Skip to content

SmartMouth Advanced Clinical Formula Clinical Research Design Protocol

SmartMouth Advanced Clinical Formula Clinical Research Design Protocol

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02709785
Enrollment
80
Registered
2016-03-16
Start date
2016-03-31
Completion date
2017-05-31
Last updated
2018-12-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingivitis, Periodontitis

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to provide evidence on the clinical efficacy of SmartMouth Advanced Clinical Formula mouthrinse in comparison to the efficacy of 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthrinse and a placebo mouthrinse. The placebo will be provided by the sponsor and will be identical to SmartMouth ACF (Advanced Clinical Formula), except it will not contain cetylpyridinium chloride, zinc chloride and sodium chlorite. The primary outcomes include measures of plaque and gingivitis. Secondary outcomes include evaluation of tooth discoloration, taste perception, malodor and calculus.

Detailed description

Study Population A 10 week double-blinded, randomized clinical study will be conducted on 80 subjects diagnosed with plaque induced gingivitis and/or chronic periodontitis. The study will take place at Saint Louis University Center for Advanced Dental Education and Southern Illinois University School of Dental Medicine. Research Design and Methods Visit 1 Subjects who sign the informed consent and medical history forms and meet the preliminary entrance criteria will be examined at baseline. All participants will be informed of the nature of the study, its purpose, and any possible risks. Subjects will also be informed as to the length of the study and the specific procedures that will be carried out. Subjects will be informed that this is a voluntary study and that they are free to withdraw from the study at any time. Clinical measurements of plaque and gingival indices will be taken. A gingival bleeding score will be determined. Examiners will be standardized for scoring. Gingival index (GI) will be measured using the Loe and Silness method (Loe and Silness 1963). The gingiva will be scored at six sites of each tooth (distobuccal, buccal, mesiobuccal, distolingual, lingual, mesiolingual) and given a score from 0 - 3. By adding the scores and dividing by the total number of sites, the GI for the patient will be obtained. The following criteria will be used for scoring: 0 - Absence of inflammation 1. \- Mild inflammation: slight change in color, slight edema; no bleeding upon probing 2. \- Moderate inflammation: Redness, edema, and glazing; bleeding upon probing 3. \- Severe inflammation: Marked redness and edema; ulceration; tendency to spontaneous bleeding Sites with GI scores of 2 or 3 will be counted as bleeding. A whole mouth total gingival bleeding score will be calculated by summing the number of bleeding sites and dividing by the number of teeth. Plaque will be scored based on the Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (PI) (Turesky 1970). A score of 0 - 5 will be assigned to six sites of each tooth (distobuccal, buccal, mesiobuccal, distolingual, lingual, mesiolingual) following the use of a disclosing solution. The following criteria will be used: 0 - No plaque 1. \- Isolated areas of plaque at gingival margin 2. \- Thin continuous band of plaque at gingival margin (up to 1 mm) 3. \- Band of plaque ˃ 1 mm and ˂ 1/3 of the tooth surface 4. \- Plaque covering 1/3 to ˂ 2/3 of tooth surface 5. \- Plaque covering ≥ 2/3 of tooth surface The Plaque Index for the entire mouth will be determined by dividing the total score by the number of surfaces examined. The Gingival Index will be measured prior to the Plaque Index. Teeth with gross caries and third molars will not be scored with either index. Extrinsic tooth stain will be scored on the facial surfaces of the 8 incisor teeth using a modification of the Lobene tooth stain index (SI) (Lobene 1968). Each incisor will be scored for stain area on a scale of 0-3. The sum of the stain scores for the subject will be used as that subject's stain score. Scores will be recorded from 0 to 3 as follows: 0: no stain detected, only tooth color 1. stain over 1/3 of the surface 2. stain over 2/3 of the surface 3. stain over more than 2/3 of the surface Supragingival calculus on the lingual surfaces of the six mandibular anterior teeth will be scored using the Volpe-Manhold calculus index (CI) (Volpe et al. 1965). The supragingival calculus in three defined planes on the lingual surface of each tooth will be measured using a periodontal probe. The measurements will be added and a mean subject score will be calculated. A complete periodontal examination will be performed for all subjects that meet the inclusion criteria. A panoramic radiograph will be taken for all subjects that do not have full mouth radiographs within the last year. Safety assessments will be made at each measurement visit. Assessment of the oral soft tissues will be conducted at each visit by visual examination of the oral cavity. All areas will be assessed and reported as normal or abnormal. Subject compensation: all subjects entered into the study will be given a gift card at the end of visit 2, visit 3 and visit 4. Visit 2 Visit 2 will occur within 4 weeks of Visit 1. Subjects entered into the study will be randomly assigned to three groups: Group 1 (Smart Mouth ACF), Group 2 (0.12% chlorhexidine) or Group 3 (placebo). All subjects will be given a complete dental prophylaxis to remove plaque, calculus, and stain. Written and verbal oral hygiene instructions will be given that include a regular regimen of brushing twice daily and flossing daily. All subjects will be assigned a commercially available ADA accepted toothbrush and dental floss. They will be given a 3 week supply of the assigned mouthrinse with written and verbal instructions for use. Subjects will be instructed not to have their teeth professionally cleaned prior to study completion. All mouthrinses will be in a plain package and dispensed by the faculty investigators. The package will be labeled with a code to indicate the product. Only the faculty investigators will have access to the code information. Directions for use will be contained in the package. The examiners will not see the product. The examiners will give instructions for mouthrinse use, but they will not be aware which rinse the subjects are using. Each product will contain two solutions which are mixed prior to use. Visit 3 Subjects will be examined 3 weeks after visit 2. All clinical measurements will be repeated. Each subject will return with any unused rinse or two empty bottles of rinse. Compliance will be determined by regulating the amount of rinse dispensed on a 3 week basis and by the measurement of any unused rinse at the end of two 3 week periods. Additional rinse will be given to each subject after visit 3 for use until the final visit. Visit 4 Subjects will be examined 3 weeks after visit 3 (6 weeks from visit 2). Clinical measurements will be repeated. Each subject will return with any unused rinse or two empty bottles of rinse. Compliance will be determined by the measurement of any unused rinse at the end of the study. Subjects will be given a survey to answer questions about their experience with the mouthrinse. Prophylaxis may be performed at this visit. Following the study, the subjects will be treated by their provider's discretion.

Interventions

DRUGSmartMouth Clinical DDS mouthrinse

Subjects use SmartMouth Clinical DDS mouth rinse for six weeks.

DRUG0.12% chlorhexidine rinse

Subjects use chlorhexidine mouth rinse for six weeks.

Subjects use placebo mouth rinse for six weeks. The placebo rinse is the same as SmartMouth Clinical DDS, but without the active ingredients.

Sponsors

Triumph Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
St. Louis University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects between the ages of 18 to 80 * Subjects with a diagnosis of gingivitis or chronic periodontitis * Entry levels of gingival inflammation and plaque accumulation will be present (mean Gingival Index ≥ 0.4 and Plaque Index ≥ 1.0) * Subjects that are in good medical health at time of the study * At least 20 permanent natural teeth

Exclusion criteria

* Use of local or systemic antibiotics during the course of the study * Subjects that are pregnant or nursing mothers * Subjects undergoing orthodontic therapy * Subjects wearing removable prostheses * Subjects taking medication which is altering the gingiva or causing inflammation * Gingival overgrowth * History of sensitivity or suspected allergies following the use of oral hygiene products * Subjects taking anti-inflammatory or anticoagulant medications that would alter the gingiva and promote bleeding * Subjects that require antibiotic prophylaxis prior to dental treatment * Subjects that have acute dental problems requiring immediate treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gingival Index6 weeksGingival Index scores gingival inflammation from 0 (healthy) to 3 (severe inflammation). The higher the score, the greater the gingival inflammation (worse outcome). Differences were assessed between treatment groups for changes in values from baseline to 6 weeks. If data were normally distributed, the paired t test was used to assess changes; otherwise the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Plaque Index6 weeksPlaque Index scores plaque accumulation from 0 (no plaque) to 5 (plaque covering 2/3 of surface or more). The higher the score, the more plaque accumulation (worse outcome). Differences were assessed between treatment groups for changes in values from baseline to 6 weeks. If data were normally distributed, the paired t test was used to assess changes; otherwise the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used.
Bleeding Score6 weeksBleeding Score is determined by adding the number of bleeding sites and dividing by the number of teeth to assess gingival inflammation. The higher the score, the worse the inflammation. Differences were assessed between treatment groups for changes in values from baseline to 6 weeks. If data were normally distributed, the paired t test was used to assess changes; otherwise the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used.
Calculus Index6 weeksCalculus Index scores the amount of calculus accumulation by adding surfaces from the lingual of the mandibular anterior teeth. The higher the score, the worse the calculus accumulation. Differences were assessed between treatment groups for changes in values from baseline to 6 weeks. If data were normally distributed, the paired t test was used to assess changes; otherwise the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used.
Tooth Stain Index6 weeksTooth Stain Index scores the amount of tooth stain from 0 (no stain) to 3 (greater than 2/3 of surface). The higher the score, the worse the staining. Differences were assessed between treatment groups for changes in values from baseline to 6 weeks. If data were normally distributed, the paired t test was used to assess changes; otherwise the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used. The score (0-3) for each tooth are summed for the total score. The 8 incisor teeth are scored. The minimum score for a subject is 0 and the maximum score for a subject is 24 (worse outcome).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects recruited from Graduate Periodontics clinic at two universities.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1 SmartMouth
24 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation SmartMouth Clinical DDS Advanced Oral Rinse
24
Group 2 Chlorhexidine
28 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse
28
Group 3 Placebo
28 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation Placebo rinse
28
Total80

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject121

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup 3 PlaceboTotalGroup 1 SmartMouthGroup 2 Chlorhexidine
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
28 Participants80 Participants24 Participants28 Participants
Bleeding Score0.860 units on a scale0.645 units on a scale0.540 units on a scale0.640 units on a scale
Calculus Index9.000 units on a scale9.000 units on a scale8.000 units on a scale9.500 units on a scale
Gingival Index1.010 units on a scale0.965 units on a scale0.890 units on a scale0.970 units on a scale
Plaque Index1.680 units on a scale1.745 units on a scale1.740 units on a scale1.895 units on a scale
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
28 Participants80 Participants24 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants40 Participants13 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants40 Participants11 Participants14 Participants
Tooth Stain Index3.000 units on a scale2.000 units on a scale1.000 units on a scale3.000 units on a scale

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 230 / 260 / 27
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 230 / 260 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 230 / 260 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Gingival Index

Gingival Index scores gingival inflammation from 0 (healthy) to 3 (severe inflammation). The higher the score, the greater the gingival inflammation (worse outcome). Differences were assessed between treatment groups for changes in values from baseline to 6 weeks. If data were normally distributed, the paired t test was used to assess changes; otherwise the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used.

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group 1 SmartMouthGingival Index-0.22 units on a scale
Group 2 ChlorhexidineGingival Index-0.34 units on a scale
Group 3 PlaceboGingival Index-0.19 units on a scale
Secondary

Bleeding Score

Bleeding Score is determined by adding the number of bleeding sites and dividing by the number of teeth to assess gingival inflammation. The higher the score, the worse the inflammation. Differences were assessed between treatment groups for changes in values from baseline to 6 weeks. If data were normally distributed, the paired t test was used to assess changes; otherwise the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used.

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group 1 SmartMouthBleeding Score-0.39 units on a scale
Group 2 ChlorhexidineBleeding Score-0.52 units on a scale
Group 3 PlaceboBleeding Score-0.43 units on a scale
Secondary

Calculus Index

Calculus Index scores the amount of calculus accumulation by adding surfaces from the lingual of the mandibular anterior teeth. The higher the score, the worse the calculus accumulation. Differences were assessed between treatment groups for changes in values from baseline to 6 weeks. If data were normally distributed, the paired t test was used to assess changes; otherwise the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used.

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group 1 SmartMouthCalculus Index-3.00 units on a scale
Group 2 ChlorhexidineCalculus Index-5.00 units on a scale
Group 3 PlaceboCalculus Index-3.00 units on a scale
Secondary

Plaque Index

Plaque Index scores plaque accumulation from 0 (no plaque) to 5 (plaque covering 2/3 of surface or more). The higher the score, the more plaque accumulation (worse outcome). Differences were assessed between treatment groups for changes in values from baseline to 6 weeks. If data were normally distributed, the paired t test was used to assess changes; otherwise the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used.

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group 1 SmartMouthPlaque Index-0.36 units on a scale
Group 2 ChlorhexidinePlaque Index-0.62 units on a scale
Group 3 PlaceboPlaque Index-0.22 units on a scale
Secondary

Tooth Stain Index

Tooth Stain Index scores the amount of tooth stain from 0 (no stain) to 3 (greater than 2/3 of surface). The higher the score, the worse the staining. Differences were assessed between treatment groups for changes in values from baseline to 6 weeks. If data were normally distributed, the paired t test was used to assess changes; otherwise the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used. The score (0-3) for each tooth are summed for the total score. The 8 incisor teeth are scored. The minimum score for a subject is 0 and the maximum score for a subject is 24 (worse outcome).

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group 1 SmartMouthTooth Stain Index0 units on a scale
Group 2 ChlorhexidineTooth Stain Index3.5 units on a scale
Group 3 PlaceboTooth Stain Index0 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026