Skip to content

Feasibility and Outcomes of Complete Coronary Revascularization Using BVS in All-comer Patients With Angina

Feasibility and Outcomes of Complete Coronary Revascularization Using Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in All-comer Patients With Stable and Unstable Angina: A Multi-centre Registry in Russian Population

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02707783
Acronym
FEASTRU
Enrollment
1602
Registered
2016-03-14
Start date
2015-11-30
Completion date
2018-07-31
Last updated
2018-12-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Angina

Keywords

stable and unstable angina, bioresorbable vascular scaffold, BVS, PCI

Brief summary

The aim of the study is feasibility of complete coronary revascularization with bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation and assessment of treatment outcomes in a group of consecutive patients with stable and unstable angina in Russian population. The hypothesis of this registry study: 1) Complete coronary revascularization with BVS implantation will be feasible to perform in at least 70 percent of patient population with stable and unstable angina qualified for revascularization after coronary angiography, 2) Complete revascularization with BVS is as safe and effective as revascularization with standard BMS (Bare Metal Stent BMS/ Drug Eluting Stent DES stent implantation (published literature comparators in matched populations). Up to 2500 patients will be enrolled in 13 Russian high volume invasive cardiology centres. 12 month clinical observation and 5-year clinical follow-up is expected.

Detailed description

Study design: Data regarding all consecutive patients qualified for revascularization (PCI Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or CABG Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting) will be collected in this prospective study. Information regarding revascularization strategy will be collected as detailed information concerning PCI procedure. In case of PCI with other than BVS stent implantation (BMS or/and metallic DES) information collected in the study will contain at least: * Reason why BVS was not implanted * Final result of baseline treatment * Acute and long-term outcome of treatment (12 month clinical observation); NB. 5-year clinical follow-up is also expected. The enrollment phase of the registry is not expected to last longer than 12 months.

Interventions

DEVICEBioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation

Sponsors

KCRI
CollaboratorOTHER
International Foundation for Development of Medical Science and Education Healthy Heart
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patient characteristics * Age \> 18 years * Able and willing to give informed consent * Willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluations * Clinical manifestation of coronary artery disease: stable angina or unstable angina * Indications for coronary revascularization

Exclusion criteria

Patient characteristics * Acute Myocardial infarction * Cardiogenic shock * Any reason for patient's inability to comply with 12-month double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) * Absolute contraindications to DES or BVS implantation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Angiographic endpoints: assessment of stent implantation final result:stent delivery, technical success (yes/no)periprocedural
Angiographic endpoints: assessment of stent implantation final result: percentage of residual stenosis (%)periprocedural
Angiographic endpoints: assessment of stent implantation final result: dissection (yes/no)periprocedural
Angiographic endpoints: assessment of stent implantation final result: slow-flow (yes/no)periprocedural
Angiographic endpoints: assessment of stent implantation final result: no-flow (yes/no)periprocedural
Angiographic endpoints: assessment of stent implantation final result: distal embolization (yes/no)periprocedural
Angiographic endpoints: assessment of stent implantation final result: side-branch occlusion (yes/no)periprocedural
Angiographic endpoints: assessment of stent implantation final result: coronary artery perforation (yes/no)periprocedural
Acute gain (mm)periprocedural
Major Adverse Cardiovascular EventsFrom hospital discharge till 12 months follow up
TVF (Target Vessel Failure)in 12 month follow-up
Any revascularizationin 12 month follow-upNumbers of any revascularization per patient.
Stent thrombosis (possible and probable)in 12 month follow-up
Periprocedural MI (Myocardial Infarction) (yes/no)periprocedural
Angina assessment questionnaire12 month follow-up

Countries

Russia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026