Skip to content

Participatory Organizational Intervention for Improved Use of Assistive Devices for Patient Handling

Deltagerinvolverende Intervention for Bedre Brug af hjælpemidler i hospitalsvæsenet

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02708550
Acronym
IRMA12
Enrollment
625
Registered
2016-03-15
Start date
2016-04-30
Completion date
2018-04-30
Last updated
2018-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Musculoskeletal Disorders, Occupational Injuries

Brief summary

Epidemiological studies have shown that patient transfer is a risk factor for back pain, back injuries and long term sickness absence, whereas consistent use of assistive devices during patient transfer is associated with reduced risk of back injury. In consequence, Danish hospitals have made great efforts to increase knowledge, availability and use of assistive devices to reduce work-related physical strain due to patient transfer. Yet, a recent survey among more than 300 nurses and nurses' aides showed that two thirds rarely uses assistive devices during patient transfer. Thus it seems relevant to investigate barriers, opportunities and practical solutions for increasing use of assistive devices among healthcare workers. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a participatory organizational intervention for improved use of assistive devices during patient transfer.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALParticipatory Organizational Intervention

Sponsors

Aalborg University
CollaboratorOTHER
National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

At the department level: Hospital departments with frequent patient handling will be eligible for participation in the cluster-randomized study. At the individual level (questionnaire replies): Inclusion Criteria: * Healthcare workers with daily patient handling (based on questionnaire reply at baseline)

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Use of assistive devices (push-button)Average use during the entire 1-year follow-up (i.e. continous measurement during 1 year) adjusted for use during 4 weeks prior to the intervention (baseline)The healthcare workers are encouraged to push one of the following two buttons every time they leave the room after having performed patient transfer; button 1 Press this button if you used the necessary assistive devices for your patient transfer and button 2 Press this button if you did not use the necessary assistive devices for your patient transfer. The number of Button 1 counts as a percentage of total counts (Button 1+2) will be calculated for set of counters and used as primary outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensity (VAS scale)change from baseline to 1-year follow-upPain intensity in the low-back is rated subjectively using a 0-10 modified VAS scale, where 0 indicates no pain at all and 10 indicate worst pain imaginable
Perceived physical exertion (Borg CR10 scale)change from baseline to 1-year follow-upPerceived physical exertion during patient handling. Borg CR10 scale
Back injurychange from baseline to 1-year follow-upThe specific question reads: Have you within the last 12 months injured your back during patient transfer? (Think of situation where the pain appeared suddenly and unexpectedly). The respondent replies yes or no
Work ability (Index questionnaire)change from baseline to 1-year follow-upThe full Work Ability Index questionnaire (Ilmarinen)
Use of assistive devices (accelerometer)change from baseline to 1-year follow-upAccelerometers will be placed on the assistive devices. The method is currently being validated in the laboratory and will be finalized before initiation of the 1 year follow-up measurement. Accelerations of a certain time frame will be defined as use, whereas brief accelerations will be considered as noise
Knowledge (Questionnaire)change from baseline to 1-year follow-upSpecific questionnaire about knowledge about patients transfer and safety at work
Organizational Readiness to Change (Questionnaire)change from baseline to 1-year follow-upQuestionnaire about Organizational Readiness to Change
Use of assistive devices (Questionnaire)change from baseline to 1-year follow-upQuestionnaire about frequency of use of the different types of assistive devices
Social capital (Questionnaire)change from baseline to 1-year follow-upQuestionnaire concerning bonding, bridging, linking A, and linking B social capital (Andersen LL 2015 Scandinavian Journal of Public Health)

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026