Skip to content

Improving Diet and Exercise in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (IDEAL Weight in ALL)

Improving Diet and Exercise in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (IDEAL Weight in ALL)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02708108
Enrollment
40
Registered
2016-03-15
Start date
2016-05-31
Completion date
2019-12-30
Last updated
2023-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

B Precursor Type Acute Leukemia

Brief summary

This study tests the ability of a focused dietary, exercise, and activity intervention to reduce fat gain during induction therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia to improve disease response and reduce toxicity.

Detailed description

In our previous study, we have observed that: 1) nearly half ALL patients are overweight or obese at diagnosis, 2) all patients, regardless of starting weight, gain significant fat mass over the first month of therapy (on average 20-30%), and 3) obesity at the time of diagnosis is associated with a higher likelihood of poor response to chemotherapy as evidenced by persistent leukemia (minimal residual disease) after induction therapy. Together, these data show that body fat is a significant risk factor for ALL treatment failure, and that its negative effects are evident within the first month of treatment. Recent laboratory and clinical data illustrates the ability of diet restriction and physical activity to improve chemotherapy efficacy, reduce treatment-related toxicities and better overall quality of life. Given the importance of successful induction therapy for ALL in predicting long term survival and the negative role of obesity on treatment success, this study tests a complete personalized dietary and exercise intervention for pre-adolescents, adolescents, and young adults newly diagnosed with B-precursor ALL (pre-B ALL) that aims to reduce fat gained during induction therapy and thereby improve treatment response, toxicity rates, and quality of life.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALDietary Intervention

Beginning at time of diagnosis, the dietary component of the intervention uses a personalized menu to implement high protein, moderate fat, and low glycemic index/high fiber diet to achieve a minimum net -10% daily caloric deficit during the induction phase of chemotherapy.

BEHAVIORALActivity and Exercise Intervention

Beginning at the time of diagnosis, the exercise and activity component uses an activity menu to implement a target level of 200 minutes per week of moderate exercise activity (as estimated by metabolic equivalents) during the induction phase of chemotherapy.

Sponsors

Gabrielle's Angel Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Greater than or equal to 10 years of age and less than or equal to 21 years of age at time of diagnosis * Have a new diagnosis of untreated NCI/Rome High Risk B-precursor ALL (HR-ALL) * Are beginning treatment on- or as per- a Children's Cancer Group/Children's Oncology Group (CCG-COG) protocol with a 4-drug Induction including vincristine, daunorubicin (or doxorubicin), asparaginase, and at least 14 days of glucocorticoid steroids

Exclusion criteria

* Have a diagnosis of Down syndrome (Trisomy 21) or any genetic disease associated with abnormal body composition * Be underweight or at risk for underweight with moderate weight loss, defined as a starting Body Mass Index (BMI) \<10th percentile for age and sex (for those \>20 years of age, defined as an absolute BMI \< 18.5) * Have pre-existing abnormal intestinal function (e.g. protein-wasting enteropathy, fat malabsorption) * Be unable to comply with the recommended diet or activity interventions (as determined by study or treatment team) * Have a history of prior chemotherapy or radiation for other cancers * Be unable to complete the necessary radiology examinations with fully interpretable data (e.g. hip replacement and metal prostheses preclude evaluation by DXA) * Be pregnant (to be confirmed by urine or serum pregnancy test as per institutional routine care for chemotherapy and radiology exams)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fat MassDiagnosis and 28-35 daysAssessment of change in fat before and after the induction chemotherapy phase (first 28 days of chemotherapy) as measured dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in comparison to fat gain in a recent historical cohort. Calculated as (Day 28 Fat Mass - Diagnosis Fat Mass)/Diagnosis Fat Mass

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease >=0.01%28-35 days from diagnosisCompare the rate of minimal residual disease positivity (defined as \>=0.01%) in the bone marrow by flow cytometry after the induction phase of chemotherapy as compared to a recent historical cohort
Percentage of Successfully Completed Visits With Study Dietitian and Study Physiotherapist28 daysAssess feasibility of incorporating the intervention into induction chemotherapy as defined by \>80% of overall scheduled study visits successfully completed. The expected number of overall visits is equal to the sum of total visits scheduled with the physiotherapist (PT) or the registered dietitian (RD). The measure was calculated as the total # expected visits/completed visits.
Percentage of Overall Adherence to the IDEAL Intervention28 daysOverall adherence to the study intervention was calculated as the mean of dietary adherence (average of percent consumed calories/prescribed calories for each food group) and activity (self-reported % adherence to prescribed days).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A non-prospective, historical cohort was used as a comparison group for this single-arm study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Obesity Intervention
Personalized 28-day Dietary Intervention and Activity and Exercise Intervention with the goal to reduce fat gain and lean muscle loss while inducing an overall negative energy balance. Dietary Intervention: Beginning at time of diagnosis, the dietary component of the intervention uses a personalized menu to implement high protein, moderate fat, and low glycemic index/high fiber diet to achieve a minimum net -10% daily caloric deficit during the induction phase of chemotherapy. Activity and Exercise Intervention: Beginning at the time of diagnosis, the exercise and activity component uses an activity menu to implement a target level of 200 minutes per week of moderate exercise activity (as estimated by metabolic equivalents) during the induction phase of chemotherapy.
40
Historical Control
Historical control assembled from previous, unselected, consecutive patients treated for B-ALL matching eligibility criteria.
80
Total120

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath12
Overall StudyNo MRD and no imaging available01
Overall StudyRegimen change10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHistorical ControlTotalObesity Intervention
Age, Continuous14.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
14.80 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.69
15.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
BMI Category
Lean
45 Participants59 Participants14 Participants
BMI Category
Obese
26 Participants46 Participants20 Participants
BMI Category
Overweight
9 Participants15 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
66 Participants92 Participants26 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants22 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants6 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
80 participants120 participants40 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
37 Participants53 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
43 Participants67 Participants24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 402 / 80
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 400 / 80
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 400 / 80

Outcome results

Primary

Fat Mass

Assessment of change in fat before and after the induction chemotherapy phase (first 28 days of chemotherapy) as measured dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in comparison to fat gain in a recent historical cohort. Calculated as (Day 28 Fat Mass - Diagnosis Fat Mass)/Diagnosis Fat Mass

Time frame: Diagnosis and 28-35 days

Population: Includes enrolled (or from historical control) with imaging information via DXA scan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Obesity InterventionFat Mass5.1 percent change in fat mass
Historical ControlFat Mass10.7 percent change in fat mass
Secondary

Percentage of Overall Adherence to the IDEAL Intervention

Overall adherence to the study intervention was calculated as the mean of dietary adherence (average of percent consumed calories/prescribed calories for each food group) and activity (self-reported % adherence to prescribed days).

Time frame: 28 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Obesity InterventionPercentage of Overall Adherence to the IDEAL Intervention82.1 % adherence
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease >=0.01%

Compare the rate of minimal residual disease positivity (defined as \>=0.01%) in the bone marrow by flow cytometry after the induction phase of chemotherapy as compared to a recent historical cohort

Time frame: 28-35 days from diagnosis

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Obesity InterventionPercentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease >=0.01%12 Participants
Historical ControlPercentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease >=0.01%30 Participants
p-value: 0.0295% CI: [0.09, 0.92]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Successfully Completed Visits With Study Dietitian and Study Physiotherapist

Assess feasibility of incorporating the intervention into induction chemotherapy as defined by \>80% of overall scheduled study visits successfully completed. The expected number of overall visits is equal to the sum of total visits scheduled with the physiotherapist (PT) or the registered dietitian (RD). The measure was calculated as the total # expected visits/completed visits.

Time frame: 28 days

Population: A total of 392 visits with the PT or RD were expected to be completed as part of the the study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Obesity InterventionPercentage of Successfully Completed Visits With Study Dietitian and Study Physiotherapist339 Visits

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026