Skip to content

The Probiotic Study: Using Bacteria to Calm Your Mind

Probiotic Treatment: The Role of the Gut Microbiome in Childhood Abdominal Pain and Anxiety

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02711800
Enrollment
9
Registered
2016-03-17
Start date
2016-11-08
Completion date
2017-09-18
Last updated
2019-01-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety, Abdominal Pain

Brief summary

The investigators seek to conduct the first open-label trial of probiotics in young children to reduce their anxiety and abdominal pain. Likewise, the investigators aim to assess the feasibility and efficacy of this treatment and to elucidate the enteric microbiota in the middle-lower GI tract. Self-report measures and a laboratory task will be collected from children, ages 9-13 years of age, and self-report measures from their primary caregivers prior to and following a 30-day probiotic administration. Children who score above cutoff in anxiety and/or abdominal pain meet the inclusion criteria for this study. Because of limited sample size and the iterative nature of intervention development, criteria for success at the pilot phase are based primarily on clinical rather than statistical criteria. The study personnel will do their best to keep and ensure the privacy and confidentiality of our participants; however, some of the risks of this study may include psychological discomfort, legal risks, and loss of confidentially.

Interventions

The investigators will use Culturelle®, a probiotic composed of the micro-organisms Lactobacillus GG. This formulation has been used for the treatment of gastrointestinal inflammation in numerous clinical trials. Dosing will follow the manufacturer's recommendation for children (1 capsule/packet per day), and will be monitored by the study Co-PI, Dr. Seed. Weekly side effects and clinical changes will be monitored by both study therapist and caregiver using the Children's Global Assessment Scale and the Clinical Global Impression Scale (Severity, Improvement, and Efficacy). The treatment duration is 30 days.

Sponsors

Nancy Zucker
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
9 Years to 13 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Participants need to meet the criteria for functional abdominal pain as specified by the Rome III: Scenario #1 Criteria for inclusion 1. In the last 2 months, how often did the child have pain or an uncomfortable feeling in the upper abdomen above the belly button? If ≥ 8 (or if the combination of #1 and #2 is ≥8) 2. In the last 2 months, how often did the child have pain or an uncomfortable feeling in the upper abdomen below the belly button? If ≥ 8 (or if the combination of #1 and #2 is ≥8) Scenario #2 Criteria for inclusion 3. In the last 2 months, when the child hurt or felt uncomfortable above (below) the belly button, how often did your child miss school or stop activities? If #1 and #2 is ≥ 2 (or if the combination of #1 and #2 is ≥2) and #3 is ≥ 25% of the time. They also have to be at or above cutoff (i.e. TS\>= 55) for Beck Youth Inventory (BYI) which can be determined by finding the corresponding raw score, gender, and age on Appendix A in the BYI manual.

Exclusion criteria

1\. Participants with immune disorders will be automatically excluded from this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Child Abdominal Pain RatingOne week pre-intervention (Study Day 1), One week post-intervention (Study Day 44)Child and parent report is used to obtain ratings of pain intensity on a 0-12 scale. A lower score equates to lower pain intensity. Ratings are obtained for a one-week period pre and post intervention, and measured 3 times daily. Pre-treatment assessments took place days 1-7, participants were treated days 8-36, and post-intervention assessments were completed days 37-44. All time points will be averaged and combined across raters (child and parent) resulting in an average pain severity rating pre and post-treatment. The change in this average rating will be assessed as pain severity outcome. This measure was averaged with the pain frequency average score (see Primary Outcome 2) to result in one primary severity/frequency pain rating pre and post treatment. The change in this combined measure is our primary index of change.
Change in Child Abdominal Pain FrequencyOne week pre-intervention (Study Day 1), One week post-intervention (Study Day 44)Child and parent report is used to obtain ratings of pain frequency, the number of distinct occasions that pain was reported. Frequency was obtained for a one-week period pre and post intervention, and measured 3 times daily during these intervals. During the 30-day intervention, end of day frequencies were made. Pre-treatment assessments took place days 1-7, participants were treated days 8-36, and post-intervention assessments were completed days 37-44. The average number of episodes across these time points will be calculated pre and post treatment. The change in this average frequency from pre to post treatment will be the measure of change.
Change in Child Anxiety SymptomsBaseline and 30 daysWe report the change in magnitude of self-reported state anxiety derived from summed raw scores obtained through the six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory at baseline and 30 days from baseline. Scores in the scale range from 6-24, with greater scores indicating worse anxiety. We obtained the summed raw scores after reverse scoring items 1, 4 & 5.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Beta Diversity (PCoA)Baseline and 30 days
Change in Trait-associated Co-functional Modules of OrganismsBaseline and 30 days
Percentage of Adherence to Treatment30 daysAdherence was calculated as: (the days probiotic was taken/total number of days of treatment) x 100, with results ranging from 0% (no probiotics taken at all) to 100% (probiotics taken 30 days out of the 30 day-treatment period). Researcher will subtract the number of pills/packets taken from the total amount.
Change in Heart RateBaseline and 30 daysBeats per minute (Bpm)
Change in Salivary Cortisol (ug/dL)Baseline and 30 days
Change in Relative Quantities of Taxa Among Groups Relative to Probiotic AdministrationBaseline and 30 days
Change in Alpha DiversityBaseline and 30 days

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lactobacillus Rhamnosus
The investigators will use Culturelle®, a probiotic composed of the micro-organisms Lactobacillus GG. Dosing will follow the manufacturer's recommendation for children (1 capsule/packet per day), and will be monitored by Dr. Patrick Seed from the department of pediatrics. The intervention duration is 30 days.
9
Total9

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLactobacillus Rhamnosus
Age, Continuous11.746 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.753
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Pain intensity1.11 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.04
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Child Abdominal Pain Frequency

Child and parent report is used to obtain ratings of pain frequency, the number of distinct occasions that pain was reported. Frequency was obtained for a one-week period pre and post intervention, and measured 3 times daily during these intervals. During the 30-day intervention, end of day frequencies were made. Pre-treatment assessments took place days 1-7, participants were treated days 8-36, and post-intervention assessments were completed days 37-44. The average number of episodes across these time points will be calculated pre and post treatment. The change in this average frequency from pre to post treatment will be the measure of change.

Time frame: One week pre-intervention (Study Day 1), One week post-intervention (Study Day 44)

Population: Data was missing for one participant

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lactobacillus RhamnosusChange in Child Abdominal Pain Frequency0.40 pain episodesStandard Deviation 0.61
Primary

Change in Child Abdominal Pain Rating

Child and parent report is used to obtain ratings of pain intensity on a 0-12 scale. A lower score equates to lower pain intensity. Ratings are obtained for a one-week period pre and post intervention, and measured 3 times daily. Pre-treatment assessments took place days 1-7, participants were treated days 8-36, and post-intervention assessments were completed days 37-44. All time points will be averaged and combined across raters (child and parent) resulting in an average pain severity rating pre and post-treatment. The change in this average rating will be assessed as pain severity outcome. This measure was averaged with the pain frequency average score (see Primary Outcome 2) to result in one primary severity/frequency pain rating pre and post treatment. The change in this combined measure is our primary index of change.

Time frame: One week pre-intervention (Study Day 1), One week post-intervention (Study Day 44)

Population: Data was missing for one participant

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lactobacillus RhamnosusChange in Child Abdominal Pain Rating0.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Primary

Change in Child Anxiety Symptoms

We report the change in magnitude of self-reported state anxiety derived from summed raw scores obtained through the six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory at baseline and 30 days from baseline. Scores in the scale range from 6-24, with greater scores indicating worse anxiety. We obtained the summed raw scores after reverse scoring items 1, 4 & 5.

Time frame: Baseline and 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lactobacillus RhamnosusChange in Child Anxiety Symptoms1.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.91
Secondary

Change in Alpha Diversity

Time frame: Baseline and 30 days

Secondary

Change in Beta Diversity (PCoA)

Time frame: Baseline and 30 days

Secondary

Change in Heart Rate

Beats per minute (Bpm)

Time frame: Baseline and 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lactobacillus RhamnosusChange in Heart Rate0.825 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 6.056
Secondary

Change in Relative Quantities of Taxa Among Groups Relative to Probiotic Administration

Time frame: Baseline and 30 days

Secondary

Change in Salivary Cortisol (ug/dL)

Time frame: Baseline and 30 days

Population: Three participants excluded from analysis: 2 with no post-treatment data, 1 with neither pre- nor post-treatment data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lactobacillus RhamnosusChange in Salivary Cortisol (ug/dL)-0.02 ug/dlStandard Deviation 0.06
Secondary

Change in Trait-associated Co-functional Modules of Organisms

Time frame: Baseline and 30 days

Secondary

Percentage of Adherence to Treatment

Adherence was calculated as: (the days probiotic was taken/total number of days of treatment) x 100, with results ranging from 0% (no probiotics taken at all) to 100% (probiotics taken 30 days out of the 30 day-treatment period). Researcher will subtract the number of pills/packets taken from the total amount.

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Lactobacillus RhamnosusPercentage of Adherence to Treatment91 percentage of adherence

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026