Decrease of Inflammation Between Baseline Kidney Biopsy and the 6 Month Kidney Biopsy1 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Exhibiting >=25% Relative Decrease of Inflammation Between Baseline Kidney Biopsy and the Week 2 Kidney Biopsy

The change in inflammation was measured by the percentage area of the renal cortex occupied by inflammatory cells on biopsy 2 weeks after polyTregs infusion. This change was expressed as the percent change relative to the baseline biopsy. The measurements were obtained using computer-assisted quantitative image analysis.

Time frame: Baseline biopsy to week 2 kidney biopsy

Population: Intent-to-treat population who initiated treatment, subset to participants with available LCA data from the Week 2 biopsy

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MaintenanceProportion of Participants Exhibiting >=25% Relative Decrease of Inflammation Between Baseline Kidney Biopsy and the Week 2 Kidney Biopsy0 Participants
polyTregsProportion of Participants Exhibiting >=25% Relative Decrease of Inflammation Between Baseline Kidney Biopsy and the Week 2 Kidney Biopsy2 Participants
darTregsProportion of Participants Exhibiting >=25% Relative Decrease of Inflammation Between Baseline Kidney Biopsy and the Week 2 Kidney Biopsy0 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Exhibiting >=50% Relative Decrease of Inflammation Between Baseline Kidney Biopsy and the Week 2 Kidney Biopsy

The change in inflammation was measured by the percentage area of the renal cortex occupied by inflammatory cells on biopsy 2 weeks after polyTregs infusion. This change was expressed as the percent change relative to the baseline biopsy. The measurements were obtained using computer-assisted quantitative image analysis.

Time frame: Baseline biopsy to week 2 kidney biopsy

Population: Intent-to-treat population who initiated treatment, subset to participants with available LCA data from the Week 2 biopsy

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MaintenanceProportion of Participants Exhibiting >=50% Relative Decrease of Inflammation Between Baseline Kidney Biopsy and the Week 2 Kidney Biopsy0 Participants
polyTregsProportion of Participants Exhibiting >=50% Relative Decrease of Inflammation Between Baseline Kidney Biopsy and the Week 2 Kidney Biopsy1 Participants
darTregsProportion of Participants Exhibiting >=50% Relative Decrease of Inflammation Between Baseline Kidney Biopsy and the Week 2 Kidney Biopsy0 Participants
Secondary

Severity of Acute Rejection Using Banff Grading

Acute cell-mediated rejection was defined using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of greater than or equal to 1A were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, or 3, with 1A being the mildest form of cellular rejection and 3 being the most severe form of cellular rejection.

Time frame: 405 days post-group allocation

Population: Intent-to-treat population who initiated study treatment, subset to participants with available central pathology read data and who experienced acute rejection. No participants met the criteria for inclusion in this analysis population.

Secondary

Severity of Culture-proven and Clinically Diagnosed Infection

A culture-proven and clinically diagnosed infection was defined as any locally reported infection due to bacterial organism, fungal organism, CMV, or which met adverse event criteria, except for COVID-19. Severe infection was defined in the study as a Grade 3 or higher infection. Severity is graded as 1 through 5 with 1 being least severe to 5 being most severe. Grade 3 is any infection associated with hemodynamic compromise requiring pressors; any infection necessitating ICU level of care; any infection necessitating operative intervention; any infection involving the central nervous system; any infection with a positive fungal blood culture; any proven or probable aspergillus infection; any tissue invasive fungal infection; any pneumocystis jiroveci infection. Grade 4 is any life-threatening infection. Grade 5 is any infection resulting in death. If a culture proven and clinically diagnosed infection did not qualify for AE reporting, then it did not have a severity grade.

Time frame: 405 days after randomization for participants in the maintenance group; 365 days after Treg infusion for the participants in the polyTregs or darTregs groups

Population: Intent-to-treat population who initiated study treatment, subset to those with culture-proven and clinically diagnosed infections

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MaintenanceSeverity of Culture-proven and Clinically Diagnosed InfectionGrade 32 Participants
MaintenanceSeverity of Culture-proven and Clinically Diagnosed InfectionNo Grade0 Participants
polyTregsSeverity of Culture-proven and Clinically Diagnosed InfectionGrade 32 Participants
polyTregsSeverity of Culture-proven and Clinically Diagnosed InfectionNo Grade1 Participants
darTregsSeverity of Culture-proven and Clinically Diagnosed InfectionGrade 31 Participants
darTregsSeverity of Culture-proven and Clinically Diagnosed InfectionNo Grade0 Participants
Secondary

Severity of polyTregs Infusion Reactions

Severity of infusion reactions were defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 set forth by the National Cancer Institute. Severity of adverse events is graded as 1 through 5, with 1 being least severe to 5 being most severe.

Time frame: 365 days after Treg infusion for the participants in the polyTregs group

Population: Intent-to-treat population, subset to participants who received the polyTregs infusion and had a polyTregs infusion reaction. No participants met the criteria for inclusion in this analysis population.

Secondary

Timing of > 10% Decrease in eGFR Compared to Baseline

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) 2021 equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicate moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or end stage kidney failure. The percent change in eGFR was calculated at each post-baseline timepoint as \[(post-baseline eGFR minus baseline (i.e., screening) eGFR) divided by baseline eGFR\] multiplied by 100 and rounded to the nearest hundredth for each participant. A participant was considered to have met the endpoint if at least one instance of a greater than 10% decrease from baseline was observed.

Time frame: 405 days post-group allocation

Population: Intent-to-treat population who initiated treatment, subset to participants who had a \>10% decrease in eGFR.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
MaintenanceTiming of > 10% Decrease in eGFR Compared to Baseline51.0 Days
polyTregsTiming of > 10% Decrease in eGFR Compared to Baseline53.0 Days
darTregsTiming of > 10% Decrease in eGFR Compared to Baseline44.0 Days
Secondary

Timing of Acute Rejection After Converting to mTOR Therapy Following polyTregs Infusion

Acute cell-mediated rejection was defined using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of greater than or equal to 2A were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, or 3, with 1A being the mildest form of cellular rejection and 3 being the most severe form of cellular rejection.

Time frame: 69 days post-group allocation to 405 days post-group allocation

Population: Intent-to-treat population who initiated treatment, subset to participants who received the polyTregs infusion, converted to mTOR therapy, and had an acute rejection event. No participants met the criteria for inclusion in this analysis population.

Secondary

Timing of Acute Rejection Using Banff Grading

Acute cell-mediated rejection was defined using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of greater than or equal to 1A were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, or 3, with 1A being the mildest form of cellular rejection and 3 being the most severe form of cellular rejection.

Time frame: 405 days post-group allocation

Population: Intent-to-treat population who initiated study treatment, subset to participants with available central pathology read data and who experienced acute rejection. No participants met the criteria for inclusion in this analysis population.

Secondary

Timing of BK Viremia

BK viremia was determined using locally reported serum PCR results. PCR results reported as positive and \>0 copies/mL were considered as meeting the endpoint. Only positive results following Treg infusion were considered for participants in the polyTregs and darTregs groups.

Time frame: 405 days post-group allocation

Population: Intent-to-treat population who initiated treatment, subset to participants who experienced BK viremia.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
polyTregsTiming of BK Viremia365.00 Days
Secondary

Timing of CMV Reactivation

CMV reactivation was defined as CMV viremia and determined using locally reported serum, plasma, or whole blood PCR results. PCR results reported as \>0 IU/mL were considered as meeting the endpoint. Only positive results following Treg infusion were considered for participants in the polyTregs and darTregs groups.

Time frame: 405 days post-group allocation

Population: Intent-to-treat population who initiated treatment, subset to participants who experienced CMV reactivation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
darTregsTiming of CMV Reactivation84.0 Days
Secondary

Timing of Culture-proven and Clinically Diagnosed Infection

A culture-proven and clinically diagnosed infection in this study was defined as any locally reported infection due to bacterial organism, fungal organism, CMV, or which met adverse event criteria, except for COVID-19.

Time frame: 405 days after randomization for participants in the maintenance group; 365 days after Treg infusion for the participants in the polyTregs or darTregs groups

Population: Intent-to-treat population who initiated study treatment, subset to those with culture-proven and clinically diagnosed infections

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
MaintenanceTiming of Culture-proven and Clinically Diagnosed Infection179.0 Days
polyTregsTiming of Culture-proven and Clinically Diagnosed Infection179.0 Days
darTregsTiming of Culture-proven and Clinically Diagnosed Infection84.0 Days
Secondary

Timing of polyTregs Infusion Reactions

An infusion reaction is characterized by an adverse reaction to the infusion of pharmacological substance, as defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 set forth by the National Cancer Institute.

Time frame: 365 days after Treg infusion for the participants in the polyTregs group

Population: Intent-to-treat population, subset to participants who received the polyTregs infusion and had a polyTregs infusion reaction. No participants met the criteria for inclusion in this analysis population.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026