Stress, Psychological
Conditions
Keywords
corporate health management, hrv, mindfulness
Brief summary
Aim of the study is the evaluation of the effects (psychological and physiological) of an hrv-biofeedback training, a mindfulness training and a combination of both training methods for stress reduction.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Healthy adults * Working in the business in which the study is conducted
Exclusion criteria
* Cardiac disease * Thyroid disease (intake of glucocorticoids) * Actual psychological illness * Intake of psychotropic drugs * Intake of other medication changing HRV
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Alteration in physiological parameters of stress: Salivary cortisol | H0: Baseline time point of assessment prior to training H1: Post training time point of assessment (6 weeks after H0) H2: Follow-up (12 weeks after H0) H3: Post training time point of assessment for former wait-list control group (18 weeks after H0) | Cortisol was assessed as salivary cortisol (one sample per subject per assessment point). Alteration in data will be statistically compared. |
| Alteration in psychological parameters of stress perception after training | H0: Baseline time point of assessment prior to training H1: Post training time point of assessment (6 weeks after H0) H2: Follow-up (12 weeks after H0) H3: Post training time point of assessment for former wait-list control group (18 weeks after H0) | We assessed psychological parameters of stress perception with the following questionnaire: TICS (Trierer Inventar zum chronischen Stress; Schulz, Schlotz & Becker, 2004). Alteration in data will be statistically compared. |
| Alteration in psychological parameters of stress coping (behavioral skills) after training | H0: Baseline time point of assessment prior to training H1: Post training time point of assessment (6 weeks after H0) H2: Follow-up (12 weeks after H0) H3: Post training time point of assessment for former wait-list control group (18 weeks after H0) | We assessed psychological parameters of stress coping with the following questionnaire: SVF 120 (Stressverarbeitungsfragebogen; Janke & Erdmann, 1997). Alteration in data will be statistically compared. |
| Alteration in psychological parameters of stress coping (behavior pattern) after training | H0: Baseline time point of assessment prior to training H1: Post training time point of assessment (6 weeks after H0) H2: Follow-up (12 weeks after H0) H3: Post training time point of assessment for former wait-list control group (18 weeks after H0) | We assessed psychological parameters of stress coping with the following questionnaire: AVEM (Arbeitsbezogene Verhaltens- und Erlebensmuster; Schaarschmidt & Fischer, 2008). Alteration in data will be statistically compared. |
| Alteration in physiological parameters of stress: HRV parameters | H0: Baseline time point of assessment prior to training H1: Post training time point of assessment (6 weeks after H0) H2: Follow-up (12 weeks after H0) H3: Post training time point of assessment for former wait-list control group (18 weeks after H0) | For the physiological assessment of HRV we used the HRV-Scanner from BioSign GmbH which gathers different HRV parameters like RMSSD and pNN50. HRV was assessed before and after a stressor (Stroop Color-Word Task (based on findings by Stroop, 1935) and D2-R Concentration and Endurance test (Brickenkamp et al., 2010). Alteration in data will be statistically compared. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Alteration in psychological parameters of depression after training | H0: Baseline time point of assessment prior to training H1: Post training time point of assessment (6 weeks after H0) H2: Follow-up (12 weeks after H0) H3: Post training time point of assessment for former wait-list control group (18 weeks after H0) | We assessed depressive symptoms with the following questionnaire: Beck Depressions-Inventar (BDI-II; Hautzinger, Keller & Kühner; 2006). Alteration in data will be statistically compared. |
| Alteration in psychological parameters of mindfulness after training | H0: Baseline time point of assessment prior to training H1: Post training time point of assessment (6 weeks after H0) H2: Follow-up (12 weeks after H0) H3: Post training time point of assessment for former wait-list control group (18 weeks after H0) | We assessed mindfulness with the following questionnaire: FFA 14 (Kurzversion des Freiburger Fragebogens zur Achtsamkeit; Walach et al., 2006). Alteration in data will be statistically compared. |
| Alteration in psychological parameters of self-compassion after training | H0: Baseline time point of assessment prior to training H1: Post training time point of assessment (6 weeks after H0) H2: Follow-up (12 weeks after H0) H3: Post training time point of assessment for former wait-list control group (18 weeks after H0) | We assessed self-compassion with the following questionnaire: SCS-D-Kurzform (Self-Compassion Scale; Hupfeld & Ruffieux, 2011). Alteration in data will be statistically compared. |
| Alteration in psychological parameters of psychological wellbeing after training | H0: Baseline time point of assessment prior to training H1: Post training time point of assessment (6 weeks after H0) H2: Follow-up (12 weeks after H0) H3: Post training time point of assessment for former wait-list control group (18 weeks after H0) | We assessed psychological wellbeing with the following questionnaire: HEALTH-49 (Kurzversion der Hamburger Module zur Erfassung allgemeiner Aspekte psychosozialer Gesundheit für die therapeutische Praxis; Rabung, Harfst, Koch & Schulz, 2007). Alteration in data will be statistically compared. |