Skip to content

Comparative Intervention Study of Stress Reduction in Corporate Health Management

Comparative Intervention Study of Stress Reduction in Corporate Health Management: Evaluation of the Effects of Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Biofeedback Training, Mindfulness Based Intervention (MBI) and Mindfulness Based HRV-biofeedback

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02709551
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-03-16
Start date
2015-02-28
Completion date
2015-07-31
Last updated
2016-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stress, Psychological

Keywords

corporate health management, hrv, mindfulness

Brief summary

Aim of the study is the evaluation of the effects (psychological and physiological) of an hrv-biofeedback training, a mindfulness training and a combination of both training methods for stress reduction.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHRV_Bfb
BEHAVIORALMBI
BEHAVIORALMBI_HRV_Bfb

Sponsors

Universität Tübingen
CollaboratorOTHER
Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)
CollaboratorOTHER
ARCIM Institute Academic Research in Complementary and Integrative Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy adults * Working in the business in which the study is conducted

Exclusion criteria

* Cardiac disease * Thyroid disease (intake of glucocorticoids) * Actual psychological illness * Intake of psychotropic drugs * Intake of other medication changing HRV

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Alteration in physiological parameters of stress: Salivary cortisolH0: Baseline time point of assessment prior to training H1: Post training time point of assessment (6 weeks after H0) H2: Follow-up (12 weeks after H0) H3: Post training time point of assessment for former wait-list control group (18 weeks after H0)Cortisol was assessed as salivary cortisol (one sample per subject per assessment point). Alteration in data will be statistically compared.
Alteration in psychological parameters of stress perception after trainingH0: Baseline time point of assessment prior to training H1: Post training time point of assessment (6 weeks after H0) H2: Follow-up (12 weeks after H0) H3: Post training time point of assessment for former wait-list control group (18 weeks after H0)We assessed psychological parameters of stress perception with the following questionnaire: TICS (Trierer Inventar zum chronischen Stress; Schulz, Schlotz & Becker, 2004). Alteration in data will be statistically compared.
Alteration in psychological parameters of stress coping (behavioral skills) after trainingH0: Baseline time point of assessment prior to training H1: Post training time point of assessment (6 weeks after H0) H2: Follow-up (12 weeks after H0) H3: Post training time point of assessment for former wait-list control group (18 weeks after H0)We assessed psychological parameters of stress coping with the following questionnaire: SVF 120 (Stressverarbeitungsfragebogen; Janke & Erdmann, 1997). Alteration in data will be statistically compared.
Alteration in psychological parameters of stress coping (behavior pattern) after trainingH0: Baseline time point of assessment prior to training H1: Post training time point of assessment (6 weeks after H0) H2: Follow-up (12 weeks after H0) H3: Post training time point of assessment for former wait-list control group (18 weeks after H0)We assessed psychological parameters of stress coping with the following questionnaire: AVEM (Arbeitsbezogene Verhaltens- und Erlebensmuster; Schaarschmidt & Fischer, 2008). Alteration in data will be statistically compared.
Alteration in physiological parameters of stress: HRV parametersH0: Baseline time point of assessment prior to training H1: Post training time point of assessment (6 weeks after H0) H2: Follow-up (12 weeks after H0) H3: Post training time point of assessment for former wait-list control group (18 weeks after H0)For the physiological assessment of HRV we used the HRV-Scanner from BioSign GmbH which gathers different HRV parameters like RMSSD and pNN50. HRV was assessed before and after a stressor (Stroop Color-Word Task (based on findings by Stroop, 1935) and D2-R Concentration and Endurance test (Brickenkamp et al., 2010). Alteration in data will be statistically compared.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Alteration in psychological parameters of depression after trainingH0: Baseline time point of assessment prior to training H1: Post training time point of assessment (6 weeks after H0) H2: Follow-up (12 weeks after H0) H3: Post training time point of assessment for former wait-list control group (18 weeks after H0)We assessed depressive symptoms with the following questionnaire: Beck Depressions-Inventar (BDI-II; Hautzinger, Keller & Kühner; 2006). Alteration in data will be statistically compared.
Alteration in psychological parameters of mindfulness after trainingH0: Baseline time point of assessment prior to training H1: Post training time point of assessment (6 weeks after H0) H2: Follow-up (12 weeks after H0) H3: Post training time point of assessment for former wait-list control group (18 weeks after H0)We assessed mindfulness with the following questionnaire: FFA 14 (Kurzversion des Freiburger Fragebogens zur Achtsamkeit; Walach et al., 2006). Alteration in data will be statistically compared.
Alteration in psychological parameters of self-compassion after trainingH0: Baseline time point of assessment prior to training H1: Post training time point of assessment (6 weeks after H0) H2: Follow-up (12 weeks after H0) H3: Post training time point of assessment for former wait-list control group (18 weeks after H0)We assessed self-compassion with the following questionnaire: SCS-D-Kurzform (Self-Compassion Scale; Hupfeld & Ruffieux, 2011). Alteration in data will be statistically compared.
Alteration in psychological parameters of psychological wellbeing after trainingH0: Baseline time point of assessment prior to training H1: Post training time point of assessment (6 weeks after H0) H2: Follow-up (12 weeks after H0) H3: Post training time point of assessment for former wait-list control group (18 weeks after H0)We assessed psychological wellbeing with the following questionnaire: HEALTH-49 (Kurzversion der Hamburger Module zur Erfassung allgemeiner Aspekte psychosozialer Gesundheit für die therapeutische Praxis; Rabung, Harfst, Koch & Schulz, 2007). Alteration in data will be statistically compared.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026